|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
August 31, 2011
·
Irene leaves
hard times for area farmers
·
Huge
greenhouses set for Calif. production
·
Kelp farming
is on its way in Scandinavia
·
Ground covers
bolster organic production
·
Can panda
poop solve biofuel woes?
Irene leaves hard times for area farmers
STONEWALL, N.C. (AP)
— Far from the beach towns that took Hurricane Irene's first hit, the storm
inflicted some of its worst damage on inland farms as crops were pummeled by
wind, scalded by salt spray and submerged by floodwaters. Some farmers are
reporting total losses.
"My tobacco crop is completely wiped out. I can't
harvest any of it," said Keith Beavers, whose Mount Olive
farm lies about 70 miles from the ocean. "It's either blown off the stalk
or off the limb, and what's left is raggedy."
It could take days or weeks for federal agriculture
officials to estimate overall losses, but the toll is already clear for many
individual farms after a growing season that was too hot in the South and too
wet in the Northeast. Especially hard-hit were tobacco growers preparing to
harvest in North Carolina and Virginia — two top tobacco states — and blueberry growers
in New Jersey
whose damaged bushes could spell trouble for future harvests.
After surveying farms in North Carolina on Tuesday, Agriculture
Secretary Tom Vilsack urged farmers to file crop
damage claims with their insurers and said federal assistance may cover
additional losses and damage to rural infrastructure.
"I've not seen the kind of flooding and damage to crops
that I saw briefly today," Vilsack said.
"And if this is representative of what North Carolina has suffered, it's a fairly
significant blow."
Still, the storm hasn't had a significant impact on the
nation's food supply or crop prices, an analyst said. While Irene damaged some
East Coast farms that grow corn and soybeans, the top producing states for
those crops are located in the Midwest. And
aside from some pockets of damage, livestock operations appear to have
generally weathered the storm well, including North Carolina's large hog industry.
Also, most crops are shipped into and out of ports on the
Gulf of Mexico and West Coast, meaning that much of the shipping infrastructure
was far from Irene's reach, said Jason Ward, an analyst with Northstar Commodity in Minneapolis.
Tobacco took some of the worst damage from Irene. In a
normal year, most tobacco would have been harvested by now. But a brutally hot
summer delayed development of the plants so that many farmers had 75 percent or
their crop still in the fields.
"We'll be lucky to harvest a third of our contracted
amount," said Jimmy Hill, who owns a farm near Kinston, N.C.
He says this is the worst hurricane damage he's seen in his 75 years.
The damage is worrisome in a state that grows more tobacco
than any other. The crop is tied to around 255,000 North Carolina jobs and accounts for roughly
$7 billion worth of business from sales to wages to purchases of supplies and
equipment.
Across the state line in the No. 4 tobacco-growing state of Virginia, the crop was
also badly damaged, along with cotton. Early estimates suggest the storm damage
to crops could run to $20 million.
"The plants are leaning over, looking like a cat's been
scratching on the leaves," said Virginia
extension agent Taylor Clarke, who was checking tobacco fields in the southern
part of the state. "They took a physical pounding."
Cotton may have an easier time bouncing back, since this was
to be a bumper year for the plant.
"Even if we lose 10 to 15 percent we're still going to
have a decent crop," said Spencer Neale, a senior assistant director of
commodities marketing for the Virginia Farm Bureau.
Blueberry plants were inundated in New
Jersey, a state that produces more of the fruit than any other
state except Michigan.
Although blueberry season ended before Irene hit, flooding
could kill plants and affect harvests in years to come. Rutgers Agriculture
Experiment Station Atlantic County agent Gary Pavlis
says the berry's root systems start to die in bushes that are in standing water
for 27 hours. Some farms in southern New
Jersey were still underwater on Tuesday, days after
Irene made landfall.
"The ground was already saturated and there wasn't a lot of places for natural storm surge to go,"
said Paul Galletta of Atlantic Blueberry, who was
still surveying damage at two farms he co-owns.
In Vermont,
officials won't be able to estimate the damage from massive flooding until the
waters have begun to recede. But the state Agency of Agriculture said growers
are facing flooded fields and barns, while dairy farmers have no way to
transport their product over washed-out roads and bridges. Southern
New England farmers appear to have weathered
the storm well, particularly apple growers, who were collectively
"breathing a sigh of relief" this week, according to Russell Powell,
executive director of the New England Apple Growers Association.
In New York, agriculture
officials were most concerned about field crops including feed corn and onions
in the black dirt regions of the Hudson
Valley. Fruit orchards
and Long Island's grape crops were largely
spared.
"Some farms are completely under water," said
Peter Gregg, spokesman for the New York Farm Bureau.
Across eastern North
Carolina, farmers were out Tuesday surveying the
damage to fields. In Stonewall, Maurice Benton managed to harvest nearly 1,500
acres of his corn crop before Irene made landfall and sent a wall of water
gushing over his fields. But he was left with 450 acres of corn and around
2,060 acres of soybeans underwater.
He thinks much of the waterlogged crops can be salvaged, but
the storm adds further harm in a year aleady plagued
by drought.
"We started out bad, but it gradually got worse,"
said Benton, who's been farming 35 years. "It's a below-average year, but
it's not going to kill us."
Not far from Benton's
farm, Charles Alexander raced to unload storage silos full of corn and wheat
after floodwaters pushed several inches of water up into the bottom of the
bins.
While most of the grains stayed dry, the silos are made to
unload from top to bottom — so everything had to go to enable him to get at the
wet stuff. At stake was 33,000 bushels of corn worth about $7.25 per bushel —
or nearly $240,000.
"It'll swell, and when grain swells it has a tendency
to bust the bin," Alexander said.
With electricity out at his silos, like in most of the Pamilco
County, Alexander first
had to use a large vacuum tool hooked to a generator to suck his corn out of
the silos and into the beds of trucks to carry it to market.
"We've had to improvise," Alexander said.
"I'll save it. It's just a little aggravating."
Return to Top
Huge greenhouses set for Calif. production
(Santa
Ynez Valley News) – Growing up in British Columbia, Steven
Newell didn’t even like tomatoes until somebody got him to try one of the Campari variety, which is known
for its juiciness and sweetness.
A couple of decades later, the 37-year-old Newell can’t get
enough tomatoes — and his family business, Windset
Farms, is bringing greenhouse-grown varieties and 21st-century hydroponic
agriculture to Santa Barbara County.
The company is building two vast 32-acre greenhouses and a
174,000-square-foot processing facility and packing plant on Black Road near Santa Maria and, despite some delays,
construction is on schedule.
In fact, Newell hopes to plant the first 16 acres of
Greenhouse No. 1 in about three weeks. Additional indoor acreage will be
planted when the facilities are ready.
“All depends on how much sun we get in Vancouver,” said
Newell, explaining that like the Santa Maria Valley, which has been shrouded in
morning fog much of the summer, his native Vancouver, British Columbia, where
the plants are propagated, has also been deprived of sun this year and that has
slowed production.
“There’s a lot of pressure,” he said. “This particular
facility and operation, everything is new from the ground up. All the systems
we have are new. There have been some delays with the trades. There have been
some delays in not getting the right parts shipped from the Netherlands. The sheer number of
tasks to do is incredible.”
About seven to 10 weeks after the first tomatoes are planted
in their coconut fiber medium, Newell said, the facility will harvest its first
crop. Hydroponic agriculture grows plants in liquid nutrient solutions rather
than in soil.
The wet winter also slowed construction, but even with the
delays, the two greenhouses now look more like biotechnical clean rooms than a
tomato farm. The floors of the both are covered in more white than a Canadian
winter, but this is fabric designed to prevent soil-born plant contamination.
The greenhouses, two of four planned, seem like living,
breathing beings, with active and passive ventilation systems, water and carbon
dioxide reclamation systems and a centralized computer system that will measure
everything from plant nutrient levels to employee production.
Not long after the greenhouses are planted, the white
flooring, support columns, planting platforms and water recycling gutters will
be obscured by a 20-foot canopy of leafy green tomato vines.
“It’ll be like a jungle in here,” Newell said, walking
through Greenhouse No. 1 in heat he estimated at about 35 degrees Celsius — 95
Fahrenheit for Americans.
Grape tomatoes will be the first crops, but Roma, Campari, beefsteak and other varieties will follow.
Even though the facility hasn’t yet produced a single
tomato, Newell said the future is ripe. He said he thinks construction of the
next two greenhouses — identical to the first two on the east side of the
packing facility — will probably proceed much sooner
than first anticipated. Windset Farms is already
exploring financing options for them.
The business has also added some new customers, including
Sysco Corp., which will increase demand for its products.
“We still believe this is the best growing climate
anywhere,” Newell said. “This is really the most environmentally sound method
of growing in the world. At the end of the day, the tomatoes will taste better
and they’ll have a much better shelf life.”
Return to Top
Kelp farming is on its way in Scandinavia
(ScienceDaily) — An underwater "field" as big
as a Norwegian county could provide two billion litres
of kelp-based fuel a year. SINTEF, the largest independent research organization
in Scandinavia, is currently establishing a
centre of expertise that will enable us to cultivate seaweed and kelp on a
large scale.
Kelp cultivation will mean that we can produce bioethanol fuel in addition to biogas for heating and fuel,
without the need to use food crops as a raw material, and without having to utilise agricultural land or freshwater resources.
This is among the reasons behind SINTEF's
decision to establish the Norwegian Centre for Seaweed and Kelp Technology,
which was opened in Trondheim
on August 15 by State Secretary Kristine Gramstad of
the Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs
Many areas of application
There are even more potential uses of kelp and seaweed
beyond applications as sources of energy.
As well as being an energy resource, macroalgae
such as kelp and seaweed are used in food production and as agents that bind
water, in biological purification systems, the reestablishment of kelp cultures
in fjords that have suffered high rates of kelp mortality, as soil improvers
and in the hunt for new compounds for medical and industrial applications (bioprospecting).
Exciting interface
"Macroalgae cultivation lies
at an exciting interface between better resource utilisation,
new marine-based products and potential renewable energy production. Although
the process of establishing new industry can be demanding, I believe that a
maritime land such as Norway,
with its major offshore and marine supply industries, solid research base and a
world-beating aquaculture industry should be quite capable of achieving success
in this field," says State Secretary Gramstad.
Efficiency challenges
Today, some 15 million tonnes of
seaweed and kelp are cultivated all over the world, mostly in Asia,
and are used in foods, animal feedstuffs, chemicals, medicines, health foods,
cosmetics and fertilisers.
"The Norwegian coastline, including all its islands, is
twice as long as the Equator. In other words, we possess huge areas that are
suitable for cultivating seaweed and kelp. However, manpower is more expensive
here than in Asia. This means that the
greatest challenge lies in cultivating large volumes at sufficiently low cost,
and research-based knowledge will be essentlal if we
are to manage this,"says chief scientist Trina
Galloway of SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture.
International invitations
Galloway says that SINTEF
has already been cultivating kelp on a trial basis, on behalf of Norwegian
industrial interests and with financial support from the the
Research Council of Norway.
"We ourselves have a good deal of competence, but there
are also inportant sources of knowledge elsewhere in
the world. The aim of the centre is to gather all such sources of expertise
into a single team, so we are inviting both Norwegian and overseas research gropups into the centre.
Could be fertilised by farmed fish
The competence centre will offer industry and the
authorities its knowledge, which will cover everything from controlled
production of seed plants and cultivation in the sea to harvesting and
processing the raw material for a wide range of applications.
Seaweed and kelp take up nutrient salts (fertilisers)
and CO2 from the sea. The plants can be cultivated in dedicated macroalgae systems, or side by side with farmed fish. The
plants can thus be fertilised by the fish and thus
help to cleanse the water around the sea-cages.
From harvesting to cultivation
At present, seaweed and kelp are not cultivated commercially
in Norway.
But we already have a major industry based on an annual harvest of around
150,000 tonnes of kelp from which alginates are
extracted. These are substances that have the ability to thicken and stabilise liquids, and are therefore used in a large number
of food products. Grisetang is also used to produce
kelp meal, which is used as a soil improver and in animal feed and health-food
products.
"Although harvesting removes less than one percent of Norway's
standing seaweed and kelp biomass, we do not recommend taking out more than
this amount, as kelp forests are actually important nursery and feeding grounds
for a wide range of invertebrates and fish. If we want to expand our kelp-based
industry, we will have to cultivate kelp on a large scale," says Galloway.
Return to Top
Ground covers bolster organic
production
(USDA-ARS)
– Studies by U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientists indicate that
organic farmers who need to periodically amend their soils with compost after
planting can still control weeds-and hold down costs-by using fabric ground
covers. This will be welcome news to organic farmers who till composted manure
into their crop fields after planting.
Agricultural Research Service (ARS) soil scientist Larry Zibilske, who works at the agency's Integrated Farming and
Natural Resources Research Unit in Weslaco,
Texas, set out to see how these
ground covers limit water penetration and affect carbon and nutrient levels in
soils. ARS is USDA's chief intramural scientific research agency, and this work
supports the USDA commitment to supporting sustainable agriculture.
Zibilske conducted a soil chamber
study using two types of commercial ground covers: a needle-punched,
double-layer fabric, and a tightly woven material made of flat polypropylene
strands. He used two types of compost-poultry litter pellets or a compost mix
of cattle manure and other organic materials-in the research.
Zibilske monitored the movement of
nutrients from the two types of composted materials through the two types of
ground covers for 30 days. Water was able to pass freely through the fabric
cover, but the polypropylene cover limited the movement of water for the first
two weeks. However, water was able to pass through the polypropylene cover much
more easily by the end of the study, perhaps because the cover was becoming
coated with organic molecules from the compost.
Zibilske found that soil microbial
activity indicators were essentially the same in soils protected by fabric
covers, soils protected by polypropylene covers, and control soil samples where
the movement of nutrients had not been impeded by a ground cover. This
similarity suggests that these ground covers did not significantly alter or
limit biological activities in the soil. Links were also observed between the
use of fabric covers and reduced soil levels of nitrogen and phosphorus levels.
The results from this study were published in 2010 in the
International Journal of Fruit Science.
Return to Top
Can panda poop solve biofuel woes?
(Yahoo!
News) – Biofuels might be a way to make energy out of renewable resources
and cut dependence on fossil fuels, but currently, producing them from corn and
other edible plants is largely impractical.
Now, a group of researchers believes they may have found a
solution — in panda poop.
The microbes in the feces of giant pandas break down
super-tough plant material in grass, corn stalks and wood chips, the
researchers reported Monday (Aug. 29) at the National Meeting & Exposition
of the American Chemical Society in Denver.
If the technique works on a large scale, inedible plants and plant waste could
be used as biofuels instead of edible corn.
"Who would have guessed that 'panda poop' might help
solve one of the major hurdles to producing biofuels, which is optimizing the
breakdown of the raw plant materials used to make the fuels?" study
researcher Ashli Brown, biochemist at Mississippi
State University, said in a statement. "We hope our research will help
expand the use of biofuels in the future and help cut dependency on foreign
oil."
Brown and her colleagues spent a year collecting and
analyzing panda feces at the Memphis Zoo.
In the excrement, they found several types of digestive
bacteria similar to bacteria found in termite guts. These bacteria help
termites break down and digest wood. In pandas, they probably help with the
digestion of woody bamboo shoots.
"Our studies suggest that bacteria species in the panda
intestine may be more efficient at breaking down plant materials than termite
bacteria and may do so in a way that is better for biofuel manufacturing
purposes," Brown said.
Under certain conditions, the panda poop bacteria can covert
95 percent of plant biomass into simple sugars, Brown estimated. The powerful
enzymes in the bacteria speed up chemical reactions, eliminating the need for
high heat, harsh acids and high pressures currently used to produce biofuels.
Bacteria would also be a more energy-efficient way to turn materials such as switchgrass, corn stalks and wood chips into fuel, Brown
said.
The next step for Brown is a complete census of the panda
gut. She's looking for the most powerful digestive enzymes. Using genetic
engineering, scientists could program yeast cells to make these enzymes, she
said. The yeast, in turn, could provide large amounts of enzymes for biofuel
production.
The study was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, The Memphis
Zoological Society, the Mississippi Corn Promotion Board and the Southeastern Research
Center at Mississippi State.
Return to Top
End Transmission