|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
June 7, 2011
·
Time running
out to solve E. coli outbreak
·
Spanish growers
reeling from false blame
·
Florida
growers say free trade rules rigged
·
For Delta
growers great flood far from over
·
Calif. ag
land owners split on solar farms
Time running out to solve E. coli outbreak
(AP
via SFGate.com) LONDON – An expert at the
World Health Organization says time is running out for German investigators to
find the source of the world's deadliest E. coli outbreak, which has spread
fear across Europe and cost farmers millions
in exports.
German officials are still seeking the cause of the outbreak
weeks after it began May 2. In the last week, they have wrongly accused Spanish
cucumbers and then German sprouts of sparking the crisis that has killed 22
people and infected over 2,400.
"If we don't know the likely culprit in a week's time,
we may never know the cause," Dr. Guenael Rodier, director of communicable
diseases expert at WHO, told The Associated Press on Tuesday.
He said the contaminated vegetables have likely disappeared
from the market and it would be difficult for German investigators to link
patients to contaminated produce weeks after they first became infected.
"Right now, (Germans) are interviewing people about
foods they ate about a month ago," he said. "It's very hard to know
how accurate that information is."
Without more details about what exact foods link sick
patients, Rodier said it would be very difficult to narrow down the cause.
"The final proof will come from the lab," he said.
"But first you need the epidemiological link to the suspected food."
Other experts issued harsher criticism of the German
investigation and wondered why it was taking so long to identify the source.
"If you gave us 200 cases and 5 days, we should be able
to solve this outbreak," said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center
for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University
of Minnesota, whose team has contained
numerous food-borne outbreaks in the United States.
Osterholm described the German effort as "erratic"
and "a disaster" and said officials should have done more detailed
patient interviews as soon as the epidemic began.
The medical director of Berlin's Charite Hospitals, Ulrich Frei,
said it took the national disease control center weeks to send his hospital
questionnaires for E.coli patients to fill out about their eating habits.
Osterholm said the Germans should have been able to trace
cases of illness to infected produce by now and that tests on current produce
won't be helpful.
"It's like looking at camera footage of a traffic
intersection today to see what caused an accident three weeks ago," he
said.
"This is an outbreak response that is not being led by
the data," he added. "Solving an outbreak like this is difficult, but
it's not an impossible task."
On Tuesday, the EU health chief warned Germany against premature — and
inaccurate — conclusions on the source of contaminated food. The comments by EU
health chief John Dalli came only a day after he had defended the German
investigators, saying they were under extreme pressure.
Dalli told the EU parliament in Strasbourg that information must be
scientifically sound and foolproof before it becomes public.
In outbreaks, it is not unusual for certain foods to be
suspected at first, then ruled out. In 2008 in the U.S., raw tomatoes were initially
implicated in a nationwide salmonella outbreak. Consumers shunned tomatoes,
costing the tomato industry millions. Weeks later, jalapeno peppers grown in Mexico
were determined to be the cause.
In the current E. coli outbreak, tests are continuing on
sprouts from an organic farm in northern Germany, but have so far come back
negative,
But Rodier said that doesn't necessarily exonerate the
vegetables.
"Just because tests are negative doesn't mean you can
rule them out," he said. "The bacteria could have been in just one
batch of contaminated food and by the time you collect specimens from the
samples that are left, it could be gone."
He said food-borne outbreaks are difficult to contain
because they involve multiple industries, government departments and in Germany's
case, several layers of bureaucracy to report numbers. That results in a slight
reporting delay, which makes it harder for experts to know whether an outbreak
is peaking or not.
The outbreak has killed 22 people — 21 in Germany and one in Sweden.
Germany's
national disease control center, the Robert Koch Institute, on Tuesday raised
the number of infections in Germany
to 2,325, with another 100 cases in 10 other European countries and the United States.
The number of victims hospitalized in intensive care with a rare, serious
complication that may lead to kidney failure rose by 12 to 642.
The institute said the number of new cases is declining — a
sign the epidemic might have reached its peak — but added it was not certain
whether that decrease will continue.
In a major difference from other E. coli outbreaks, women —
who tend to eat more fresh produce — are by far the most affected this time.
The majority of the victims in Germany
are between 20 and 50 years old and tend to be highly educated, very fit, and
lead healthy lifestyles, investigators said.
"What do they have in common? They are thin, clean
pictures of health," said Friedrich Hagenmueller of the Asklepios Hospital
in Hamburg, Germany.
Return to Top
Spanish growers reeling from false
blame
(AFP
via Yahoo! Finance) – Ten days into an E. coli outbreak wrongly blamed on
Spanish cucumbers, Spanish fruit and vegetable exports are still suffering with
no indication when they might recover, producers said Monday.
A total of 22 people have died, all but one of them in Germany, and some 2,000 people have become ill
across Europe (Chicago Options: ^REURTRUSD -
news) from the enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) outbreak which has affected 12
countries.
Authorities in Germany initially, but falsely,
blamed imported Spanish cucumbers.
Growers have seen their produce shunned, with Russia and Qatar among states that have since
applied temporary bans on fresh-produce imports from European states.
"Spanish fruit and vegetable exports were still not
back to normal on Monday," the country's main agricultural export
association, FEPEX, said, estimating losses to the sector at around 200 million
euros ($290 million) per week.
"Russia's
decision has negative repercussions, there are Spanish trucks blocked at the
border," a spokeswoman for the association said. "Exports to Germany
are practically paralysed.
"In addition to vegetables, fruits have begun to also
be badly affected, not only because exports were frozen all of last week, but
because this situation has led a fall in prices of 35 percent since May 27,
according to estimates by producers" in the southern region of Andalucia,
she said.
"The demand for fruits and vegetables has not recovered
and that is due in large part to the lack of a clear and strong correction by
German and (EU) authorities," the spokeswoman said.
Agriculture Minister Rosa Aguilar said Spain would ask for "100 percent"
compensation for the loss at an emergency EU summit on the crisis to be held in
Luxembourg
on Tuesday.
"We have told Germany that it must reimburse us
for the loss. If it covers 100 percent, which is what we are demanding, the
affair will be closed. Otherwise we reserve the right (to take) legal
action."
Spanish government anger at Germany jumping to conclusions
comes on top of mounting calls from German, Dutch, French, Belgian and
Portuguese growers' organisations for compensation or emergency aid to the
farming sector.
Return to Top
Florida
growers say free trade rules rigged
(naplesnews.com)
– Southwest Florida farmers have more rules
and regulations than their overseas competition.
A tomato and bell pepper grower, Cecil Howell cannot compete
with cheaper foreign labor and sales of produce.
Howell, co-owner of H&R Farms, about 20 miles east of
Immokalee, said free trade from Mexico
is killing his business.
“International trade has not been kind to Florida,”
Gene McAvoy, a multi-county vegetable agent with the University of Florida/IFAS,
said. “We have negotiated a number of free trade agreements, but free trade
doesn’t mean fair trade.”
Growers in other countries don’t have to adhere to the labor
rules and regulations like U.S.
farmers do, including child labor and environmental protection.
“It makes it very difficult to compete,” McAvoy said.
Howell, who has been farming since 1980, said all farms in
Immokalee spend thousands of dollars to abide by the rules and regulations,
while not compensating for what farmers are spending to grow produce. In the
fall, tomatoes were sold for 25 cents a pound.
“It’s frustrating,” Howell said. “We are just not getting
paid enough for what we are farming.”
Mexico is
the largest competition for vegetable growers in the United
States, while Brazil is the largest competition
for the citrus industry.
“Somehow, we have to come up with a way of making trade fair
and I’m not sure how that is done,” McAvoy said.
He added that other countries should have the same
requirements as farms in United
States, including rules for labor,
environmental protection and chemical usage, such as pesticides.
About 70,000 acres of vegetables are planted a year in Southwest Florida, including about 20,000 acres of
tomatoes, McAvoy said.
Some growers, such as Pacific Tomato Growers, have farms in Mexico
too. Pacific Tomato Growers is headquartered in Palmetto, south of Tampa.
Currently, there is no inspection of pesticides on raw
agricultural produce from Mexico,
McAvoy said. Most of the produce that comes from Mexico
is exported from Culiacan,
in the Mexican state of Sinaloa.
Unlike the U.S.,
where farmworkers are paid minimum wage per hour, workers could be paid $20 per
day in Mexico,
McAvoy said.
Everglades Farms Inc. manager Frank Ochoa echoed Howell’s
concerns.
“The influx of produce from other countries is what is
really killing the small farmer,” Ochoa said.
The farm off County Road 858 grows and packs a variety of
produce including tomatoes and bell peppers.
As the growing season ends, McAvoy reflected on the season.
He said local farmers had a good season because Mexico had a freeze in February.
McAvoy said the freeze isn’t a long-term solution to the
problem. He is interested in protecting local growers.
“It’s a big problem, if we continue down this road, we will
push food produce out of the United
States,” McAvoy said.
Return to Top
For Delta growers great flood far from
over
(The
Commercial Appeal) – This was supposed to be a big year.
Crop prices were up. The weather had cooperated, mostly, in
the fall and the spring. Mid-South farmers had their fields ready and were
looking to cash in.
In fact, a lot of farmers were depending on 2011's crop to
make up for the low prices and bad weather of the past two years.
Then the water came.
It crept out of the Yazoo
River onto Matt Edgar's farm near Yazoo City, Miss.,
on Mother's Day weekend. All he could do was watch and "hope for the
best." By then, he had planted all of his fields.
Up north in Memphis, the Mississippi River was three miles wide and crowds had
gathered in Downtown to get a look at the mammoth, history-making deluge.
"It was going to be an above-average year at
worst," Edgar said. "To put it into perspective, our wheat crop was
going to be the highest-priced crop we'd ever sold and was the highest-yielding
crop we'd ever raised."
Edgar was only able to harvest 150 acres of that
high-priced, high-yielding wheat. The remaining 650 acres of it are still
underwater. So are hundreds of acres of his soybeans and corn. In all, 75
percent of the crop acres he planted this year were ruined by floodwaters.
He's not alone. Rob Coker also farms around Yazoo City,
and around 4,500 acres -- or 65 percent of his total cropland -- went
underwater at some point.
"We really did think we were going to have a very good
year, and now we're just going to scrape and try to hope we can break
even," Coker said. "It's been a difficult ride; you never know what's
going to come with floodwaters. It's happened before, but nothing like
this."
In all, floodwaters ruined about 600,000 acres of Mississippi cropland,
according to the American Farm Bureau Federation. Waters ruined 650,000 acres
in Tennessee.
Overall, the flood washed out about 3.6 million crop acres this year along the Lower Mississippi River.
The flood hit Arkansas
farmers the hardest, with 1 million acres destroyed there, according to the
Arkansas Farm Bureau. That destruction could have a $500 million effect on Arkansas' economy this
year. Agriculture is the state's largest industry segment and accounts for
about $16 billion of its economy overall.
An ironic twist -- and there are a few with this flood --
saved Payneway, Ark., rice farmer Dan Hosman from posting an even bigger loss
this year.
Light but weekly rains in April kept him from planting the
thousands of acres he farms with his brother, Don, and father, Buddy. So, rain
saved them from planting seed and spending hours of work on land that would
have been washed away. Some of that land is in the St. Francis Floodway, which
syphons water away from nearby Trumann and Marked Tree but doesn't flood every year.
"I've heard about the (flood of 1973) all my life. That
was always the bad one around here," Hosman said. "This one beats '73
by a foot or two."
Remnants of white sandbags remain in the yards of just about
every house close to Hosman's grain storage facility at the intersection of
highways 63 and 14. Muddy banks, dingy water lines on cars and sheds, and dark,
empty fields are the ghosts of the highest water that has come and gone.
Even though the gawkers and cameras have left the banks of
the Mississippi
and television news crews have packed their waders, a lot of farmland in the
Delta remains underwater.
On Thursday, Hosman rumbled his SUV on a graveled levee road
to one of his best fields, a flat, 1,500-acre expanse just off of Highway 63.
All of it was underwater Thursday, the surface occasionally disturbed by fish
feeding below.
The water -- about a foot-and-a-half of it -- moved slowly
along, creating a babbling, hissing white noise as it streamed across an access
road on its way, by and by, to the Mississippi River.
"I'll have roads I'll have to rebuild where they've
washed out," Hosman said looking over the flooded field. "All of
these farms are precision leveled (with GPS systems) so we'll have to go back
in there and fine-tune them, so that's more money, too. We'll have washouts,
some holes, sand blows and we'll have to deal with all that, too."
It'll be another two or three weeks before Hosman and his
family will know where they stand. Yazoo
City farmers Edgar and
Coker said they'll plant whenever the ground gets dry. But all of them said
they'll plant soybeans. The planting season for wheat and corn is too far
along, they said. And all of them said they will have to make some kind of a
crop.
"We really don't have a choice," Edgar said.
"If we don't, we'll have no income for the rest of the year so we have to
find another crop."
But that is posing its own challenge. While Edgar and Coker
and farmers throughout the Delta wait for some fields to dry, in yet another
ironic twist, they're battling a monthlong drought.
Meanwhile, crop insurance adjusters are fanning out to farms
all over the Delta. Farmers will get some of their investment back, but likely
not enough to carry them over to the next year.
The government has also stepped in with help to just about
anyone affected by the floodwaters, tornadoes and other natural disasters that
struck this year. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has so far approved
more than $5 million in assistance for Tennessee,
more than $6.2 million for Mississippi and
more than $9.6 million to Arkansas.
The USDA's Farm Service Agency is now providing emergency
loans to farmers in counties that have been federally declared disaster areas.
The low-interest loans are set to help them recover from production and
physical losses of the flood to restore or replace farm-essential property, pay
for production costs this year, pay essential family living expenses,
reorganize farm operations and refinance certain debts.
Edgar knows what many think of all this.
"Everybody thinks the farmers have got it made and that
insurance is going to take care of them and then the government gives us all
these handouts, but all of that is definitely not true," he said.
This year's flood has been "disastrous" and that
the insurance companies and government would respond the same way to emergency
situations with other industries.
Back at Hosman's flooded rice field, he chose reality over
philosophy when asked what he thinks about the flood of 2011 in general.
"I think it's June 1st and it's getting late (to
plant)," he said with a laugh but without hesitation. "Farming has
been a great livelihood and we love it, but, gosh, these last three years have
been, well, trying."
Return to Top
Calif. ag land owners split on solar farms
(fresnobee.com)
– California's
push for clean energy is starting to take shape on Valley farmland, and some in
the local agricultural community are pushing back for fear of a land grab.
With nearly two dozen solar energy projects in the pipeline
across California’s Fresno County,
farming interests recently succeeded in forcing new checks on the burgeoning
industry.
The checks are modest, but growers and county policymakers
expect the rules to tighten as more proposals emerge and more farmland gives
way to power generation.
"If we take ag land and fill it with solar panels,
you're never going to replace that land," said Manuel Cunha, president of
the Nisei Farmers League, a Fresno
advocacy group for agriculture. "I'm not against alternative energy, but
when that alternative energy starts to take away from the farming industry,
then I have questions."
Solar developers and some in what is proving to be a divided
agricultural community believe the two enterprises can co-exist.
Patrick Enrico, whose family has farmed near Firebaugh for
more than 50 years, is among many who believe committing less-productive
agricultural land, particularly on the county's drier west side, to the
production of electricity makes good sense.
"It's actually a better use of the land than having to
put water on it and creating drainage problems," Enrico said. He plans to
lease 158 acres that once grew tomatoes and cotton to a solar developer.
"It's almost like the perfect situation."
Many farmers have remained open to seeing more marginal
lands used for generating power. Support, though, has slipped as the number of
solar proposals has grown and developers have set their sights on more fertile
areas.
Most of the installations are slated for "prime"
farmland, considered of highest value to growers, and almost all require
cancellation of Williamson Act contracts. Those are deals that leverage state
money to keep agricultural land from being developed.
Farming advocates say that while some prime farmland, like
Enrico's, may be better suited to solar panels today when water shortages are
common and farmed food is plentiful, times will change and retired farmland may
be needed again.
"Prime ag land is not something we want to see go
away," Fresno County Agricultural Commissioner Carol Hafner said. "We
want to maintain the agricultural production that's going to provide the food
and fiber for this region."
Most of the leases to solar companies are planned for 20 to
30 years with optional extensions.
To date, only a handful of the projects have won approval in
Fresno County. But 20 commercial proposals
totaling more than 7,000 acres of agriculturally zoned land await county
review, and more are expected.
Given that the same fundamentals that farmers want -- space
and sun -- are what solar developers want, the stage is set for conflict.
"This is sort of a new area," said John White,
executive director of the Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Technologies, a Sacramento-based partnership of environmental and energy
groups.
"The industry is not as prepared for the issues as we
should be. ... You're going to have land-use conflicts in areas where
communities aren't sure this [technology] is appropriate."
The disputes, said White, could slow the development of
renewable power, but he believes the problems will work themselves out with
time.
Fresno
County sets rules
The surge in solar energy proposals in Fresno
County and across the San Joaquin Valley, say industry observers, comes as
federal money pours in for renewable projects and state law requires utilities
to get more power from green sources.
While California's
high desert has long been a choice spot for solar, competition for desert real
estate and conflicts over fragile wildlife -- like the protected desert
tortoise -- have shifted interest toward the Valley, observers say.
Last year, that interest prompted Fresno County
planners, overwhelmed with applications for solar, to halt new approvals. They
wanted first to figure out a sensible way to proceed.
The Board of Supervisors last month ended the impasse.
Responding to concerns from the farming community, supervisors initiated an
extensive application process for developers who want to use farmland for power
generation -- and need to get out of Williamson Act contracts to move forward.
Under the board's new provisions, solar developers must
provide the agricultural history of the land they are pursuing and explain why
they didn't select a non-agricultural site. The solar companies also must
present a plan for removing their panels should power generation cease.
The board reserves final say on whether the projects
proceed.
Several solar companies declined to comment on the new
rules, but industry groups said the requirements don't appear burdensome.
Supervisor Phil Larson, who represents western Fresno County,
expects the requirements to increase as county policymakers get more experience
with the industry.
"There are a lot of issues that aren't in these
[provisions] that need to be dealt with," Larson said. "There needs
to be more control."
Supervisor Susan Anderson has talked about limiting solar
projects to certain parts of the county. Some in the farming community have
suggested quotas.
In addition to losing farmland, growers worry that new solar
installations won't make good neighbors. They say the operations may take issue
with agricultural dust and pesticide drift. And they fear that the new equipment
could harbor bugs and weeds.
There are economic concerns, too.
The farmland converted to energy production may initially
produce more property taxes for local governments as the tax breaks from
Williamson Act contracts are lifted. However, unlike construction of a
building, which would add to a property's taxable value, solar panels are
exempt from property taxes.
Lorelei Oviatt, director of planning in Kern County,
where several solar projects are up and running, said counties may be asked to
subsidize renewable energy. "That may be a legitimate request from the
state, but we have to make sure we're locating the projects in the smartest
places."
The solar industry also presents different job opportunities
than agriculture, Oviatt noted. Often, she said, solar plants don't stimulate
employment like farming does. When agricultural products are shipped, packaged
and sold, each step creates jobs.
"We're still looking for the right balance of solar
here in Kern County,"
she said, "and I'm sure Fresno
County will struggle with
this, too."
Can they live together?
Advocates for solar power say Fresno County
has plenty of room to support both energy projects and farming -- and both make
sense here.
"When you turn your pump on or your cold-storage compressors
on, you want electricity to be there," said Greg Kirkpatrick, who is
spearheading two solar proposals south of Dos Palos in Fresno County.
"Agriculture is an enormous user of electricity in the San Joaquin Valley,
and we need to make sure it's available."
Responding to public support for clean energy, Gov. Jerry
Brown in April signed legislation requiring one-third of California's power to come from renewable
sources, such as solar, by 2020. Already, the major utilities face a 2013
deadline for delivering 20% of their power from green sources.
PG&E officials say solar energy now constitutes only a
small portion -- less than one-tenth of one percent -- of its California energy
portfolio, although that fraction is growing.
"There are a lot of these contracts out there but
they're just not all producing yet," said PG&E spokesman Denny Boyles.
Boyles said tapping unused farmland to generate solar power
in the San Joaquin
Valley remains vital to
the company's long-term energy plans.
The first of the backlogged solar proposals in Fresno County,
which would generate 50 megawatts of electricity for PG&E, is scheduled to
go before the Board of Supervisors this summer. (One megawatt typically meets
the needs of 500 to 1,000 homes.) The project is on a 318-acre site six miles
south of the city of San Joaquin.
Last month, an advisory panel to the Board of Supervisors
recommended that the Williamson Act contract on part of the proposed site be
canceled and the project be allowed to proceed.
The applicant, European-based Gestamp Solar, which has more
than a half-dozen local projects in the hopper, declined to comment.
Industry insiders, though, say solar companies will go out
of their way to respect agriculture.
"Give these guys a chance to show that they can be good
neighbors," said Mignon Marks, acting executive director of the California
Solar Energy Industries Association.
Return to Top
End Transmission