|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
June 21, 2011
·
Syngenta
expects to double key crop sales
·
Calif. growers
united against new water regs
·
Wild pollinators
take over for honeybees
·
India’s food
chain seeing big changes
·
Peruvian
spuds have high-tech home
Syngenta expects to double key crop
sales
ZURICH
-- (Dow
Jones) – Swiss agrochemicals giant Syngenta AG (SYNN.VX) Tuesday said
soaring demand for seeds and pesticides should help it more than double revenue
generated from its main seed and crop protection products in the next few
years.
Informing investors at the company's capital markets day at
its Jealott's Hill Research Centre in the U.K.,
Syngenta said new products and a recently launched revamp should also allow the
Swiss conglomerate to outgrow the agrochemicals sector, which is expected to
grow fast amid fears of a global food crisis.
"Our confidence in the future growth potential of our
business is underpinned by an innovation pipeline which will increase sales of
key crops to over $17 billion [after] 2015 from $8.4 billion today", said
chief executive Mike Mack. "This, combined with our integrated business
model, will enable us to grow faster than the global market and deliver
superior returns to our shareholders."
Syngenta, based in Basel,
is one of the world's largest makers of cereal and vegetable seeds, fungicides,
herbicides and insecticides. It has a market share that's about 15% more than
that of rivals like U.S.-based Monsanto (MON), Dupont
Co (DD) and Germany's
Bayer AG (BAYN.XE). The Swiss company, which has some 26,000 staff and
generated around 50% of its 2010 annual sales of $11.6 billion in emerging
markets, has benefited from the ongoing food price rally that is considered to
spur demand in the agrochemical sector.
According to recent research published by consultancy marketsandmarkets, the sector is set to grow sales at
double- digit rates over the next five years. This is because food prices have
soared during 2010 and 2011 and have remained at elevated levels ever since,
according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. The
body's FAO Food Price Index, which includes cereals, oils and meat, stood at
232 points in May, slightly below its record level of 238 points, which it hit
in February.
Syngenta in February launched an
restructuring that will integrate the commercial operations of its seeds and
crop protection divisions, helping the Swiss company, which was created out of
Novartis AG (NVS) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) in 2000, keep costs in check and
also spur sales.
Innovative products such as the recent launch of a seed
protection product designed to help shield the root system of cereals and
soybean--and which could fetch global peak sales of some $200 million--should
also help the company outgrow the market and expand its market share to 17%
over the next few years.
According to consultancy marketsandmarkets,
the global agrochemical market is expected to grow $223 billion in 2015 from
$134 billion in 2010. The consultancy said the rise is "due to increasing
population and decreasing land availability" and is "also driven by
the use of agrochemicals in the production of biofuels, which are rapidly
gaining in importance over traditional petroleum-based fuel."
This situation has proved a boon for agriculture companies,
which had previously struggled to find fresh avenues of growth and at a time
when most farmers were concerned about food price developments, making them
reluctant to buy newer and often more expensive products. As food prices have
remained at high and comparatively stable level, companies such as Syngenta
were recently able to lift prices.
Analysts and investors welcomed Syngenta's
bold projection, sending its shares higher. The stock, which has remained flat
this year despite the company's strong first quarter performance, also
benefited from CEO Mack's confident statement about the company's
"robust" performance in the second quarter. At 1146 GMT, the shares
were up 3.4%, or CHF9.1, at CHF278.4 in a slightly higher Swiss stock market.
"The outlook for its key crops business is above
consensus," said Zuercher Kantonalbank.
"It's also positive that the company remains confident about its second
quarter performance as there were market concerns that the bad weather might
have impacted its business." Other analysts agreed, noting that Syngenta
may also increase dividends or launch share buybacks if the agrochemical market
remains sound.
Return to Top
Calif. growers united against new water
rules
(Santa
Cruz Sentinel) WATSONVILLE, CA — Pajaro
Valley farmer Dick Peixoto
minces no words when it comes to a proposed set of water regulations that could
play a key role in state budget talks: They will destroy farming in California.
"It's the most bizarre thing I've ever seen in my
life," said Peixoto, whose Lakeside Organic
Gardens grows 44 kinds of
organic vegetables on 1,200 acres. "It's holding us to a standard that's
impossible to attain."
Peixoto is not alone in that view.
Large and small farmers throughout the Salinas
and Pajaro valleys have spent the past two years
warning that the rules threaten agriculture, the top industry in the state and
county.
Moving slowly toward a September vote, the rules would
radically reshape how farms in the Pajaro and Salinas valleys are regulated,
making Central Coast water rules among the toughest —
if not the toughest — agricultural regulations nationwide.
But those controversial, and largely unknown, rules could
still be part of the mix as Gov. Jerry Brown seeks a final budget solution that
likely would need at least some Republican support, including possibly from
Republicans whose districts include the Central Coast
farmlands covered by the proposed rules.
What's at stake? Merely safe drinking water for
Californians, the price of putting food on the table, the economic vitality of
a $36 billion farming industry, and a decision that should resonate for years,
locally and across the country.
The rules propose tough new rules for farmers that aim to
eliminate pesticide discharges and limit nitrate runoff and even sediment
runoff.
Problems from nitrates
Nitrates, which can enter groundwater through fertilizer,
are a nationwide problem and growing point of contention between farmers,
regulators and environmentalists seeking to ensure access to safe water. In
levels that exceed safe drinking levels — and a lot of the untreated
groundwater beneath the Central Coast does — nitrates can lead to numerous
ailments, including a blood problem known as Blue Baby Syndrome, when an
infant's blood is incapable of carrying sufficient oxygen.
The rules also implement a broad monitoring and enforcement
program that has farmers up in arms.
While some general monitoring has been done to outline the
scope of the problem, the proposed rules also allow the board to keep records
on individual farms, and make those records public.
In other words, the rules name names.
Farmers have objected on numerous grounds, and Peixoto's sentiment is a common one. Farmers say it's hard
to pinpoint exactly how much farms contribute to the nitrate problem (something
many agree with) and that seeking to prevent pesticide runoff amounts to a back
door regulation on pesticide use.
"It would be impossible to have zero runoff," Peixoto said.
More than 100 groups have weighed in on the proposals, which
would affect farms from Santa Barbara to Santa Cruz. They include
politicians, advocates for farmworkers, the poor and clean water, Monterey Bay caretakers, strawberry growers,
small wineries and more.
"Everyone has a dog in this fight, even if they don't
know it," said Gary Shallcross, a former member
of the board weighing the rules, the Central Coast Regional Water Quality
Control Board. "There hasn't been much press on it, and part of the reason
is, it's so complicated."
It wasn't always like this. When the state signaled more
that a decade ago that it wanted to get a handle on the water quality problem
posed by agriculture, the two sides ventured forward in a spirit of
cooperation. Proposals were advanced that helped outline the scope of the
problem and begin work on solutions.
New set of rules
But a second set of rules was due in 2009, and with more
aggressive rules, things changed. That spirit of cooperation — forged in part
by people no longer part of the debate — now seems an idyllic memory.
"Everybody looked to the Central Coast
as the model," said Danny Merkley, a water
quality lobbyist for the California Farm Bureau Federation. "You have a
whole new dynamic, a whole new set of human beings with different values and
different perspectives on how the world should work."
Shallcross, a pro-environment
former board member replaced in one of former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's last
acts in office, agrees with Merkley's assessment,
even if their outlook on new proposed rules differs.
If passed, the rules would hand environmentalists their biggest
victory yet in their battle against nitrates, an issue
some say dwarfs the biggest environmental struggles of the past several
decades. A win here gives them a pedestal from which to carry the fight
nationally.
"These are serious, serious problems. We should be glad
to live in a state where it's easier to have your voice heard," said Dipti Bhatnagar, Northern
California program director for
the Oakland-based Environmental Justice Coalition for Water, stressing that
farming must become sustainable.
"We're not interested in (type of) agriculture that's
taking place in the Salinas
Valley, which is
ridiculously harmful."
Merkley bristles at those kind of
sentiments. He said the Farm Bureau is having "high-level"
conversations about finding ways to ensure communities have access to safe
water. To him, some of the players in the environmental community seem less
interested in finding solutions and saving farms, particularly small ones, than
in raising money and building their organizations' membership lists.
Other regional water boards have proposed tough rules, but
it's widely acknowledged that the Central
Coast rules are the
toughest.
Not backing down
In an email, the board staff made clear it has no intention
of backing down. Supporters say that's because this region grows crops such as
strawberries and lettuce that require added fertilizer, which contributes to
water problems.
"The water board is the only agency with the authority
and responsibility to take on this challenge," wrote Lisa McCann,
supervisor of the watershed protection section of the Central Coast Regional
Water Quality Control Board.
As the two sides have become more entrenched, speculation
has turned to whether lawmakers in Sacramento
would force a solution more favorable to farmers.
Normally, state lawmakers would hold only persuasive
authority over the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. In fact,
many have weighed in through letters that almost universally criticize the
aggressive rules.
Democratic U.S. Rep. Sam Farr, long a supporter of working
with farmers cooperatively to develop clean-water strategies, sent his own
strong letter.
Fear of more conflict
"I fear that if the (board) implements the staff's
current ... proposal, much of the time, energy and resources that previously
went into water quality measures, will instead be channeled into further
conflict over practical viability, economic impact and scientific validity of
the new (proposal) itself," Farr wrote in February.
But the board has been unable to vote on the rules. With
three vacancies and two members who cannot vote because of conflict-of-interest
rules, the board lacks a quorum. And since the governor is tasked with filling
those vacancies, Brown could wield vast sway over how the controversy plays
out.
Speculation has focused on the two moderate Republican
senators representing the Central
Coast, Sam Blakeslee and
Anthony Cannella. Both have emerged as key figures in
the budget debate, seeking Democratic concessions on big issues such as a state
spending cap and regulatory reform as a condition of their support.
Brown would need both votes, along with two Republican
members of the Assembly, to force through a budget that includes an extension
of taxes due to expire June 30. His budget veto last week is likely to renew
efforts to win that support.
Weeks ago, members of Brown's staff notified select members
of the environmental community that Republicans had placed the Central Coast
proposed rules on the table as a talking point during budget discussions, said
several sources familiar with the meeting who spoke on the condition of
anonymity.
A spokesman for Brown said the governor was working to fill
the vacancies, but declined to say whether the agricultural water rules are on
the table as a potential piece of the final budget solution.
Worried about changes
Environmentalists are guarding against any Sacramento effort to tinker with the rules.
Save Our Shores is asking supporters to sign form letters that are being sent
to Brown's office, urging the governor not to negotiate away clean water rules.
"Our understanding is, one of the asks in the budget —
and this is all being done behind closed doors — is easing up on the ag
regulations. And that's real problematic," said Jennifer Cleary of Save
Our Shores.
During a hectic week in Sacramento, neither Blakeslee nor Cannella were available for comment. But both have signaled
that agricultural interests have their ear, mentioning in testimony or
correspondence with the board that they have heard from farmers on the issue.
"I am gravely concerned that the increasing level of
regulation and mitigation requirements ... will result in the loss of
productive agricultural land and will threaten the existence of small farmers
and ranchers," Cannella wrote to the board in
March.
Cannella is not alone in those
sentiments. Even Democratic Assemblymen Luis Alejo of
Watsonville, and Bill Monning
of Carmel, have
questioned the breadth of the rules.
In a statement provided by his staff, Blakeslee said more
work needs to be done on the rules.
Blakeslee's concerns
"An ag ... program must be
developed to protect water quality without driving agriculture out of our
state," Blakeslee said. "I continue to be concerned that the staff
proposal fails to strike the right balance."
Lobbying, of course, is a vital part of any regulated
industry, and Merkley doesn't deny that he's spoken
with state lawmakers and the highest levels of state government about the
issue.
"We're constantly asked by legislators who represent
that region, and the governor's office, what's going on down there? What's
happening? What's your side of the story?" Merkley
said.
Merkley said the Farm Bureau
prefers to work with staff to make the rules more palatable.
"When that fails, sometimes that's your only other
option, to raise it to a higher level," he said.
But environmentalists are hoping the board sticks to its
guns, with a vote on the rules now scheduled for September.
"We, as a country, as a state, have an obligation to
provide water that is safe for families," said Bhatnagar
of the Environmental Justice Coalition for Water. "We don't want farms to
go away, but they have to become sustainable."
Return to Top
Wild pollinators taking over for
honeybees
(physorg.com)
Bumblebees, solitary bees and other wild pollinating insects are much more
important for pollinating UK
crops than previously thought, say researchers.
They found that honeybee populations have nose-dived so
dramatically in recent years that they can only do half as much pollination as
they did in the early 1980s.
Where honeybees used to provide around 70 per cent of the UK's
pollination needs they now only pollinate a third. At worst, that figure could
well be more like 10 to 15 per cent.
Paradoxically over the last 20 years, the proportion of UK
crops that rely on insects for pollination has risen from just under 8 per cent
in the early 1980s to 20 per cent in 2007. And over the same period, yields of
insect-pollinated crops, which include oil seed rape and field bean, have gone
up by 54 per cent.
This means that honeybees can't be solely responsible, or
aren't the only important pollinator.
So if honeybees aren't pollinating the crops, what is? The
researchers think that other important pollinating insects, such as bumblebees,
hoverflies and solitary bees must be making up the shortfall.
"Our finding suggests that wild insect pollinators make
a much bigger contribution to UK
crop pollination than previously thought," says Tom Breeze from the University of Reading, lead author of the study.
£400 million per year
Insect pollination is estimated to be worth around £400
million per year to UK
crop agriculture. And until now, people have widely assumed that honeybees are
the most important pollinators, with a figure of around 90 per cent of
pollination services coming from honeybees bandied around.
"We had an inclination that this wasn't an accurate
figure at all," says Breeze. "Honeybees have been in decline for
years, so it didn't make sense."
Indeed, there's zero large scale research that backs up the
assumption that honeybees are the biggest pollinators.
So Breeze and colleagues from the University
of Reading set out to learn how
important insect-pollinated crops are to UK agriculture and – using data
from an earlier study – to figure out the real contribution from honeybees.
Bee Swarm Removal L.A - Go green and Call (818)884-6891 10% Off on your First Appointment - www.abeeking.com
This is the first time anyone has looked at the contribution
from both honeybees and other pollinators on such a grand scale.
"Bumblebees, hoverflies and red mason bees are key wild
pollinators, but there are at least 250 bee species alone in the UK,
which we thought almost certainly contribute more than honeybees do,"
Breeze says.
Although Breeze and his colleagues found that honeybees
don't provide the same level of service that other species do, they point out
that it's not one pollinator or the other that's important; both types are
crucial.
"There was a seminal study in 2006 which found that you
get the best pollination, best yields and best fruit when you have both wild
pollinators and honeybees," says Breeze.
He says the next step for this research is to do the same
thing on a Europe-wide scale to compare different countries with the situation
in the UK
and to go into fields to see which pollinators are pollinating.
"This study challenges the long held beliefs
surrounding the importance of honeybees as the major pollinators and could
potentially result in a paradigm shift in people's
thinking," says Science and Innovation Manager Dr. Andrew Impey from the Natural Environment Research Council.
The research is published in Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment.
Return to Top
India’s food chain seeing big
changes
SHIVTHAR, India (Reuters)
- Ajit Govind Sable's
family have owned their farm in India's western Maharashtra state for 10
generations, which even for a region that has been farming for more than 10,000
years is long enough to witness plenty of changes.
Two generations back, they started cultivating sugar cane
here in Shivthar, a village in Maharashtra's
highlands near the Krishna river.
India's
most industrialized state soon became its largest sugar producer.
Today, it's not sugar the 35-year-old Sable is talking about
as he sips sweet tea in the front yard of the low, two-storey farmhouse where
half the ground floor houses his turmeric crop.
He's discussing peppers, which he is now growing under
polythene plastic coverings. Like an increasing number of farmers in India,
Sable is exploiting a shift in taste toward fruits and vegetables among
Indians.
"My colleagues grow flowers under poly," Sable
says. "But the investment for that is too much for me, so I'm trying out
peppers. You can't eat flowers if you can't find buyers for them," he
notes.
While many Indian farmers are eager to adjust to changing
diets in one of the world's fastest growing markets, the government continues
to subsidize the cultivation of wheat, sugar and rice crops to ensure basic
food needs for the country's half a billion poor.
The result is overflowing stocks of these carbohydrate-heavy
staples and a huge subsidy bill that is adding to a ballooning budget deficit.
India,
many agricultural experts say, is spending billions to prop up a traditional
farm sector at the expense of investment in new crops and agricultural
innovation.
But in a country where one out of five Indians goes hungry,
the government has had to focus on foods that fuel or fill -- carbohydrate-heavy
wheat, rice and sugar. About 36 percent of women and 34 percent of men in India
are underweight. The costs of that undernourishment is
high in terms of healthcare, lost productivity and poor quality of life.
At the same time, a growing urban middle class is consuming
more higher-value, high protein foods, which is stoking food price inflation --
as well as changing business and farm models in rural India.
The food chain in India is undergoing deep change.
"There is a view that this is a structural shift and
pulses, milk, meat, eggs, fish, protein items -- these are sectors where you
need to concentrate," Abhijit Sen, who sits on the government's planning committee, said
in a speech on June 5.
RISING MIDDLE CLASS
Those shifts have been under way for years but are
accelerating with rapid urbanization and the expansion of India's middle class. Take Avantika Singh, for example. A consultant in the hotel
industry, she lives in an apartment block in Delhi with her husband Sanjay, a television producer,
and their 7-year-old daughter, Romsha.
The Singhs are still fond of
traditional Indian food such as idlis, southern style
rice pancakes served with spicy sauce, and parathas,
wheat flatbreads cooked with oil or ghee.
But on this day Avantika, 41, is
cooking pasta with fresh peppers.
"As a working person, I look at whatever is easy to do
and nothing too elaborate," she says. "When you make idlis it's a whole day, day-and-a-half procedure. I don't
have that kind of time."
She sees her parents' generation suffering the effects of
the sugar-heavy, oily diet they grew up on.
"Even if we make parathas, we
don't put butter and ghee in," Avantika says.
India
is getting wealthier as well as healthier.
Its 8 percent annual growth, second only to China among
major countries, is boosting incomes rapidly in the trillion dollar economy.
Per capita income surged to $1,265 in 2010 from $857 in 2006 -- a nearly 50
percent increase -- according to the World Bank and IMF.
Middle class households are expected to grow 67 percent in
the next five years, bringing over 53 million households into an annual income
bracket between 340,000 and 1.7 million rupees ($7,600-38,000).
Bijay Kumar, managing director of
the National Horticulture Board, says having more money than your parents is
pushing up demand for high-protein foods.
"Rising income levels are allowing people to spend on
high value stuff," he says. "People are more aware of health. They
are increasing their intake of fruits in their regular diet."
In 2009-10, Indians boosted spending on fruit and vegetables
by nearly 9 percent over the year earlier. They shelled out almost 31 percent
more on meat, eggs and fish. Spending on cereals, on the other hand, was flat.
"A dietary transformation is underway in the country
and demand for high value, vitamin and protein rich food such as fruit,
vegetables, milk, eggs, poultry, meat and fish is increasing," the
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) said in a study this year.
FOOD SECURITY
Years of eating an oil-rich, sugary diet high in
carbohydrates have left many Indians with a paunch and a health problem. India
has the world's largest diabetes population at just below 51 million people,
while heart disease is the single-largest cause of death.
Yet hunger is endemic among the country's 500 million poor.
The government of Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh is drafting a Food Security Act that promises to expand subsidized wheat
and rice well beyond the current 30 percent of the population in a country that
is home to 40 percent of the world's malnourished children.
That could mean India spending about $25 billion a
year on providing cheap food or about 9 percent of total spending this year --
more than four times the expenditure on healthcare.
While the farm sector is slowly diversifying, it is a
declining contributor to growth, despite providing a living to more than half
the country's workforce.
About 600 million Indians are dependent on farming -- half
the population of 1.2 billion -- even though agriculture makes up only 14.6
percent of the economy and has been declining from 30 percent a decade ago.
A severe drought meant no growth for the sector in 2009-10
and last year it missed its 4 percent target for expansion, Indian officials
said, even as the overall economy powered ahead with 8.5 percent growth.
The average size of farms in India is a mere 1.33 hectares --
about the size of two soccer pitches -- and that figure has been steadily
declining.
Farmers are finding it ever more difficult to make ends
meet. The introduction of high-yielding seed varieties and increased use of
fertilizers and irrigation spawned the Green Revolution in the 1960s that
allowed India
to become self-sufficient in grains. But experts say agriculture innovation and
efficiency has stalled in recent years and farmers are getting squeezed by
rising costs and inefficient agronomy.
Since the mid-1990s, an estimated 150,000 small farmers have
committed suicide, according to the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice
at New York University, most of them over debts.
Increasingly, voices in government and among experts are
calling for a different approach, one that curbs subsidy spending, tackles
inflation and boosts agricultural production of higher-value foods.
CUT SAFETY NETS
Ashok Gulati is a recent recruit
to the government's inner circle from the world of research. His white hair and
beard marked him out at conferences when he worked for IFPRI in New Delhi.
Now as chairman of the government's commission on farm
prices and costs he has moved, as he puts it, from talking a lot with hardly
anyone listening to being heard every time he speaks.
Gulati says too much money is
going into safety nets such as subsidies and minimum wages when the government
should be investing more to boost agricultural growth and innovation.
India's
agriculture ministry plans to invest about $4.8 billion in 2011-12.
"I would say you should have 70 percent of resources
for growth and 30 percent for welfare objectives, but it's the other way
around," Gulati says.
The World Bank has criticized the subsidies as highly
inefficient. But they have powerful political supporters, especially Sonia
Gandhi, president of the ruling Congress Party, whose vote bank has long been
in rural areas.
Gulati also favors modernizing
distribution networks. Supply chains should be shortened, by making it easier
for retailers and food processors to buy direct from farmers.
Although many states now allow retailers to do this outside
the regulated local markets known as mandi, in
practice poor infrastructure makes that difficult.
COLD STORAGE
Ganpat Chowdhary,
45, is a trader at a mandi in Pune.
Surrounded by piles of rose and pale green mangoes sweating in the fierce
summer sun, he has his own problems -- the perishable nature of his products.
About 30 percent of fruit and vegetable production goes to
waste in India.
Summer temperatures which regularly top 40 degrees Celsius (104 F) also mean
fruit stored without chilling can ripen overnight.
Temperature-controlled warehouses are sprouting up across India
but are mostly small-scale private enterprises.
"We are also keen to set up a cold storage
facility," Chowdhary says. "It's essential,
as damage levels are very high in fruits."
The National Horticulture Board's Kumar says wastage can be
trimmed by increasing the amount of cold storage facilities available.
"We need good infrastructure to collect and aggregate
farm goods produced in remote areas," he said. "They need to be
delivered to consumers as early as possible.
Chowdhary, who's been in the fruit
business for the past two decades, has a different idea.
"In the last four to five years, sales of fruit have
risen by 25-30 percent. The next stage for us is to go back to the farm and
process fruits."
That way he could sell direct to the supermarkets.
SUPERMARKET SUPPLY CHAINS
Devendra Chawla
is showing off his display of chutney jars at a branch of a Big Bazaar
supermarket in an expensive South Delhi neighborhood .
Indians are increasingly heading to air-conditioned stores
like this, where aisles are packed with choice instead of the tiny mom-n-pop
stores where items are lifted off dusty shelves offering just one or two brands
of essential groceries.
Chawla says Big Bazaar's size and
presence across India
allows them to buy from both big distributors and local suppliers.
He sees huge potential for those who get it right. "If
the country is growing by 8 to 9 percent, incomes will increase and I think
food as a category will get developed," he says.
"The market is so huge that it can absorb many more
(retail) brands," says the clean-shaven Chawla,
sporting the intercontinental look of open-necked check shirt and chinos .
"The supply chain and cold storage are also getting
developed, so I think for the country and for our company, food is a big bet.
It's huge."
But the government needs to invest much more in distribution
infrastructure, he said.
"If we can develop good infrastructure and then supply
chains and cold storage, I think that can make a lot of difference to the
country."
India's
supply chains are fragmented and often involve several layers of middlemen
between tractor and table.
Its road system is clogged and underdeveloped, while railway
freight turnaround times are slow with limited availability of refrigerated
freight vans. Cold storage of about 24 million tonnes
is woefully inadequate for the world's second-biggest producer of fruit and
vegetables. All of this means availability of fresh produce is highly
regionalized.
It's not unusual to see wooden flatbed carts loaded with
vegetables and fruits right on the doorstep even in big cities -- very
convenient for shoppers but it does increase the mileage and moves for produce
and raising the chance of damage.
Back in Shivthar (Shiva's ground),
transportation is also on Sable's mind as his daughter takes the evening's milk
from their cow in a metal churn up to the end of the road for collection.
He says he'd like to sell to retail food chains because they
offer higher prices, but it's hard to deal with them directly.
"It's a headache to arrange transport according to
their needs. I prefer to sell to wholesalers. They buy from the farm gate, so I
don't need to worry about the transportation delay and wastage," he says.
Return to Top
Peruvian spuds have high-tech home
(The
Miami Herald) – David Tay heaves aside a metal
door that leads into an earthquake-proof room chilled to 42 degrees. There,
under the glow of blue-tinged lights, are thousands of test-tubes, each with
small green sprouts trapped inside.
This room is the heart of the International Potato
Center and home to more
than 7,000 varieties of spuds.
For the last 40 years, the center, known by its Spanish
acronym of CIP, has scoured the globe building up the world’s most complete
collection of potatoes. In the process it has become a genetic Noah’s Ark, safeguarding tuber
varieties in the face of manmade and natural disasters.
“It may not be sexy,” said Tay, the head of the CIP’s genetic resources
and conservation division, “but I think somebody has to do it. And the whole
idea is that we carry this social responsibility to humankind so that we can
face the future.”
Along with the in-vitro gene bank, the CIP is keeping root
tips in cryopreservation — frozen in liquid nitrogen — at -321 degrees
Fahrenheit, and has potatoes under guard at the fortified “Doomsday Seed Vault
“in Spitsbergen, Norway. In addition, it has sent samples to more than 100
countries, and offers Andean farmers disease-free local varieties to keep them
alive in the wild.
The obsession with preserving obscure potatoes may seem odd
in the United States, where most people are only familiar with russets,
fingerlings, yellow, red and white potatoes.
But Tay is fond of reminding
visitors that potatoes are not from Idaho, but
from the Andes.
“These are the great-grandparents of all the potatoes in the
world,” he said, waving an arm at the gleaming test-tubes. And there’s no way
of telling which one of the 7,000 varieties may have “the winning gene” that
could make it the ideal crop for a changing planet.
Peru
is a natural fit for the CIP. Scientists believe the first potatoes were
domesticated in the southeastern part of the country, near Lake
Titicaca, about 8,000 years ago. Spanish explorers took home
potatoes in the mid-16th century.
Since then, this New World crop has become an Old World hit. China,
Russia, India and the Ukraine are now the world’s top
potato producers. The United
States is the fifth-largest grower, churning
out some 19 million metric tons a year.
But Peru
still has the monopoly on potato diversity. Of the 187 wild species in
existence, Peru
is home to 91. The next closest country is Mexico with 36. The United States,
by comparison, is home to three wild species.
Peru’s
genetic bounty is on display at the Mercado de Zurquillo
in Lima, where
stalls overflow with dozens of different types of spuds. There are long horseshoe-shaped
potatoes, tiny balls of deep purple, and conical yellow potatoes that look like
carrots.
Lisbeth Marisol, who tends one of
the stalls, picks up a small red potato as knobby as a baby’s fist. It’s called
the pusi piña, and Marisol said protective mothers
ask their son’s girlfriends to peel them.
“When you peel it, you have to take out all the eyes very
carefully and leave it really pretty,” Marisol said. “If you can do that, then
they’ll let you stay with their son. If you can’t, then you lose him.”
Many of the varieties at the CIP are like the pusi piña — interesting to look at but not likely to catch
on with consumers. Yet they possess genetic traits that make them invaluable.
Shelley Jansky is a research
geneticist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and a professor at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has been developing strains of potatoes
that are resistant to diseases such as blight, the common scab and virus y.
What she has found is that wild potato species — those that have
been left to fend on their own for generations — often have inborn defenses.
“Anytime we have looked for any kind of disease resistance
in wild species we’ve eventually found it,” she said. Recently, a colleague
discovered a wild potato that can fight off the virus y — an emerging global
threat — even when rising temperatures have destroyed the resistance in other
varieties.
“If we can have resistance that holds up under warm
temperatures, that will be a significant improvement,” she said.
Jansky gets her wild potatoes from
the United States Potato Gene Bank in Sturgeon
Bay, Wis. But the U.S.
gene bank often exchanges material with the CIP.
One of the CIP’s biggest successes stories has been the
development of an amarilis variety potato that is resistant
to late blight. Blight is the same disease that wiped out the potato crop in Ireland
in the 19th century sparking a famine that killed more than a million people.
Today, late blight is estimated to cause $10 billion in losses to the potato
industry worldwide.
While potatoes are the world’s third-largest food crop after
rice and wheat, their ability to grow amid harsh conditions makes them ideal
for countries that are seeing the effects of climate change, Tay said.
And unlike wheat, corn or rice, potatoes are not
internationally traded. That has shielded them from the price spikes that have
rocked other commodities.
“If climate change affects world food prices, the potato
could play an important role in price stability,” Tay said. “This is an important crop for local
food security.”
If the lowly potato does emerge as the crop of the future,
the CIP will be able to take some of the credit.
“We don’t own them,” Tay said of the potatoes. “We are just holding
them in custodianship for the whole world.”
Return to Top
End Transmission