http://www.aglinenews.com

" I heard it
through the
AgLine"

 

June 9, 2011

 

 

·        Beleaguered Spanish farmers hand out veggies

·        Rising labor costs will alter produce industry

·        NASCAR gives ethanol a power boost

·        Study reveals four new honeybee maladies

·        Organic farming finds a growing base in India

 

 

Beleaguered Spanish farmers hand out veggies

 

(Associated Press) MADRID – They handed out tiny cherry tomatoes and heavy watermelons, sweet apricots and crisp peppers, purple eggplants and white potatoes — the entire rainbow of Spain's farm bounty.

 

Spanish farmers whose revenue has been devastated by the deadly E. coli outbreak gave away an estimated 40 tons of produce Wednesday to draw attention to their plight.

 

Hundreds of people lined up under a hot sun to edge past tables brimming with produce from all over Spain. They walked away with plastic bags or cardboard crates bulging with ripe peppers, tomatoes, apricots, eggplant, lettuce, potatoes and just about everything else that Spain grows this time of year.

 

Farm leaders at a press conference joined the Spanish government in rejecting as insufficient an EU aid offer of euro150 million ($220 million) for farmers across Europe.

 

They called on the European Union to help Germany — which initially blamed Spanish cucumbers for the outbreak, then German sprouts, only to backtrack both times — and take on a much bigger role in investigating the still-unknown source of the bacteria that has killed 26 people and sickened over 2,700.

 

They also urged a massive public relations campaign to restore European consumer confidence in fresh produce — something that will be hard to do when Germany still has not found the source of the deadly outbreak.

 

"The EU must be responsible. It should not try to buy us off with euro150 million," said Miguel Lopez, secretary general of the COAG farm association, which has calculated Spanish farmers' losses alone at euro350 million ($511 million) so far.

 

"It is disgraceful. It is humiliating. It is pathetic," Lopez said of the EU aid offer.

 

Francisco Gil, a 52-year-old farm leader from the southeast Murcia region, said money for lost sales will not solve the problem, officials must find the source of the bacteria to restore consumer confidence.

 

The EU, he said, "has not addressed the real issue. It is not about money. It is about fixing the problem."

 

Return to Top

 

 

Rising labor costs will alter produce industry

 

(UC Davis) – Immigration reform and stricter enforcement of current immigration laws could significantly boost labor costs for California’s $20 billion fresh fruit, nut and vegetable crops, according to agricultural economists at UC Davis and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

 

This, in turn, would likely prompt the industry to adjust by increasing mechanization and introducing harvesting aids to boost laborers’ productivity, they predict. Imports may also rise.

 

California’s produce industry depends on a constant influx of new, foreign-born laborers, and more than half of those are unauthorized laborers, primarily from Mexico,” says Phillip Martin, a professor of agricultural and resource economics and one of the nation’s leading authorities on agricultural labor.

 

“The cost of hiring these laborers will likely rise as the U.S. government ramps up enforcement of immigration laws by installing more physical barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border and requiring more audits of workers’ I-9 employment verification forms,” Martin says.

 

He notes that such audits often cause workers to quit their jobs rather than clear up discrepancies in their documents. As a result, some farm employers already are making plans to hire higher-paid, legal guest workers, who must be provided with government-approved housing.

 

He projects that immigration reform could result in legalization of currently unauthorized farmworkers, again encouraging farm employers to turn to the higher paid guest workers to tend and harvest their crops.

 

If labor costs do rise, Martin suggests that three major adjustments could occur: mechanization to reduce the need for hand labor, an increase in produce imports if rising costs make U.S. produce less competitive, and introduction of more harvesting aids to increase the efficiency of laborers.

 

For example, there could be wider use of mechanized harvesting for raisin-grapes, a shift to more imports in the asparagus industry, and the use of harvesting aids — such as in-field conveyor belts — to speed strawberry harvest.

 

Martin’s study, conducted with Linda Calvin of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, was supported by USDA and the University of California Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. The report, titled “Labor Trajectories in California’s Produce Industry,” appears in the current issue of the ARE Update at: http://agecon.ucdavis.edu/extension/update/.

 

Return to Top

 

 

NASCAR gives ethanol a power boost

 

(pjstar.com) HENNEPIN — How do you convince American consumers that ethanol-based fuel is clean, efficient, renewable and also powerful?

 

"What better way than to run it in race cars," Mark Marquis told an enthusiastic crowd in a large tent Thursday on the grounds of the ethanol plant that he developed and now runs.

 

About 500 people were there to eat steak and pasta in an "Appreciation Day" luncheon for Marquis Energy LLC employees and guests including farmers, businesses that work with the company, and public officials.

 

And for dessert, they got a close-up look at the race car strategy by meeting NASCAR driver and now ethanol spokesman Kenny Wallace, and also checking out the Toyota Camry that he drives partly under the sponsorship of Marquis and the Illinois Corn Growers' Association.

 

The racing connection stems from a conclusion by American Ethanol - a large coalition of domestic ethanol producers and other related or supporting industries - that it was time to change the public perception of ethanol and get away from "food versus fuel" debates, Mark Marquis said in an interview.

 

"Ethanol needed a boost in its image," the company president said. "We wanted to prove that if it's good for race cars, then we can prove to the public that it's good for passenger cars."

 

Under a six-year contract, NASCAR competitors now run exclusively on E85 fuel. And Marquis, who is on a board that initiated the effort, decided to directly involve his company after meeting Wallace.

 

"I made a trip up here this winter, and I convinced Mark they needed a spokesperson," Wallace said while signing autographs. "Mark's a supporter of me, and that means even more than the money."

 

Wallace, who ranks seventh in point standings in the Nationwide Series, will drive under Marquis and Illinois corn growers sponsorship in races Saturday night and on Sept. 17 at Joliet's Chicagoland Speedway. His number 09 Camry was recently emblazoned with logos for Marquis Energy and Family Farmers.

 

"This is the real race car," Wallace told the crowd. "Everything you're seeing here today is the real deal. Nothing is fake."

 

The Family Farmers logo results from a group effort by corn growers and other producers' groups to foster the image associated with that phrase, said Dave Loos, director of research and development for the Illinois Corn Marketing Board.

 

"It's kind of a two-edged sword. We're pushing hard on E85 and also promoting the image of family farmers," Loos said. "We'll set up an educational exhibit and will have a combine (at the races). We're wanting to talk agriculture to race fans."

 

One of the people posing for photos with the car was state Sen. Darin LaHood, R-Peoria. While admitting he's not a race fan, he said he was very impressed with the car's technology, and also the ethanol plant.

 

"I'm very proud to support Mark and his operation here," LaHood said.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Study reveals four new honeybee maladies

 

(EurekaAlert.org) – A 10-month study of healthy honey bees by University of California, San Francisco scientists has identified four new viruses that infect bees, while revealing that each of the viruses or bacteria previously linked to colony collapse is present in healthy hives as well.

 

The study followed 20 colonies in a commercial beekeeping operation of more than 70,000 hives as they were transported across the country pollinating crops, to answer one basic question: what viruses and bacteria exist in a normal colony throughout the year?

 

The results depict a distinct pattern of infections through the seasons and provide a normal baseline for researchers studying a colony – the bee population within a hive – that has collapsed. Findings are reported in the June 7 issue of the Public Library of Science ONE (PLoS ONE) at www.PLoSone.org.

 

The study tracked 27 unique viruses that afflict honey bees, including four that previously were unknown and others proposed as causes of the Colony Collapse Disorder that has been wiping out colonies for the past five years, according to senior author Joe DeRisi, PhD, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and professor of biochemistry and biophysics at UCSF.

 

"We brought a quantitative view of what real migrating populations look like in terms of disease," DeRisi said. "You can't begin to understand colony die-off without understanding what normal is."

 

Because the colonies in this study remained healthy despite these pathogens, the research supports the theory that colony collapse may be caused by factors working alone or in combination, said Michelle Flenniken, PhD, who jointly led the research.

 

"Clearly, there is more than just exposure involved," said Flenniken, a postdoctoral scholar in the laboratory of UCSF microbiologist Raul Andino, PhD. "We noticed that specific viruses dominated in some seasons, but also found that not all of the colonies tested positively for a virus at the same time, even after long-distance transport in close proximity."

 

Honey bees are critical to U.S. agriculture, which depends upon them to pollinate 130 different crops, representing more than $15 billion in crop value each year and roughly one-third of the human diet, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

 

For the California almond crop to be successfully pollinated, DeRisi said, roughly half of the honeybees in the country – about 1.3 million honeybee colonies – must be in the Central Valley by the first week in February, when the trees begin to bloom. That need is echoed throughout the country, as different crops come due for pollination, resulting in semis traversing the nation for most of the year, each bearing hundreds of hives.

 

Since 2006, however, the bee industry has reported a mysterious phenomenon involving the sudden disappearance of most of a hive's worker bees, which leaves the queen and young bees without enough workers to support them. The disorder is one factor in the growing decline of U.S. honey bees – an estimated 30 percent of the population is lost each year and some beekeeping operations cite 90 percent losses, the USDA reports.

 

Researchers nationwide have identified various possible causes of that collapse, mainly based on pathogens found in the affected hives. While this study did not identify the cause of colony collapse, it did offer a measurement of the normal levels of pathogens.

 

In addition to viruses, the research revealed six species each of bacteria and fungi, four types of mites and a parasitic fly called a phorid, which had not been seen in honey bees outside California. One of the new viruses, a strain of the Lake Sinai virus, turned out to be the primary element of the honey bee biome, or community of bacteria and viruses.

 

"Here's a virus that's the single most abundant component of the bee biome and no one knew it was there," DeRisi said, noting that hundreds of millions of these viral cells were found in each bee in otherwise healthy colonies at certain times of the year.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Organic farming finds a growing base in India

 

(The New York Times) DEHRA DUN, INDIA — On Thakur Das’s farm in northern India, rice fields stretch into the distance, creating a chartreuse sea of waist-high stalks. Mr. Das, 59, gazed out at the crops on his small farm, about 16 kilometers from the city of Dehra Dun, where he grows rice, wheat and corn in rotation, as well as turmeric and beans. It looked to be another plentiful harvest. “Too much growth,” he joked.

 

The bounty was all the more fruitful because Mr. Das’s farm, 10 miles from the city, is organic. He has not used chemical pesticides or fertilizers since 2002, when he joined Navdanya, a nonprofit biodiversity center and organic farm, a few kilometers away, to learn how to farm organically. Since he went organic, Mr. Das said, his crop yields, and his profit, have doubled.

 

Before Mr. Das switched to organic, one acre, or about 0.4 hectare, of land yielded 600 kilograms, or 1,300 pounds, of rice; now it yields 1,200 kilograms. He practices crop rotation and intercropping, or growing different crops together in the same field, and uses natural pesticides and fertilizer, like compost produced by worms.

 

“Organic is best benefit. Taste is different. Size of grain is bigger,” said Mr. Das. “Most farmers use chemicals. Soil is totally dead.”

 

In India, certified organic farming accounts for only about 1 percent of overall agriculture production, according to the Indian Agricultural Products Export Development Agency. Organic farming is still small worldwide, as well; it accounts for less than 2 percent of global retail production, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization.

 

But as food prices rise around the world, agriculture has moved to the top of the global agenda after decades of neglect from policy makers and investors. India’s Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s used high-yield seeds, chemical fertilizers and irrigation to significantly increase agricultural production.

 

Yet over the years, chemical “inputs” — namely, fertilizer and pesticides — have depleted soil, and inefficient irrigation has caused water tables to plunge in many parts of India. For many farmers, crop yields have fallen even as India’s food demand has increased. Now farmers and experts are looking for improved farming methods. In some cases, this means a back-to-basics approach.

 

A paper submitted to the U.N. General Assembly last December highlighted the benefits of “agroecology” — otherwise known as organic farming. “Agroecology delivers advantages that are complementary to better known conventional approaches such as breeding high-yielding varieties. And it strongly contributes to the broader economic development,” the U.N.’s Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food wrote.

 

In India, agriculture has always been an important topic, even if methods remain largely outdated and manual. More than half of the country’s population of 1.2 billion relies on agriculture for a living.

 

Hunger and food security are also pressing, perennial issues for hundreds of millions of poor Indians. Malnutrition rates of children under age 5 is higher in India than in sub-Saharan Africa. Suicides of struggling, indebted farmers claim newspaper headlines each year. In India, rising food prices are particularly politically sensitive; the affordability of onions, a staple food here, is an unofficial but critical barometer of public sentiment in election years.

 

The vast majority of farms in India are small — three acres — and farmers can be burdened by the cost of fertilizer and pesticides, even though the government heavily subsidizes them. For some small farmers like Mr. Das, organic farming makes sense if farmers are given training, support and linked to markets with affluent customers.

 

Navdanya, which is leading the charge for organic farming and biodiversity in India, has trained 500,000 farmers in sustainable agriculture in 16 states across India since it was founded in 1987. It also set up the largest direct-marketing, fair-trade organic network in the country and has established seed banks to preserve indigenous seeds. Navdanya sells its products in stores in Delhi, Dehra Dun and Mumbai.

 

The organization says that “ecological agriculture is highly productive and the only lasting solution to hunger and poverty.”

 

A new report from Navdanya, called “Health Per Acre,” was released in New Delhi in March by Syeda Hameed, a member of the Indian Planning Commission, whose chairman is Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

 

According to the report, “a shift to biodiverse organic farming and ecological intensification increases output of nutrition while reducing input costs.” Agricultural output should be measured in terms of “‘Health per Acre’ and ‘Nutrition per Acre’ instead of ‘Yield per Acre,”’ the report says. The paper said that “this should be the strategy for protecting the livelihoods of farmers as well the right to food and right to health of all our people.”

 

Vandana Shiva, the Indian environmentalist and advocate who founded Navdanya, claims that organic farming produces more food and nutrition than conventional methods. Through intercropping, one organic farm could produce 900 kilograms of food per acre, including 400 kilograms of corn and 500 kilograms of beans and other crops, according to Navdanya’s studies of the farms of its members. A comparable conventional farm growing one crop would yield 500 kilograms of corn but would lose the other products.

 

Organic farming produces “twice the amount of nutritional needs by intensifying biodiversity rather than monoculture and chemicals,” Ms. Shiva said.

 

The report from the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food pointed out that the Green Revolution had focused primarily on increasing cereal crops that contain relatively little protein and other essential nutrients. “Nutritionists now increasingly insist on the need for more diverse agro-ecosystems in order to ensure a more diversified nutrient output,” it said.

 

But some agriculture experts say that while organic farming has benefits, it cannot make a significant dent in total agricultural demand. Organic farming is an important niche market with big potential near major cities. But it is “not a general solution to malnutrition at all,” said Mark W. Rosegrant of the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington. “You have to put inputs in to get yields. To move fully to organic, you are going to lose productivity.”

 

A chapter in the 2006 book “Global Development of Organic Agriculture,” co-written by Mr. Rosegrant, said that compared with “high-yielding crops cultivated with the use of fertilizer and pesticides, most organic crops yield less per hectare due to a combination of lower nutrient supply and yield reductions from weeds, fungi, and insects.” The paper cited a study from 28 countries that found “that on average organic yields are 80 percent of those under conventional agriculture.”

 

There are other barriers to the growth of organic farming in India. Organic certification from international agencies is expensive and bureaucratic. A shift to organic farming requires extensive training and support for farmers who are largely uneducated. Farmers must be connected to markets and shops that sell their goods, usually in cities with wealthy consumers — no small feat in India where roads and infrastructure are poor.

 

Organic food is at least 30 percent more expensive than foods produced by conventional methods. In India, there is no financial support from the government for organic farming, while the majority of fertilizer and pesticide companies are subsidized.

 

But if organic farming reached a greater scale, prices would fall, said Vinod Bhatt, a director of Navdanya. As he led a tour of Navdanya’s tranquil 45-acre farm near Dehra Dun, Mr. Bhatt walked past lush rice fields and explained how ginger and turmeric were grown between rows of corn to retain soil fertility and maximize yield per acre.

 

A botanist by training, Mr. Bhatt said rice should not be grown in successive seasons but should be alternated with peas, wheat, corn and mustard over two years to keep the soil fertile. Marigolds planted on the edge of the field help keep pests away, as do lantana plants and neem trees, and mixtures made of cow urine and worm secretions, he said.

 

Mr. Bhatt joined Navdanya in 1997, and he recalled that interest in organic farming was limited back then. Now, “farmers are coming to us because they can see the results,” he said. He pointed out some okra growing on tall stalks.

 

Mr. Bhatt bent a stem so a visitor could peer at the large green “lady fingers,” as okra is called in India. “I don’t know why people don’t believe organic is more productive,” he said.

 

Return to Top

 

End Transmission