|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
February 26, 2010
·
‘Monster’
weed escaping Roundup lasso
·
Vilmorin sets
sights on biotech seed market
·
High-tech
tool assists with pest forecasting
·
GM crops seen
as crucial to UK agriculture
·
UN support of
GM crops in Mexico denounced
‘Monster’ weed escaping Roundup
lasso
(The
Commercial Appeal) – Weeds have always bedeviled farmers, but as planting
season begins, Palmer pigweed -- called a "monster weed" -- is
expected to be an agricultural "game changer."
That's because it has become resistant to Monsanto's
ubiquitous Roundup herbicide, a glysophate-based weed
killer that has been the top-selling herbicide for decades.
Monsanto said 2009 sales of Roundup were about $1.8 billion,
and sales of other glysophate-based herbicides were
$422 million.
Monsanto pairs the weed killer with its seeds that are
genetically modified to be resistant to it. So, if a farmer sprays Roundup on a
field, it will kill everything but those plants modified to resist it. While
Monsanto engineered this trait into crop seeds in laboratories, pigweed and a
handful of other weeds have developed it on their own.
Larry Steckel, a University of Tennessee
weed specialist in Jackson,
Tenn., said farmers are now
turning to herbicides used in the 1980s and 1990s to weed their fields. While
Roundup costs farmers about $10 per acre per season, these other chemicals can
cost $35-$40 per acre per season, shaving already thin profit margins.
He said the problem is top of mind for Mid-South farmers on
both sides of the Mississippi River from the Missouri Bootheel
to Tunica County.
"Their fear is that it's going to be on huge acres of
fields this year and I think it most likely will be," Steckel
said. "It's changed everything."
The existence of glysophate-resistant
weeds was a rumor in 2004. Pigweed first emerged on a Georgia farm in 2005 and slowly
made its way across the South and now to 18 states. It first showed up on a Tennessee farm in late
2005.
Dyersburg
cotton and soybean farmer Jimmy Moody said he has worried about
Roundup-resistant weeds for a long time but that it finally "exploded on
us last year."
He said he'll spray Roundup again this year and spray a herbicide mixture just for pigweed. But farmers have to
spray for pigweed before it comes out of the ground or else the weeds become
"steel" and have to be pulled out by hand.
"If we can't control the weeds, you just can't grow
cotton with them," Moody said. "The worst possible scenario is that
it puts us out of business."
While one crop-input problem rarely gets a spotlight at the
annual Mid-South Farm and Gin Show, this year's show will feature a special
seminar solely devoted to glysophate-resistant weeds.
"Sometimes an issue comes along that we think merits a
highlight," said Timothy Price, the show's manager. "Our industry
openly and honestly looks at challenges and tries to find solutions."
Return to Top
Vilmorin sets sights on biotech seed
market
(Bloomberg)
– Vilmorin & Cie., Europe’s second-
largest seed company, expects to start selling its first genetically modified
seeds within six years, according to Chief Executive Officer Adrian Huige.
The French company now sells biotech crops from Monsanto Co.
and other rivals, and is developing its own modified plants, Huige said in an interview in Paris. Vilmorin may bring genetically
modified corn to the market in 2015 or 2016, followed by wheat between 2016 and
2018, he said.
Biotech crop planting worldwide rose 7.2
percent in 2009, according to a report by the International Service for the
Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, a
non-profit group funded by governments and companies including Monsanto.
Brazilian farmers grew more herbicide-tolerant soybeans and insect-resistant
corn, the group said.
“Monsanto’s dominance will continue, but over time that
dominance will be reduced,” said Huige.
Paris-based Vilmorin says it accounts for 5 percent of the
world seed market, compared with 25 percent for Monsanto, 15 percent for DuPont
Co.’s Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. unit and 9 percent for Syngenta AG.
Commercial introduction of biotech wheat, now five to seven
years away, will raise the value of the market for planting material for the
grain, Huige said. Only 30 percent of global wheat
plantings use commercial seed at the moment, he said.
Wheat Market
“There is a real potential to revolutionize the market
there,” Huige said at a press conference yesterday.
Farmers carry out two-thirds of planting in Europe and four-fifths in North America using grain held over from the prior
harvest, according to the CEO.
The value of the wheat market, based on royalties paid for
seeds, is estimated at $200 million to $300 million, compared with more than $5
billion for corn seed, Huige said.
“In terms of surface, wheat is the most-cultivated crop,” Huige said. “In value, that’s certainly not the case. If we
succeed in introducing GMOs in wheat and good
hybrids, you could see a similar effect to what we saw in corn.”
Existing wheat hybrids “haven’t been convincing” to farmers
in terms of performance, the CEO said. For wheat, “improved hybrids are at
least 10 years off, but you have to invest in them today,” Huige
said.
Insect-Resistant
Wheat improvement will focus on more efficient use of
nitrogen by the plant, as well as drought tolerance, according to the
executive. Resistance to insects and pesticides will be “less important” than
in corn, he said.
Genetically modified crops cannot be sold in the European
Union without regulatory approval, whether for use in food, animal feed or
cultivation, and food products that contain biotech ingredients must be labeled
as such.
The EU ended a six-year moratorium on new gene-modified
crops in 2004 after introducing new regulations, though it has yet to endorse
any request for cultivation since then. Two modified corn varieties approved
under prior rules can be grown in the 27-nation bloc, according to GMO Compass,
an EU-funded database.
Germany
last year banned the planting of St. Louis-based Monsanto’s insect-resistant
MON810, one of the two approved corn varieties, joining countries including France and Hungary that had already outlawed
growing of the grain.
Loss
Narrows
Seed companies work to improve traits by cross-breeding
different plants in a process called hybridization, as well as by using
biotechnology to introduce genes from different species such as bacteria into
plants.
Vilmorin held the press conference after releasing results
for the first half through December. Its net loss narrowed to 25.9 million euros ($35 million) from 28.5 million euros
a year earlier as sales gained 2.7 percent to 314.2 million euros.
The stock has dropped 13 percent this year in Paris
trading, matching Monsanto’s decline in New
York.
The French company plans to raise 200 million euros by selling shares at a discount to current investors,
Chief Financial Officer Daniel Jacquemond said
yesterday. It wants to use the money to pay for takeovers, expand its
vegetable-seed business in Asia and develop
corn and wheat varieties.
“This operation has as its only goal to finance growth,” the
CFO said. “It’s not a refinancing operation.”
Return to Top
High-tech tool assists with pest
forecasting
(Northeastern IPM Center)
– Pest forecasting models are a powerful IPM
tool, but high-tech early-warning systems require significant investment and
technical expertise. To save costs, IPM researchers in Pennsylvania have adapted an existing online
system that is benefitting growers throughout the state.
The Pennsylvania Pest Information Platform for Extension and
Education, or PA PIPE, was developed by Penn
State’s College of Agricultural
Sciences and an IT firm called ZedX, Inc. The system is based on a tool known as ipmPIPE, created in 2004 as a national decision support
system for managing soybean rust.
The PA PIPE provides forecasts for diseases, insects, and
weeds, including those that affect field crops, grapes, tree fruit, forests,
tomatoes, and potatoes.
“Growers in our state are using the system to predict when
pest activity will be happening and to focus their scouting efforts,” explains
entomologist John Tooker, who has helped to adapt the
system for field crops.
“Timing is critical when it comes to managing plant
diseases,” says plant pathologist Beth Gugino, who is
fine-tuning models to predict the severity of risk for early blight and late
blight. For years, her colleague Alan McNab had
issued forecasts to growers throughout the state based on his own network of
weather stations. When McNab died in 2006, vegetable
growers urged the college to find some way of continuing this crucial service.
Their request was the impetus for Penn
State’s investment in PA
PIPE.
ZedX’s high-resolution weather
data drive the specific forecasts of various models within PA PIPE. Once a
particular pest model has been plugged into the system, forecasts can be
generated on a fairly automatic basis.
Ground-truthing is important
though, so Tooker and Gugino
verify the system’s predictions and supplement the data with real-world
observations. For example, forecasts for the black cutworm depend on the pest’s
northward movement during a particular growing season, so Tooker
monitors the insect’s arrival across the state. These observations then allow
the models to be set in motion and predict larval activity.
Currently there is no cost to growers who use PA PIPE,
although additional levels of service might be available for a fee in the
future. Growers can log in to the system and save their own data so they can
gather crop-, pest-, or location-specific information quickly on their next
visits.
“Many states are searching around for different extension
models that use information technology,” says PA IPM Coordinator Ed Rajotte, who sees potential for other states to adapt the
system and expand its utility. Currently the system covers Pennsylvania
and portions of southern New York and northern
West Virginia.
For more information about PA PIPE, contact John Tooker (814-865-7082), Beth Gugino
(814-865-7328), or Joe Russo (814-357-8490).
The Northeastern
IPM Center
encourages integrated pest management for reducing risks to human health and
the environment.
Return to Top
GM crops seen as crucial to UK agriculture
(guardian.co.uk)
– The government's drive to push controversial genetically modified crops up
the national agenda will receive a further boost today, when former cabinet
minister Chris Smith will tell farmers that the technology has a key role in
helping the UK beating climate change.
Lord Smith, former culture secretary under Tony Blair and
now chair of the Environment Agency, will say that both GM crops and new
technologies to support "precision farming" - including
nanotechnology - could help tackle growing climate pressures such as water
shortages.
Addressing delegates at the National Farmers' Union's (NFU)
annual conference in Birmingham,
Lord Smith will tell farmers that climate change "will create new demands
on land and environmental resources" and "could provide opportunities
for novel crops and systems".
Intense lobbying by food companies, the growing significance
of climate change, recent international food crises and shortages and a major
independent Royal Society report have all helped to give the government the
authority to put GM back on the national agenda. The controversial technology
was the focus of intense campaigns including destruction of GM crop trials by
environmentalists in the 1990s, and last month came under renewed attack from
academics and organic food campaigners at the Oxford Real Farming Conference.
Lord Smith will say: "We can already see wildlife
following climate change – the mayfly is now found some 40 miles further north
than before and warmer winters and wetter summers are thought to be a major
factor in the rapid decline of pollinating insects with UK bee populations, in particular,
falling by 10-15% over the last two years.
"The reliance on seasonal weather patterns means that
farming will follow climate change too. My own personal view is that we probably
need to be readier to explore GM options, coupled of course with proper
environmental safeguards, in adapting to the changes that the climate will
bring."
The GM industry now involves 14 million farmers in 25
countries who are growing 134m hectares of GM crops around the world. This is a
7% increase compared with last year.
Lord Smith will recommend more use of new technology:
"New tools and technologies are becoming available, nanotechnology for
example, as well as the use of satellites, IT and other tools to support
precision farming. We need to understand the environmental implications of
novel approaches in order to embrace them and be clear how they will help us
achieve long-term goals.
"We need to ensure that science is at the forefront of
development and innovation and that effective knowledge transfer means farmers
can adapt and innovate. Innovation has already seen British agriculture adapt
to the economic challenges it has faced over the last 15 years or so and I know
it will do so into the future."
Organic farmers have been more resistant to the use of GM
than "conventional" farmers represented in the membership of the NFU,
although the latter broadly agrees that any such developments must be subject
to proper scientific evaluation.
Yesterday Paul Kelly, founder of Kelly's Turkeys, told the conference:
"GM has had a terrible press and consumers are very confused. But it is
only a matter of time before we are feeding our turkeys GM feed."
As well as exploring the potential of new crops and technologies,
Lord Smith will underline the need for agriculture to become more water
efficient as climate change ushers in longer, hotter, drier summers.
On the opening day of the conference yesterday, the
Conservatives set out plans to prevent development on top quality farmland,
reform the body which delivers EU subsidies to farmers and set up a review of
red tape as part of efforts to back British farming.
The Liberal Democrats also set out proposals to improve
delivery of subsidies by the Rural Payments Agency, which in 2006 left farmers
without EU grants after problems with its computer system.
Return to Top
UN support of GM crops in Mexico denounced
(IANS/EFE)
Mexico City: The UN's
Food and Agriculture Organisation is supporting the
introduction of transgenic, or genetically modified, crops in Mexico and other developing nations, alleged the Greenpeace chapter in the country.
'The only thing these types of tools do is ensure that the
biotechnology industry has a monopoly on the seeds that feed the world,'
Greenpeace Mexico and dozens of national and international non-governmental organisations said in a letter sent Wednesday to organisers of an FAO conference on agricultural
biotechnologies in developing countries.
The conference will be held March 1-4 in Guadalajara, Mexico.
The missive expressed concern about the gathering and said
it is regrettable that more than $900,000 will be spent on a conference 'to
whitewash the image' of a technology that 'contaminates (native crop
varieties), increases the use of pesticides and, through patents, eliminates
traditional agriculture'.
Greenpeace Mexico
also said that various national and international organisations
will hold a parallel forum with renowned experts in the field to demonstrate
the negative effects GM crops would have in Mexico.
Last October, the Mexican government - backed by domestic
farm producers eager for higher yields - issued the first permits for experimental
cultivation of transgenic corn 'on plots isolated' from other fields, saying
the measure was necessary to ensure food security.
Corn has been the staple of the Mexican diet for centuries,
especially among low-income segments of the population.
The letter to the conference organisers
was signed by more than 80 Mexican and international organisations,
which said they were 'dismayed' over the FAO's
support for genetically modified strains of corn, describing the diversity of
that crop in Mexico as 'a resource of unprecedented importance for humanity'.
One of the organisations
co-signing the letter was Semilla de Vida (Seed of
Life), whose spokeswoman, Adelita San Vicente, told
EFE that the richness of Mexican agriculture 'is not compatible with the transgenic
plants'.
'Irreversible transgenic contamination,' San Vicente said,
'would mean the end and the death' of agricultural diversity in Mexico,
considered one of the birthplaces of corn.
The country is home to 59 species and 200 adapted varieties of
maize, used in ancient times by different Mesoamerican peoples and cultures
such as the Olmecs and Aztecs.
According to San Vicente, the solution to the environmental
crisis and hunger lies not with GM crops but with a return to smallholder
farming.
The Semilla de Vida representative
said 'industrialised agriculture controlled by large
corporations' is responsible for the imbalances that have divided the world
into countries with problems of obesity and regions ravaged by hunger.
Return to Top
End Transmission