|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
August 3, 2009
·
Organic
Center rejects organic nutrition study
·
Growers start
trucking firm to move produce
·
Dakota
growers struggle with ‘grasshopper year’
·
EU farmers
bear the brunt of GM crop politics
·
Federal funds to ease
California water woes
Organic Center
rejects organic nutrition study
(Organic
Center) – An advance copy of a study appeared last week that will be
published in the September edition of the "American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition." The published paper, "Nutritional quality of organic
foods: a systematic review," was written by a team led by Alan Dangour, at
the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and funded by the United
Kingdom's Food Standards Agency (FSA).
In their written report, the London team downplayed positive findings in
favor of organic food. In several instances, their analysis showed that organic
foods tend to be more nutrient dense than conventional foods. Plus, their study
omitted measures of some important nutrients, including total antioxidant
capacity. It also lacked quality controls contained in a competing study
released in 2008 by The Organic Center (TOC). Last, the FSA-funded team also
used data from very old studies assessing nutrient levels in plant varieties
that are no longer on the market.
The London
team reported finding statistically significant differences between organically
and conventionally grown crops in three of thirteen categories of nutrients.
Significant differences cited by the team included nitrogen, which was higher
in conventional crops, and phosphorus and tritratable acids, both of which were
higher in the organic crops. Elevated levels of nitrogen in food are regarded
by most scientists as a public health hazard because of the potential for
cancer-causing nitrosamine compounds to form in the human GI tract. Hence, this
finding of higher nitrogen in conventional food favors organic crops, as do the
other two differences.
Despite the fact that these three categories of nutrients
favored organic foods, and none favored conventionally grown foods, the
London-based team concluded that there are no nutritional differences between
organically and conventionally grown crops.
A team of scientists convened by The Organic Center (TOC) carried
out a similar, but more rigorous, review of the same literature. The TOC team
analyzed published research just on plant-based foods. Results differ
significantly from the more narrow FSA review and are reported in the study
"New Evidence Confirms the Nutritional Superiority of Plant-Based Organic
Foods."
The TOC findings are similar for some of the nutrients
analyzed by the FSA team, but differ significantly for two critical classes of
nutrients of great importance in promoting human health – total polyphenols,
and total antioxidant content. The FSA team did not include total antioxidant
capacity among the nutrients studied, and it found no differences in the
phenolic content in 80 comparisons across 13 studies.
Click
here to read the entire response or copy and paste the link below
http://www.organic-center.org/science.nutri.php?action=view&report_id=157
Return to Top
Growers start trucking firm to move
produce
(AlbertLeaTribune.com)
– Farmers in southeastern Minnesota
are hoping to capitalize on a growing interest in local foods and have launched
a trucking business to haul their produce direct to office buildings in the
Twin Cities.
Jack Hedin owns Featherstone Farm, an organic farm in
Rushford. In the cold sorting room, workers sort potatoes, leeks and other
produce in boxes and weigh them.
Hedin said they have produce from Rock Spring Farm and more
on the way from other farms, as well as several pallets of his own produce.
Hedin started the trucking business to solve a problem. He
had a lot of people asking for his produce, but they wanted CSA boxes, which
stands for Community Supported Agriculture.
In CSA, customers commit to buy a farm’s produce for the
season. Every week they get a box of produce directly from the farm. The
problem is how to get all that food to all of those customers.
“By their very nature, CSA members are scattered all over a
metropolitan area and they pick up at many small sites,” Hedin said. “They don’t
want to be backed up at a warehouse somewhere in line with a forklift to get
their produce.”
Until this year, the lack of transportation hurt his
business. Hedin had to turn away customers because he couldn’t get produce to
them fresh enough, and his farm alone didn’t do enough business to cover the
cost of a system of trucks and refrigeration. But Hedin realized other farms
were in the same bind. Together they could justify trucking vegetables to the
Twin Cities.
“You see between three, four pallets from Rock Spring, three
four pallets from Keewatin and three, four of
our own, we consolidate those all (and) put them in stacks according to
destination,” Hedin said.
Five days a week, a truck drives produce up to a warehouse
in the Twin Cities. Then vans distribute the produce to spots around the metro
area according to a schedule.
On Wednesdays, for instance, Hedin sends a van of produce to
Fourth Avenue,
right at the Hennepin
County Government
Center.
“Three-thousand government employees in one building,” he
said. “There are two hooded parking meters right down there and she pulls up
the van, opens the door and sets up a little table.”
It’s uncommon to buy melons that actually ripened on the
vine, or tomatoes that travelled just 150 miles to reach customers instead of
1,500. Mark Muller, with the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy in Minneapolis, said more
people want that.
Muller’s group advocates for locally-grown and organic food
production. Muller said consumers worry about their food’s safety and its
carbon footprint.
“The question has come up again and again, are we in a
little bit of a fad here? Like the pet rock phenomenon,” Muller said. “People
are going back to eating McDonald’s and having these long distribution systems
and get sick of the local foods movement. I think this is a real shift that’s
happening here. We are going to continue having this interest and these are
real market opportunities for farmers.”
Jean Kinsey, however, thinks it’s a fad.
Kinsey co-directs the Food
Industry Center
at the University
of Minnesota. She said
the interest in local food may last, but she’s skeptical that it will ever be a
significant part of the market.
It’s probably useful to know that organic food has been
growing at double digit rates for several years and in total still occupies
less than 3 percent of the total food sales,” Kinsey said.
Still, more farms and more consumers are participating in
CSA than ever before. In 1989, two farms distributed CSA boxes in the Twin
Cities. Today, 43 farms distribute boxes to about 5,000 people.
Jack Hedin said that market could be even larger if there
were more trucking systems like his.
“This is so necessary, not only for our own farms, but also
for the future of this type of small-scale family farming in the future,” Hedin
said. “Because my belief is there would be a lot more farms like ours if this
trucking thing were really solved.”
Hedin said, as more people taste the quality of produce like
his, he believes more people will demand and pay for local food.
Return to Top
Dakota growers struggle with
‘grasshopper year’
(AberdeenNews.com)
MITCHELL, S.D.
- Adele Harty began noticing grasshoppers in Haakon
County (South Dakota) around July 1. It didn't take
long for the insects to spread throughout the area.
''By the 10th or 12th, you could drive down the road and it
was just covered with hoppers,'' the Haakon County Extension educator said.
''We have a lot of grasshoppers.''
And on the vast prairies near the tiny town of Milesville, about 75 miles
west of Pierre, rancher Birgil Smith simply declares that ''they're bad.''
''They're just literally covering the highway,'' he said.
Amy Mesman of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service has declared 2009 a ''grasshopper year,''
with much of the western part of South
Dakota showing an 80 percent increase in grasshopper
population.
It's unwelcome news to residents of Haakon County,
where the insects are taking a toll on sweet clover and alfalfa crops and
causing some producers to alter their harvest schedules.
''The sweet clover that was here is pretty much stripped of
its leaves and flowers,'' Harty said. ''(Alfalfa farmers) have gotten in a lot
quicker to get a second cutting so they get it before the grasshoppers do.''
Although anecdotal evidence shows that grasshoppers have not
yet become a plague in central and eastern South Dakota, they are present in larger
quantities than usual, according to Extension agents based in the Mitchell
region.
But those agents also note that it could get worse in spots,
and that could be bad news for corn and soybean farmers.
The main culprit is the two-striped grasshopper. A cropland
feeder, the insect is showing up in most West River
counties. However, Davison County Extension Educator John Cairns said East River producers also need to be on the lookout for
the green and yellow insects. Cairns
is noticing 'hoppers in the Mitchell region already.
''Grasshoppers are really voracious leaf-eaters...so it's
something that a guy needs to be checking,'' Cairns said. ''I can tell you from walking
out in pastures that they sure are plentiful.''
A swelling population in the area could take a particularly
negative toll on corn crops in the area right now, said Mike Catangui, state
Extension entomologist, because the plant's current pollination phase makes it
particularly sensitive to injury. Catangui said producers should check the
leaves of their corn and soybeans. If the corn or soybeans show 10 and 20
percent defoliation, respectively, it's time to spray for grasshoppers.
''It's all about the bottom line,'' Catangui said.
The grasshopper population could be higher this year because
of last winter's snow cover, Catangui said. He speculates that the snow
insulated the eggs, which are generally laid 4 to 6 inches beneath the ground.
Without the cover, many eggs would not have survived the cold temperatures.
Bruce Helbig, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's state
plant health director, said surveys of West River
counties show that it's ''shaping up to be a bad year for grasshoppers.''
In addition to the two-striped species, Helbig said the
red-legged grasshopper - a fellow cropland annihilator - has also been spotted.
''We're not out of the woods with grasshoppers,'' Helbig
said.
Return to Top
EU farmers bear the brunt of GM crop politics
(theherald.co.uk)
– The EU's double standards on genetically modified crops are proving expensive
for farmers in general and livestock farmers in particular.
On the one hand, the governments allow the importation of GM
produce such as seedless grapes, but on the other refuse to let UK
farmers grow them.
GM offers huge financial benefits to growers and the
environment by allowing them to use crop varieties that are resistant to a whole
range of diseases, thus requiring less chemical sprays. The most obvious
example would be GM varieties that are resistant to potato blight. It's a
devastating fungal disease of potatoes that requires regular spraying of
chemicals to control it. Apart from the obvious environmental advantage of less
spraying, there is also the carbon-emitting fuel savings that can made as a
result of less tractor work.
Whilst arable farmers are being denied access to GM crop
varieties that are widely grown elsewhere in the world and consumed on the
British market, it is livestock farmers who are currently being forced to dig
deepest into their pockets for this double-standard folly.
They are being denied access to cheap imported feedstuffs
like GM modified soy beans and maize, yet are expected to compete with imported
meat from animals fed on GM feedstuffs.
The current main gripe is the EU's zero tolerance for GM
imported feed. When very low levels of non-approved GM material is found in
shipments of animal feed to the EU, the zero tolerance approach results in
these important shipments being rejected. With huge tonnages involved, this has
caused distortion in the markets for soya and maize, reduced supplies and
driven feed price hikes that threaten livestock farmers' viability.
Latest estimates are that the UK livestock industry could face
additional feed costs upwards of £30m for soya rations alone because of
shipments being turned away at EU ports.
NFU Scotland has written recently to Scotland's Cabinet secretary for
rural affairs, Richard Lochhead, seeking his support for more acceptable GM
tolerance levels.
This week, NFUS, along with Ulster Farmers' Union, National
Farmers' Union of England and Wales
and the National Pig Association wrote to the Department for the Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) ministers on the same subject.
Allan Bowie, vice-president of the NFUS, said: "A
practical solution to the issue of low-level GM presence in feed imported into
the EU must be found if livestock producers are to be spared from seeing their
tightening margins eroded by animal feed costs that have been inflated by
dithering in Europe.
"Demanding zero tolerance levels of non-approved GM
crops in imported animal feed is unjustifiable on scientific and food safety grounds
and is symptomatic of Europe's muddied
approach to the whole GM debate.
"Many of our livestock producers - whether cattle,
sheep, pigs or poultry - are limited by climate and geography in the types of
protein feeds that they can grow at home. They are reliant on imported feed to
ensure their stock receives the proper nutrition and at a cost that hopefully
allows them to make a profit on their meat, milk and eggs.
"The European Commission must be made to realise that
reduced livestock production in the EU, brought about by inflated feed costs,
will see our demand for livestock products increasingly met by animals from
other countries that are fed the very same feed our farmers are not allowed to
use. As the acreage of GM crops increases in major exporting countries, and new
varieties are planted, the likelihood of this will increase, as will the cost
to producers."
Return to Top
Federal funds to ease California water woes
(AP
via Yahoo! News) FRESNO, Calif.
– Federal agencies have pledged to send nearly $60 million in grants to help California communities,
farms and dairies suffering from ongoing water shortages.
It's welcome news for farmers on the west side of Fresno County,
the most productive agricultural county in the nation. Farms in the area are
receiving only 10 percent of their federal water allocation this year.
The funding includes $40 million in stimulus money aimed at
drought-relief projects, the bulk of which will go to the agriculturally rich San Joaquin Valley, where three years of dry weather
and irrigation cutbacks have crippled production and caused severe
unemployment.
Most of the Department of Interior's stimulus funds are
intended to help growers dig new wells and install temporary pipelines and
pumps to move water to farms that need it most, Deputy Interior Secretary David
Hayes said.
"The farming communities in the San
Joaquin are central to our bread basket, to our prosperity and to
our agricultural strength as a nation," he said.
The grants, plus other federal funding announced earlier
this year, should help put rural communities back to work by freeing up water
supplies to keep crops and fruit trees growing, Hayes said.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture also announced that it
would direct an additional $18 million in grants to help California farmers, dairy operators and
resource conservation districts use water more efficiently and tackle
environmental problems.
"Regulations for air quality and water quality keep
getting tougher, so this will be a huge help," said Michael Marsh, CEO of
Western United Dairymen.
The biggest winner was the sprawling Westlands Water
District, which received a total of $9.5 million in grants from both agencies.
The district, which produces about $1 billion in crops
annually and is one of Fresno County's biggest employers, says the water
shortages have meant hundreds of thousands of acres used to grow lettuce,
tomatoes and other crops have been fallowed this year.
The USDA grants will help Westlands farmers save enough
water to irrigate 1,000 more acres and put about 800 people to work, said Tom
Birmingham, the district's general manager.
More than $2.2 million will be spent so U.S. Geological
Survey scientists can monitor how increased pumping affects California's
central aquifer, which some state scientists fear could sink enough to slow
delivery of water to Southern California.
The California Aqueduct, a major canal that delivers
drinking water to more than 20 million people, is among many structures
threatened by the sinking.
A study released by the USGS earlier this month revealed
that groundwater pumping is causing the valley floor to sink.
Return to Top
End Transmission