http://www.aglinenews.com

" I heard it
through the
AgLine"

 

July 13, 2011

 

 

·       Drought spreads pain from Florida to Arizona

·       Slim work force impacting California farms

·       Heirloom tomatoes a big hit in Arkansas

·       US farmers favor GM seeds – USDA study

·       How scientists can get growers to innovate

 

 

Drought spreads pain from Florida to Arizona

 

(The New York Times) COLQUITT, Ga.The heat and the drought are so bad in this southwest corner of Georgia that hogs can barely eat. Corn, a lucrative crop with a notorious thirst, is burning up in fields. Cotton plants are too weak to punch through soil so dry it might as well be pavement.

 

Farmers with the money and equipment to irrigate are running wells dry in the unseasonably early and particularly brutal national drought that some say could rival the Dust Bowl days.

 

“It’s horrible so far,” said Mike Newberry, a Georgia farmer who is trying grow cotton, corn and peanuts on a thousand acres. “There is no description for what we’ve been through since we started planting corn in March.”

 

The pain has spread across 14 states, from Florida, where severe water restrictions are in place, to Arizona, where ranchers could be forced to sell off entire herds of cattle because they simply cannot feed them.

 

In Texas, where the drought is the worst, virtually no part of the state has been untouched. City dwellers and ranchers have been tormented by excessive heat and high winds. In the Southwest, wildfires are chewing through millions of acres.

 

Last month, the United States Department of Agriculture designated all 254 counties in Texas natural disaster areas, qualifying them for varying levels of federal relief. More than 30 percent of the state’s wheat fields might be lost, adding pressure to a crop in short supply globally.

 

Even if weather patterns shift and relief-giving rain comes, losses will surely head past $3 billion in Texas alone, state agricultural officials said.

 

Most troubling is that the drought, which could go down as one of the nation’s worst, has come on extra hot and extra early. It has its roots in 2010 and continued through the winter. The five months from this February to June, for example, were so dry that they shattered a Texas record set in 1917, said Don Conlee, the acting state climatologist.

 

Oklahoma has had only 28 percent of its normal summer rainfall, and the heat has blasted past 90 degrees for a month.

 

“We’ve had a two- or three-week start on what is likely to be a disastrous summer,” said Kevin Kloesel, director of the Oklahoma Climatological Survey.

 

The question, of course, becomes why. In a spring and summer in which weather news has been dominated by epic floods and tornadoes, it is hard to imagine that more than a quarter of the country is facing an equally daunting but very different kind of natural disaster.

 

From a meteorological standpoint, the answer is fairly simple. “A strong La Niña shut off the southern pipeline of moisture,” said David Miskus, who monitors drought for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

 

The weather pattern called La Niña is an abnormal cooling of Pacific waters. It usually follows El Niño, which is an abnormal warming of those same waters.

 

Although a new forecast from the National Weather Service’s Climate Prediction Center suggests that this dangerous weather pattern could revive in the fall, many in the parched regions find themselves in the unlikely position of hoping for a season of heavy tropical storms in the Southeast and drenching monsoons in the Southwest.

 

Climatologists say the great drought of 2011 is starting to look a lot like the one that hit the nation in the early to mid-1950s. That, too, dried a broad part of the southern tier of states into leather and remains a record breaker.

 

But this time, things are different in the drought belt. With states and towns short on cash and unemployment still high, the stress on the land and the people who rely on it for a living is being amplified by political and economic forces, state and local officials say. As a result, this drought is likely to have the cultural impact of the great 1930s drought, which hammered an already weakened nation.

 

“In the ’30s, you had the Depression and everything that happened with that, and drought on top,” said Donald A. Wilhite, director of the school of natural resources at the University of Nebraska in Lincoln and former director of the National Drought Mitigation Center. “The combination of those two things was devastating.”

 

Although today’s economy is not as bad, many Americans ground down by prolonged economic insecurity have little wiggle room to handle the effects of a prolonged drought. Government agencies are in the same boat.

 

“Because we overspent, the Legislature overspent, we’ve been cut back and then the drought comes along and we don’t have the resources and federal government doesn’t, and so we just tighten our belt and go on,” said Donald Butler, the director of the Arizona Department of Agriculture.

 

The drought is having some odd effects, economically and otherwise.

 

“One of the biggest impacts of the drought is going to be the shrinking of the cattle herd in the United States,” said Bruce A. Babcock, an agricultural economist at Iowa State University in Ames. And that will have a paradoxical but profound impact on the price of a steak.

 

Ranchers whose grass was killed by drought cannot afford to sustain cattle with hay or other feed, which is also climbing in price. Their response will most likely be to send animals to slaughter early. That glut of beef would lower prices temporarily.

 

But America’s cattle supply will ultimately be lower at a time when the global supply is already low, potentially resulting in much higher prices in the future.

 

There are other problems. Fishing tournaments have been canceled in Florida and Mississippi, just two of the states where low water levels have kept recreational users from lakes and rivers. In Texas, some cities are experiencing blackouts because airborne deposits of salt and chemicals are building up on power lines, triggering surges that shut down the system. In times of normal weather, rain usually washes away the environmental buildup. Instead, power company crews in cities like Houston are being dispatched to spray electrical lines.

 

In this corner of Georgia, where temperatures have been over 100 and rainfall has been off by more than half, fish and wildlife officials are worried over the health of the shinyrayed pocketbook and the oval pigtoe mussels, both freshwater species on the endangered species list.

 

The mussels live in Spring Creek, which is dangerously low and borders Terry Pickle’s 2,000-acre farm here. He pulls his irrigation from wells that tie into the water system of which Spring Creek is a part.

 

Whether nature or agriculture is to blame remains a debate in a state that for 20 years has been embroiled in a water war with Alabama and Florida. Meanwhile, Colquitt has allowed the state to drill a special well to pump water back into the creek to save the mussels from extinction.

 

Most farmers here are much more worried about the crops than the mussels. With cotton and corn prices high, they had high hopes for the season. But many have had to replant fields several times to get even one crop to survive. Others, like Mr. Pickle, have relied on irrigation so expensive that it threatens to eat into any profits.

 

The water is free, but the system used to get it from the ground runs on diesel fuel. His bill for May and June was an unheard of $88,442.

 

Thousands of small stories like that will all contribute to the ultimate financial impact of the drought, which will not be known until it is over. And no one knows when that will be.

 

The United States Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency has already provided over $75 million in assistance to ranchers nationwide, with most of it going to Florida, New Mexico and Texas. An additional $62 million in crop insurance indemnities have already been provided to help other producers.

 

Economists say that adding up the effects of drought is far more complicated than, say, those of a hurricane or tornado, which destroy structures that have set values. With drought, a shattered wheat or corn crop is a loss to one farmer, and it has a specific price tag. But all those individual losses punch a hole in the food supply and drive prices up. That is good news for a farmer who manages to get a crop in. The final net costs down the line are thus dispersed, and mostly passed along.

 

That means grocery shoppers will feel the effects of the drought at the dinner table, where the cost of staples like meat and bread will most likely rise, said Michael J. Roberts, an associate professor of agricultural and resource economics at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, N.C. “The biggest losers are consumers,” he said.

 

 

Kim Severson reported from Colquitt, Ga., and Kirk Johnson from Denver. Dan Frosch contributed reporting from Denver

 

Return to Top

 

 

Slim work force impacting California farms

 

(New American Media) – The number of immigrants illegally crossing into the United States from Mexico has declined according to a new study, and some California farmers are already seeing the effects on their crops.

 

“We’ve seen in the valley this year a reduction of labor that we haven’t seen for five or six years,” said Manuel Cunha, president of the Nisei Farmers League in Fresno, Calif.

 

“There could be crops that could go down as being damaged because they cannot be harvested fast enough. Many of the vegetables growing in the valley are going to be in competition for the labor as well,” he said. “You’re going to see rotting.”

 

Net immigration from Mexico has fallen sharply, and may even be down to zero, according to a recent study by Princeton University demographer Douglas S. Massey. Massey credits several factors for the shift: smaller family sizes and more job opportunities in Mexico, rising border crime, and immigration crackdowns in the United States.

 

Experts say the deciding factor in the decision to migrate north is often an economic one – and with unemployment remaining high in the United States and Mexico’s economy booming, many Mexicans are choosing to stay in their home country.

 

“We’ve heard that many people from Tijuana or Juarez at different times have migrated out of fear for their personal security or that of their families’ to San Diego or El Paso, but those aren’t typical migrants,” said Robert Donnelly, program associate at the Mexico Institute in Washington, D.C., a research center that studies U.S.-Mexico relations. “I would think that in most parts of the country the leading factor is still economic.”

 

The evidence of slowing illegal migration can be seen along the border: Border apprehensions of undocumented Mexicans have fallen more than 70 percent since 2000. Meanwhile, an increase in legal migration of Mexicans has brought in 64 percent more immediate relatives from 2006-2010 than during the previous five years.

 

On some farms across California, which produces half of the nation’s fruits and vegetables, the drop in undocumented immigrants can already be felt.

 

“We have heard from some of our members that the labor market is tightening up,” said Wendy Fink-Weber, spokesperson for Western Growers in Irvine, Calif., an agricultural trade association whose members grow, pack and ship the majority of the fruits, nuts and vegetables in California and Arizona.

 

Don Villarejo, founder of the California Institute for Rural Studies, agrees that California farms have seen a labor shortage this year. “We are seeing the indication of the movement of people away from where they feel they might be at risk,” he said.

 

“This year, starting in January and February, there was a shortage of people planting vegetables in the Salinas Valley,” explained Cunha, noting that the labor shortage “moved to the San Joaquin Valley as well.”

 

“We’ve seen a reduction in crew where there are usually 20 to 25 people in a crew. Now they are down to 14 to 15, or 17 to18.”

 

But not everyone has seen a drop in labor.

 

Maria Machuca, communications director of United Farm Workers, estimates that there are “approximately 450,000 farm workers that travel from farm to farm in California.” She said that according to the Department of Labor, “at least 50 percent of them are undocumented.” The UFW however estimates that it’s even higher, as much as 80 percent.

 

“There are actually a lot of farm workers looking for jobs during the season (between May and September), so we haven’t heard that people have jobs open,” she said.

 

Some of this may be due to a decrease in farm jobs as more machines replace workers, noted Villarejo. “Owing to mechanization, shifts in cropping patterns,” he said, “there has actually been a roughly 15 percent decline for hired farm workers in the past 15 years.”

 

But mechanical practices can’t fix the labor shortage, noted Cunha. “Vines cannot be picked mechanically.”

 

Dave Kranz, spokesperson for the California Farm Bureau Federation, a private non-profit organization in Sacramento and the largest farm organization in California, said that he wasn’t aware of a significant labor shortage this year, though it may be too soon to tell. Farmers would notice this during the peak season of the harvest in August and September, he said.

 

But he added, “hiring people who can come and go legally” has been a “long-term concern” for the agricultural industry.

 

“It’s a hard thing to get farmers to talk about,” added Fink-Weber, “even though we admit that 70 percent of our workforce as a whole is improperly documented.”

 

“Here in California,” she added, “we don’t have state laws like Arizona or Georgia,” that have each passed laws cracking down on undocumented immigration.

 

With anti-immigration bills being signed into law in various states, policies toward immigrants could have a direct impact on labor, according to Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA).

 

“Workers are making decisions on what states to move to based on the welcoming nature of that state,” Salas said.

 

Georgia’s onion-growers, for example, worry their state’s new anti-immigration law could lead to a labor shortage in their fields. The Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association estimates that the losses stemming from Georgia’s new law, HB 87, will total at least $250 million this year alone, according to the blog, Farmworkers Forum.

 

Fink-Weber of Western Growers added that she is hearing from her agricultural members that, “If they are going to expand, they aren’t doing it in the U.S. – but in Mexico or other countries.”

 

Return to Top

 

 

Heirloom tomatoes a big hit in Arkansas

 

LITTLE ROCK, Ark (Reuters) - A cake with heirloom tomato icing? Don't laugh.

 

The dessert with a hint of zing was the highlight of an all-tomato feast on Friday in Monticello in southeastern Arkansas to promote heirloom tomatoes.

 

Guests enjoyed a buffet dinner of stuffed tomatoes, tomato flatbread, five-tomato salad, basil chicken and several tomato-based sides topped off with tomato cake.

 

The all-tomato dinner grew out of consumer yearning for home-grown tomatoes rather than the hard, grainy and tasteless offerings at many grocery stores, organizers said.

 

"There is an argument for heirlooms in that they are better tasting than commercial varieties that you find in a grocery store," said Dr. Bob Stark, professor of agricultural economics at the Southeast Research and Extension Center in Monticello.

 

"People who have grown up eating home-grown tomatoes are finding that they want them again and may pay a premium price for them," he said.

 

Heirloom tomatoes are varieties handed down through generations, perhaps with the seeds passed within families.

 

For southern Arkansas farmers, heirloom tomatoes like the Cherokee purple and the original Arkansas Traveler could become a valuable cash crop.

 

Stark and Paul Francis, a professor of plant and soil science, have been working for two years, in part with funding from the Arkansas Agriculture Department, to research heirloom tomatoes' economic viability.

 

In recent years, heirloom tomatoes, any open-pollinated traditional variety that is at least 50 years old or older, have become more popular. But unlike tomatoes grown in mass hot houses, an heirloom tomato is less disease resistant, bruises more easily and has a shorter shelf life.

 

The seeds from heirlooms can be saved and planted the next year. In contrast, commercial tomatoes are hybrids grown for conformity, and growers have to buy seeds each year adding to production costs.

 

Arkansas is a natural place to test these tomatoes, as the tomato is the official state fruit and vegetable.

 

Since 1956, Warren, Arkansas in Bradley County has hosted the annual Pink Tomato Festival each June. Former President Bill Clinton has often praised Arkansas tomatoes and attended the festival numerous times as governor.

 

"To some extent, the heritage of the people who originally settled southeast Arkansas brought tomatoes with them," Stark said. "In south Arkansas, the weather was a little bit warmer and that contributed to the growth of the industry."

 

The state was once a major tomato producer. In 1989, southeast Arkansas producers shipped 11,820 tons of fruit. By 2005, the total was down to 4,285 tons. In 2009, half of all tomato crops faced disaster after rain put a dent in pollination and early heat contributed to cracked and misshapen fruits.

 

John Gavin, Bradley County staff chair for the University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service, said heirloom crops cannot not be raised in mass amounts because of the labor associated with pruning and picking.

 

"You will pay for the delicacy of it," said Gavin. "But people are willing to do it as we are beginning to see."

 

Stark and Francis have given seeds and plants to area growers to test endurance and blight resistance.

 

At Friday night's dinner, guests left with seeds, tomatoes and recipes.

 

"The interest is definitely there, thanks to Food Network (television) chefs talking about heirlooms, but we will continue to fuel interest in these tomatoes especially to growers despite some disease risk," said Stark.

 

Return to Top

 

 

US farmers favor GM seeds – USDA study

 

(desmoinesregister.com) – Genetically engineered varieties of soybeans, cotton and corn are preferred by American farmers over their conventional and organic counterparts, according to newly released data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

 

Key findings of USDA's Economic Research Service report, Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S.:

 

- The use of GE soybeans rose to 94 percent in 2011, up from 93 percent in 2010.

 

- The use of GE cotton is at 90 percent in 2011, down slightly from 93 percent in 2010, but up from 88 percent in 2009.

 

- The use of biotech corn climbed to 88 percent in 2011, up from 86 percent in 2010.

 

Ab Basu, acting executive vice president, food and agriculture for the Biotechnology Industry Organization, issued the following statement in response to the report's findings: "This year's data on adoption of genetically engineered crops suggest that nine out of 10 U.S. farmers choose to plant biotech varieties of soybeans, cotton and corn."

 

Return to Top

 

 

How scientists can get growers to innovate

 

(SciDev.net) MEXICO CITY – Researchers must pay attention to farmers' social and economic networks to help ensure the adoption of new technologies, a study has found.

 

US scientists conducted interviews with agricultural experts, credit unions and farmers in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico — home of the 'green revolution' in wheat.

 

They found that, while farmers have successfully adopted many new technologies such as new wheat varieties released by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico, not all research has been as successful in making its way from the lab to the field. The research was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences last month.

 

For example, a CIMMYT initiative to promote alternative fertiliser management strategies — with successful on-farm trials that had shown the approaches could save farmers a lot of money — was not taken up by farmers.

 

This was partly because of the influence of credit unions — which provide crop loans and insurance. The unions' role as retailers of fertiliser, seeds and other agricultural inputs may mean that they are more likely to advise farmers to stick to tried and tested techniques, instead of trying innovations, said the researchers.

 

Their influence is strong because state-funded agricultural extension systems were scaled back, which led to the unions also providing technical advice, the researchers said. This means farmers are more likely to listen to these unions than researchers.

 

"The most successful innovations that have been adopted by farmers in the Yaqui Valley have come from collaborations among researchers, farmers and local establishments like the credit unions," said Ellen McCullough, a researcher at Cornell University, United States, and lead author of the research.

 

Researchers have to recognise and engage with local knowledge systems and actors, such as credit unions, if they are to roll out their innovations, said the authors.

 

"Our study highlights the need for scientists who want their knowledge and know-how to be useful and used by farmers to pay attention to the knowledge system," McCullough said. "Researchers should spend some time studying the knowledge system before assuming too much about it; this will help them understand what types of information decision-makers need and how to reach them."

 

But researchers working in the area told SciDev.Net their links with the farmer community are already strong.

 

Pedro Aquino, a principal researcher in CIMMYT's socioeconomic programme, said that the organisation is looking at developing improved technologies and management strategies that incorporate all players in the farming community in the region, which "holds the closest links between researchers and farmers in the whole country".

 

Lope Montoya-Coronado, head of the Yaqui Valley's Experimental Centre at the National Institute of Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research, agreed: "The bonds between researchers and farmers are very tight [here] because farmers can appreciate the results in their fields".

 

He said that what set farmers in this region apart was the strength of the networks: farmers raise funds through a local board to help researchers develop high-priority technologies.

 

Return to Top

 

 

End Transmission