|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
August 30, 2011
·
GM corn pest resistance
rattles industry
·
Texas+ dust
bowl driving commodity rally
·
Crop mobs
sprout to help small farmers
·
Are farm
subsidies making Americans fat?
·
Kenya farmers
learning greenhouse production
GM corn pest resistance rattles industry
(AFP)
– A voracious pest which has long plagued corn farmers is devouring a
widely-used variety that was genetically modified to thwart the rootworms,
raising fears of a new superbug.
The news sent shares of farm chemical and seed maker
Monsanto Co. down nearly 4 percent on Monday, according to the Associated
Press.
So far, there is no evidence that a significant number of
rootworms have developed a resistance to the corn's protective toxin.
However, experts warn that farmers may be forced to resume
the heavy use of pesticides if resistant bugs become widespread.
They also caution that farmers may be using genetically
modified crops in ways that hasten the development of resistant bugs.
"The western corn rootworm is one of the most
significant insect pests of corn in the United
States and has a potential to become a very significant
insect in Europe," said Michael Gray, a crop scientist at the University of Illinois.
Farmers used to be able to manage the pests by rotating
which crops they planted in their fields.
But rootworms started to lay their eggs on soybeans -- the
most common substitute -- which meant farmers had to use pesticides to get rid
of them. The hardy and adaptive bugs have also developed resistance to some
pesticides, Gray said Monday.
Monsanto released the first seeds that were
genetically-modified to protect themselves from rootworms in 2003. US farmers used this type of seed for 45% of the
US
crop in 2009.
Evidence of the first resistant rootworms was found in four Iowa fields that
suffered extensive damage from the pests in 2009.
Gray is currently investigating whether rootworms which
devoured genetically modified corn in Illinois
this year have also developed a resistance.
Laboratory testing published last month confirmed that the
bugs collected from the Iowa
fields were able to pass a resistance to the crop's toxins on to their
offspring.
"These results suggest that improvements in resistance
management and a more integrated approach to the use of Bt
crops may be necessary," wrote lead researcher Aaron Gassmann
of Iowa State University.
The fields where the resistant rootworms were found had been
planted with the genetically modified seeds for at least three consecutive
years.
That could have helped the bugs develop a resistance, Gassmann wrote.
Another contributor could be the insufficient use of
"refuges," he concluded.
Farmers are supposed to plant 20 percent of their fields
with corn that doesn't have the genetic modification so that if resistant bugs
develop they will end up breeding with non-resistant rootworms drawn to the
unprotected plants and lessen the chance of passing resistance on to the next
generation.
Monsanto is already working to make it easier for farmers to
comply with these government-mandated "refuges" by selling bags that
contain a mix of unprotected and protected seeds.
It also has several other products already on the market
which could work as a substitute if significant resistance develops and has
several new products in the pipeline, said spokesman Lee Quarles.
But while Monsanto is taking the study results
"seriously" there is no reason for farmers to stop using the current
seeds, he said.
"Today's products work," Quarles told AFP.
"They continue to provide tremendous performance to farmers and we're
seeing that performance on greater than 99% of all acres planted."
Return to Top
Texas+ dust bowl driving
commodity rally
(Bloomberg)
-- The worst U.S.
crop conditions since the dust bowl era of the 1930s are tightening domestic
supplies of cotton and boosting prospects for a rebound in prices that fell
more than any other commodity this year.
Withering fields in Texas,
the largest U.S.
grower, led Governor Rick Perry, a Republican presidential candidate and the
son of a cotton farmer, to ask supporters to pray for rain to end a “monster
drought” shrinking cattle herds and killing crops. Cotton futures in New York may rise as
much as 15 percent by the end of December to $1.20 a pound, the median of 17
estimates in a Bloomberg survey of analysts showed.
“It’s by far the worst drought I’ve ever been through,” said
Dahlen Hancock, 52, who has farmed cotton for three
decades near Lubbock, Texas, and lost more than half of the 5,850 acres he
planted this year. “We thought we’d kind of seen it all, to some degree. This
rewrote the books.”
Shortages in everything from corn to coffee are spurring
speculators to buy crops, anticipating that slower economic growth will still
mean supply deficits. At a time when bets on higher oil prices dropped 13
percent in seven weeks and those on copper disappeared, wagers on 11
agricultural commodities rose 38 percent, U.S. Commodity Futures Trading
Commission data show.
Cotton slumped 52 percent since reaching the all-time high
of $2.197 in March and encouraged U.S. farmers to allocate 25 percent
more acres to the crop. This year’s 28 percent plunge in prices is the worst
among the Standard & Poor’s GSCI gauge of 24 commodities, which rose 4.2
percent.
Gap, American Eagle
The MSCI All-Country World Index of equities fell 9.1
percent, and Treasuries returned 7.2 percent, a Bank of America Merrill Lynch
index shows. Costlier fiber may raise costs for clothing companies from Gap
Inc. to American Eagle Outfitters Inc.
The drought in Texas
and parts of five neighboring states may exacerbate gains in United
Nations-tracked world food prices, which held near a record in June. Global
corn stockpiles will slide for a third year through August 2012, as a record
harvest fails to meet demand, U.S. Department of Agriculture data show. Wheat
inventories will shrink for a second year, and soybean supplies will drop, the
USDA estimates. Damage to grazing pastures means the U.S. cattle herd on July 1 was the
smallest for that date since at least 1973.
The USDA expects 30 percent of the domestic cotton crop will
be lost, topping the previous record of 27 percent in 1933, when dust storms
wiped out fields in Texas and Oklahoma amid the Great
Depression.
Crop Insurance
Insurance and programs to conserve soil and water are
helping today’s farmers avoid the same economic devastation, according to Jon
Devine, a lead economist at Cotton Inc., a trade group based in Cary, North
Carolina.
Claims will be higher than in recent years because of damage
to non-irrigated, dry-land cotton and crops on farms with access to stored
water supplies, according to Ted Etheredge. He’s the
president of Lubbock, Texas-based Armtech Insurance,
the fifth-largest U.S.
writer of federally sponsored crop policies.
U.S.
farmers are expected to make record profit this year, the USDA estimates. Farm
income may reach $94.7 billion in 2011 and cotton farmers’ average net-cash
profit, or earnings used to pay expenses and debt, may rise 21 percent to
$294,200 this year, for a second consecutive gain, the USDA estimated in
February.
Monitored Warehouses
The U.S.
may harvest about 16.55 million bales of cotton in the year that began Aug. 1,
down 8.6 percent from an estimated 18.1 million bales in the previous season,
according to the USDA. A bale weighs 480 pounds, or 218 kilograms.
Cotton may rally because the U.S. has “basically run out of
stocks this year” until the harvest begins in October, said Peter Egli, a Chicago-based director of risk management at
merchant Plexus Cotton Ltd. The government estimates American stockpiles at the
end of July were the lowest in 15 years. Inventories in warehouses monitored by
the ICE Futures U.S. exchange plunged 86 percent this year.
“This bottleneck situation could temporarily spike prices,” Egli said. Manufacturers “don’t have to panic,” because
supplies from Australia and Brazil will compensate for U.S. losses when they are available
for shipment in May and June, he said.
Global production is forecast at a record 122.7 million
bales, up 7.1 percent from a year ago, according to the USDA. Worldwide consumption
will rise 1.1 percent to 115.2 million bales, the estimates show.
Chinese Production
In March, cotton surged to the highest in 140 years of
trading in New York as flooding in Pakistan and freezes in China ruined crops.
Output in India,
the largest exporter after the U.S.,
may jump to a record in the season ending Sept. 30, according to the country’s
Cotton Advisory Board. Australia,
the third-biggest exporter, may plant a record crop in 2011-2012, industry
group Cotton Australia
said Aug. 10. Production in China,
the world’s top grower, may rise for the first time in four years, according to
Beijing Orient Agribusiness Consultant Ltd.
Concern about economic growth may curb demand, limiting the
rally anticipated in the Bloomberg survey. The U.S. will expand at an average
2.3 percent annual rate in the second half of the year, about a percentage
point less than projected in July, the median estimate of 53 economists
surveyed by Bloomberg showed.
Economic Growth
Gross domestic product climbed at a 1 percent annual rate
from April through June, less than previously estimated, capping the weakest
six months of the recovery that began in mid 2009, revised Commerce Department
figures showed on Aug. 26.
Slowing job growth and plunging confidence, exacerbated by
political gridlock and financial-market turmoil this month, threaten to weigh
on consumer and business spending for the rest of the year. The Federal
Reserve’s policy-setting committee said Aug. 9 that growth is “considerably
slower” than anticipated.
Global consumption slid 11 percent to a four-year low in the
2008-2009 marketing year, amid the worst global recession since World War II. U.S.
use fell to the lowest in at least four decades. U.S. apparel imports dropped 12
percent to $64.3 billion in 2009, according to the National Council of Textile
Organizations.
World use also declined during the U.S. recessions in 1990-1991 and
1981-1982, USDA data show. Futures fell by at least 10 percent during four of
the past six recessions. The biggest decline in that time was 44 percent, from
1973 to 1975.
Buying Underwear
“The consumer gets the final vote,” said Mike Stevens, an
independent trader in Mandeville,
Louisiana. “The mill could buy
the cotton, the mill could spin it, and make it into a t- shirt or underwear,
but somebody’s got to take that off the shelf. If you’re a guy out of work,
he’s not running here buying new underwear tomorrow.”
The 7.6 percent rebound in global demand after the end of
the U.S.
recession helped push futures up 54 percent in 2009 and 92 percent in 2010. In
the year ended July 31, U.S.
exporters booked a record number of cotton shipments for the marketing year
that began this month, according to Devine of Cotton Inc.
Texas
farmers produced $1.15 billion of cotton in 2008, boosting the state’s $1
trillion economy, data from the National Cotton Council and the Department of
Commerce show. The state’s cotton industry employs more than 38,000 people,
generating about $5.5 billion of revenue.
Abandoning Crops
Farmers have abandoned 54 percent of cotton fields in the
High Plains region of Texas,
the biggest growing area, according to Plains Cotton Growers Inc., a Lubbock,
Texas-based industry group. This year’s drought caused a record $5.2 billion in
farm losses across the state, according to Texas A&M
University.
“My dad was a dry-land cotton farmer,” Governor Perry said
in a speech while standing on bales of hay at the Iowa State Fair in Des Moines on Aug. 15.
“You want to know how I learned my faith? Be a
dry-land cotton farmer, and you understand that you’re going to spend a lot of
time asking the good Lord to do something on the weather side of things.”
Conditions today in the south central U.S., particularly in Texas
and Oklahoma, are the worst since at least the
dust bowl era, said Gary Raines, an economist at industry consultant FCStone Fibers & Textiles in Nashville, Tennessee.
Worsening Conditions
The conditions that caused the drought will probably persist
or intensify, according to Chris Hyde, a meteorologist at MDA EarthSat Weather Inc. in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
The one- year drought, the most severe on records going back to 1895, goes
beyond Texas
cotton.
More than 50 percent of the area in a six-state region in
the southern U.S., which consists of Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi and Tennessee, is experiencing “exceptional” drought, according to
the University of Nebraska Lincoln’s U.S. Drought Monitor. Oklahoma had the hottest July ever,
according to the Oklahoma Climatological Survey.
In Texas, the second-biggest winter-wheat grower and the
biggest cattle producer, 99.9 percent of the state is suffering from drought,
and 96 percent of pasture and range conditions were rated “poor” or “very poor”
in the week ended Aug. 21.
Clothing retailers are still contending with the surge in
prices over the past two years. San Francisco-based Gap, the largest U.S.
apparel chain, reported Aug. 18 that second-quarter profit fell 19 percent as
higher retail prices failed to cover the gain in manufacturing costs.
Squeezing Profit Margins
“Companies have seen 10 to 20 percent year-on-year cost
increases” in cotton and other raw material costs, said Adrienne Tennant, an
analyst at Janney Montgomery Scott LLC in Vienna, Virginia.
“The price increases that we saw six to nine months ago are showing up in
products now.”
Cotton will squeeze margins in the second half of the year
for American Eagle Outfitters Inc., the Pittsburgh-based teen- apparel chain,
Chief Executive Officer James O’Donnell said Aug. 24 on a conference call with
analysts. The company lowered its full-year profit forecast to 85 cents to 95
cents a share, from a May projection of $1.02.
The slump in prices since March won’t reduce costs until
later this year, Susan McGalla, chief executive officer
of Wet Seal Inc., the Foothill Ranch, California-based
apparel chain, said in a conference call with analysts Aug. 18.
“When we think about buy, hold or short, cotton’s definitely
something that we would lean toward buying,” said James Dailey, who manages
$200 million at TEAM Financial Management LLC in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
“You just look across the supply and demand situation for a lot of agricultural
commodities, they’re very tenuous.”
Return to Top
Crop mobs sprout to help small farmers
(McClatchy
News Service) – Jamie Vidich looked over his acre
of farm land and considered the tasks that had to be done that day. Remove
diseased eggplant and tomato plants, pull irrigation tape, make soil boxes for
new seeds, uproot weeds -- normally it would take him days to finish. It's
usually just him, a brother and a friend working the land at Bear Island Farm
in Colleton River Plantation. But Sunday, the chores only took a few hours.
More than 15 volunteers came to the small farm as part of a
growing trend of helping hands. Popping up all over the country, "crop
mobs" are loose organizations of volunteers that organize trips to assist
independent farmers with daily tasks.
"There's more people out than
I've ever seen here," Vidich said.
The idea grew out of North
Carolina's Triangle region when a group of farmers
got together about three years ago to help one of their own with a harvest.
Crop mobs have quickly evolved, an outgrowth of the
recent interest in organic and locally grown foods that has swept the nation.
More than 50 groups now exist, according to the clearinghouse website
CropMob.org.
A crop mob based out of Savannah sprouted earlier this spring.
Organizer Andrea Malloy first investigated the concept at a conference of
Georgia Organics, an organization that promotes organic and sustainable
farming. She teamed with Savannah
resident Grace Corry and, with the help of Crop Mob Atlanta, got under way.
They work within a two-hour radius of the city, and have put their sweat into
six farms so far. Malloy said the Bear
Island mob was the best
attended yet.
Bear
Island connected to the
mob when Malloy spoke to Vidich for a survey she was
doing for the conservation league about small farmers in Beaufort and Jasper
counties. Vidich started farming about a year ago on
land that's been in his family since before Colleton River
became a plantation.
The mob worked for several hours Sunday morning before
breaking for lunch, catered by Cast Iron Chef, followed by a refreshing dip in
the nearby river.
"Small farms couldn't do what they do without support
from the community," Vidich said. "It's the
community that makes the farm."
Lady's Island resident
David Hislop came to help but also to glean knowledge
from Vidich. Hislop helped
start the Sea Island Local Outlet at Habersham Marketplace that sells locally
grown products. Now he's moving into farming with a plot at Habersham, where he
plans to raise chickens and grow vegetables.
Beaufort still is an up-and-coming area in terms of farming,
Hislop said. It hasn't reached a saturation point,
and farmers have to fight each other for business. In the spirit of the crop
mob, farmers will have to work together if they want to flourish, he said.
"I believe in collaboration between farmers," Hislop said. "We complement more than we
compete."
For more information about Crop Mob, go to
www.cropmobgeorgia.com or www.facebook.com/CropMobSavannah.
Return to Top
Are farm subsidies making Americans fat?
(Orlando
Sentinel) – At a time when the nation is struggling to reel in its fiscal
and physical waistlines, cutting programs that may bloat both seems like a good
idea. As a result, farm subsidies — payments the federal government gives to
American farmers when their profits are off — have found themselves squarely in
the crosshairs.
When the federal government subsidizes a crop, farmers are
enticed to grow more of it, which drives supply up and prices down. Food
manufacturers buy more abundant cheap crops and thus more of them stream into
the food supply. If the food happens to be unhealthy, that's a problem. Or so
the argument goes.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture distributes $10 billion
to $30 billion a year in subsidies to farmers. More than 90 percent of those
subsidies go to growers of five crops: corn, wheat, rice, soybeans and cotton.
Less than 1 percent goes to fruits and vegetables — precisely the foods the
federal government says we need to eat more.
Corn, which reaps nearly 40 percent of the subsidies, and
wheat are the most heavily subsidized. They are also staples in a variety of
common, fattening, nutrition-deficient foods.
Corn is the main ingredient in high-fructose corn syrup, a
cheap sweetener laced into packaged foods and sodas. Wheat gets refined into
flour, a chief component of breads, bagels, processed cereals, cakes, cookies
and muffins — foods nutritionists refer to as simple or "bad"
carbohydrates. Both corn and wheat are heavily used to feed livestock, a
leading source of saturated fats.
Subsidies also encourage farmers to focus on innovations
that aid the production of those crops, making them even cheaper.
So has the government tipped the food scale in a direction
that makes us fat?
Not so fast, say agricultural economists.
"I get annoyed because everyone points to farm
subsidies as one of the top two reasons for the obesity epidemic, but it's
irrelevant," said Julian Alston, professor of agricultural economics at
the University of California, Davis,
adding that eliminating farm subsidies would have a negligible effect on
obesity rates.
"If farm subsidies have contributed to America's
obesity epidemic, the impact has been slight and indirect," added Richard
Post, director of the Center for Nutrition Policy for the USDA, creator of the
new My Plate nutrition guidelines. "Subsidies have a far smaller impact on
shelf price than many Americans think."
Not all about the money
However, the Environment Working Group — a nonprofit
public-health advocacy group that has been tracking and condemning farm-subsidy
policy for years — sees the matter differently.
"Decades of subsidizing big grain growers have assured
a cheap, steady supply of corn and wheat, which is in almost every food on the
shelves," said David Degennaro, legislative
analyst for the environmental group. "It has contributed indirectly to
making the wrong kind of calories cheaper."
Even so, said Post, "If the price of corn went up 50
percent, the net effect would increase the cost of a box of cornflakes by 1.6
cents or a 2-liter bottle of soda by 1.9 cents. That is not likely to impact
consumer behavior."
Another report shows that a 30 percent increase in the price
of feed grain would raise the price of meat and poultry by 4 to 5 percent.
Such a shift could affect consumer behavior, said Lisa
Powell, a senior research scientist at the Institute for Health Research and
Policy at the University
of Chicago.
"Individuals are sensitive to food pricing."
Powell has done studies that show the consumption of fresh
fruits and vegetables goes up when prices go down. She's also found that food
price and weight are related.
In a study she published in 2009, children's weight was
sensitive to the price of fruits and vegetable, and that was particularly true
for low-income children. "A 10 percent reduction in fruit and vegetable
prices reduced low-income children's BMI by 1.4 percent," Powell said.
But shelf price isn't the only issue here. There's also the
problem of conflicting agendas.
Subsidy programs are at odds with federal health
recommendations, said Dr. Neal Barnard, president of the Physicians Committee
for Responsible Medicine, which issued a report this year on the conflict
between America's
agricultural and health policies.
The new USDA dietary guidelines released in January
emphasize eating more fruits and vegetables and less processed fats, meats and
corn-based sweeteners. Yet the unhealthy foods are the ones that get the
subsidies. "From a public-health perspective, altering these policies is key to addressing the epidemic of obesity among
Americans," Barnard said.
Also
Why carbs count and how to count them
New diabetes research
shows double the number of adults have it
Co-author Matt Goulding will answer questions about making healthy
restaurant choices
After gastric bypass
surgery, some patients battle new addictions
Florida ranks in top 10 of states with high
diabetes rates
Conquer cravings and tame temptation
See more stories »
XLack of sleep contributing to obesityHow fat is America? New report gives nation an
FEating at restaurants boosts risk of obesity,
experts warnAs Americans' debt has soared, so has
obesity Eliminating U.S. grain subsidies (wheat, rice and corn) would lead to
each American eating about 1,000 fewer calories a year, according to a 2009
analysis published by Alston and his colleagues. That amounts to a pound lost
every three and a half years, which is better than the average pound Americans
gain each year.
And eliminating subsidies would likely improve the nation's
economic health.
Times have changed
Farming has changed a lot since the Great Depression, when
farm subsidies played a big role in helping farmers survive and families eat.
"But it doesn't make sense to rely on policies we had 80 years ago,"
said Degennaro.
Every year since 1996, the average farmer has done better
financially than the average person. "Farms fail far less often than
non-farm businesses fail, so the rationale for government to continue to prop
up this sector has gone away," he said.
When asked to respond, the Florida Farm Bureau refused to
comment.
Although Alston doesn't believe subsidies have had much
effect on Americans' health, he opposes them for financial reasons.
"Propping up farmers and leaving them on the farm is not a rational
economic position, because we have too many farmers. A better solution would be
to help get them out of agriculture," he said.
Now would be a good time, adds Alston, because farm
subsidies, which fluctuate depending on world market prices, are at record
lows.
"Given the debt and America's ills," said Degennaro, "we need to make sure we're not spending
money on programs that have negative consequences."
Return to Top
Kenya farmers learning greenhouse
production
NAIROBI
(AlertNet) – Isaac Kimani’s
farm is small, but he believes it holds the key to his country’s agrarian
future.
One third of Kimani’s three-acre
plot in Ndeiya, a rain-starved village on the
northwest edge of the capital, is covered by a polyethylene-sheet greenhouse.
Kimani believes that greenhouse
farming can increase crop yields - an essential goal in a country where the
poor are at risk of going hungry - while also protecting the environment and
helping Kenya
cope with increasingly severe droughts believed associated with climate change.
Kimani says that greenhouses offer
environmental advantages over open fields, particularly when farmers use
chemicals to increase crop yields.
“In open field farming it is not possible to manage the flow
of chemicals and so there could be damage to the environment when fungicides
and pesticides are applied irregularly,” Kimani said.
“But in a greenhouse, where we apply chemicals through drip
irrigation, we are able to control spillage and surface runoff.”
GROWING MORE UNDER COVER
Greenhouse technology can also help farmers produce more on
a small piece of land, according to Elijah Mwangi,
the farm manager at Mang’u Youth Polytechnic in
central Kenya.
He is training farmers to shift away from rain-fed agriculture.
Even under extreme weather conditions, Mwangi
says, a single eight metre by 30 metre
greenhouse can generate revenue of 240,000 Kenyan shillings (about $2,600) in
one season, more than twice what an average small-scale farmer earns
cultivating one acre of land outdoors.
Last month, Mwangi led a team of
agronomists at the Mang’u farm in testing the
efficiency of greenhouse technology by planting a dozen tomato seedlings inside
a greenhouse and another in an open field, both watered with drip irrigation.
“The plants in the open field have already withered because
of exposure to erratic weather, pests and diseases,” Mwangi
says. “We are expecting a good harvest from the plants in the greenhouse in the
next few months because they are shielded from changing climatic conditions.”
Ian Rector, Africa
adaptation programme manager at the United Nations
Development Programme, says that an additional
advantage of the technology is that it reduces emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs).
“Greenhouse farming prevents GHGs
emitted by agrochemicals from escaping into the atmosphere, so this is a better
way of (adapting to) climate change in industrial and agricultural sectors,”
said Rector during a press conference in Nairobi.
HIGH COSTS
However, there are concerns that the technology will not be
widely adopted in Kenya
unless the government subsidises the cost of
constructing greenhouses and invests in irrigation, especially in the arid
parts of the country.
Kimani says that erecting a
greenhouse is expensive: a greenhouse covering 240 square metres
can cost as much as 250,000 shillings (about $2,700) to erect, which puts it
beyond the reach of many poor farmers.
“Even when farmers decide to invest in a smaller greenhouse,
the cost of buying materials is still very high,” Kimani
says. “This can tempt them to look for timber which they use as poles to put up
the unit. It can stress the forest reserves.”
Nevertheless, an initiative by the government and a private
horticulture company, Amiran Kenya, is attempting to persuade Kenya’s
young people to adopt greenhouse farming.
Launched in May with a budget of 88 million shillings (about
$943,000), the Kenya Polytechnics Next Generation Farmers Initiative plans to
equip the country’s 650 youth polytechnics with greenhouses, which Amiran Kenya manufactures.
The idea is to change the perception that agriculture is an
occupation for the aging, according to Aileen Kamau,
the project leader at the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports.
So far 100 polytechnics have been supplied with greenhouse
training kits to spur uptake of the technology.
“The youth polytechnics serve as community demonstration centres, where the technology can be transferred to farmers
living near the institutions through skills support,” Kamau
said. “This year we will be investing in the technology in another 150
institutions.”
Return to Top
End Transmission