http://www.aglinenews.com

" I heard it
through the
AgLine"

 

May 8, 2007

 

 

·        Farm newsman booted in wake of Monsanto expose

·        Locally grown replacing organics in popularity

·        Dole puts another 5000 acres on the market

·        WGA, Bayer unite in Green Field Alliance program

·        Fuel, input costs are up, but so are tomato prices

 

 

 

Farm newsman booted in wake of Monsanto expose

(AlterNet.com) By Russell Mokhiber

If you have heard of Learfield Communications, it is probably from listening to college football and basketball games.

The Jefferson City, Missouri based Learfield is one of the nation’s largest broadcasters of college sports.

But it also produces news programming heard throughout the farm belt.

Learfield was started 35 years ago by Clyde Lear and Derry Brownfield.

Lear went on to be the chairman of the company. He bought out his friend and partner Brownfield in 1985.

Brownfield went on to do market news reports for the Learfield news division until 1997 or so, when he started broadcasting a daily call-in show called The Common Sense Coalition.

Derry Brownfield would broadcast The Common Sense Coalition from the studios of Learfield Communications.

Learfield would subsidize the program and allow Brownfield to use its studios and satellite hook-up.

Monsanto happens to be a big advertiser of the Learfield news division — to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

Brownfield happens to think that Monsanto is an evil corporation.

Therein lies the rub.

For weeks, Brownfield had been ripping Monsanto on air for its policies of enforcing its seed patents against farmers.

On the April 16 show, Brownfield’s topic was seed industry concentration in America.

His guests were Fred Stokes, president of the Organization for Competitive Markets, and Michael Stumo, general counsel of the group.

Stokes and Stumo were promoting a new project to study corporate concentration in the seed industry.

Monsanto is the dominant player in the global seed industry and has a reputation for playing rough.

On air, Brownfield quoted from a newly published Vanity Fair article titled “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” by Donald Barlett and James Steele.

“Monsanto relies on a shadowy army of private investigators and agents in the American heartland to strike fear into farm country,” Barlett and Steele write. “They fan out into fields and farm towns, where they secretly videotape and photograph farmers, store owners, and co-ops, infiltrate community meetings, and gather information from informants about farming activities. Farmers say that some Monsanto agents pretend to be surveyors. Others confront farmers on their land and try to pressure them to sign papers giving Monsanto access to their private records. Farmers call them the 'seed police’ and use words such as 'Gestapo’ and 'Mafia’ to describe their tactics.”

After reading from the Vanity Fair article, Brownfield then begins to riff on the Mafia theme.

“Multinational corporations are doing everything possible to change agriculture — and not for the better,” Brownfield says on the show. “I know a little bit about this — not a lot, just a little bit — but Monsanto literally they have Mafia goons out, do they not? They show up on farmers’ property, they try and harass them, they say if you don’t sign this, we are going to take you to court. They have literally tried to destroy agriculture as we know it. They have a goon squad. Maybe that’s not what they like to be called. But if it was the Mafia, we would call them the goon squad.”

Calling Monsanto’s patent enforcers goons was apparently the straw that broke this camel’s back.

Brownfield’s stint at Dearfield was about to end.

Last week, Brownfield was told that he could no longer broadcast out of the Dearfield studios. His buddy, Clyde Lear, posted a blog on the Learfield web site saying that Brownfield’s last show will be in mid-May.

“The Common Sense Coalition grinds to a halt on our system,” Lear wrote.

“Most of his listeners loved him as did his affiliates,” Lear wrote about his buddy. “He didn’t mind controversy or taking on giants like the Monsanto Corporation. He thought they were bad for farmers, too big for their britches and generally bad for America. Increasingly he’s been saying so, without seeking balance, in my opinion.”

And then later, in response to listeners who were upset that Brownfield was being let go, Lear wrote:

“Some seem to think the reason Derry is leaving is because Monsanto threatened to stop advertising if we didn’t put a gag on him. If that were the only reason Derry was asked to leave, then I can see why they think we are selling out. We’ve parted ways because accusations being made about not only advertisers, but individuals, corporations, government, (fill in the blank) were based on fear and lies with absolutely no truth to back them up. I abhor radio talk shows like Rush Limbaugh…and Derry Brownfield where half-truths are articulated. I won’t be a part of them. And, that’s my right.”

But in an interview with Corporate Crime Reporter, Lear admits that the Monsanto issue is what drove his buddy Brownfield out.

“If the Monsanto issue had not come up, we would not be here today,” Lear said.

Lear said that the President of Learfield Communications, Roger Gardner, talked recently with John Raines, Monsanto’s director of public affairs.

“John Raines talked to Roger Gardner about the difficulties they felt Brownfield is giving them,” Lear said. “(Gardner) told me he talked to John Raines about the Vanity Fair article.”

“The pressure I got came from the president of the news division, Stan Koenigsfeld,” Lear said. “Stan is the guy that has responsibility for selling and maintaining the financial viability of our news division. Stan is a no nonsense guy. So, Stan comes in and says — why are we doing this? Why do we continue to do this? We give him all of these things and he spits in our face by lambasting our good advertisers, without giving them an opportunity for fair and balanced reporting. And it is not reporting — it’s just entertainment. Why do we continue to do this?”

Lear says that the complaints have been mounting over the past five years about Brownfield.

“And I’ve been saying to Stan, settle down, it will all be alright,” Lear said. “But I imagine Stan is getting a lot of pressure from his sales executives. We have three that call on Monsanto for different products. And I would assume that he is getting pressure from those sales executives. When those sales executives call on Monsanto, Monsanto is complaining to the sales executives. That is where the connection happens. But you would have to talk to them about the kind of leverage Monsanto is putting on them. They have never to my knowledge threatened to pull any advertising.”

Lear finally confronted Brownfield.

“I went to him and said — Derry, look, lay off of this,” Lear said. “Lay off of this Monsanto thing. I am getting a lot of complaints.”

Lear said he was the only one in the company who could approach Brownfield.

“I’m the only one who can talk to him,” Lear said. “No one else in the company will go to him. He is kind of persona non grata. He is one of the guys who helped start the company years ago. He was my partner for years until 1985 when I bought him out. He is a dear friend of mine. So, there is no one else — all of the rest of the guys are half my age. They won’t go to him. They are afraid of him. They just won’t go and talk to him.”

“They all came to me and said — go talk to Derry,” Lear said. “We’ve got to quit doing this. Plus, it came at a bad time. It came during the same week that the National Association of Farm Broadcasters national convention was being held in Kansas City. And at that convention, of course, Monsanto was omnipresent. They are there trying to woo farm broadcasters, because they want them to say nice things about them, right? So, here are all of the Monsanto people at this convention. And their advertising agencies — Osborne & Barr out of St. Louis — among others. They were all there. And it was embarrassing, because all of that week, Derry is lambasting Monsanto.”

“We have explained to Monsanto, in any way we can, that the Brownfield Network has nothing to do with Derry’s show,” Lear says. “This is a completely independent show that he puts on. Well, Monsanto says - he’s doing it from your studios, isn’t he? And we say yes, we give him space because of the history.”

“And they ask — how else do you help him? If he weren’t doing the show, would this problem disappear?”

“So my guys came to me and said — we’ve got to do something about this.”

“So, I went in to Derry and I sat down with him,” Lear said. “It was very good natured. I wasn’t angry. I wasn’t planning on doing anything. I said — let this Monsanto thing go for awhile. Just let it go.”

“He said — 'Clyde- - Monsanto is an evil empire,’” Lear recalled. “'This is evil. He said — every farmer hates Monsanto. You know what they have done — and then he would lambast Monsanto and lay out this litany of stuff that they do. It included milk. Apparently there is a human growth hormone that they put in the milk. I don’t know a thing about it, but apparently they won a court case that prohibited milk retailers from putting on the milk carton the label — hormone free. I didn’t know anything about this, but Brownfield was complaining about how the liberal judges of America are siding with the evil empire. And Monsanto pays them off. All kinds of allegations which I’m sure are not true. But Derry believes them.”

“So, I said — will you let Monsanto be on the air? And he said — I’m not going to give them a forum. But then he changed his mind and said — yeah, bring them on. I’ll let them on the show.”

Lear then went to hole up with his executives. And his execs told him — “It’s bigger than this now. We just don’t need to be associated with him.”

“So, I just walked back there and said to Derry — you say you are not going to lighten up. And he said no, I’m staying the course. And I said — not with us you are not. You are going to have to find some other way to distribute your program, and you are going to have to find some other office to do it out of.”

Given that he was willing put Monsanto on his show, why not keep him on?

“Maybe we should have,” Lear said.

Would you reconsider your decision?

“I don’t think so,” Lear says. “It is just not a business I want to be in anymore.”

Lear says he feels sad about parting with his old buddy, but he wants to help set up an internet radio studio for Derry out of Derry’s home office.

“We are helping him build a new facility in his home,” Lear says. “But we won’t have a connection to him. Then we can easily say to Monsanto — we don’t have a thing to do with Derry. We don’t have a thing to do with him. He’s not on our property. We can’t control him.”

Brownfield said he couldn’t comment on the situation until after May 30.

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter.

Source Link

 

Return to Top

 

 

Locally grown replacing organics in popularity

 

(progressivegrocer.com) – This year, shoppers are opting to choose locally grown produce over organic alternatives, according to the 16th annual Shopping for Health 2008 survey released yesterday by the Food Marketing Institute (FMI) and Prevention at the FMI Show in Las Vegas. When cost is the same, 50 percent of consumers say they would choose locally grown produce vs. organic (28 percent). Only 9 percent would choose a store-packaged alternative.

"Shoppers' new interest in locally grown food reflects their strong desire to purchase fresh fruits and vegetables," said Cary Silvers, director of consumer insights for Rodale, the publisher of Prevention, who presented the findings at the FMI Show. "The battle between organic and locally grown represents who shoppers believe can deliver the freshest produce."

Meanwhile consumers who once purchased organic but no longer do cited the following reasons for their change in behavior:

-- 70 percent say it's too expensive.

-- 39 percent cite the lack of perceivable difference between organic and nonorganic foods.

-- 33 percent are concerned about the safety of organic produce.

In addition to the findings on local and organic trends, the study revealed some of the "product swaps" consumers make to try and eat healthier. The swaps that consumers say they would make include:

-- Healthier alternatives in the same product category, for example, those with less fat or fewer calories. Consumers reported they would purchase healthier salad dressings (41 percent), potato chips (36 percent), and ice cream (27 percent).

-- 100-calorie packs of cookies: 23 percent said they would purchase this over any other alternative, but 20 percent of cookie-eaters would not change their habits at all.

--Drink less soda: 29 percent of consumers choose this alternative, but 28 percent would not change their consumption.

Other findings from the report include the following:

-- More than one in three shoppers (38 percent) said they had started a diet in 2007.

-- Two-thirds (66 percent) of these shoppers were still on a diet by November 2007.

-- More than half of dieters (57 percent) said they are on no specific diet regimen; theare merely watching their calories.

The 2008 Shopping for Health survey of America's supermarket shoppers is the 16th in an annual series conducted by FMI and Prevention with the support of Men's Health and Women's Health magazines.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Dole puts another 5000 acres on the market

 

(honoluluadvertiser.com) – Dole Food Co. has expanded its effort to raise cash by selling Hawai'i land, and is putting 5,000 acres in Wahiawa on the market two months after agreeing to sell 2,000 acres on O'ahu to an unidentified buyer. The California-based firm with deep roots in Hawai'i said it has hired commercial real estate firm CB Richard Ellis Inc. to market the property for sale.

Dole spokesman Marty Ordman and CB Richard Ellis officials declined to identify the property except to say it is in Central O'ahu. Most, if not all, of Dole's Central O'ahu land is in Wahiawa, according to county property records. Ordman said the land is primarily zoned for agriculture and is leased to farmers growing crops or raising cattle, though some is fallow.

None of the land being put up for sale is farmed by Dole, which grows pineapples on 2,700 acres, and coffee and cacao on an additional 195 acres. The company owned by billionaire David Murdock has said it intends to continue its agricultural operations in Hawai'i, but is shedding nonstrategic or underperforming assets around the world.
O'ahu land held for sale by Dole represents roughly 25 percent of what the company owns on the island, most of which is pastureland, part of the forestry reserve or leased to others largely for farm use.

According to the most recent information from the state Data Book in 2006, Dole was the seventh-largest Hawai'i private landowner with 28,472 acres. Dole's presence in Hawai'i dates back more than a century as the place where James Dole founded the company in 1901 as Hawaiian Pineapple Co. and made pineapple production Hawai'i's second-largest industry. Today Dole is still the second-largest pineapple producer in the state. Dole was also once a major sugarcane grower on O'ahu, but it exited the business when its Waialua Sugar Co. closed in 1996.

Dole's land sale plan on O'ahu will add to thousands of acres of agricultural land in the state that has been on the market or sold in recent years. Much of the prior selloff was the result of major pineapple producer Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. shutting down local operations in 2006. After Florida-based Del Monte quit pineapple production in Hawai'i, it returned 5,100 acres of leased land in Kunia to local landowner James Campbell Co.

Campbell has sold or received bids for much of the property, including a $31.3 million sale of 2,300 acres last year to Monsanto Co. for seed crop operations. About 850 acres of Campbell's Kunia land is listed on the market for $9.2 million by CB Richard Ellis. In 2004, Del Monte also quit farming pineapple on about 2,000 acres in Wahiawa leased from the George Galbraith Trust with an estimated value of $30 million to $50 million that the state has proposed buying.

Hawai'i's largest pineapple producer, Maui Land & Pineapple Co., also has been selling pieces of "noncore" land in recent years. The company, which owns more than 25,000 acres on Maui and grows pineapple on roughly 4,000 acres, sold nearly 3,000 acres of mostly agricultural land in the past few years. Dole disclosed in December that it intended to sell Hawai'i land, and in March agreed to sell 2,000 acres on O'ahu to an undisclosed buyer for $39 million in a deal expected to close between July and September. That property also was not identified by Dole but is leased to a seed corn producer.

Dole's move to sell land also is occurring outside Hawai'i and would help the financially struggling company pay off what Bloomberg News calculated to be $350 million in bonds maturing next year. A diverse food producer with global farming operations, Dole is the world's largest producer and marketer of fresh fruits, vegetables and cut flowers, and also markets a growing line of packaged and frozen foods.

Last year, the company reported a net loss of $58 million on revenue of $6.9 billion, down from a $90 million loss on revenue of $6.2 billion in 2006. To raise cash, Dole last year sold $41.7 million of assets, and at the end of last year held another $76.2 million in assets for sale, including a fresh-cut flower distribution facility in Florida and more than 4,000 acres in California producing almonds, olives, citrus and grapes.

 

Return to Top

 

 

WGA, Bayer unite in Green Field Alliance program

 

(Wire Services) – The United Fresh 2008 brought together representatives of the fresh fruit and vegetable industry in Las Vegas, Nevada (USA). Bayer CropScience introduced its global food chain partnership concept in the USA.

“Based on our food chain partnership philosophy, we are initiating and supporting activities to facilitate partnerships for the benefit of all players in the food chain - from field to fork”, said Gregg Storey, food chain relations manager at Bayer CropScience LP. “In the United States, Bayer CropScience and the Western Growers Association support producers in their efforts to supply consumers with high-quality fruits and vegetables through the Green Field Alliance.”

Green Field Alliance – a unique partnership

“The goal of this unique partnership is to enhance the value programs and services that are vital to the growth and success of Western Grower’s members”, said Brent Crossland, Marketing Manager at Bayer CropScience.

A percentage of every Bayer CropScience product sale purchased by Western Grower members will go directly to the Green Field Alliance Funds. This funding facilitates the dissemination of scientific and technical information to members, staff, policy makers and the public. The funds are also used to tackle four priority issues for Western Growers: food safety, federal farm policy, immigration and transportation.

“It is safe to say that the Green Field Alliance partnership has helped to effectively advance the health and vitality of the American produce industry and that Bayer CropScience, through its financial commitments, is a solid and unparalleled partner in these efforts”, said Hank Giclas, Vice President, Strategic Planning, Science & Technology Western Growers.

Integrated crop protection for high quality fruit and vegetable production

Bayer CropScience has initiated food chain partnerships in various crops in many countries worldwide. “A wide range of affordable, high quality fruits and vegetables available all year round provides the basis for healthy nutrition”, explained Storey. “We look forward to launching further food chain partnership projects in additional crops and countries.”

Bayer CropScience supports integrated crop production according to good agricultural practice as an important element of sustainable agriculture. The solutions offered by Bayer CropScience in food chain partnership projects include activities such as the development and implementation of integrated crop protection tailored to meet local requirements and support for growers in the production of high quality fruits and vegetables. Company experts provide importers and exporters with information on international trading standards relating to crop protection and help to avoid trade barriers.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Fuel, input costs are up, but so are tomato prices

(cfbf.com) – As California farmers are planting their processing tomatoes, they are seeing higher prices as well as rising input costs and a shift to alternative crops.

"The price of processing tomatoes has gone up 11 percent since last year, so we're hopeful that we'll have a good crop to end up on the positive side," said Tony Turkovich of Button and Turkovich, a farming operation near Winters in Yolo County.

Turkovich grows 1,200 acres of conventional and organic tomatoes. He produces canning tomatoes for Pacific Coast Producers in Woodland and Campbell's Soup in Dixon, as well as dried tomatoes for Culinary Foods in West Sacramento.

The average base price of processing tomatoes is $70 per ton this year, compared to $63 per ton in 2007, said Ross Siragusa, president of the Sacramento-based California Tomato Growers Association. "It's $70 and if you add late- and early-season premiums, it comes out as a weighted average of $72.60."

While tighter tomato supplies, the weak U.S. dollar, low carryover stocks of grains worldwide and other factors have driven up prices, farmers are also faced with higher input costs. The CTGA estimates that total costs have risen by 5 percent. Certain expenses have increased dramatically for growers.

"Fuel is up close to 30 percent compared to the same date last year," Turkovich said. "Fertilizer is up 80 percent, some chemicals have more than doubled, water is going to be more expensive and availability is going to be a challenge."

In addition, on Jan. 1 the minimum wage rose from $7.50 to $8 an hour.

Farmers are doing what they can to reduce their expenses.

"We have an ongoing effort at trying to become more efficient," Turkovich said.

To this end, he utilizes reduced tillage to cut down the number of tractor passes through the field and drip irrigation to minimize water use.

In recent years Turkovich has primarily used surface water, but due to potentially limited water availability, he plans to pump well water to supplement his surface water. "We're trying to get the electricity hooked up to the pumps that we haven't used for a number of years," he said.

Martin Medina, farm manager at Button and Turkovich, said, "One of the ways that we're trying to make our tractors more efficient is by using wider equipment. That includes the 25-foot lister, cultivator and planter. It saves labor, fuel and time by going with wider equipment."

In addition, the farming operation can reduce labor costs by using a carousel transplanter because it requires only five employees, in contrast to the 10 employees needed on a finger transplanter.

"With the carousel planter, we're reducing the labor costs specifically on that one by reducing the number of transplant laborers," Medina said.

Although there was a shortfall of rain during the 2006-07 season, the water situation improved this past winter. The wet winter was followed by a dry March, when Sacramento Valley farmers began transplanting tomatoes.

Gene Miyao, University of California Cooperative Extension vegetable crops advisor, said, "I think the story regarding cultural practices will be attempts at reducing fuel usage and perhaps fertilizer input because of escalating costs."

Processing tomato growers will receive an average base price of $70 per ton this year, compared to $63 per ton in 2007.

He noted that growers may combine operations such as cultivating and fertilizing in one pass. In addition, "With fertilizers, more attention may be paid to adjusting application rates based on residual carryover of nitrogen from the previous crop."

California's 2008 processing tomato crop is projected to be slightly smaller than last year's crop, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The projected statewide production is 11.8 million tons, compared to 12.1 million tons in 2007, the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service reported. This year's estimated acreage is 288,000 acres, compared to 296,000 acres last year.

"We survey the processors and these figures for 2008 are basically what they intend to contract, and the tonnage is what they feel they want to run through their plants," said Jack Rutz, deputy director of the USDA NASS California Field Office. While the tonnage is expected to drop from the previous year, "It's coming off of a very large crop, and at 11.8 million tons, it would still be large."

Siragusa said, "I think it's highly unlikely that we'll have 288,000 acres. I think we'll have significantly less."

A CTGA survey of growers indicated that they will plant about 265,000 acres, he noted. "The 265,000 acres is roughly a 10 percent reduction from last year. That number seems pretty reasonable. If you take 265,000 acres and assume 40 tons per acre, we'll end up with a crop of 10.6 million tons, compared to the 11.8 million that NASS came out with."

The price has gone up because tomato canneries and other processors need a steady supply of tomatoes; as a result of tighter supplies, they are paying higher prices to farmers.

Meanwhile, world prices for wheat, corn, soybeans, rice and other staple crops have increased due to low global carryover stocks. As a result, some California tomato production is being replaced by alternative crops.

In addition, alternative crops such as wheat and safflower are becoming increasingly attractive because there is less risk involved in producing them. These crops require less water and labor. Moreover, "You have a much more predictable yield with a number of other crops versus tomatoes," Siragusa said. "A tomato grower's yield can easily swing 15 percent plus or minus, and if you're on the down side, you're not making any money."

Furthermore, whereas it costs about $2,400 to grow an acre of tomatoes, other crops cost significantly less to produce, such as safflower, which costs around $500 an acre, he said.

Miyao noted, "The high returns for alternative crops like wheat, corn, safflower and alfalfa have allowed growers to reevaluate their cropping plans for this year and perhaps several years into the future. We've seen movement by tomato growers to some permanent crops like almonds in the past several years. Now, there are several crop alternatives that appear financially attractive and with less risk."

The reduction of tomato acreage poses the greatest challenge, Siragusa said.

"I am concerned that the industry will be unable to get enough acres--that's my biggest concern," he said. "I worry that other crops that are lower risk or with lower water input will take more acres out. Look at the demographics of growers: Growers are getting older and are less inclined to take a big risk, and processing tomatoes are a risky crop. I think growers and processors need to work together to find a way to maintain a solid acre base."

He added, "Just as California growers are growing more wheat, so are the Europeans for the same reasons--higher prices and less risk--so the Europeans will be exporting less tomatoes. The Chinese are growing more wheat and other crops. So there's a great opportunity for California (tomato growers), but we need both acres and the water to take advantage of it."

While supply is down, Siragusa said, "The weak dollar has increased the demand for processing tomatoes for the export markets. Tomatoes in California are attractively priced, so as long as the quality meets export specifications, it's a great opportunity."

Worldwide demand for tomatoes is roughly 33 million tons, he said, with projected growth of 750,000 tons to 1 million tons a year.

Chris Rufer, owner of The Morning Star Co., the nation's largest tomato processor, based in Woodland, said that Europe represents a potential marketing opportunity for California tomato growers.

The European Union is decoupling, or changing, its subsidy system, which is creating the potential for California to sell products there. As a result, California tomatoes are cheaper than the European supply. "California tomato paste is a better value, so that's a bright spot and we'll see how that plays out in the next couple of years," Rufer said.

To supply the flourishing tomato market, farmers are doing all they can to increase their yields.

Richard Stewart, partner of the Woodland-based TS&L Seed Co., said, "As far as the seed industry goes, it's by observation that tomato growers are increasing their budgeted tons per acre due to the newest processing-tomato genetics that have considerably higher yield potential than in years past. Secondly, we've seen a trend toward high soluble-solid tomato packs and less focus on viscosity-type tomatoes--that is processor-driven."

Stewart is also a partner in Westside Transplants, based in Firebaugh, which is building a new greenhouse facility in Yolo County to supply tomato transplants and other crops.

"This is the newest processing tomato-transplant facility this far north," he said. "It brings us closer in proximity to customers to reduce transportation costs."

In terms of pest control, environmental conditions have been favorable as growers plant their tomatoes.

"Moderately mild and dry weather is not usually good for springtime diseases like bacterial speck or other diseases," Miyao said.

Last year, the virus that causes tomato yellow leaf curl disease was first identified in California. It appeared in tomato plants growing in a high school greenhouse in Brawley, Imperial County. The disease is transmitted by Bemesia whiteflies. While it is a potentially devastating disease to California tomato production, it has not been found in the state's processing tomato district, said Brenna Aegerter, UCCE farm advisor in San Joaquin County.

"We don't expect that this virus will become a problem in the Central Valley," Aegerter said. "However, because it is such a devastating disease, we want everyone to be aware of what it looks like. That way, if it does show up we will hopefully find out about it right away."

As tomato planting continues throughout the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys, farmers are hopeful that the weather will cooperate and pest problems don't flare up so they can try to supply the growing demand for their tomatoes.

"We're cautiously optimistic," Turkovich said. "The conditions for planting are extremely good right now. Barring any major disease or weather problem, hopefully we'll have a decent crop and it will be a profitable year."

Return to Top

 

End Transmission