July 26, 2011· Proposed road regs anger many farmers · Rain, cold a headache for Northwest ag · How honeybees tolerate some pesticides · Central America launches ‘Google’ weather · 10 electrocuted, 2 killed in corn farm accident Proposed road regs anger many farmers(Billings
Gazette) – Tractors lumbering down country roads are as common as deer in
rural
"It's a huge deal for us," said John Youngberg of the Montana Farm Bureau. After years of allowing state governments to waive commercial driver's license requirements for farmers hauling crops or driving farm equipment on public roads, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is poised to do away with the exceptions.
Regulators are suggesting that all wheat shipments be considered interstate, even when farmers making short hauls to local grain elevators aren't crossing state lines. The change would make commercial driver's licenses — and all the log books and medical requirements that go with them — a necessity for farmers. Some might not qualify.
The licenses would also be required of farmers driving farm equipment down public roads. Farmers hauling grain for a neighbor or landlord would be considered commercial drivers hauling for someone else.
Ranchers hauling livestock in trailers as small as 16 feet would also be subject to the new rules.
But before finalizing the proposed changes, FMCSA is
accepting public comment. It originally allowed 30 days for public input last
May. Then 18
In a cautionary letter, Rep. Dennny Rehberg, R-Mont., told FMCSA Administrator Anne Ferro to drop the regulations.
"Under your proposal, tractors, combines and pickup trucks hauling trailers would be regulated as commercial vehicles," Rehberg wrote. "Producers who operate these vehicles would be required to obtain commercial driver's licenses, medical cards and log their hours as if they were long-haul truck drivers."
Traditionally, farmers driving farm machinery have been exempt from commercial driver's licenses, as have farmers hauling wheat, provided they didn't cross state lines and traveled no farther than 150 air miles to the elevator.
"When you haul a commodity 150 miles, it just doesn't make sense to have a commercial driver's license," Youngberg said.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration says it wants to make sure federal safety regulations are being carried out uniformly across the nation. According to FMCSA, some states have been asking the administration to clarify rules on grain trucking, farm equipment and trucking for someone else. The reasons behind those questions are numerous.
Dana Peterson, National Association of Wheat Growers executive officer, said farm equipment on public roads has become an issue in urban areas, while the other two trucking issues have been sticking points with FMCSA.
"That's been the interpretation of the agency for several years now," Peterson said of the interstate rule for grain. "But it hasn't been interpreted that way in all the states."
FMCSA argues that because grain will ultimately be shipped out of state, it should be regulated as an interstate product at every transportation step. Treated as a product destined to cross state lines, grain becomes federally regulated under the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution.
If a farmer's trip to the local elevator is viewed as an intrastate transaction, then public safety becomes the main issue and the state has final say. Officials with the Montana Department of Transportation and Montana Department of Agriculture confirmed last week that they have not responded to federal requests for public comment about the proposed changes.
The argument that grain ultimately leaves the state seems to
have
In
In
The bigger issue in the federal proposal is whether commercial driver's licenses are required for farmers in crop-sharing agreements involving leased farmland where everyone has a stake in the crop's sale.
Rain, cold a headache for Northwest ag(AP via The Seattle Times) TANGENT, Ore. — Dennis Glaser's farm should be abuzz with activity, with his tractors in the field and three John Deere combines churning out premium Oregon grass seed.
But the combines sit idle in a garage, and Glaser has plenty
of time to show around some visitin g golf course managers. That's because,
while most of the
Across the
"I don't recall it ever being quite this bad," said Glaser, 64, who farms land that's been in his family since the year before he was born. "We've had wet springs, but it usually stops at some point on the way."
Not this year.
Anticipating a rapid harvest, Glaser bought a third, $250,000 combine last week to help keep up. He doesn't want to leave 1,300 acres of grass in the field like he had to do in 1967, another especially rainy year. He's bracing for the possibility of losing 20 percent of his business.
Grass seeds grow on the top of stalks. Farmers harvest it by cutting the stalks and bundling them into rows called windrows, then waiting seven to 10 days for the seeds to dry out. They're then collected in a combine, which separates the seeds from the rest of the plant.
The typical warm, dry summers in
Dampness can destroy the seed or cause it to germinate before it reaches a golf course or baseball outfield.
"The industry kind of counts on it not raining once you
get to July," said Mark Mellbye, an
The problem is, much of the
One rain storm is enough to set back the crop for five days, pushing the harvest closer to the rainy season and making it harder to fill orders on time, experts said.
The unusual weather isn't just affecting seeds.
A warm spell in February followed by frosts and freezing
temperatures hurt cherry and apple production, leading to a U.S. Department of
Agriculture disaster declaration last week that covers eight counties in
northeast
Last month,
In
Consumers get accustomed to eating particular foods at certain times of year, farmers say, and if you miss the window, many customers lose interest. The cherry harvest, typically well under way in early July, had barely begun at that time this year.
"If you have to wait until after the Fourth of July to
start selling your cherries, then you've missed a huge market
opportunity," said Lynn Long, an
It's not all bad news. Wheat, a roughly $1 billion per-year
crop in
But other farmers need some warm weather to dry things out. Glazer said it's always a gamble with the weather.
"There's no reason to go to How honeybees tolerate some pesticides(redOrbit.com) -- A new study reveals how enzymes in the honey bee gut detoxify pesticides commonly used to kill mites in the honey bee hive. This is the first study to tease out the precise molecular mechanisms that allow a pollinating insect to tolerate exposure to these potentially deadly compounds. The findings appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). Previous studies have shown that honey bee hives are contaminated with an array of agricultural chemicals, many of which the bees themselves bring back to the hive in the form of contaminated pollen and nectar, said University of Illinois entomology professor and department head May Berenbaum, who led the new research. "There are agricultural pesticides everywhere," she said. "They accumulate in the wax of bee hives, so bees in particular are exposed. And their habit of foraging very broadly across a staggering diversity of plant species also tends to expose them to many different types of habitats, which may also have different types of chemical residues." Other chemicals are applied directly to the hives, she said. For the past 20 years, beekeepers have used acaricides – chemicals designed to kill mites but not bees – in the hive. While evidence so far does not support the idea that exposure to synthetic pesticides is a cause or significant contributor to colony collapse disorder, the massive die-off of honey bees first reported in late 2006, "it's abundantly clear that pesticides aren't really very good for any insect," Berenbaum said. "So we figured it was about time somebody knew something about how pollinators process toxins." The researchers focused on cytochrome P450s, enzymes that are well-known agents of detoxification "in most air-breathing organisms," Berenbaum said. Other studies had shown that cytochrome P450s in honey bees play a key role in their tolerance of pyrethroid pesticides, such as tau-fluvalinate, which is used to kill mites in the hive. But no previous study had identified specific cytochrome P450s in bees or in other pollinating insects that contribute to pyrethroid tolerance, Berenbaum said. In a series of experiments, the team identified three cytochrome P450s in the honey bee midgut that metabolize tau-fluvalinate. They discovered that these enzymes also detoxify coumaphos, a structurally different organophosphate pesticide that also is used to kill mites in bee hives. "This suggests that these honey bee cytochrome P450s are not particularly specialized," Berenbaum said. "That raises the possibility that a nontoxic dose of tau-fluvalinate may become toxic if an enzyme that is principally involved in its detoxification is otherwise occupied with a different chemical." The evidence also suggests that honey bees were "pre-adapted" to detoxify pyrethroid pesticides, Berenbaum said. Pyrethroids are similar in structure to naturally occurring defensive compounds, called pyrethrins, produced by some flowering plants. Honey bees have likely had a long history of contact with pyrethrins, which are found even in some flowers in the daisy family. It appears that the same enzymes that helped the honey bees detoxify the pyrethrins in nature may also help them tolerate this relatively new pesticide exposure. The new findings should enhance efforts to develop mite control methods that are even less toxic to bees, Berenbaum said. Also on the study team were
|
|||||||||