|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
March 22, 2011
·
So far, risk low from
radiation in Japan food
·
EU court
deals blow to anti-GM crop lobby
·
Solar
greenhouses vital to China veg supply
·
Firm takes
greenhouse veggies to new heights
·
African
beetle latest threat to honeybees
So far, risk low from radiation in Japan
food
(AP
via SFGate.com) Radiation-tainted spinach from Japan's damaged nuclear reactors
may sound scary, but here's a reality check: Even if any made it to stores there,
you'd have to be Popeye to eat enough to worry.
With some fallout found in an increasing number of foods,
Japan's government is taking steps to stop contaminated products from reaching
consumers and the U.S. and other countries are double-checking imports.
The Chernobyl disaster made clear that radiation from food
can be a real risk: Thousands of cases of thyroid cancer after the 1986 reactor
explosion there are blamed on the Soviet Union's failure to stop children in
the region from drinking milk contaminated with radioactive iodine children
who also weren't given a thyroid-protecting drug, potassium iodide.
Japan's
earthquake-damaged reactors haven't leaked nearly as much radiation as Chernobyl, and aren't
expected to and this time around, people are being warned, food is being
tested and there's potassium iodide in the high-risk zone.
Japan has
banned sale of milk, spinach and a few other products in regions from the
leaking power plant toward Tokyo
after discovery of higher-than-allowed levels of radiation in a range of foods.
On Monday, the World Health Organization said Japan should act quickly to ensure
that no contaminated foods are sold as a precaution against long-term risk to
nearby residents who otherwise might repeatedly consume large amounts of those
products.
Still, international scientists say risk from food in Japan so far is low, especially outside the
disaster zone and in the U.S.
in particular because it imports very little food from Japan.
Besides, there was radiation in food well before Japan's
earthquake and tsunami.
"The world is covered in cesium-137 from the atomic
weapons tests of the `50s and `60s," says nuclear physicist Patrick Regan
of the University of Surrey in England.
"There is radioactivity in all food. It's really a
matter of saying how much," agrees University
of New Mexico radiologist Dr. Fred Mettler, who studied the health effects of the Chernobyl disaster. Here
are questions and answers about the situation:
Q: What's the danger?
A: Radioactive iodine, from food or the air, can build up in
the thyroid, leading to thyroid cancer years later. Young children and pregnant
women are at greatest risk. Thyroid cancer is one of the least fatal cancers if
treated promptly.
Radioactive cesium can build up throughout the body, is
harder to eliminate and high levels are thought to be a risk for various other
cancers.
But it takes quite high exposure to harm, says Mettler: In contaminated villages around Chernobyl, thyroid cancer was documented. But
if there was an increase in any other cancer, it was too small to detect, he
says.
Q: In what foods in Japan have these radioactive
elements been found?
A: Iodine has been found mostly in milk and spinach, but
also in chrysanthemum greens, leeks and a few other foods. Cesium also has been
found in some vegetables. Levels found so far range from trace amounts to milk
with iodine levels five times the acceptable limit, and in spinach, iodine
levels 27 times the ceiling. Officials soon will test seafood.
Q: If you ate that, what would it mean?
A: You'd have to eat 2 pounds of the most contaminated
spinach to absorb about as much radiation as you'd get from a CT scan of the
head, says Dr. Clifford Chao, radiologist-in-chief at New York-Presbyterian
Hospital.
People who drank milk with the highest measured levels of
iodine for two weeks would absorb less than a year's worth of natural
background radiation, according to a report from British environmental
radiation group, Mike Thorne and Associates Ltd. But infants would absorb more
than adults.
Q: What about breastfeeding?
A: Radioactive iodine could be in breast milk if nursing
mothers in Japan
were exposed; potassium iodide comes in doses for infants, too, if needed.
Q: What's being done to make sure contaminated foods don't
reach consumers outside of Japan?
A: China,
South Korea and a number of
neighboring Asian countries have ordered radiation monitoring of food imports
from Japan.
"There is no risk to the U.S. food supply," the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration said Monday.
Foods from Japan
make up less than 4 percent of all U.S. imported foods, but the FDA
said it would "be paying special attention" to imports from the
earthquake-affected area.
Q: How does radiation get into food anyway?
A: Fallout can land on crops in fields and wash into the
soil to be soaked through the roots. Livestock can eat contaminated animal
feed. It's possible seafood could be affected from
contaminated water, although in the ocean "dilution would be huge," Mettler says.
Q: What about canned or other foods stored before the
earthquake can residents eat that?
A: The WHO says radioactivity cannot contaminate sealed
packaged foods, and that cropland can be covered with tarps and livestock
brought into barns and fed clean feed.
Q: How long will radiation be a food threat?
A: Radioactive iodine decays quickly, with a half-life of
eight days, meaning the length of time it takes for half of it to break down
harmlessly. "In a couple of months, the iodine is a non-issue," says Mettler.
Cesium, however, can stay in soil for 30 years. But animals
intended for slaughter can be given clean feed for a few months until cesium in
their bodies drops to safe limits, he says. Also, the
radiation stays only in the top inches of soil so deep plowing can make a field
safe to use.
Q: Wait a minute, the U.S. and other countries irradiate
certain foods to kill bacteria. How is that different?
A: No radioactivity is left in irradiated foods because the
energy used, from such sources as X-rays and electron beams, is too low. The
FDA, World Health Organization and other authorities have repeatedly found the
process to be safe.
Return to Top
EU court deals blow to anti-GM crop lobby
BRUSSELS (AFP)
France broke the law when
it halted cultivation of genetically-modified crops without first asking the EU
to impose emergency measures, the legal advisor to Europe's
top court said on Tuesday.
Advocate-general Paolo Mengozzi's
opinion represents a major blow to France,
Austria, Greece and Poland, all of whom sought European
Court of Justice guidance after being taken to court
in national jurisdictions by GM-foods giant Monsanto and others.
"The French authorities could not suspend the
cultivation of genetically-modified maize MON 810 on national territory without
having first asked the European Commission to adopt emergency measures citing a
risk to health and the environment," Mengozzi
said.
Judges are not bound by the legal opinion, but in the vast
majority of cases the legal argument holds firm.
The advocate-general also said France cannot now invoke a
safeguard clause inserted into European Union law aimed at preventing the
release of GM cells into the environment.
The MON 810 strain, which the court said is
"particularly resistant to parasites and used as animal feed," was
first authorised in 1998.
In 2007, Monsanto applied for re-authorisation,
valid for 10 years, but France
adopted national laws in December that year and February 2008 outlawing its
growing, amid public outcry in a famously proud traditional farming nation over
the march of GM crops.
The safeguard clause, however, may not be invoked by states on their own, and besides, in this instance, the company was
not informed of the legal basis for its exclusion from the French market --
which the court also said was the wrong legal basis.
It should have been based on law covering raw material
foodstuffs and genetically-modified animal feed, and only the European
Commission can make that call, the court said, because only Europe-wide action
could act sufficiently to protect health and the environment.
Return to Top
Solar greenhouses vital to China veg
supply
(Times
of India) WASHINGTON Increased
proliferation of efficient solar greenhouses in China may contribute to solving
worldwide problems such as the energy crisis and global climate change,
according to a new report based on 20 years of systematic studies.
Solar greenhouses have played a vital role in China's
agricultural scene for years. New innovations in greenhouse design are allowing
growers to produce more varieties of vegetables, even during long winter
months.
In the recently published report Chinese scientists called
solar greenhouses "the most important type of infrastructures for growing
horticultural crops in China."
The team of researchers from the College
of Agronomy and Biotechnology at China Agricultural
University presented an
extensive report on single-slope solar greenhouses in a recent issue of HortTechnology.
Single-slope solar greenhouses are built facing south using
support and insulation walls on the north, east, and west sides. A short roof
is installed on top of the north wall. The south side is supported by metal or
bamboo frames (or a mixture of both materials), and is covered with plastic
film and an insulating blanket. These energy-efficient greenhouses use solar
energy as the only source of light and heat for winter crop production in the
region between latitudes 32°N and 43°N for production of warm season crops such
as tomato and cucumber.
As in other parts of the world, the feasibility of using
solar greenhouses in China
largely depends on the relative duration of sunshine in the winter and
temperatures at the greenhouse site. Solar greenhouses are widely used in the
regions north of Huai
River and the Beijing area, where greenhouses usage has
greatly reduced energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions. The success of China's solar greenhouse operations has
contributed to the structures' adoption by countries such as Japan, Korea,
and Russia.
The researchers noted that while solar greenhouses have many
advantages-energy savings, reduced pollution, and improved economic
development-the structures also have distinct disadvantages due to their heavy
reliance on the sun and weather conditions. Especially during winter, less
solar radiation and low temperatures can have a significant negative impact on
warm-season vegetable productivity of the greenhouses, and addressing these
issues can be challenging.
"Innovation and optimization of the greenhouse
structure needs to continue. More work needs to be done on gutter-connected,
double-arched, and semi-underground greenhouses. New wall insulation materials
need to be developed to reduce the thickness of the wall while improving its
insulation efficiency and expanding space utilization, said Zhen-Xian Zhang,
lead author of the study.
The study also recommended that breeding new varieties of
horticultural crops that can adapt to low light and winter temperatures in
solar greenhouses would provide another strategy to ensure sustainable
development of the greenhouse industry.
"The solar greenhouse has a very bright future,
especially given the amount of concern over the global energy crisis and
climate change. Additionally, significant energy savings can be realized from
switching to solar greenhouses. We hope this technology can be applied to
regions of similar climate to help reduce energy consumption and CO2
emissions", Zhang said.
Return to Top
Firm takes greenhouse veggies to new
heights
(fastcompany.com)
We are in the midst of a global food crisis, with the price of food
skyrocketing globally over the last year. As the cost of corn has jumped 87%
and wheat 74%, tens of millions of people are finding it harder than ever to
feed their families, with the rising price of food even helping to trigger the
wave of social unrest sweeping the Middle East.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) said a record 40 million
Americans, or 1 in 8, may not be able to eat without government assistance. As
the CEO and co-founder of Home Town Farms in San Diego, Dan Gibbs has developed
an innovative solution: commercial vertical organic urban farming that provides
food that is not only lower in cost, by higher in quality as well.
The causes of our rising food prices are many. Bad weather
in key growing regions around the world has lead to short supplies. The steady
growth of the world's population to reach seven billion this year has stretched
the world's agricultural production capacity to the limit. "At the most
basic level, the crisis is a test of mankind's ability to feed itself,"
wrote BusinessWeek (February 21, 2011).
Even in the US,
the high price of food is having an impact. The down economy and unemployment
has left millions of people right here in the U.S. unable to afford food for
their family, and the high cost of low quality food is increasingly apparent,
with the tide of obesity continuing to rise and contribute to our spiraling
health care costs.
Home Town Farms vertical organic urban farming is the
solution to both bad food and high prices. They are introducing vertical
farming in greenhouses that will be located in cities and suburbs on unused
land, empty lots or even roof tops, growing vegetables and berries vertically
to produce six to eight times the productivity as conventional agricultural. By
using greenhouses and combining organic farming with vertical growing methods,
they drastically reduce the need for pesticides and herbicides,
reduce fertilizer use by 80%, and also save 85% of the water. By growing and
selling local food in urban and city areas, where it will be used without
shipping it thousands of miles, they avoid the need for long distance food
distribution, reducing fuel use and fuel costs by as much as 90%. Overall,
Gibbs estimates that food produced by Home Town Farms will be half the cost of
it takes to traditional farmers and the current distribution system to grow and
ship the produce from the farm to the city. Plus at the same time create good
green jobs and help the planet.
"We will build these farms in the center of each
community with direct sales to the people," said Dan Gibbs, co-founder of
Home Town Farms. "The bottom line is we can offer fresh, locally grown
vine ripened organic vegetables and berries at conventional non-organic prices.
This will allow every family in America
access to Whole Foods quality produce at affordable prices."
Another benefit of the approach being developed by Home Town
Farms is that the food they produce is not only affordable, but higher quality
because it is picked fresh and sold locally. Conventionally grown produce is
often picked weeks early and shipped thousands of miles to reach consumers,
reducing its nutritional value and quality. The vegetables and berries from
Home Town Farms will be bursting with flavor and nutrients, while still being
affordable, providing a healthier alternative for budget-minded consumers
looking for a change.
"Freshly picked vine ripened vegetables and berries can
help provide optimal health to individuals," said Steven A. Brody M.D., Ph.D, a nutrition expert. "The phytonutrients
in these foods constitute powerful substances to fight cancer and heart
disease. Fresh vine ripened vegetables have the highest potency of these
healthy micronutrients. Consequently, I would encourage the consumption of vine
ripened produce for anyone interested in good health and well-being."
As the price of food rises, the Home Town Farms approach
provides a hedge against future price increases since food is grown locally and
sold directly to consumers rather than being sold on the global commodity
market and has much lower need for outside resources like fuel. Their approach
will also boost food security in the neighborhoods where it is adopted,
ensuring a steady food supply in the event of shortages or disruptions of the
food distribution network.
All of the pieces are there for Gibbs and Home Town Farms as
they put them all together to make this innovative approach to food production
a reality. As the world's production capacity is strained, we will need more
innovative solutions like Home Town Farms that can provide the growing
population with high quality and low cost food for many years to come. To get
involved, get in touch with Gibbs and see how you can help.
If you want to find out more about Home Town Farms or
commercial vertical organic urban farming go to www.hometownfarms.com.
Glenn Croston is the author of "75 Green Businesses"
and "Starting Green", helping business to start green and grow green
at www.startingupgreen.com.
Return to Top
African beetle latest threat to
honeybees
(The
Windsor Star) WINDSOR, Ont. -- Honeybees in Essex
County (Ontario, Canada)
are facing another threat, this time from an African
beetle.
Essex
County and part of
Chatham-Kent has been placed under a bee quarantine to stop the spread of the
small hive beetle.
Its something were taking very seriously, provincial
apiarist Paul Kozak said Tuesday of the beetle which
is native to sub-Saharan Africa.
The small hive beetle was found in Ontario
for the first time in September in Essex
County. The larvae of the
beetle can eat developing honeybees, pollen and honey. The larvae defecate in
the honeycomb which causes the honey to ferment and spoil.
Beekeepers can easily spot this and remove the honey. There
is no health risk to the honey-eating public, Kozak
said.
Kozak said its not clear what the
impact on the honey production and pollination industry in Ontario will be if the beetle spreads. He
said beekeepers have been dealing with the pest in the United States for about a decade.
The beetles can be controlled with traps and chemicals but the best way to ward
them off is to have strong honey bee colonies, he said.
The quarantine was established Monday to slow the spread of
the beetle into the rest of Ontario.
The quarantine means beekeepers are not to move their bee colonies or equipment
out of the quarantine area without the approval of the provincial apiarist.
Beekeepers are also being asked to report any new discoveries of the small hive
beetle to the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
The beetle, which can fly, likely came from across the
border.
Beekeepers are already dealing with two mites that can hurt
honey bee
Return to Top
End Transmission