|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
January 19, 2010
·
Communication
key to precision ag’s future
·
Breeding
beneficial nematodes not to ‘wimp out’
·
California
growers have GM seed on their mind
·
Cornell grads
use their degrees down on the farm
·
Ag
technologies of the future on stage in Miami
Communication key to precision ag’s future
(Farmers
Weekly Interactive UK) – Precision farming technology has boomed over the
last 10 years with GPS guidance and yield mapping systems now commonplace on UK
farms. But what will be the next step?
In the short term, some reckoned products and services from
competing manufacturers would become fully integrated and others saw greater
levels of tractor and implement automation. But some of the longer-term
predictions painted a very different picture for tomorrow's agriculture.
Precision Decision's Clive Blacker thought integrating
products from different manufacturers would be essential. "We need to get
to a point where machines are inter-compatible," he said.
Many companies were aspiring to achieve the ISO 11783
standard, with systems such as the Isobus console
allowing implements from multiple manufacturers to be managed from one control
unit, he said. "But this is still in its infancy when it comes to
precision farming."
Part of the problem was that new developments were far more
advanced than the current standards system, he added. "It is being pulled
along by the industry rather than pushing the industry forward."
Improving communication between machines and systems would
be another development area, he said. "Wireless communications will become
common and vehicles will be online 24/7, allowing real-time data transfer and
processing." This would allow large amounts of information to be
transferred between office-based computers and machines, he added.
Compensating for sloping fields
Developments in GPS guidance would include greater levels of
accuracy and automation, said John Deere's Mark James.
Auto-headland turns where the tractor had the ability to
take the implement out of work, perform a headland turn and put the machine
back to work, were already possible, he said. "This has been achieved by
tying in existing headland management features with automatic guidance
systems."
Compensating for implement crabbing on slopes was another
development area. In most current systems implements followed passively behind
the tractor. On flat fields the implement tracked accurately behind the tractor,
but on sloping ground it tended to crab down the bank, he explained.
Two options would be available to remedy this, he said. A
system called Open Loop had been used on some equipment, which used predefined
dimensions of the implement and its attachments to keep it in line with the
tractor. Although not yet proven, the system could prove cost-effective, he
said.
Active implement guidance would be the next step, allowing
the implement to steer itself independently of the tractor. Steering wheels or
disc coulters would be used to do this, he said. "Typically this would be
controlled using an RTK system mounted on the implement itself."
Developments further down the line could see leader/follower
systems where one or more vehicles track each other or buddy vehicles
controlled by one operator in central machine, he concluded.
Robotic Agriculture could be the future
Small, fully automated, intelligent machines could be the
precision farming workhorses of the future, according to Simon Blackmore from
the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen,
Denmark.
"Treating crop and soil selectively according to their
needs by small, autonomous machines is the natural next step in the development
of precision farming," he said. "Prototype automated tractors have
already been produced by manufacturers such as John Deere, but these are only programmed to work within defined parameters."
Future machines would need to be more intelligent and target
individual plants, rather than large blocks, he added. "Such accurate
field operations would not be feasible behind a manned tractor, but if they
were mounted on an autonomous machine they could become viable," he
explained.
"The technology is already there; we just need to work
on the software and infrastructure to support them."
Precision decision - assess the need
Talk of cutting edge precision farming technology was
plentiful at this year's HGCA R&D conference, but visitors were warned that
seeking ultimate precision could be false economy.
Assessing soil variation was an essential part of farm
management and precision farming techniques could improve crop management and
profitability, said Peter Dampney of ADAS.
But the extent of these improvements could vary
substantially from farm to farm. "Growers shouldn't seek a spurious level
of precision," he warned. "Farms with significant variation in soil
type could benefit from precision-farming technology, but where there are only
one or two soil types, variation of in-field
applications could be wasted."
Based on current estimates, three-quarters of the country
didn't have enough variation to warrant variable-rate applications, he added.
"You need to justify the need for technology before making any
decisions."
On farms where variable-rate technology could be justified,
growers had several inexpensive options to explore before conducting expensive
soil sampling and coring, said Dr Dampney. "You
can use soil survey maps, aerial photographs and satellite images to start
identifying soil zones." Old field maps could help identify divisions
between soil types, he added.
This approach was also relevant when selecting GPS guidance
systems, said John Deere's Mark James. "Our cheapest aftermarket GPS
system offers the best return on investment."
TAG's Stuart Knight agreed. He
reckoned farm size, cropping and the level of on-farm variation determined the
complexity of system needed. But services to measure variation had progressed
much more slowly than the systems for managing it which made the process more
difficult, he noted.
Benefits of variable nitrogen application were debatable and
could be smaller than reported commercially, he added. "This is partly
because not all fields will have sufficient variation to justify altering
nitrogen input."
Controlling weeds
Spraying systems with the ability to target individual
plants or leaves are already under development, said Mark Norremark
from Aarhus University, Denmark. "As the price of
pesticides increases we had to look at ways of making up for this," he
said.
Dropping glyphosate on individual plants could offer a
98-99% reduction in the amount of product used, he noted.
Prototype systems were small-scale, but full-size versions
could be seen in the future.
GM stumbling block
Lack of genetically modified crops was the main stumbling
block in Europe's bid to be more precise, said
farmer and COPA-COGEGA chairman Paul Temple.
"As a result of politics we are being deprived of the
most precise form of plant breeding technology - genetically-modified
crops."
GM crops had the ability to reduce inputs, be better for the
environment, offer higher profits and in turn drive investment into even better
plants, he said. "If you want a more precise form of farming, you need to
start with the plant."
In the USA,
Canada and Australia, GM crops with precision
technology on tractors had increased productivity, weed control and
conservation of moisture and soil, he said.
Return to Top
Breeding beneficial nematodes
not to ‘wimp out’
(BYU via Medical News
Today) – Microscopic nematode worms can be a potent organic insecticide,
killing crop-raiding bugs without harming plants or beneficial insects and
without the environmental side effects of chemicals. But when the worms are
mass-bred for agricultural purposes, they tend to, as Byron Adams says,
"wimp out," and are not as deadly as their cousins that grow in the
wild.
The Brigham
Young University
biology professor and his students analyzed the genetic changes in lab-raised
worms that make them less deadly to bugs. These results will help preserve the
talents of what Adams affectionately calls
"natural-born killers." The findings also help us understand how to
defeat parasites that harm beneficial plants and animals and those that cause
human disease.
The team reports its results in the new issue of BMC
Genomics. Graduate student Bishwo Adhikari
is the lead author; two co-authors who were undergraduates at the time are now
pursuing Ph.D.s at Caltech and the University
of Wisconsin.
How the worms protect crops
When the worm, called H. bacteriophora
finds an insect in the soil, it crawls inside and, Adams
says, "barfs up" special bacteria that had hitched a ride with the
worm. The bacteria quickly kill the insect and spread, and the worm gobbles up
the bacteria and reproduces. The bacteria and baby worms eat what's left of the
bug, and then head off together in search of another insect host.
Plants and other insects, such as bees, are spared, and the
worms are not toxic to humans. The bacteria are only deadly when introduced
inside the insect, not when ingested, and can't survive in soil or water. So
they are only a threat to the insects targeted by the worm, which include the
Japanese beetle, many species of weevils, the Colorado potato beetle, cucumber
beetles and many others. These pests can wreak havoc on citrus trees, turfgrass, potatoes, and many other crops.
The worms occur naturally in concentrations too small to be
effective at eradicating pests. So farmers can purchase bulk quantities of
nematodes mass produced in huge fermentation tanks and spread them through
irrigation. Producing deadly nematodes by the barrel is the problem.
Lab-grown worms wimp out
Previous research has shown that the worms are less deadly
to insects when grown away from their natural habitat. After a few generations,
they don't reproduce or find hosts as well, they have a tougher time tolerating
heat and they aren't as toxic to the bugs they do find.
"We wanted to know the genetic mechanisms that were
responsible for these changes, so we did a series of experiments to look at
differences in gene expression between the killers and the wimps," said Adams.
The team examined all of the expressed genes of an inbred line
(wimps) of worms and their original parental line (killers). They found
differences in the expression of 1,185 genes, including those involved with
metabolism, virulence and longevity.
"We show that even very small changes in the relative
expression of these genes can produce large changes in wimpiness,"
Adams said.
Now scientists can take steps to improve the quality of
worms shipped to farmers. But that's not what has Adams
most excited about this work.
Even broader application
"The research also shows that many of the genes
involved in the killer/wimp traits in these worms are unique to worms that are
nasty parasites of plants, humans and other animal friends," Adams says.
Some of these genes they identified play fundamental roles
in host-parasite interactions, such as virulence and the suppression of host
defense systems. That means the products of these genes could be promising
targets for pharmaceuticals.
Other interventions could prevent disease by disrupting and
altering the functions of these genes - taking what was learned about how the
bug-killing nematodes evolved to became less deadly and leading harmful
parasites down the same road.
Student contributions serve as launching pad
Two undergrads generated the "wimpy" line of worms
for the study, which required experiments to prove that the genetic
deterioration came about because of inbreeding and not other potential genetic
causes. They are the first authors on another paper about this that has been
submitted for publication.
John Chaston, featured here for
his work on nematodes in Antarctica, is now a National Science Foundation
fellow pursing a Ph.D. at the University
of Wisconsin.
Adler Dillman is now at Caltech,
studying how genes influence behavior under world renowned worm geneticist Paul
Sternberg, also a co-author on the paper. By the time he graduated from BYU, Dillman had presented research at nine scientific
conferences.
"Dr. Adams' attitude is unique among undergraduate
professors in that he encourages students to study the primary literature and
then to approach him with particular studies or questions that they find
interesting," Dillman said. "He then helps
you turn that interest into a research program. Working for him was the best
thing that happened to me as an undergraduate."
Other coauthors on the paper are: BYU's Chin-Yo Lin, Ohio State's Xiaodong Bai and Parwinder
Grewal, Michigan
State's Todd Ciche, the USDA's David Shapiro-Ilan; and Rutgers' Anwar Bilgrami and Randy Gaugler.
Return to Top
California growers have GM seed on their
mind
(HanfordSentinel.com)
– It's the off season; many fields lie barren and farmers are turning their
minds to that all-important kick-off: Choosing the right seed to plant in the
ground.
From cotton to corn to vegetables, growers are making
budgets, planning cropping patterns, calculating water supplies and looking
carefully at the choices of available seed.
It's not their granddaddy's seed market anymore. A genetics
revolution has enabled scientists to manipulate genes to yield specific traits
that farmers want, cranking up new seed development to warp speed and
leapfrogging over decades of conventional plant breeding practices.
The biggest seller so far: "Roundup-ready"
varieties that allow the popular weed killer to be sprayed over the top of the
crop without harming it. The plants have a specific gene engineered into their
makeup to achieve the resistance.
Westside grower Tony Azevedo is
planning to use a Roundup-ready Pima cotton seed this year, he said. Azevedo said he'll give it a shot on 300 acres to see how
it does. He's used Roundup-ready seed on other crops before.
Like other farmers, Azevedo is conservative.
If he thinks he can find a conventional seed that will do the job and is
cheaper, he'll naturally go in that direction.
Sometimes, depending on a variety of factors, including soil
condition and the availability of labor, it doesn't pencil out to go the
genetically modified direction.
But for small grower Marty Dutra, it makes perfect sense.
Dutra, with 180 acres northeast of Hanford,
is a small fry in a sea of big fish. If he went with conventional cotton or
corn seed, he'd face the problem of probably having to hire a crew to hand hoe
the field or pay an expensive crop dusting service.
With the Roundup-ready varieties, he can drive a spray rig
through the field himself. Most of the time it only takes one application, he
said.
"We just have less labor involved in it, and as a small
grower, it's a little hard to get a [work] crew in the field," he said.
Roundup-ready has now become the standard for a wide variety
of row crops used for animal feed. In Kings County,
that often means corn used for dairy silage and grain feed. It's also become
common in cotton plantings.
Stratford-area seed salesman Jeff Chedester
said that 10 years ago, almost all the row crop seed he sold was conventional.
Since then, the genetics revolution -- what he called "transgenics"
-- has transformed his seed sales for cotton and corn into 80 percent
genetically modified.
Chedester said a whole host of
issues, from the cost of fertilizer and sprays to the need for less
environmental impact, has created a major market for genetically modified
seeds. With traits built into the plant for insect resistance, disease
resistance and other qualities, farmers can cut back on expensive insecticides
and herbicides.
And they may soon have a long smorgasbord of options. Seed
makers like Monsanto are working on drought-resistant crops and other varieties
that require less fertilizer. Soon, farmers might be able to walk into the seed
store and do "gene stacking," meaning they pick the traits they want
and put them into a designer combination.
"Guys are looking for ways to produce more efficiently,
and this is the primary way to meet that goal," Chedester
said.
Azevedo hopes he'll eventually be
able to plant genetically modified varieties of onions, garlic, cantaloupes and
tomatoes -- crops that end up on dinner tables. Current law limits genetically
modified seeds to fiber crops or plants grown for livestock food. Azevedo said it depends on consumer attitudes toward eating
food grown from genetically modified seed.
Small growers like Dutra are on the same wavelength.
"I sure hope it stays. It's just a must for us,"
Dutra said.
Return to Top
Cornell grads use their degrees down on
the farm
(thedailynewsonline.com)
– They were looking for jobs with respected companies, positions that would
immediately give them responsibilities and a chance to expand what they learned
at Cornell University.
Three recent Cornell grads found those careers with local
agriculture producers. And they say their friends with ag-related degrees had
no trouble finding jobs. That differed from the crop of graduates with other
degrees, who finished college in May and tried to find jobs in a soft economy.
In New York state, the August unemployment rate was 9.0 percent, the
highest level since 1983.
Learning by experience
Jordyn Torrey, 23, earned her
degree at Cornell in applied economics and management, with an emphasis in farm
management and finance. The AEM degree often is a ticket to work for a large
investment broker and bank.
Torrey didn't want that life. She preferred working for her
family in Elba. She said that doesn't mean she
set a low bar for herself. In fact, she thinks she is working for one of the
leading farms in the country.
Torrey Farms is one of the largest vegetable growers in the
Northeast. Jordyn spent most of the summer working
closely with her father, Mark Torrey, co-owner of the operation.
Jordyn has been scouting for
insects, weeds and disease, paying close attention to the farm's onion and
cabbage crops. She learned to scout the previous three summers, working as an
intern at the former United Agri Products, now known
as Crop Production Services in Fancher.
Jordyn expects to work with the
farm's marketing program in the winter.
"I have a lot to learn," she said. "At
Cornell, they can only teach you so much information. The rest you have to
learn by experience."
Jordyn is one of seven siblings
who will likely work at the family farm. Her two younger brothers, Lucas and
Max, are Cornell students. Jordyn and four of her
siblings -- sisters Shannon and Molly, and brothers Travis and Jed -- all have
found roles at the farm, and they have returned with a passion for the business
after getting their education, said Maureen Torrey Marshall, the farm's
co-owner and Jordyn's aunt.
"They come back with a greater appreciation of what we
do," Marshall
said. "At Cornell they learn some of it from a textbook, and they come
here and see the reality of how it happens."
No to Florida,
Yes to Albion
Sarah Brown envisioned a career in a big city, or at least a
more distant locale, working in the produce industry. The Albion and Cornell
graduate worked as an intern in Washington,
D.C., for former Congressman Tom
Reynolds. She tried a job in London
for Elizabeth Arden, the cosmetics and perfume company.
After graduating with a degree in communication and a minor in marketing, Brown
almost took a position with a company in Florida.
But an opportunity emerged just down the road from her home in Point Breeze.
Brown, 22, was hired as the sales and marketing manager for Intergrow Greenhouses, a company with a 30-acre greenhouse
that grows hydroponic tomatoes. The crop lasts year-round and the tomatoes on
the vine are nearly uniform. Intergrow has about 70
employees and often sends three tractor-trailers of product out the door each
day.
The company sees room for expansion, and hired Brown to help
develop more markets, said Intergrow co-owner Dirk Biemans.
He was juggling the marketing position with his role as the
manager of the operation.
"We want to keep growing," Biemans
said.
The company mostly sells its tomatoes in the Northeast, but Biemans and Brown said they want to stretch the customer base.
She will represent the company Oct. 2-5 in Anaheim, Calif.,
during one of the produce industry's biggest events, the annual Produce
Marketing Association summit. Intergrow will make its
debut as an exhibitor at PMA.
Brown said she welcomes the duties she's been given, charged
with expanding the company's profile in the produce industry. With the Florida company, she
said wouldn't have been given so many responsibilities. Brown is helping Intergrow develop a new Web site and brochure. And she
doubts she would be in Anaheim
next week had she been with the other company.
"I never thought in a million years I'd be back in Western New York," Brown said. "But I found an
opportunity with a growing company and I'm my own manager."
Brown is happy to be so close to her family, who own Brown's
Berry Patch in Point Breeze. She recently joined the Albion Rotary Club and
serves on the board for the Albion
Main Street Alliance.
Intergrow has more job
opportunities, Biemans said, especially for
supervisors. The company six months ago hired Brandon Branciforte
as a manager. Branciforte, 23, earned a bachelor's
degree in English at Plattsburgh State College.
The Le Roy native also took an organic farming course. He
likes agriculture, but he doubted there was year-round work in the produce
industry.
At Intergrow he will be busy, even
during the winter. He said he is fascinated by the hydroponic tomatoes, how
they grow using a solution of water and fertilizer.
"You have to learn what the plant wants," he said.
"It's interesting. I'm learning things all the time and I'm not at a
desk."
Local Chamber of Commerce and Department of Labor leaders
have been trying to better promote local careers in agriculture, including
opportunities for college graduates. On Tuesday, the Genesee County Chamber of
Commerce will tour Torrey Farms, Lamb Farms and CY Farms, meeting a new
generation of farmers and seeing how technology is embraced at the operations.
Return to Top
Ag technologies of the future on stage in
Miami
(AgLineNews.com) – Delegates
and exhibitors from more than 30 countries have already registered for the
IFA-New Ag International conference on Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers (EEF)
and the 8th New Ag International Conference and Exhibition set for
March 23-26 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Miami.
EEF Conference Program
The term enhanced-efficiency fertilizers
(EEF) encompasses slow-and controlled-release fertilizers, and
fertilizers stabilized with urease and nitrification
inhibitors. “The market for these products is developing at a sustained pace.
Traditionally, these products have mainly been applied to specialty crops.
However, slow- and controlled-release fertilizers are seeing increased market
share in the broad acre crop sector (rice in Japan, and more recently corn in
the USA and rice in China)”, says Jean Pierre Leymonie,
Director of New Ag International, the quarterly global publication dealing with
specialty inputs and technologies in agriculture.
“In 2005, the International Fertilizer Industry Association
(IFA) organized an international workshop on EEFs.
This was the first international industry event entirely dedicated to EEFs. Five years later, it is time to update the knowledge
in the field of research and development, agronomic and environmental benefits,
economics of EEF use, policy and regulatory framework, current market and
outlook. The USA,
one of the most advanced places for the use of EEF in the world and is a
logical place for organizing such a meeting,” says Patrick Heffer,
Director of the Agriculture Committee at IFA.
The Miami
conference will include 23 papers with speakers from nine countries, coming
from academic circles, the industry and consultancy
firms. All aspects of this increasingly important input sector will be covered:
Markets, agronomics, emerging technologies and beneficial impact on the
environment. Key questions will be addressed: How is the EEF market expected to
evolve in the medium- to long-term? What will be the key drivers of the EEF
market: product development, economics or policy environment?
The conference will run all day on 23d March and 24th
morning hours. Three keynote papers will open the conference on the 23rd:
Agronomic
effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers, by Mike Stewart,
International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), USA
The effect of
enhanced-efficiency fertilizers on nitrous oxide emissions from various
cropping systems, by Ardell D. Halvorson, United
States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), USA
The world market for
enhanced-efficiency fertilizers, by Sarah Landels,
Agindustries Research & Consulting, Inc, USA
The event is sponsored by five of the world leaders in
Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers: Agrium Advanced Technologies, Agrotain, Haifa Chemicals, Scotts Professional and SFP. The
full programme may be downloaded at: http://www.newaginternational.com/ifa/ifa.html
27 SPEAKERS AND MORE
THAN 30 EXHIBITORS FROM EVERY CORNER OF THE WORLD AT THE NEW AG INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION
“After seven conferences held in Spain, Italy, Turkey,
Mexico, Hungary and India, we have decided to bring the event to the USA, a
market which in some respects – the use of biostimulants
in particular – is seen as behind some markets of Europe, the Middle East, Asia
and Latin America. Biostimulant science, the
technology, their use and their efficacy will therefore be central points in
the conference and in the exhibition,” says Andrew Osborne, Director of New Ag
International.
The programme for the New Ag International
conference and exhibition includes 27 papers and speakers from 12 countries.
The program follows the EEF conference beginning the afternoon of March 24 and
running through March 26.
The full programme may be downloaded at: http://www.newaginternational.com/miami/miami.html
It covers plant
nutrition, irrigation, fertigation and biocontrol. Five keynote speakers will open the conference
on the 25th: Giuseppe Natale, CEO, Valagro Spa (Italy) will speak about World
trends in speciality plant nutrition; Dr Pierre. M.J Ramakers, Senior Entomologist, Wageningen
UR Greenhouse Horticulture (The Netherlands) will cover the Need for Innovation
in integrated control of greenhouse pests;
Lawrence E. Datnoff, Professor and Department
Head, Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University (USA)
will highlight the Role of Plant Nutrition in IPM for Suppressing Plant
Diseases; One of the most awaited papers will be that of Prof Pierdomenico Perata, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa (Italy): Plant Genomics tools to predict
the function and efficacy of Biostimulants. A fifth
paper (speaker to be announced) will cover the need to boost the installation
of microirrigation & fertigation
systems around the world.
The concluding
papers will be an opportunity to hear what is going on in the USA and the challenges to boost market
development. Already more than 30 companies from the irrigation, biocontrol, plant nutrition and
technology sectors have booked exhibition space representing 15 countries: Belgium, Canada,
China, France, Germany,
India, Ireland, Israel,
Italy, Netherlands, Poland,
South Africa, Spain, Switzerland
and the USA.
The event is
sponsored by Brandt, Haifa Chemicals and Valagro,
three of the leading brands for specialty inputs for foliar, fertigation and biostimulants
application.
Both events are
officially supported by NAHSA, the North American Horticulture Suppliers
Association.
For
more information, contact New Ag International at conference@newaginternational.com
or by phone at +44 (0) 208 892 48 21
Return
to Top
End Transmission