|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
August 19, 2008
·
Tracing
tainted produce is no easy task
·
New tomato
virus concerns Calif. growers
·
GM super
carrot bred for consumers
·
Climate
change blamed for UK aphid boom
·
Bt maize has no effect on
plant bug fitness
Tracing tainted produce is no easy
task
(USA
Today) – When government investigators found a hot trail to a potential cause
of the salmonella outbreak that had confounded them for weeks, it led them to
the "Pink Palace." Nicknamed for its pink
paint job, the palace is the McAllen Produce Terminal Market, a 42-acre
wholesale market 5 miles north of a major border crossing point for Mexican
fresh produce entering the USA.
From concrete loading docks, 100 small distributors and importers peddle tons
of fresh produce a day, including Mexican-grown peppers, limes, mangoes and
watermelon, mostly to supermarket and restaurant buyers. Need a new TV or
lawnmower? They're here, too. It was jalapeno peppers that drew Food and Drug
Administration investigators. Last month, they found Mexican-grown jalapenos at
a small distributor here that were contaminated with the same strain of
salmonella saintpaul that's sickened 1,405 people nationwide and in Canada.
Whether those peppers, or others from a different farm in Mexico, caused the outbreak is
uncertain. The investigation continues. Mexico says its tests show none of
the strain on suspect farms. U.S.
lawmakers have said the investigation, now in its third month, has taken too
long. They've also called for stronger laws ensuring that food sellers know
where their products come from so that future outbreaks can be solved faster.
But the workings of the McAllen
market reveal the sometimes long, convoluted and freewheeling way that fresh
produce moves from farm to fork. They also underscore how difficult traceback
can be, especially when small players are involved. That's been the case in the
salmonella investigation, which focused on tomatoes before turning to peppers.
"The traceback has worked. It's just been slow," says David Acheson,
the FDA's food-safety chief, of the investigation. The McAllen market is capitalism in motion. In
the morning, semis, pickups and vans pour through the gates of the complex
carrying fresh produce, mostly from Mexico. It's delivered to
distributors who rent stalls in the market's giant warehouses.
In the afternoon, much of the produce goes out. Buyers include U.S. retailers with stores from Georgia to Illinois, local distributors who deliver to
restaurants via pickups, and flea-market vendors. Buyers can walk the docks,
stall to stall, eyeing the goods. Most often, they drive to the dock of a
preferred supplier. Prices are spoken, not written. Crumpled cash is as common
as credit. Orders for one case, or a truckload, are filled all the same.
Most of the USA's fresh
produce once moved through such markets in cities from New
York to Chicago to Los Angeles, says Bryan
Silbermann, president of the Produce Marketing Association, which represents
3,000 grower/shippers, retailers and others. Today, the markets handle about
20%, as big retailers, restaurants and food producers have shifted to buying
directly from growers and approved suppliers.
Improved traceability
The change has improved food traceability. Big companies, including Costco
Wholesale, Fresh Express and Ace Tomato, say computerized systems enable them
to trace fresh produce from stores to growers within hours or minutes. Key to
that capability? Numbers or other identifiers that go on cases or pallets of
produce and stay with the produce from the field or packing shed to the
processing plant or store.
But at the McAllen
market, crates and pallets of produce sometimes sit on the loading dock without
such identifying information, even though sellers can say where they got them.
Still, traceability in such instances is lost or at risk, says Ace Tomato
President Parker Booth.
Produce in crates or pallets may be mingled with produce from multiple growers.
Once unmarked produce gets to a store warehouse, it may be more easily mixed
with other produce, he adds.
Booth's company won't buy from terminal markets, even though he says the
produce is probably safe. "We don't know where that product came
from," he says. "We want to buy direct from the grower."
Frontera Produce, one of Texas' largest fresh
produce distributors, is headquartered 10 miles north of the McAllen market. In the past, it bought from
market distributors if its regular suppliers ran short and Frontera needed more
fruits or vegetables to fill orders for customers such as Wal-Mart, Kroger and
Safeway. Spot buying like that is common in the industry, says Frontera CEO
Will Steele.
A year ago, Frontera eliminated purchases from distributors who couldn't track
produce to the field. About six of several dozen failed to meet the new rules.
Some were from the McAllen
market, says Steele.
"Eighty percent of the industry has good traceback, 20% doesn't, and they
put all of us at risk," he says.
The contaminated jalapeno peppers that the FDA said it found at the McAllen market were
handled by distributor Agricola Zaragoza. On July 21, it recalled the peppers,
which had been shipped to customers in Texas
and Georgia
in plastic crates and bags with no brand name or label, according to a company
statement. The company refused further comment.
'One up, one back'
Federal law, adopted as part of The Bioterrorism Act after the 9/11 terrorist
attacks, requires food producers, distributors and others to record to whom
they sent product and from whom they received it.
In documents published in 2004, the FDA said 20% of food traceback
investigations ended prematurely because of inadequate record-keeping by the
industry.
The one-up, one-back requirement fell short of what the FDA had wanted, says
William Hubbard, a former FDA official who oversaw policy at that time. He says
the FDA wanted distributors or wholesalers to keep records tracking a food back
to its source. One-up, one-back was settled upon after food companies argued
that a full accounting would be too onerous, given that multiple distributors
may handle food as it moves through the supply chain, Hubbard says.
Nearly everybody can fulfill one-up, one-back, Steele says. But the FDA's
Acheson says broad use of paper records by smaller companies involved in the
salmonella traceback delayed FDA investigators.
The FDA also lost hours trying to reconcile records company-to-company along
the supply chain, asserts Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich. At a congressional hearing
last month, Stupak displayed a box from a California
supermarket that had no identifying information except "tomatoes" and
"USA."
The delays cost tomato producers dearly. Their sales tanked throughout June
amid FDA suspicions that tomatoes were to blame for the outbreak before the
agency's focus shifted in July to peppers. The FDA is currently warning
consumers to avoid raw jalapeno and serrano peppers grown in Mexico and foods that contain them.
"A faster system … would allow (us) to exclude products faster … and give
you a source faster," Acheson told lawmakers. Many foods can be hard to
track. A package of hamburger that's ground in a store, for example, may include
beef from multiple suppliers. Stores, regulated by local and state laws, may
not be required to keep grinding records, says Ben Miller, traceback
coordinator for the Minnesota Department of Agriculture.
Fresh produce is particularly tough. It moves fast so it doesn't perish. It may
be repacked, sold in bulk and handled by a half-dozen companies with different
tracking capabilities. On a recent morning at the McAllen market, Javier Topete worked off four
computer screens in an air-conditioned room off the loading dock of his
company, Soles Produce.
Within minutes, Topete determined the Mexican orchard in which a particular
case of mangoes were grown. The mangoes were headed to retailers including
Wal-Mart and Sam's Club. Nearby, Romeo and Gracie Gutierrez,owners of GTZ
Produce,worked their stall together. Romeo does the buying; Gracie waits for
buyers on the dock, swatting flies in the midday heat.
GTZ buys produce from a broker, who buys from growers in the USA and Mexico, says Romeo. One of GTZ's frequent
customers is a distributor that sells to a regional grocery chain, he adds.
Following a one-up, one-back trail can be fast. It took Minnesota
food-safety officials three days to track a contaminated jalapeno garnish from
a restaurant there through three U.S.
distributors to two growers and a distributor in Mexico, says Miller. One of the
three unidentified U.S.
distributors was at the McAllen
market, but it was not Agricola Zaragoza. The FDA says it was first led to the McAllen market by other
state investigators' tracebacks.
Setting new standards
Getting that kind of speed in every traceback is needed, proponents of new
standards say. Since late last year, companies such as Frontera have joined
trade associations and retailers, including Food Lion, to set new traceability
standards.
The Produce Traceability Initiative calls for numbers on cases of produce that
identify producers, lot numbers and harvest dates, and scanners that record
cases' movements through shipping. Ace Tomato's system costs about 1 cent a
box, whether the box sells for $6 or $13, Booth says. Even for small firms, the
cost would be "minimal" over time, he adds.
Backers of the initiative expect to set deadlines for adoption of electronic
records within weeks. Compliance will be voluntary. The FDA's Acheson says
mandatory rules may be needed.
Either way, Frontera's Steele says change is needed. "There will always be
outbreaks," he says. "What matters is … whether we can go to a store
and say, " 'We've detected a problem, and it's isolated to this particular
pallet or box and let's keep doing business.' "
TRACKING TAINTED
PEPPERS
Here's the trail Minnesota
food-safety investigators followed to track jalapeno peppers from a restaurant
in Roseville back to Mexico.
1 On June 30, state investigators visit a restaurant in Roseville, Minn.,
after getting a flurry of salmonella saintpaul illness reports in the previous
week. They check the credit card receipts of customers, some ill, and compare
what they ate. Their focus turns to jalapenos used in a garnish. All told, 28
people are sickened. Investigators also get invoices from the restaurant
showing where it got jalapenos.
2 Investigators determine that the jalapenos came from
Distributor A in St. Paul
that diced them.
3 Distributor A got peppers from fresh-produce Distributor B
based near St. Paul
on June 7, 10, 13 and 14.
4 Distributor B received peppers on June 5 from Distributor
C at the McAllen Produce Terminal Market in McAllen, Texas.
Distributor B also got peppers on June 9 and 13 from Distributors D and E at a
produce market in Los Angeles.
5 Distributor C got produce from a distributor in Nuevo
Leon, Mexico. Peppers arrived in McAllen on May
28, one day after leaving Mexico.
6 Distributors D and E got produce from two growers in Baja California in Mexico. Peppers left Mexico
on June 2 and 8.
Sources: Minnesota Departments of Agriculture and Health
Return to Top
New tomato virus concerns California growers
(Daily Democrat) – A new and unidentified virus has appeared
in a number of processing tomato fields in Northern
California.
This new virus looks a lot like tobacco streak virus, which
is fairly common in the delta. But when University of California
plant pathologists ran DNA tests for tobacco streak on tissue samples from
these mysteriously diseased plants they came back negative. Tests for other
familiar tomato viruses have also come back negative.
While this new virus has already shown up early this summer
in quite a few tomato fields, it has not yet caused significant crop damage.
"Another virus is very widespread in our area,"
said Gene Miyao, UC Cooperative Extension farm adviser in the Sacramento Valley.
"The symptoms on plants are an odd combination between tobacco streak and
spotted wilt. Young branches have necrotic streaks beginning near the apical
growth but extending five inches or so at times down the stem.
Flower bracts on these branches often are blighted. Necrotic
spotting on the new leaves appears spotted wilt-like. Fruit is without symptoms
at this point. Tests have confirmed this suspected virus is neither spotted
wilt nor tobacco streak."
Miyao said he first began to hear reports of the new virus
in June from pest control advisers. He has since seen it or heard of it in
fields in southern Colusa County, around Woodland
and in the delta region of San
Joaquin County.
"It looks like tobacco streak virus, which is more
prevalent in the delta," Miyao said.
Like tobacco streak this mysterious virus causes a necrotic line
or streak from the apex five or six inches down the stem."
But after UC Davis DNA tests showed that it is not tobacco
streak virus, a number of UC plant pathologists began trying to figure out what
this ailment is.
"The plants are very vigorous; they're not wilted
except for the parts that show virus symptoms," Miyao said. "That
would indicate that the problem is a virus, rather than one of the familiar
soil borne fungal diseases that attack the vascular system of tomatoes."
Tobacco streak virus is transmitted by thrips, and this new
virus may also be transmitted by thrips.
"At this point it is not devastating," Miyao said.
But he added that it is unnerving to not know what the disease is, because that
means no one knows how serious it could become or how it should be managed.
Curly top is another tomato virus that gives the foliage a
purplish color that makes the plants look almost like ornamentals. Miyao said
he has only seen a little curly top virus in the Sacramento Valley
this year.
Alfalfa mosaic virus is transmitted by aphids. Although
aphids have been widespread in the Sacramento
Valley this year, alfalfa
mosaic has not become a serious issue.
"Virus infected plants are more prevalent in our area
this year," Miyao said. "Annually, curly top and alfalfa mosaic are
commonly found in local fields but at low levels, often as a few curious
looking plants in a field."
The increasing incidence of tomato viruses in the Sacramento Valley is, so far, worth noticing to
make sure it does not grow into a more serious problem in the future.
Return to Top
GM super carrot bred for consumers
(NaturalNews) Researchers at the Baylor College of Medicine
in Texas have
genetically engineered a carrot to provide more calcium, according to a paper
published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
In the past, most genetically engineered products have been
marketed to farmers, claiming to provide benefits such as herbicide resistance.
The "super carrot," however is part of a new trend toward products
that claim to provide a direct benefit to consumers. Other researchers are
working to modify potatoes to absorb less oil during frying, and to boost the
cancer-fighting-chemical content of broccoli.
While carrots contain naturally occurring calcium, the
mineral is poorly absorbed by the human body. In the modified carrots, a gene
has been changed to allow calcium to move more freely across the carrot's cell
membranes.
To test the carrot, researchers fed both normal and
genetically modified carrots to 15 women and 15 men between the ages of 21 and
29, then conducted urine tests to determine calcium absorption. The researchers
found that participants absorbed 41 percent more calcium from the genetically
modified carrot than from the natural variety.
That amounts to a calcium content of between 27 and 29
milligrams per 100 grams (four ounces) of modified carrots.
The recommended dose of calcium is 1,000 milligrams per day.
Researchers acknowledged that the carrots by themselves could never provide a
person with enough calcium.
"In the future, this would be to simply offer consumers
that choice," said researcher Jay Morris. The researchers also suggested
that other plants could also be modified to provide more calcium.
Researcher Kendal Hirschi noted that the carrots still have
to pass safety tests before they can be provided to consumers.
Dairy products are a well-known source of dietary calcium,
but many people cannot eat them due to allergies, or choose not to for health
or other reasons. Green leafy vegetables are also a good dietary source of
calcium.
Return to Top
Climate change blamed for UK aphid boom
(bbsrc.ac.uk) – Aphids are emerging as sentinels of climate
change, researchers at BBSRC-supported Rothamsted Research have shown. One of
the UK’s
most damaging aphids – the peach-potato aphid (Myzus persicae) – has been found
to be flying two weeks earlier for every 1°C rise in mean temperature for
January and February combined.
This year, the first aphid was caught on 25 April, which is
almost four weeks ahead of the 42-year average. This work is reported in BBSRC
Business, the quarterly research highlights magazine of BBSRC (the
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council).
Dr Richard Harrington of the Rothamsted Insect Survey said:
“One of the most noticeable consequences of climate change
in the UK
is the frequency of mild winters. As a direct result of this, aphids seeking
new sources of food are appearing significantly earlier in the year and in
significantly higher numbers. We have been studying the seasonal biology of
aphids for a long time now and we know that populations can continue to grow
over the winter and spring provided that conditions are warm enough. After a
warm winter, there are much larger numbers flying and they are hence detected
much earlier. This means that there are more aphids flying in spring and early
summer, when crops are particularly vulnerable to damage.”
Scientists at Rothamsted Research have been monitoring the
flying form of all aphid species for 42 years. They use a network of 16 suction
traps (12 in England and 4
in Scotland),
placed at various sites, to collect a representative sample of all flying
insects. The long term data on aphids can be used to understand the wider
implications of climate change, and also to prepare for the season ahead by
determining the need for and timing of aphid control measures (based on
preceding winter temperatures). As well as being important indicators of a
changing climate, aphids can cause devastating damage to crops. They extract
large amounts of sap, weakening the plant, and also spread plant viruses. In
addition, because the sap is very high in sugars the aphids excrete very sticky
honeydew, which can encourage the growth of sooty moulds that build up and
prevent sunlight from reaching the leaves, causing further weakening.
Professor Nigel Brown, Director of Science and Technology,
BBSRC said:
“Environmental change is one of the big challenges facing
the world today. These long-term data on the seasonal appearance of flying
aphids not only show that there are already noticeable changes in the UK
climate, but they also provide the knowledge which will help to mitigate the
consequences.”
Return to Top
Bt maize has no effect on plant bug fitness
(CropBiotech Update) – One of the major concerns with the
use of insecticidal protein-expressing transgenic crops is their possible
effects on target organisms.
Scientists from the Aachen University and University of
Göttingen in Germany investigated the effect of the Bt-corn line Mon88017 on
plant bugs, specifically the rice leaf bug (Trigonotylus caelestialium), as
non-target organisms. The Cry3Bb1-expressing Bt-corn variety is resistant to
the western corn rootworm, one of the most devastating crop pests in Europe.
Results of ELISA tests indicated that rice leaf bugs in
Bt-corn plots ingested Cry3Bb1 at all stages of their life. Nymphs contained on
average 8 ng (nanograms) Cry3Bb1. Adult insects, on the other hand, showed
varying amounts of Cry3Bb1, ranging from a few to over 60 ng.
Despite this exposure there were no indications of a
negative impact of the Bt-corn and the potential stressor Cry3Bb1 on the rice
leaf bug. The field densities of the rice leaf bug were always similar in
MON88017, the near-isogenic line and conventional maize varieties.
The paper published by Transgenic Research is available at
http://www.springerlink.com/content/836p55v111835448/fulltext.pdf Non subscribers
can read the abstract at http://www.springerlink.com/content/836p55v111835448/?p=df06f249f0d64ccf850307b9b750a29d&pi=2
Return to Top
End Transmission