|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
June 1, 2010
·
Feast and
famine for Texas onion growers
·
Cool weather
tough on California melons
·
Chinese
growers cultivate a new image
·
Moth spit
aids potato production – study
·
Working in a biotech lab
is risky business
Feast and famine for Texas onion growers
(AgriLife
News) McALLEN -- Market prices for spring
onions hit an all-time high in the Lower
Rio Grande Valley's
recently wrapped-up harvest season, according to an expert with the Texas
AgriLife Extension Service.
"Some growers have huge smiles on their faces, but
others missed out on the good prices due to rain," said Dr. Juan Anciso,
an AgriLife Extension vegetable specialist in Weslaco.
"I've never seen prices this high," said Anciso, a
20-year veteran of the South Texas vegetable
industry.
Growers last year averaged $8 per 50-pound bag of yellow
onions, about break-even prices, he said.
But this year, the law of supply and demand kicked in and
prices shot up, Anciso said. Growers fetched $30 to $40 per 50-pound bags of
yellow onions and $50 to $60 for white onions. Red onions, marketed wholesale
in 25-pound bags, earned growers $25 to $35 per bag.
"Prices were high for two reasons," he said.
"Storage onions left over from last year's harvest ran out two months
earlier than usual this year, in February instead of April. Then Mexico
got hit hard with rain during their growing season, so imports were down. That
put an upward pressure on the market."
Unfortunately, not all Valley growers were able to cash in,
he said.
"Market prices have been high since February, and they
never let up much," he said. "But rains caused problems here too.
Some fields lost 80 percent of their crop to decay from the rain and some
fields were just abandoned."
The high prices were passed on to consumers, Anciso said, as
onion prices at supermarkets hit $3 per pound.
He estimates some 50 growers in the four-county Lower Rio Grande Valley planted
about 8,700 acres of onions this year, an increase of 500 acres over last
year's acreage.
While the rains helped keep insect pressures and insecticide
costs low, they promoted fungus growth, an expensive foe for farmers.
"It was bad," Anciso said. "While they
normally spend $300 to $400 per acre for fungicides, this year they spent an
average of $1,000 per acre."
The Valley’s onion harvest grosses an average of $150
million in farm gate receipts but should be higher this year despite some crop
losses, he said.
While some are sold locally, most South
Texas onions are shipped north.
“Our onions have an established reputation of being mild and
are very much in demand," Anciso said. "They are sold all over the
country, but most go straight up a corridor through Dallas,
into the Midwest and even into New York and Canada."
Return to Top
Cool weather tough on California melons
(NEWS10.net)
– Unseasonably cool wet weather is making a mess in Sacramento Valley
melon fields.
At this point in the year, the plant should be at least 24
inches," said melon grower Jon Tecklenburg as he stood and looked at his
weed-choked field in Lodi.
"Usually, it's hot right now. Too hot for weeds to grow, but the constant
rain is letting them take hold."
Tecklenburg's Ranch is known for ambrosia melons.
"They're kind of a back yard melon, but we grew them and took them to the
farmers market and people loved them," Tecklenburg said.
But if his fields don't dry out soon, Tecklenburg said he
could lose 50 percent of his ambrosia crop this year.
Black plastic covering the row of plants is supposed to warm
the plants and help spur growth, but Tecklenburg said it's been too cloudy and
cool.
"The plant just sits there and hardly grows," said
Tecklenburg. "Normally, we'll have
each plant three to five melons per plant. Many of these have one flowering
melon and we don't even know if that one's going to stay."
Adding to Tecklenburg's woes, cool temperatures are keeping
bees in the hives he's rented. He needs the bees to pollinate the plants, but
they only venture out from the hive when the sun comes out and temperatures
increase.
Tecklenburg vowed to do what he can to save his plants.
"We'll run our irrigation system through a hot water
treatment and bring the water temperature up," Tecklenburg said.
"That will bring the soil temperatures up and hopefully prompt a growth
spurt."
Meanwhile, he looks skyward hoping the sun will pop out,
warm the earth and chase away the rain clouds that are cause him so much pain.
Return to Top
Chinese growers cultivate a new
image
(China Daily)
– Vehicles of all shapes and sizes jockey for position under the early morning
sun, their drivers honking their presence in a cacophony of apparent chaos.
Plump red tomatoes, lurid green cabbages and slender sticks of celery are just
some of the produce being loaded and unloaded from the jam of carts, trailers
and the backs of lorries.
This is Xinfadi in southwest Beijing, believed to be the world's biggest
wholesale market for fruit, vegetables, meat, seafood and seeds. Measuring more
than 100 hectares, it provides a trading center for as many as 80,000 people
every day, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Dealers and buyers come from Tianjin, Hebei, Henan, Shandong, Inner
Mongolia and even as far as Fujian, Yunnan and Hainan.
In early July it is due to expand further with the opening
of the Xinfadi International Trade Center when traders from the United States,
Germany, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, the Philippines, Singapore, New Zealand
and Chile will strike deals with their Chinese counterparts in a
specially-constructed market hall. They will be taking advantage of China's
booming agriculture business.
"The rise in some sectors has been so fast that it
almost defies description," said Scott Rozelle, Cheung Kong Scholar and
guest professor at Beijing's
Renmin University of China. "Every two years China
adds the equivalent of the vegetable production capacity of California. The cultivated area dedicated to
fruit orchards is more than 5 percent, more than double the share of the next
closest major agricultural nation, including the US,
the European Union, Japan
and India.
There has also been a continuous and rapid rise in livestock and
fisheries."
In March Premier Wen Jiabao announced plans to allocate
818.3 billion yuan for agriculture, farmers and rural areas, an increase of
more than 93 billion yuan over last year, and said local governments would also
increase their investment. He said the government would spend 133.5 billion
yuan to subsidize agricultural production, a year-on-year increase of 6.04
billion yuan.
The boost reflected the need to prepare for the possible
damaging fallout from climate change, which many believe was responsible for this
year's drought in Yunnan
that has had a damaging effect on agricultural output. It would also benefit
domestic consumption during a period of economic uncertainty, the needs of an
ever-rising population and it would counter the widening wealth gap between the
rising number of urban dwellers and those who remain in the countryside.
The latter group makes up more than half of the total 1.3
billion population and, in the interests of social harmony, the government does
not want to disenfranchise them, say analysts. According to the National Bureau
of Statistics, the average annual income of farmers stood at 5,153 yuan in
2009, up 8.5 percent from a year earlier, but still less than a third of
average urban incomes.
Agriculture is an important economic sector in China,
employing more than 300 million people. Its share of gross domestic product has
fallen from 40 percent in 1970 to less than 10 percent today, but that is due
to the spectacular growth of other industries.
China
ranks first in worldwide farm output, primarily producing rice, wheat,
potatoes, sorghum, peanuts, tea, millet, barley, cotton, oilseed, pork and
fish. The country, according to Rozelle, is 98 to 99 percent self-sufficient in
food production with agricultural exports worth $17.3 billion in 2004.
However, it belies the economic diktat that big is best.
Farm sizes have remained much the same size as in the late 1970s, when farmland
began to be returned to individual households.
Subsequent policies have made life easier for Chinese farmers
with the granting of certain tightly controlled rights to farmers to lease
their land to other people for longer, a move regarded as key to the ultimate
creation of the highly industrialized and highly profitable megafarms seen in
the US and Australia.
Nonetheless, many rural landowners, even those who have
taken jobs as migrant workers in cities, remain reluctant to give up their
land, regarding it as a form of social security. They mainly leave behind the
old and middle-aged women, according to Rozelle.
"Ninety-five percent of young men are in the cities
working in industry and in the service sector. Most have never farmed and never
will. The average farm size is one acre. How do you go to 20 acres? It means 19
people will have to sell their land."
Although the use of mechanism has risen with tractor makers
such as John Deere establishing a presence in China and increasing its sales
revenue in the country by 300 percent over the past five years, the nation's
farmers still lag behind the productivity of developed nations.
"In Australia
and the US
the average corn farmer spends one to two days on every hectare," said
Rozelle. "In 1990, a Chinese farmer spent 200 days per hectare. Today he
spends less than 100 days."
Rozelle predicts that the face of China's agricultural industry will
change over the next decade but first wages must rise, farm sizes must increase
and branding and marketing must mature. "It will happen in the next 10
years if China
is successful in continuing its transition to a modern economy," he said.
According to Mao Changqing, the chief agricultural analyst
at CITIC Securities, there is a lot of private investment interest in seeing a
revolution in China's
rural land system but he says the government has no plans to encourage bigger farms
in the near future. One factor behind this is China's stated desire to maintain a
minimum of 120 million hectares of arable land to ensure agricultural
self-sufficiency.
There are also fears about what farmers could do once they
have sold their land. Because of the hukou system they do not possess the same
political and social rights and benefits as urban residents.
However, there are indications that industrialization is
creeping ahead. Last year Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co LP announced the
final completion of a series of investments worth $150 million in Ma Anshan
Modern Farming Co Ltd, a leading dairy farming company headquartered in China's central province of Anhui
known as Modern Dairy.
It is one of the largest operators of centralized large-scale
dairy farms in China.
With KKR's investment, Modern Dairy said it was intending to construct another
20 to 30 large-scale farms in China
as well as to pursue acquisitions over the next few years, in order to
capitalize on the industry's growth.
The milk supplier has about 40,000 dairy cows and produces
more than 150,000 tons of raw milk a year, KKR said. "We have brought in
not only capital but, more importantly, international best practices and
expertise in the dairy farming industry that will help Modern Dairy develop
world-class facilities," David Liu, KKR's head in China, said in a
statement.
Industrialization
With growing industrialization comes the need for greater
government supervision. China, the world's third-largest milk producer, is pushing
dairy farms to meet higher standards after melamine, an industrial chemical
used to make plastics and tan leather, was found in some infant milk powder and
other dairy products last year.
Some suppliers had added the chemical to diluted milk to
make the protein content appear higher than it was, the Chinese government
said.
Nonetheless, this has not deterred other foreign investors.
Fonterra said in February it wanted to invest in two more dairy farm operations
in China
near its existing pilot farm. Last year China's big dairy market posted
double-digit annual growth and a demand of 27 billion liters of milk.
Fonterra had identified several possible sites for the new
farms near Tangshan,
and would consider partnering on the investment. Each of the new farms was
planned to be of a similar size to Tangshan,
with around 35 hectares of land and around 3,300 milking cows, creating
employment and training opportunities for 350 people.
The company said due diligence was under way and the aim was
to complete the final long-term lease agreement by mid-2010.
Furthermore, investment bank Goldman Sachs bought 10
intensive poultry farms in Hunan and Fujian provinces in 2008
for $300 million in the race to capture assets in the food production market.
Goldman already holds a 13 per cent stake in China Yurun Food Group, the
country's second meat and poultry processor. Its net income has more than
tripled in the past three years.
Xinfadi's future
What does all this mean for Xinfadi? Is China ultimately heading for a
Western-style system in which giant supermarkets deal directly with farmers in
order to improve their control, consistency in produce and cost-effectiveness?
Not any time soon, according to Xing Mengyu, vice-manager of Xinfadi.
He points out large supermarkets such as Walmart, Auchan and
Hualian buy many of their products at the market. Xinfadi tomato dealer Dong
Jianrong from Zhangjiakou in Hebei province estimated one-third of the
produce went to supermarkets, with two-thirds going to small retailers.
According to a 2008 study by Elsevier into the production
and procuring of horticultural crops in northern China, not one farmer sold to a
supermarket or specialized supplier but used small trading groups. The same
survey suggested supermarkets got two-thirds of their vegetables from local
wholesale markets and one-third from other sources.
The paper, to which Scott Rozelle contributed, concluded:
"Although we showed the rise in horticultural crops was paralleled by a
surge in the emergence of supermarkets in urban areas, there has been almost no
penetration of modern wholesalers or retailers into rural communities. Since
China's horticultural economy is almost completely unregulated and since
China's road and communication networks have improved remarkably over the past
10 years, small traders working with a limited amount of capital and using
extremely large amounts of low-cost labor (while utilizing the relatively
efficient road and communication infrastructure) appear to be out-competing all
other types of would-be procurement agents."
The survey found competition between traders was so fierce
and profit margins so thin there was little to attract new, more innovative
entrants. It showed consumers wanted their food produce cheap and the existing
system was the cheapest, adding: "It may be that, at least now and in the
immediate future, China
will still be relying mostly on traditional wholesale channels. If this is
true, food safety in China's
food system may suffer.
While this may be bad news for the quality-conscious
consumer, it is good news for small, poor farmers. It should be recalled,
however, how fast China
is changing in so many areas.
"If any one (or perhaps several) of these
characteristics changed, we might expect to see China's horticultural economy -
from both the supply and procurement side - change. The change, like so many
other things in China,
could be very rapid."
If the Carrefour chain of supermarkets is anything to go by,
that change may have already begun. It introduced its Carrefour Quality Line
(CQL) to China last year,
said Chen Bo, corporate communications manager of Carrefour China. The company says it now
controls every step from farm to store including growing, processing, packaging
and delivering in an effort to ensure taste, safety and traceability to
consumers while also guaranteeing added-value, including higher income for
farmers and environmentally friendly practices. The company also set up direct
partnerships with farmers.
Producers and growers must follow strictly Carrefour's
specifications to ensure that those commitments are respected. It says it cut
out all the middlemen in the supply chain, which allows the stores to pay more
farmers and keep prices competitive.
However, Xinfadi's Xing Mengyu said Carrefour was still
buying produce at the wholesale market.
Return to Top
Moth spit aids potato production – study
(Cornell
University via redorbit.com) – When it comes to potentially doubling the
output of the world's fourth largest food crop, the secret may be in the spit.
Researchers at Cornell
University, as well as the University of Goettingen and National University of
Colombia, have discovered that when a major South American pest infests potato
tubers, the plant produces bigger spuds.
The secret to this increased yield, they write in the
peer-reviewed journal Ecological Applications (April 28, 2010), is found that
the saliva of the Guatemalan potato moth larvae (Tecia solanivora). The major
pest, which forces many farmers to spray plants with pesticides every two
weeks, contains compounds in its foregut that elicits a system-wide response in
the Colombian Andes commercial potato plant (Solanum tuberosum) to produce
larger tubers.
The researchers found that when the spit of the tuber moth
caterpillar gets into a tuber, all the other tubers of the plant grow bigger,
said co-author André Kessler, Cornell assistant professor of ecology and
evolutionary biology. Researchers believe that compounds from the insect's
saliva somehow increases the rate of the plant's photosynthesis to compensate
for the tubers lost to the caterpillar damage. As a result of more
photosynthesis, more carbon is drawn into the plant and used to create starch,
which makes for bigger tubers.
Plants have a number of responses to insects and other
animals that eat them, including changing metabolism or producing toxins, said
Kessler. In turn, the herbivores may develop strategies to counter the plant's
defenses and influence its signaling pathways.
"This could be an example where the co-evolutionary
arms race led to a beneficial outcome for both," said Kessler.
Another key seems to be getting the right mix of potato and
pest.
When the larvae infested fewer than 10 percent of the
tubers, the plant produced marketable yields (after infested tubers were
removed) that weighed 2.5 times more than undamaged plants, according to the
study. When up to 20 percent of the potatoes were damaged, marketable yields
still doubled. When as many as half of the potatoes were infested, yields
equaled those of plants with no infestation.
The findings have implications for potato farmers. Once
isolated, the compound could lead to considerably higher yields in some
varieties.
Initially, researchers wanted to show how these pests
reduced potato yields, but they actually they found yield increases, said Katja
Poveda, the study's principal investigator, at the Agroecology Institute of the
University of Goettingen, Germany, and the Cornell entomology department.
"The moth eats all varieties of potatoes, but so far
only this one variety responded" with increased yields among seven
varieties that were tested as part of a larger project, said Poveda. Future
experiments will test more commercial varieties, as well as wild potatoes, she
added.
The potato study was funded by the German Research
Foundation.
Return to Top
Working in a biotech lab is risky business
(The New York
Times) – They are the highly trained, generally well-paid employees in the
vanguard of American innovation: people who work in biotechnology labs. But the
cutting edge can be a risky place to work.
The casualties include an Agriculture Department scientist
who spent a month in a coma after being infected by the E. coli bacteria her
colleagues were experimenting with.
Another scientist, working in a New Zealand lab while on leave from
an American biotechnology company, lost both legs and an arm after being
infected by meningococcal bacteria, the subject of her vaccine research.
Last September, a University
of Chicago scientist died
after apparently being infected by the focus of his research: the bacterium
that causes plague.
Whether handling deadly pathogens for biowarfare research,
harnessing viruses to do humankind’s bidding or genetically transforming cells
to give them powers not found in nature, the estimated 232,000 employees in the
nation’s most sophisticated biotechnology labs work amid imponderable hazards.
And some critics say the modern biolab often has fewer federal safety
regulations than a typical blue-collar factory.
Even the head of the federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration acknowledges that his agency’s 20th-century rules have not yet
caught up with the 21st-century biotech industry.
“Worker safety cannot be sacrificed on the altar of
innovation,” said David Michaels, OSHA’s new director. “We have inadequate
standards for workers exposed to infectious materials.”
The current OSHA rules governing laboratories, for example,
were not written with genetic manipulation of viruses and bacteria in mind.
“The OSHA laboratory standard deals with chemicals,” Mr. Michaels said. “It
doesn’t deal with infectious agents.”
Earlier this month, as a first step toward possible new
regulations, the agency issued a sweeping request for information on
occupational risks from infectious agents, and for suggestions on how best to
reduce them. The focus is mainly on hospital and other health care workers, but
any rules are expected to also cover industry laboratory workers.
Some safety experts in the biotechnology industry argue that
there is no big safety problem, and that workers are adequately protected by
various voluntary guidelines on safe laboratory practices and by OSHA’s general
rule that employers provide a safe workplace.
“The OSHA requirement applies to all industries, including
the pharmaceutical industry,” said John H. Keene, a biosafety consultant to
industry and former president of the American Biological Safety Association, a
professional society for those involved in biolab safety.
But at least three trends are stoking concern among safety
advocates. In the wake of the 2001 anthrax attacks, the federal government
stepped up research involving biowarfare threats, like anthrax, Ebola and many
other of the world’s deadliest pathogens. Another factor is that the new
techniques of so-called synthetic biology allow scientists to make wholesale
genetic changes in organisms rather than just changing one or two genes,
potentially creating new hazards. Just this month, the genome pioneer J. Craig
Venter announced the creation of a bacterial cell containing totally synthetic
DNA, which Dr. Venter described as the first species “whose parent is a
computer.”
The third trend involves the shifting focus of the
pharmaceuticals industry — potentially the largest source of new biotechnology
jobs. Drug makers, responding to competition from cheap generic medications,
are moving beyond the traditional business of making pills in chemical
factories to focus instead on vaccines and biologic drugs that are made in vats
of living cells.
There are currently few good statistics on biolab accidents.
One study, reviewing incidents discussed in scientific journals from 1979 to
2004, counted 1,448 symptom-causing infections in biolabs, resulting in 36
deaths. About half the infections were in diagnostic laboratories, where
patient blood or tissue samples are analyzed, and half in research
laboratories.
But that may be a “substantial underestimation,” the study’s
authors wrote, because many incidents are never made public. The study was done
by two biosafety experts and published in the book “Biological Safety:
Principles and Practices.”
A survey done by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2006
found that the rate of workplace injury and illness in corporate scientific
research laboratories was well below the average for all industries. The survey
included labs in industries like information technology as well as
biotechnology, and excluded labs handling the most dangerous pathogens.
Allegations about a more recent case came to light only
through a lawsuit. It was filed against the drug giant Pfizer by Becky McClain,
a former molecular biologist at the company’s largest research center, which
employs 3,500 people in Groton,
Conn.
Ms. McClain, now 52, says she has suffered bouts of
temporary paralysis after being infected by a genetically engineered virus at
the Groton lab.
A jury last month awarded Ms. McClain $1.37 million, saying Pfizer had fired
her for raising questions about laboratory safety.
Pfizer said it went to considerable effort to accommodate
Ms. McClain and dismissed her for refusing to return to a safe workplace. The
company also pointed out that OSHA had found that Ms. McClain was not fired for
raising safety concerns. But the jury ruled otherwise, saying Ms. McClain was
indeed fired for raising safety concerns of public interest.
The jury never actually addressed whether a workplace virus
had made Ms. McClain ill, because the judge threw out that claim, in part for
lack of evidence. Mr. Michaels, the OSHA director, declined to comment on the
McClain verdict, but said the issues under dispute in her case underscored the
gaps in regulatory protection for lab workers.
For almost all private businesses, OSHA requires employers
to report workplace deaths and serious accidents. But the information is
usually kept in-house by employers and given to OSHA only if requested during
an annual spot check of 80,000 companies — a small fraction of the
approximately seven million employers bound by OSHA regulations.
Moreover, OSHA does not have jurisdiction over many academic
and government biolabs, where there have been dozens of known cases of worker
illness or at least exposure to harmful agents.
Many laboratories in both the public and private sectors
adhere to practices in a safety manual published jointly by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. Employees
of government biolabs and others that receive federal research grants for
genetic engineering are covered in part by stricter guidelines from the
National Institutes of Health, and some companies voluntarily follow those
guidelines. But other private industry workers are dependent on OSHA.
Mr. Michaels said that rather than trying to establish new
rules for each infectious agent or for any specific hazards, he expected OSHA
to eventually require employers, in consultation with their employees, to
identify all potential hazards in their workplaces and to take steps to reduce
them. OSHA would then have the power to cite employers for failure to adequately
implement this process.
“OSHA has 2,000 inspectors for 130 million-plus workers in
seven million workplaces,” Mr. Michaels said. “We can’t take them on one at a
time.”
Despite the fact that some worker advocates are pointing to
Ms. McClain’s case as representative of broader problems, they are hard pressed
to cite other examples of workers in biotechnology companies being harmed.
But these advocates contend that the reason more cases in
private industry are not coming to light is that current rules do not put
enough pressure on companies to report them. And OSHA’s general safety
requirement is notoriously difficult to enforce.
“We don’t know how many Becky McClains there are,” said Adam
M. Finkel, who worked for OSHA both as a regional administrator and a director
of health standards. “Everybody knows there’s new stuff being made every day
that’s incredibly dangerous, but nobody knows how to get their arms around it.”
Return to Top
End Transmission