|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
January 5, 2010
·
Cold snap has
Florida growers feeling the heat
·
GM crops
included in British future food plan
·
Honeybees
learn differences in food temperature
·
Whiteflies
sabotage alarm system of plants – study
·
Water! New
book asserts it’ll be worth fighting over
Cold snap has Florida growers feeling the heat
(Miami Herald)
– From nursery growers in the Redland to strawberry farmers 250 miles north in Plant City, Florida's
agricultural industry is suddenly engaged in a form of mass
reverse-hibernation: The colder it gets, the less they sleep.
With temperatures expected to dip to 30 degrees in some
inland sections of South Florida Tuesday morning and the low- to mid-20s in Central Florida, there will be a lot of weary but anxious
farmers watching the mercury through the frostiest early morning hours and
working to protect crops and plants.
``As an industry, we're all very, very concerned,'' said
Redland nursery owner Steven Leonard. ``I haven't slept the last couple of
days, and probably won't for the next three or four.''
That's because after a brief but slight warm-up, another
major cold front could roll through by the weekend as well. The National
Weather Service predicts South Florida won't
see a high above 68 all week.
For tourists, the unusual extended cold snap might cost them
a good tan to show off back home. For the state's shrinking farming belt, it
could be much costlier.
At stake for Leonard: Some 200 varieties
of foliage worth $1.5 million at his 26-acre Sturon
Nursery -- most of them tropical species highly vulnerable to frost.
Sub-freezing temperatures would be ``lethal,'' Leonard said.
BELOW FREEZING
Portions of western Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties, home
to hundreds of nurseries and vegetable farms, could spend at least a brief time
below that freezing 32-degree marks.
Forecasters and the Florida Department of Agriculture warned
that Florida's two biggest cash crops -- citrus, with a harvest worth about $1
billion a year, and strawberries, fetching about $400 million -- could see even
colder temperatures at the peak of the harvest season.
Industry representatives said little damage was reported
from Monday night's first frigid wave across Central
Florida.
Andrew Meadows, a spokesman for Florida Citrus Mutual, said
temperatures dropped to 26 in some groves but not for the four hours or more it
takes to damage the fruit. Meadows said growers are optimistic but ``we'll all
be watching the thermometer for the next several nights.''
GETTING COVERED
Ted Campbell, executive director of the Florida Strawberry
Growers Association, said growers in Hillsborough
County, which produces
the bulk of the fruit, watered fields throughout the night, covering the fruit
in a protective sheet of ice.
Because they grow low to the ground and won't freeze until
it hits 28 degrees, strawberries can weather the cold better than many crops, Campbell said. But freezes
can make the fruit too weak to ship long distances, he said, cutting into sales
at the peak of the season.
Freezing days are fairly typical in South
Florida but the National Weather Service reports that it's been at
least at least seven years since such a stretch of days averaging 10 to 15
degrees below normal.
COLD OF '89
The last time Leonard recalls it being so cold for so long
in the Redland was 1989, which caused ``massive'' losses to the agriculture
industry, he said.
``We will see some damage immediately, and then a week from
now, we'll really see the extent of it,'' he added.
That's why he's getting such little sleep. It's the coldest
at night, and so Leonard and his staff have worked around the clock, monitoring
conditions and reacting in turn.
When temperatures near the freezing mark, Sturon will blast the crops with 70-degree water to fend
off frost.
Some plants will also be covered with blankets, although
that isn't possible with many varieties -- such as the 18-foot palm trees.
As of late Monday, there had been minimal damage to Sturon's two nurseries, but that could change the colder it
gets.
Return to Top
GM crops included in British future food
plan
(IrishExaminer.com)
– BRITAIN’S first major food strategy for 60 years, which Environment Secretary
Hilary Benn will launch at the Oxford Farming Conference today, will call for a
sea change in the way people think about farming.
The document will also recommend a move towards accepting GM
crops to create a "sustainable and secure food system for 2030.”
Rising to the Challenge is the theme of the conference,
which will explore how farmers can respond to the immense agricultural
challenge of feeding a world population of 9 billion by 2050 with minimal
environmental impact.
The British Government strategy, which will set out its food
plans for the next 20 years, will warn that agriculture must brace itself for
sudden shocks, including natural disasters, volatile commodity prices and
uncertain fuel supplies.
It will encourage consumers to throw less food away and to
adopt leaner and healthier diets, to promote higher crop yields and to urge
food producers to reduce the impact they have on the environment.
The strategy will also warn: "It is now clear that we
face a big challenge in feeding the world. With a growing population, climate
change and the pressure we are putting on land, we will have to produce more
food sustainably.
"We also need to provide the right information for
people to make more informed choices about what they eat. Diet will have a huge
impact not only on our health and our economy, but most importantly on
sustainability."
Prime minister Gordon Brown will
say in a foreword to the report that Britain faces "big challenges
which mean we need to think differently about food".
He will say food production must increase "without
damaging the air, soil, water and marine, resources, biodiversity and climate
that we all depend on.
"We need to feed more people globally, many of whom
want or need to eat a better diet. We need to tackle increasing obesity and
encourage healthier diets."
Conference chairman Heather Peck said agriculture faces a
huge challenge – feeding 9bn with less land, water, and oil, as well as greater
climatic extremes.
The conference will also debate how businesses manage risk
in the context of increased production and consumer and environmental demands.
Kerry Group chief executive Stan McCarthy will give a speech
addressing how to manage a world-class food business built from strong
co-operative roots
Professor Patrick Wall, School
of Public Health and Population
Science, University College, Dublin,
will speak about the food safety and supply challenges facing the food and
farming sector today and in the future.
Return to Top
Honeybees learn differences in
food temperature
(UCSD via
ScienceDaily.com) – Biologists at UC San Diego have discovered that
honeybees can discriminate between food at different temperatures, an ability
that may assist bees in locating the warm, sugar-rich nectar or high-protein
pollen produced by many flowers.
While other researchers had previously found hints that bees
might have the ability to do this, the UCSD biologists provide the first
detailed experimental evidence in a paper that will be published in the
December 1 issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology.
"We show that honeybees have the ability to associate
temperature differences with food," said James Nieh,
an associate professor of biology who headed the study. "This information
may help guide bees looking for food by allowing them to distinguish which bees
are returning to the hive with the highest quality of food."
"Body temperature is seen in terms of its net caloric
benefit to the other foragers," said Nieh.
"The warmest forager in the nest is the one most likely to be visiting of
the sweetest, highest quality food."
Nieh and researchers in his
laboratory last year published a paper showing that bumblebees returning to
their nests with higher quality pollen were warmer than bees that collected
pollen with less protein. That gave the UCSD scientists evidence that bees may
change their body temperature to reflect food quality, even for food that they do
not consume and that has no direct metabolic impact on the bee.
Knowing that honeybees sense the temperature of returning
foragers with their antennae, while these foragers conduct elaborate dances
within the hive to communicate food location, Nieh
and his colleagues wondered whether bees also sensed the temperature of their
food. With the help of two undergraduate students, Tobin Hammer and Curtis Hata, he sought to find out whether bees possessed this
ability.
Training bees to stick out their tongues in return for a
sugary reward when the team touched a warm surface to a bee's antenna, the
researchers found that bees could learn to identify warmth with food. Next,
they tested whether the bees could learn to associate temperature differences
with a food reward and discovered that this was also the case.
However, while the bees' abilities to recognize the
temperature difference increased dramatically as the differences in
temperatures rose, the scientists discovered that the bees were better at
recognizing warm temperature differences than they were at cold temperature
differences. In fact, the bees' abilities were twice as good at recognizing
differences of 10 degrees Celsius above room temperature than
they were at recognizing differences of minus 10 degrees Celsius below room
temperature.
The researchers point out in their paper that this enhanced
ability to distinguish warmer temperature differences could be an advantage for
gathering nectar in many flowers. During the day, they note, temperatures in
the centers of daffodils can be up to 8 degrees Celsius warmer than they are
outside the flowers.
"A honeybee's ability to associate positive temperature
differences with nectar rewards could also have a natural role inside the
nest," the researchers conclude in their paper. "Honeybee foragers
can elevate their body temperature after returning from a high-quality food
source, and foragers returning from natural nectar or pollen sources increase
their thoracic temperature when the colony has need for these resources."
The study was supported by the UC San Diego Opportunities
for Research in Behavioral Sciences Program, which is supported by the National
Science Foundation. ORBS is a program for high school
students and undergraduates that provides research experience for students who
are traditionally underrepresented in the sciences.
Return to Top
Whiteflies sabotage alarm system
of plants
(ScienceDaily.com)
– When spider mites attack a bean plant, the plant responds by producing odours which attract predatory mites. These predatory mites
then exterminate the spider mite population, thus acting as a type of
"bodyguard" for the plant. However, if the plant is simultaneously
attacked by whiteflies, insects that are related to aphids, the plant becomes
less attractive to the predatory mites and therefore more vulnerable to spider
mites.
Together with German colleagues, researchers from the
Laboratory of Entomology at Wageningen
University published this discovery in
the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA.
The research team studied the strength of the plant's
"cry for help" through a chemical analysis of the plant odour blend and found that one of the odour
components (beta-ocimene) is produced in much lower
quantities if the plant is not only attacked by spider mites, but also by
whiteflies. The production of the odour decreases
because of a lower expression rate of the plant gene that
codes for a crucial enzyme in the production chain. When the researchers
added ocimene to the odour
of plants which were attacked by both species, the attraction of predatory
mites was restored.
This recent breakthrough demonstrates that there are also
herbivores that can interfere with a plant's "cry for help," possibly
because the whiteflies attempt to interfere with the plant's defence system. Spider mites also produce more offspring on
a plant under attack by whiteflies. For a spider mite, there are therefore two
reasons why a bean plant which is being attacked by whiteflies is better than a
bean plant that is not being attacked: more offspring and fewer bodyguards. It
is therefore no surprise that the researchers found that the spider mite
preferred plants infested with whiteflies above plants without them.
The results of this study are significant for integrated
crop protection in which a combination of methods can be used to fight various
pests infesting a crop. Integrated crop protection offers effective
possibilities for environmentally safe pest control, and is based on a solid
knowledge of the crop system and its complex of enemies. Once it becomes clear
which insects weaken plant defence systems and which
strengthen them, more focused research on environmentally-safe pest control
will be possible, and people will no longer be caught off guard by unexpected
interference from some pest species.
The fact that plants "cry for help" at all was
discovered by the Wageningen research group in 1988.
Since that time, various laboratories worldwide have continued studying this
topic and it is now known that many -- if not all -- plants apply this type of defence. The research conducted worldwide has focused
primarily on the situation in which plants are only attacked by a single
herbivore. In nature, the situation is much more complex, however. Plants are
involved in a continuous arms race with herbivorous insects which exploit the
plant as food in a variety of ways. Spider mites suck the contents of
parenchyma cells. Contrary to what their name suggests, whiteflies are not
actually flies at all, but sap-sucking insects related to aphids, which suck
from the vascular tissue located deeper in the plant. Some insects reinforce
the plant's defence system which protects it from
other predators.
Return to Top
Water! New book asserts it’ll be worth
fighting over
(npr.org)
– Just as wars over oil played a major role in 20th-century history, a new book
makes a convincing case that many 21st century conflicts will be fought over
water.
In Water: The Epic
Struggle for Wealth, Power and Civilization, journalist Steven Solomon
argues that water is surpassing oil as the world's scarcest critical resource.
Only 2.5 percent of the planet's water supply is fresh,
Solomon writes, much of which is locked away in glaciers. World water use in
the past century grew twice as fast as world population.
"We've now reached the limit where that trajectory can
no longer continue," Solomon tells NPR's Mary Louise Kelly. "Suddenly
we're going to have to find a way to use the existing water resources in a far,
far more productive manner than we ever did before, because there's simply not
enough."
One issue, Solomon says, is that water's cost doesn't
reflect its true economic value. While a society's transition from oil may be
painful, water is irreplaceable. Yet water costs far less per gallon — and even
less than that for some.
"In some cases, where there are large political
subsidies, largely in agriculture, it does not [cost very much]," Solomon
says. "In many cases, irrigated agriculture is getting its water for free.
And we in the cities are paying a lot, and industries are also paying an awful
lot. That's unfair. It's inefficient to the allocation of water to the most
productive economic ends."
At the same time, Solomon says, there's an increasing
feeling in the world that everyone has a basic right to a minimum 13 gallons of
water a day for basic human health. He doesn’t necessarily have an issue with
that.
"I think there's plenty of water in the world, even in
the poorest and most water-famished country, for that
13 gallons to be given for free to individuals — and let them pay beyond
that," he says.
Solomon says the world is divided into water haves and
have-nots. China, Egypt and Pakistan are just a few countries
facing critical water issues in the 21st century.
In his book he writes, "Consider what will happen in
water-distressed, nuclear-armed, terrorist-besieged,
overpopulated, heavily irrigation dependent and already politically unstable Pakistan when its single water lifeline, the Indus river, loses a third of its flow from the
disappearance from its glacial water source."
Solomon notes some good water news, too. The United States
has made significant progress in curbing its water use, thanks to market forces
and legislation such as the Clean Water Act.
"Our water use between 1900 and 1975 actually tripled
relative to population growth," he says. "Since 1975 to the present
day, it has flat-lined. And we still had a population increase of about 30
percent and our GDP continued to grow. So it's an amazing increase in water
productivity."
Return to Top
End Transmission