|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
June 30, 2011
·
Monsanto
incentives focus of SEC probe
·
More critics
line up against LightSquared
·
Drought-stricken
Texas officially a disaster
·
E. coli
crisis prompts interest in irradiation
·
World
geneticists find joy in Spudville
Monsanto consumers focus of SEC
probe
NEW YORK
(TheStreet.com)
-- As Monsanto continues to regroup following a sluggish 2010 with strong
third-quarter earnings, yet more trouble has bloomed for the controversial
producer of genetically modified seeds.
Buried in a press release that otherwise struck happy tones
about the company's financial turnaround, Monsanto disclosed that the
Securities and Exchange Commission has launched an investigation into the
"customer incentives" programs it has used to win sales for its
Roundup-branded herbicide.
Roundup was once the company's bread-and-butter product. But
competition from generic competitors in China -- the product came off
patent some years ago -- has torpedoed sales of the weedkiller, which had been
a high profit margin business.
Since it was acquired and then spun off from Pharmacia in
2000, Monsanto has redirected its business away from chemicals and toward
bioengineered seeds and traits. Its business model, though, remains
Roundup-dependent: One of the key selling points for its major seed product
lines -- corn and soybeans, in particular -- is that they have been genetically
modified to be resistant to Roundup, which is based on a chemical known as
glyphosate.
According to Monsanto, the SEC "is conducting an
investigation regarding Monsanto's customer incentive programs relating to its
glyphosate products in fiscal years 2009 and 2010, and Monsanto has received a
subpoena for documents in connection therewith. Monsanto is cooperating with
the staff's investigation."
By "customer," Monsanto is referring to
distributors of agricultural products, not the farmer end-users of the
herbicide.
On the company's conference call to discuss third-quarter
results, CEO Hugh Grant repeated the company's prepared statement and declined
to comment further "out of respect for the SEC's
process."
In reply to a question from an analyst, Grant said that the SEC's probe was not directed at its seed business.
As it turns out, the Roundup business appears to have
rebounded for Monsanto of late, at least judging by its third-quarter numbers.
The company's "agricultural productivity" segment took in sales of
$943 million during the quarter, up from $600 million in year-ago period.
Meanwhile, Monsanto said that the segement's gross
profit would come to $700 million for the full fiscal 2011.
Monsanto said the increased sales and gross profit were
"led by the positive response to the repositioning of the glyphosate
business," as well as a boost from the consumer Roundup product for the
lawn-and-garden market.
Still, in earlier years, Roundup sales exceeded $1.3 billion
per quarter, with gross profit of more than $2 billion annually.
In 2009, Monsanto spent some $400 million to reorganize the
struggling chemicals business.
Investors shrugged off the SEC probe Wednesday, focusing
instead on the company's improved profit forecast. Shares of the St. Louis company were up 4.4% to $69.87.
Monsanto has seen its share of regulatory trouble. The
Department of Justice has been investigating possible antitrust violations in
the seed industry since 2009. Monsanto, which has acquired more than 20 of the
nation's biggest seed producers and sellers over the last decade, has long
pursued a strict policy with its customers, obligating them to buy its bioengeenered seeds every year rather than use them in
multiple planting seasons. Farmers who disobey have been blacklisted.
Though Monsanto hasn't been named as part of the
government's antitrust probe, it's widely understood that the St. Louis agricultural giant is the focus.
Return to Top
More critics line up against LightSquared
(PCWorld.com)
– Mobile startup LightSquared has gained
another wholesale customer on Tuesday even as more critics joined a group that
opposes LightSquared's planned LTE network on the
grounds that it will interfere with GPS.
NetTalk, which sells an
inexpensive alternative to landline phone service using VoIP (voice over
Internet Protocol), will resell access to LightSquared's
LTE (Long-Term Evolution) mobile network under its own branded service. The
companies did not disclose the value of the multiyear agreement. NetTalk joins customers including Best Buy and Leap
Wireless that plan to buy wholesale service from LightSquared, which won't
offer services directly to consumers. Sprint Nextel also plans to use LightSquared's service, according to news reports.
But opponents continued to line up against LightSquared,
claiming the carrier's plans imperil GPS (Global Positioning System) devices
because its LTE towers will interfere with satellite signals that those devices
depend on. On Tuesday, more than a dozen new members joined the Coalition to
Save Our GPS, which repeatedly has voiced concern about LightSquared's
plans. The new members include FedEx, the Air Line Pilots Association, Magellan
GPS and the New York City Fire Department.
LightSquared is facing a deadline on July 1 to report the
results of a testing program it was required to set up as condition of its
network approval from the FCC. The carrier had to form a technical working
group with entities that make and use GPS technology, then report by June 15 on
any interference with GPS and ways to resolve it. After information came in too
late from the tests, the group received an extension until July 1. Test results
that have already been disclosed showed serious interference with devices used
for public safety, agriculture, aviation, surveying and other applications.
The carrier was granted access to valuable spectrum for LTE
by agreeing to deploy a hybrid satellite-LTE network that would provide mobile
data service across rural areas of the U.S. and fill in metropolitan areas
with the higher-capacity LTE system. The plan has caused controversy because it
allows cellular signals in the MSS (Mobile Satellite System) frequency band,
which until now has been used only for fairly low-power satellite signals.
Critics say the terrestrial LTE network would use about 1 billion times more
power than satellite systems do, knocking out GPS communications.
Last week, LightSquared proposed initially leaving aside the
upper 10MHz of its spectrum, which is closest to the GPS band, and launching
its service in a lower 10MHz band instead. It said the alternative plan would
also involve lower power operation. Critics, including the Coalition, said the
new proposed plan would still cause interference with highly sensitive GPS
equipment. At a hearing last week before the U.S. House of Representatives'
Subcommittees on Aviation and on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation,
lawmakers and witnesses called for more testing to make sure that move would
mitigate the interference for all GPS devices.
On Monday, the Coalition continued to attack LightSquared's new proposal, saying it would not lower
power levels or prevent interference.
"LightSquared's claim that
lower band operations would be largely free of interference for non-high
precision GPS users is simply not true," the group wrote in a press
release. "The only real solution to the LightSquared interference problem
is to move out of the MSS band altogether."
LightSquared has struck back with its own public-opinion
campaign, launching a Public Policy page on its website and sponsoring a study
of GPS by consulting company The Brattle Group. The study said the GPS industry
gets an implicit $18 billion subsidy from the U.S. government because it uses GPS
frequencies free of charge. GPS devices essentially use LightSquared's
spectrum because they lack adequate filters to limit the frequencies they use
Return to Top
Drought-stricken Texas officially a
disaster
LUBBOCK, Texas
(AP)
-- West Texas farmer Billy Brown remembers the
devastating drought that spanned the state in the 1950s -- and believes this
one is worse.
Brown is among the farmers and ranchers across all of Texas who can now apply
for low-interest emergency loans after the U.S. Department of Agriculture on
Tuesday designated the entire state a natural disaster area.
Texas
is enduring its worst drought in decades as high temperatures, windy conditions
and lack of rainfall persist across most of the state.
Because the dry conditions across the nation's
second-leading agricultural state come as commodity prices are strong, Brown
said farmers and ranchers are taking an even larger financial hit.
"The grass just crackles underneath the feet,"
Brown, 72, said of walking across his acreage in the town of Panhandle where he grows corn, cotton, wheat and grain sorghum. "It will be that way until we
get sufficient rain to turn everything around."
The Agriculture Department designated 213 of Texas' counties directly
affected by drought as disaster areas, and the remaining 41 also qualified for
assistance because they are contiguous. Thirty-two counties in Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arkansas and New Mexico
also garnered the designation because they are adjacent to Texas counties.
Many producers have lost their entire crop because of
drought and wildfires, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in the news
release.
"President Obama and I want these farmers and ranchers
to know that we will support them through the recovery process and help them
once again become productive suppliers of food, fiber and fuel that keep America
prospering," he said. "This designation will help provide that
support."
Ranchers and farmers must qualify for the loans that will
come from the USDA's Farm Service Agency.
Texas has been suffering
for months, the result of an intense La Nina weather pattern, which is a
cooling of the tropical Pacific Ocean.
The state just endured its driest-ever eight-month span --
ending May 31 -- and some parts have not seen significant precipitation since
August, prompting drastic drops in lake and underground water levels. Burn bans
are in place in 235 of the state's 254 counties and nearly 260 water suppliers,
most around the San Antonio area, have either voluntary or mandatory
restrictions on water use.
May, typically the state's wettest month, did little to
alleviate the problem, yielding less than half its average rainfall at an
estimated 1.65 inches.
The state is also enduring its worst wildfire season ever.
More than 3 million acres have been scorched by the wildfires that have not
even spared the more humid East Texas region.
It all means Texas
agriculture could sustain its worst single-year loss, potentially topping the
2006 record of $4.1 billion. There will be no dryland crops in the Panhandle
and South Plains regions. Even irrigated cotton acres are fighting for survival
as incessantly windy conditions dry out moisture that farmers put onto fields.
Crop insurance will only cover part of the cost of planting
a field that never gets a crop up.
Brown thinks this year's conditions are worse than the dry
spell of the 1950s, which lasted about six years, affected every part of the
state and is considered to be the area's "drought of record." He
knows that he, like many producers, will miss out on the high commodity prices.
With rain it could have been an "exceptional" year, he said.
"It'll be a lean year compared to what we
expected," the farmer of 40 years said. "But we'll be able to cover
our expenses."
Return to Top
E. coli crisis prompts interest in
irradiation
(FoodProductionDaily.com)
– The recent E.coli outbreak is likely to renew
interest in the irradiation of salads, although it is too early to tell if it
will lead to generic approval across the EU, according to an irradiation
specialist from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
This is what happened in the US, where irradiation was approved
as a treatment for killing pathogens on spinach and lettuce following an E.
coli scare in 2006, Carl Blackburn, food irradiation specialist at the IAEA
told FoodProductionDaily.com.
The issue has once again raced up the food safety agenda in
the aftermath of the deadly outbreak of E.coli 104:H4
originating in Germany
that has so far killed 47 and sickened around 4,000 people.
Irradiation using low dosage treatments would be beneficial
especially if used in combination with washing and packaging technology, said Blackburn.
The technique destroys microbial populations, reduces the
need for chemical pesticides and fumigants, and does not impair the flavour of the produce, said the specialist, whose division
AGE is the joint IAEA/FAO division for Nuclear Techniques in Food and
Agriculture.
Drawbacks
But although some European countries already approve the use
of irradiation for salads and the science is well developed, there are
drawbacks related to implementation on a fully commercial scale, Blackburn explained.
Firstly, he said there is limited capacity, with few irradiation
facilities that treat food for the EU market.
Most of these are multipurpose irradiators, said the
specialist, geared towards irradiating medical products which in contrast to
salads require high levels of treatment.
In the EU, there are less than 30 food irradiation
facilities, he said, with another 10 facilities in non-EU countries which are
allowed to irradiate food for the European Market.
“I don’t think any have considered irradiating salads and I
doubt many of these treatment facilities are situated close to major salad
producers,” said Blackburn.
In addition, there is also a regulatory hurdle in the
region, he said. Although several EU countries such as France, the UK
and the Netherlands
can allow a wide range of foods to be irradiated for sale to consumers, most EU
countries only allow the irradiation of dried aromatic herbs, spices and
vegetable seasonings.
European law concerning which foods can be irradiated has
yet to be fully harmonised, he said.
Consumer perceptions
The specialist also said that, despite any private
enthusiasm for the technique from the European food industry, he felt that no
one wanted to be the first to embrace the technology in public.
“EU law requires that irradiated-food is labelled
as irradiated or treated with ionising radiation. My
feeling is that major retailers are unwilling to stock such labelled
products, fearing customers will mistakenly associate the wording as a warning
rather than view it positively.”
Former EFSA chairman Professor Patrick Wall also agreed that
consumers remained sceptical about the use of
irradiation for food products.
“Our anecdotal experience has been that food businesses are
reluctant to adopt the technology due to concerns that consumers would choose
not to buy their products if they are irradiated,” he told this publication.
“Rather than think of it as a first cousin of their
microwave many of them think of Chernobyl,”
he said.
“With salads, the words people think of are fresh, wholesome
and natural and irradiation as a technology does not sit well here.”
Misinformation
A spokesperson for FSA told FoodProductionDaily.com it is
difficult to get the facts across about irradiation when there is a large
amount of “misinformation”, particularly on the internet, with a small number
of “very vocal groups” opposed to its wider use.
“It is also difficult to judge what the general consumers’
attitude would really be when there is no practical experience of seeing
irradiated foods for sale on the UK market,” said the authority.
“It is worth noting that irradiation is widely used in sterilising medical devices and pharmaceutical products
without the same level of negative publicity.”
The spokesperson said it was difficult to know if the E.coli outbreak would change people’s perceptions about the
technique.
“Over the past few years, the US
has had a number of high profile cases of food poisoning by E. coli which have
been followed by promotion of irradiation in some sections of the media, while
some irradiated foods are now on sale in the US, the market remains very small,”
said the spokesperson.
The future for irradiation
Despite the potential drawbacks of irradiation as a
decontamination technique, Blackburn said he
was hopeful for the future, as recent advances in food irradiation technology
include the development of commercial scale X-ray facilities.
“Maybe the use of X-rays generated by machine (rather than
gamma irradiation which relies on radiation emitted from radioactive sources)
could in future play a role,” he said.
Parts of the food industry already use low powered X-rays to
detect bone fragments in meat products therefore, the use of more powerful
X-ray machines to treat salad might be viewed favourably,
said the specialist.
“The issue with labelling may
persist, but hopefully people will begin to view the technology favourably or at least understand that it doesn’t mean the
food is radioactive, but it means that the food has been zapped,” he said.
The IAEA works for “the safe, secure and peaceful uses of
nuclear science and technology”, running and supporting research centers and
scientific laboratories in Vienna and Seibersdorf, Austria;
Monaco; and Trieste, Italy.
Return to Top
World geneticists find joy in Spudville
(McClatchy
via physorg.com) – David Tay heaves aside a metal
door that leads into an earthquake-proof room chilled to 42 degrees. There,
under the glow of blue-tinged lights, are thousands of test tubes, each with
small green sprouts trapped inside.
This room is the heart of the International Potato
Center and home to more
than 7,000 varieties of spuds.
For the past 40 years, the center, known by its Spanish
acronym of CIP, has scoured the globe building up the world's most complete
collection of potatoes. In the process it has become a genetic Noah's Ark, safeguarding tuber
varieties in the face of manmade and natural disasters.
"It may not be sexy," said Tay, the head of the CIP's genetic resources
and conservation division, "but I think somebody has to do it. And the
whole idea is that we carry this social responsibility to humankind so that we
can face the future."
Along with the in-vitro gene bank, the CIP is keeping root
tips in cryopreservation - frozen in liquid nitrogen - at -321 degrees
Fahrenheit, and has potatoes under guard at the fortified "Doomsday Seed
Vault "in Spitsbergen,
Norway. In
addition, it has sent samples to more than 100 countries, and offers Andean
farmers disease-free local varieties to keep them alive in the wild.
The obsession with preserving obscure potatoes may seem odd
in the United States, where most people are only familiar with russets,
fingerlings, yellow, red and white potatoes.
But Tay is fond of reminding
visitors that potatoes are not from Idaho, but
from the Andes.
"These are the great-grandparents of all the potatoes
in the world," he said, waving an arm at the gleaming test-tubes. And
there's no way of telling which one of the 7,000 varieties may have "the
winning gene" that could make it the ideal crop for a changing planet.
Peru
is a natural fit for the CIP. Scientists believe the first potatoes were
domesticated in the southeastern part of the country, near Lake
Titicaca, about 8,000 years ago. Spanish explorers took home
potatoes in the mid-16th century.
Since then, this New World crop has become an Old World hit. China,
Russia, India and the Ukraine are now the world's top
potato producers. The United
States is the fifth-largest grower, churning
out 19 million metric tons a year.
But Peru
still has the monopoly on potato diversity. Of the 187 wild species in
existence, Peru
is home to 91. The next closest country is Mexico with 36. The United States,
by comparison, is home to three wild species.
Peru's
genetic bounty is on display at the Mercado de Zurquillo
in Lima, where
stalls overflow with dozens of different types of spuds. There are long
horseshoe-shaped potatoes, tiny balls of deep purple, and conical yellow potatoes
that look like carrots.
Lisbeth Marisol, who tends one of
the stalls, picks up a small red potato as knobby as a baby's fist. It's called
the pusi pina, and Marisol
said protective mothers ask their son's girlfriends to peel them.
"When you peel it, you have to take out all the eyes
very carefully and leave it really pretty," Marisol said. "If you can
do that, then they'll let you stay with their son. If you can't, then you lose
him."
Many of the varieties at the CIP are like the pusi pina - interesting to look
at but not likely to catch on with consumers. Yet they possess genetic traits
that make them invaluable.
Shelley Jansky is a research
geneticist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and a professor at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison. She has been developing strains of potatoes
that are resistant to diseases such as blight, the common scab and virus Y.
What she has found is that wild potato species - those that
have been left to fend on their own for generations - often have inborn
defenses.
"Anytime we have looked for any kind of disease
resistance in wild species we've eventually found it," she said. Recently,
a colleague discovered a wild potato that can fight off the virus Y - an
emerging global threat - even when rising temperatures have destroyed the
resistance in other varieties.
"If we can have resistance that holds up under warm
temperatures, that will be a significant improvement," she said.
Jansky gets her wild potatoes from
the United States Potato Gene Bank in Sturgeon
Bay, Wis. But the U.S.
gene bank often exchanges material with the CIP.
One of the CIP's biggest successes stories has been the
development of an amarilis variety potato that is
resistant to late blight. Blight is the same disease that wiped out the potato
crop in Ireland
in the 19th century sparking a famine that killed more than a million people.
Today, late blight is estimated to cause $10 billion in losses to the potato
industry worldwide.
While potatoes are the world's third-largest food crop after
rice and wheat, their ability to grow amid harsh conditions makes them ideal
for countries that are seeing the effects of climate change, Tay said.
And unlike wheat, corn or rice, potatoes are not
internationally traded. That has shielded them from the price spikes that have
rocked other commodities.
"If climate change affects world food prices, the
potato could play an important role in price stability," Tay said. "This is an important crop for
local food security."
If the lowly potato does emerge as the crop of the future,
the CIP will be able to take some of the credit.
"We don't own them," Tay said of the potatoes. "We are just
holding them in custodianship for the whole world."
Return to Top
End Transmission