http://www.aglinenews.com

" I heard it
through the
AgLine"

 

March 4, 2010

 

                                                                                                         

·        Bee disappearance solved – Canadian Prof

·        East gears up for new fight against blight

·        Green onion food-safety guidelines released

·        Tough new spuds not afraid of disease bullies

·        Tax break keeps many in California farming

 

 

Bee disappearance solved – Canadian Prof

 

(University of Guelph) – Varroa mites are the main culprit behind mysterious die-offs of honeybee colonies that have alarmed beekeepers, crop growers and the general public over the past three years, according to a new study by a University of Guelph biologist.

 

The study, published last month in the journal Apidologie, found that the parasitic mites were responsible for more than 85 per cent of honeybee colony mortality in Ontario. The next most important killers were too-sparse beehive populations in fall and insufficient food reserves for winter, says Prof. Ernesto Guzman, School of Environmental Sciences.

 

About one-third of Ontario's colonies died in the winter of 2006-07 and another one-third died in 2007-08 – about three times the expected winter loss in average years. Some beekeepers in parts of the province lost all of their hives.

 

Guzman says his study offers solutions for beekeepers and crop growers, many reliant on honeybees for honey production and for pollination of many other food crops.

 

"Varroa mite is the main culprit of colony mortality in Ontario," says the Guelph researcher. "Eighty-five per cent of mortality cases were associated with varroa mite."

 

He studied 408 commercial colonies in six southern Ontario counties, including Wellington, Middlesex and Norfolk. In fall 2007, spring 2008 and early summer 2008, he counted bees in colonies and weighed colonies to gauge food reserves. He also tested bees for varroa mites, tracheal mites and the Nosema fungus, all known to cause infection in bees.

 

Besides varroa mite infestation, weak populations and low food reserves in the fall can cause colony mortality, says Guzman. "We're pretty sure we've solved a great deal of the mystery."

 

Based on his study, he recommends beekeepers strictly follow a mite treatment regimen, feed their bees enough sugar syrup and avoid splitting colonies too late in the season.

 

Tim Greer, president of the Ontario Beekeepers' Association, says the Guelph study will help the province's roughly 2,200 beekeepers improve their management practices. He says the industry still needs reliable treatments for varroa mites. "We've identified the problem, now it's coming up with treatment," he says.

 

Greer says experts are also concerned about effects of systemic pesticides on bees in other parts of the world, although those products appear not to be a major problem in Ontario.

 

In his Guelph lab, Guzman is studying genetic techniques to learn more about honeybee infections and to help breeders develop better bees.

 

This research was funded by the Ontario Beekeepers' Association, the Ontario Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Rural Affairs, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, and the Inter-American Institute for Co-operation on Agriculture.

 

Contact:

Prof. Ernesto Guzman

School of Environmental Sciences

519-824-4120, Ext. 53609

eguzman@uoguelph.ca

 

Return to Top

 

 

East gears up for new fight against blight

 

(masslive.com) – AMHERST - The prolonged rain and cold during the early growing season last year were part of a perfect storm of conditions that caused a devastating blight to ravage certain crops throughout the Northeast.

 

Many farms lost virtually all their tomatoes and potatoes.

 

And while the fungus, called late blight, does not easily survive winter, farm specialists at University of Massachusetts in Amherst are developing strategies to try to prevent the reoccurrence of such a widespread outbreak.

 

 "We do have a higher risk this year because it occurred in so many areas last year," said Ruth V. Hazzard, a vegetable specialist for the University of Massachusetts Extension in Amherst.

 

"One other thing we're doing at UMass is setting up a weather monitoring system to give growers good information about when problems might develop. And we're also asking gardeners and farmers alike to be very vigilant in watching for infected potato and tomato plants," she said.

 

One of the most feared plant diseases that can strike a tomato or potato field, late blight caused the Irish potato famine of the 1840s and 1850s in which more than a million people died, mainly of starvation. The fungus creates olive-green or brown lesions on the leaves of a vulnerable plant, eventually killing it. Once detected on a farm, the plant disease can completely defoliate a field within weeks unless control measures are taken. However, fungal spores from an infected plant can become airborne, quickly spreading the disease to other farms and fields.

 

Last spring, a tomato seedling wholesaler sent young plants infected with the fungus to big box stores and nurseries throughout the East.

 

"Suddenly every store was a source of the blight," Hazzard said. "Then everybody who bought the seedlings and took them home and planted them became a source. It was a terribly effective dissemination system for the fungus."

 

"We often have late blight in one place or another around New England. It might start at one farm and spread in that local area. But that is very different from the kind of broad dissemination we experienced last year," Hazzard said.

 

Then, when the weather turned unusually cold and wet in May and June, the blight thrived, worsening the effect.

 

"It was really a perfect storm," she said.

 

Fortunately, the fungus can't survive by itself in the soil through a New England winter. However, it can survive on a living host plant which is kept out of freezing temperatures, such as a potato tuber that is stored inside through a winter for planting the next year or an infected potato buried below the frost line in a compost pile.

 

Hazzard said that any re-emergence of late blight this coming season "will depend on a number of factors. One will be the weather. The cool and wet period that lasted so long last year was extremely favorable for the blight. If we have really dry weather, you would be less likely to have an outbreak."

 

However, any outbreak would probably not be as widespread as that of last year, she said.

 

"If it does appear, it would not be like having sources of the fungus all over the Northeast. It would be at those particular sites with some spreading from there," Hazzard said.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Green onion food-safety guidelines released

 

(Western Growers) – To strengthen the safety of the green onion supply chain, Western Growers, in partnership with the Produce Marketing Association and United Fresh Produce Association as well as other industry associations, academics, regulatory agencies and the green onion industry, released a new voluntary food safety guidance document for the production and harvest of green onions —  the “Commodity Specific Food Safety Guidelines for the Production, Harvest, Post-Harvest, and Value-Added Operations of Green Onions.” 

 

“After several years of work, it is extremely satisfying to finally complete this project,” said Sonia Salas, Western Growers Science & Technology manager.  “As growers and handlers begin to apply these practices, the value of these voluntary guidelines will increase.  Additionally, we will treat this as a living, breathing document - updating it as new science presents itself.”

 

This document is based on work begun by the fresh produce industry in the summer of 2006, at the request of the U. S. Food and Drug Administration, and is meant to augment green onion food safety efforts already underway in Mexico and Canada.   

 

“The Guidelines for the Production and Harvest of Green Onions represent a substantial body of work that will provide a much needed general framework which growers, packers, distributors, marketers, regulators, and consumers can use as the basis for evaluating the effectiveness of food safety controls used with the production of this fresh vegetable”, said Dr. Robert Buchanan, director, Center for Food Safety and Security Systems, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Maryland.

 

“This document presents the food safety best practices to be followed by green onion suppliers, and to be used as a purchasing requirement by customers.   It establishes the level of performance, programs, and procedures that, when adopted, will significantly increase the level of food safety across the green onion supply chain”, added Dave Murphy, director of food safety and quality programs at Boskovich Farms, Inc. “Many of the most regarded experts in growing, processing, and selling of green onions have collaborated on this document.  I encourage everyone in our industry to take advantage of the Guide in their operations.”

 

The “Commodity Specific Food Safety Guidelines for the Production, Harvest, Post-Harvest, and Value-Added Operations of Green Onions” is available for any interested party on the Western Growers website at  www.wga.com/foodsafety under the “Best Practices” section.  This project was funded through the California Department of Food and Agriculture under the USDA Specialty Crop Block Grant Program.

 

Western Growers is an 85-year-old agricultural trade association whose members from Arizona and California grow, pack and ship about half of the nation’s fresh produce.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Tough new spuds not afraid of disease bullies

(USDA-ARS) – Americans love potatoes, consuming about 130 pounds per person annually. But it's a wonder the spuds even make it to the dinner table, given the many fungal diseases that attack the tuber crop—powdery scab and black dot among them.

Now, five new potato breeding lines being tested by Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists and collaborators could open the door to new varieties of the crop that resist powdery scab and black dot diseases, caused by the fungi Spongospora subterranea and Colletotrichum coccodes, respectively.

These fungi often occur together in the same soil, attacking the potato plant's roots, tubers or stems. Outbreaks can cause yield losses of up to 25 percent and prevent tubers from reaching the sizes needed by the french fry and fast-food industry. Of the two fungi, only black dot can be chemically controlled with fungicides; however, multiple applications are needed, ratcheting up production costs to prohibitive levels. A more sustainable alternative is genetic resistance, according to geneticist Chuck Brown, with the ARS Vegetable and Forage Crops Production Research Laboratory in Prosser, Wash.

In studies conducted there since 2004 with Washington State University professor Dennis Johnson, assistant Tom F. Cummings and postdoctoral associate Nadav Nitzan, Brown screened an existing collection of wild and cultivated potatoes for sources of natural resistance to powdery scab and black dot in a local grower's infested field.

The effort ultimately led to five advanced potato breeding lines that had been developed from a wild species from Mexico, Solanum hougasii, and a recent commercial release, Summit Russet. In three years of field trials in Washington State and Idaho, the potato breeding lines consistently showed fewer disease symptoms—root galling for powdery scab and sclerotia-infected stems for black dot—than other lines and varieties tested.

The potato breeding lines themselves aren't intended for production. Instead, they'll be made available as seed for use in breeding programs aimed at developing the first commercial varieties with dual resistance to the fungal diseases, according to Brown, who discussed the research at the 48th Annual Washington State Potato Conference in January.

The research findings have been published in the journal Plant Disease.

ARS is the principal intramural scientific research agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). This research supports the USDA priority of promoting international food security.

Return to Top

 

 

Tax break keeps many in California farming

 

(Modesto Bee) – For nearly half a century, California has balanced its explosive growth with a sensible, cost-effective program that protects a vital sector of our state economy — agriculture — and does it in a way that benefits all of us.

 

Today, that landmark law, known as the Williamson Act, is at risk.

 

Passed in 1965, the California Land Conservation Act expresses the state's commitment to protecting vital food-producing farm and grazing land, along with the additional advantages such land provides: wildlife habitat preservation and watershed protection. Land conserved by the act can also act as a buffer against leapfrog development.

 

Under the law, farmers and ranchers who agree to keep land in agriculture and open space are permitted to pay taxes at a lower rate than the full market or development value.

 

The state then partially reimburses local government for the lost tax revenue. The contribution by the state is nominal — just a small fraction of 1 percent of the overall state budget — but the return is significant.

 

The question is, will the state this year see the soundness of this investment? In today's highly competitive global economy, the law literally helps California farmers stay in business: It is said that one-third of California farms wouldn't survive without the Williamson Act.

 

You don't have to be a farmer or live in a rural area to reap the benefits. All of us enjoy the field-to-table products that farms provide. Open space also helps protect threatened and endangered species. In the Sacramento Valley, rice and corn fields provide some of the last roosting and foraging grounds for iconic migratory water birds like the greater sandhill crane.

 

The far-reaching impact of the Williamson Act on California agriculture and the state's overall land-use planning is striking. A satellite image of California spotlighting the agricultural production would reveal millions of acres dispersed throughout the state.

 

More than two-thirds of this agricultural land — about 17 million acres — is protected and preserved by the Williamson Act. And this land "under the act" contributes significantly to the state's coffers and the nation's food supply, preserving California's enviable role as the nation's leader in agricultural output.

 

The fact is, the Williamson Act is one of the most effective on-the-ground tools to ensure that California's land resources of today will be there for everyone's future. This is especially true of agricultural land at the urban fringes in our state that are especially threatened by development.

 

Last year, the state essentially suspended its financial support of the Williamson Act. California should not make a similarly short-sighted decision this year, which would hasten the threat of losing the program altogether. The loss of the Williamson Act will be significant and far-reaching in local communities and across the state. Once gone, its positive impacts will be difficult, if not impossible, to replicate.

 

Today's state budget crisis requires lawmakers to make some tough choices. Our counties face even more dire funding crises as a result of state funding cuts. Without Williamson Act "subvention" funding from the state, many counties will be forced to cut deeply into local public safety and health and human services programs.

 

Protecting California farmland and open space is too important to let unravel. We can ensure that won't happen through an ongoing commitment to the Williamson Act. The state needs to keep this vital law "on the job" and working for all of California.

 

Bradshaw is a Modoc County supervisor and chairman of the Regional Council of Rural Counties. Zeleke is the director of the Central Valley & Mountains Region of The Nature Conservancy.

 

Return to Top

 

 

End Transmission