http://www.aglinenews.com

" I heard it
through the
AgLine"

 

September 7, 2007

 

 

·        Innovative science tracks bee die-off suspect

·        Amateur breeder reveals secrets to monster veggies

·        Mini melon mania captures growers and consumers

·        Precision ag benefits seen in corn production

·        Commentary: Olympic veggies and Olympic pigs

 

 

Innovative science tracks bee die-off suspect

 

(chicagotribune.com) – After a year of anxiety over the mysterious devastation of commercial bee colonies around the country, researchers may have produced a break in the case: a bee virus that appears strongly linked with afflicted hives.

The cutting-edge technique the team used to isolate the virus may find applications with human diseases as well. Instead of trying to culture bacteria or isolate viruses -- often a lengthy process -- the researchers ground up the bees and rapidly sifted through all of the genetic material in search of a suspicious microorganism.

If scientists can prove the viral infection is helping cause massive bee die-offs, it could clear the way for beekeepers to breed colonies that are genetically resistant to the disease. Fruit and vegetable growers are desperate to defeat the disorder, which threatens bees that pollinate apples, carrots, blueberries, almonds and other foods.

The new study, published online Thursday by the journal Science, found that nearly all affected colonies contained a recently identified virus called Israel Acute Paralysis Virus, or IAPV. By contrast, only one of 21 unaffected samples tested positive for the virus.

The innovative method the scientists used may be applicable to the search for novel germs that might underlie chronic human diseases such as obesity. That could be a lasting legacy of the hunt for the bee culprit, said study co-author Dr. W. Ian Lipkin, director of Columbia University's center for infection and immunity.

"I really do think these new technologies will revolutionize our approach to epidemiology," Lipkin said. He said that if similar techniques had been applied to the SARS outbreak in 2003, they could have yielded a viral suspect "in as short as a week."

For all the interest in IAPV, the authors said they suspect the bee condition arises from many factors, such as poor nutrition, parasitic mites, the stress of moving bees cross-country and pesticide exposure.

How the new virus interacts with other causes to ravage bees may be the next big mystery to tackle, said report co-author Edward C. Holmes, a professor of virology and evolutionary genetics at Penn State University.

"It raises more questions than we really resolved," Holmes said.

Since investigators first identified Colony Collapse Disorder last fall, the condition has spawned a cottage industry of theories about its genesis. One investigator claimed the cause was cell phone radiation; others blamed global warning or genetic engineering of plants. Some doubted that the disorder was real at all.

The group behind the Science study excluded some explanations -- for example, there is no evidence that cell phone radiation affects bees, said co-author Diana Cox-Foster, an entomology researcher at Penn State. But other environmental factors may well play a role, including pesticides that have been shown to help viruses replicate within their hosts, she said.

Most researchers agree Colony Collapse Disorder is real. The illness hit nearly a quarter of U.S. beekeeping operations last winter, killing nearly half of the bees on average. In most cases, worker bees leave the hive never to return -- one reason the problem also has been called "disappearing disease."

"We've been scratching our heads about this for a year now," said Jerry Hayes, chief of the apiary section for the Florida Department of Agriculture.

To see if an infection was causing the problem, scientists sequenced genetic material from ground-up bees and from royal jelly, a secretion bees use to feed larvae. They compared bees from affected hives across the country to healthy bees from Hawaii and Pennsylvania.

Just a few years ago it would have been a hopeless chore to distinguish the bee genes in such samples from the mass of infectious agents present in every living thing. But other scientists had just completed work on the bee genome when the team started work, making it easy to exclude the bee's genes from the raw results by consulting genetic databases.

What remained was a genetic slurry of bacteria, fungi, parasites and viruses. Most of the microbes were part of the bees' normal complement, including bacteria that help the insects digest food. But the database comparison also revealed a match with IAPV, which Israeli researchers discovered in 2004.

The evidence suggests a strong correlation between the virus and Colony Collapse Disorder, but it doesn't mean the microbe directly causes the disease. To see if it does, the group plans to try infecting healthy bees with the virus and seeing if they show signs of the disorder.

Some experts believe the virus may have come to the U.S. with bees imported from Australia. Yet although the virus is present in Australia, that country has not recorded widespread bee die-offs. One explanation could be the varroa mite, a bee parasite common in America but absent from Australia. The mite is known to spread diseases or leave bees more vulnerable to infections.

Another major area of study is the effect of constantly moving bees around the U.S. -- a strategy many commercial beekeepers use to keep up with pollination seasons in different regions.

So far it appears the disorder shows up almost exclusively in such migratory colonies, which may be weakened by inadequate feeding and frequent highway transport.

"That seems to be one of the key issues because that's what stresses the bees," said David Anthony, president of the Michigan Beekeepers Association.

 

Source Link

 

Return to Top

 

 

Amateur breeder reveals secrets to monster veggies

(washingtonpost.com) – Bright yellow tomato blossoms burst forth in the lush, vine-laden garden of Marvin Meisner. They are the season's stragglers, destined never to fruit and ripen.

They do, however, offer some lessons in growing a freakish four-pound tomato. Meisner, a retired cardiologist, searches for a bloom that is fuller than the others, picks it and then plucks all of the petal-like anthers from the flower to reveal not one pistil -- the organ whose base swells to become the actual tomato -- but two fused together.

A regular tomato has just one. Beefsteak varieties sometimes have two. When you see three, four or more fused pistils, you know you have hit pay dirt in the world of giant tomatoes. Such a flower may produce a tomato for every pistil, all of them morphing into one big, ugly lobed fruit that in weight and appearance resembles a small pumpkin.

The pumpkin, as it turns out, is an apt model for the giant tomato. Over the past 20 years, growing enormous gourds has become a cult in North America among Type A backyard gardeners.

Meisner is also a giant-pumpkin gardener and last year raised a gourd weighing 1,060 pounds, a personal best. He is among a cadre of giant-pumpkin growers who believe that the same methodical approach to raising gargantuan gourds can be applied to the tomato, with killer results.

He has just written a book laying out the techniques: "Giant Tomatoes" ($19.95, Annedawn Publishing, http://www.giantpumpkin.com). It was edited and published by Don Langevin, another big-pumpkin guru who believes the action is shifting to tomatoes.

"There are 25 million people growing tomatoes in this country," Meisner said, leading me around his garden, sun-bathed but cooled by an elevation of 1,300 feet. "Everybody wants to grow a big tomato."

Indeed, the world of giant-tomato growing already has a few legends. In 1986, Gordon Graham, a gardener from Edmond, Okla., was cleaning up a tomato vine that had spilled into his melon patch and found a lone fruit that changed his life. At 7 pounds 12 ounces, it became -- and remains -- the world's heaviest recorded tomato. The company that makes Miracle-Gro fertilizer created an epoxy replica of it and paid Graham to tour the country to talk about his giant-tomato efforts. Graham, now dead, may have happened upon the fruit but was heavily into giant-tomato cultivation.

Meisner now possesses the replica of the world's biggest tomato, which was 26 1/2 inches in circumference and could have made more than 20 tomato sandwiches. Meisner believes this jumbo fruit was formed from as many as five fused pistils. Tomatoes, by the way, are berries, botanically, but are classified as vegetables.

In the New Jersey seaside town of Long Branch, Minnie Zaccaria has been raising big tomatoes for more than 40 years. Her biggest have exceeded six pounds. But her lasting contribution to mega-tomatoes is a hybrid she made by crossing two heirloom beefsteak varieties, one red, one pink. She declined to name them, noting that she has sold the rights to the hybrid to Totally Tomatoes, a seed company in Randolph, Wis. ( http://www.totallytomato.com). The company will send out next year's catalogue in late November, when Big Zac seeds will sell for $2.75 per packet of 10, a spokeswoman said.

In his garden, Meisner relies on a number of beefsteak varieties, among them Brutus Magnum, Giant Belgium, Slankard's, Todd County Amish and Tennessee Britches, of which one massive fruit measured eight inches across. Graham's monster was a variety called Delicious. Meisner is clear about which variety will define the future of this sport. "Big Zac is number one," he said.

Giant tomatoes have definite cultural requirements: deep soil, a site in full sunlight, adequate supports and a spring start for the seeds to give these long-ripening fruits plenty of time to mature. A giant tomato needs about 70 days from pollination to harvest.

Meisner uses an automatic drip irrigation system to provide each vine with a gallon of water per day under a thick layer of straw mulch. By keeping the leaves dry, he cuts down on fungal diseases.

He suggests a high-phosphorus feed at the start of the season to promote root growth. After the fruits have begun to grow, he uses a fertilizer formulated for tomatoes (avoid high-nitrogen types, he advises) and a biweekly foliar feed using a fish-and-seaweed emulsion. Zaccaria applies a foliar feed every week.

Pruning is important. Suckers are removed to allow only two vining stems per plant, and only two fruits are allowed to develop. They must be supported with surveyor's tape or twine to prevent them from bending and kinking their stems.

Meisner asserts that Gordon Graham's world record will be beaten, particularly as more gardeners join the chase. The more vines, the greater the chances of a new champ. But the winner will need good cultivation techniques, the right seed of big tomatoes producing fused blossoms, "and luck," Meisner said.

Already, growers are nipping at Graham's heels. One of the major trophy tomato contests in North America is held every Labor Day weekend at a housewares store in Toronto. Last year's Great Tomato Hunt was won by Gianfranco Sarin, with a tomato weighing 7 pounds 7 ounces.

A dry, difficult growing year reduced the weights this year. First place went to a tomato weighing 4 pounds 12 ounces grown by Giuseppe Spatari of Toronto. Meisner placed third with a fruit weighing 4 pounds 9 ounces.

The obvious, and so far unasked, question is: How do these tomatoes taste?

Meisner said their extra water content makes them less flavorful than smaller tomatoes. However, he gave me a three-pounder that was everything you'd want in a homegrown tomato: flavorful, firm and sufficiently acidic to be interesting. It sits on the kitchen counter like a Smithfield ham, to be picked at.

The second question is: Why?

"I think people who grow tomatoes don't set out to grow a giant tomato," Zaccaria said, "but if they do, they're so happy. It eggs them on."

Source Link

 

Return to Top

 

 

Mini melon mania captures growers and consumers

 

(montereyherald.com) – To the untrained eye, the mini watermelon is, well, just a small watermelon. But to Richard Molinar, there are nuances to note. Does it weigh 4-7 pounds? Is the skin color striped or solid? The rind thick or thin? The flesh a deep red, orange-red or brilliant yellow? Does it have an appealing crunch or a mushy texture? Is it super sweet, or is there a hint of tartness? Is it seedless?

And can farmers make money growing them? All of these questions come to Molinar's mind as he strolls the watermelon field at the University of California's Kearney Research and Extension Center. Molinar, a UC farm adviser, is co-leader of what is likely the largest mini watermelon trial in the West.

Industry insiders are eager to taste his work — and find the new, hot varieties that will snare shoppers. Their wait soon will be over. A public tasting at the center in Parlier took place Sept. 6, followed by lectures that should have farmers on the edge of their seats: "Viruses and How They Are Spread," "Weed Management: Organic/Conventional," "Insect Predators and Parasites" and "All About Bacillus thuringiensis."

Molinar's not growing 23 varieties of small watermelons simply because he likes them: There's money to be made. In 2006, mini watermelons captured 8.5 percent of the U.S. market, said Kenton Kidd, a retail merchandiser with the National Watermelon Promotion Board.

It's the fastest-growing segment of the market, he added. Jefferson Lowe of Corona Seeds in Camarillo, thinks worldwide demand for the minis is 15 percent. European demand helps bump it up, he said. "Will market share grow? That is the question," said Lowe, who's predicted the rise of the mini watermelon since the 1990s. While Europeans have long liked small melons, minis caught on in the United States in the early 2000s. Media attention piqued the interest of farmers.

At that time, "everyone was starting to look at this and say, 'Maybe we should get into this,'" Lowe said. "By 2004, they were really being looked at more as a fashion fruit," he added. Now, "they're pretty much here to stay."

So why the attraction to the minis? Folks who can't finish the huge ones welcome the smaller size, Molinar said. Plus, the minis (also called personal watermelons) leave more room in the refrigerator.

Beyond those characteristics, farmers have many colors, flavors and textures to consider. At UC Kearney, Molinar points out the familiar striped watermelons, as well as ones with solid-colored, dark-green skins. He thumps them and listens. Overripe melons sound "too deep and hollow," he said. Unripe ones have a "tinny, high sound." And the ones that are just right are somewhere in between.

Indeed, a watermelon's success depends as much on advertising as on desirable traits. And no matter the size, orange and yellow ones need a better boost. "Unfortunately, the numbers on the orange and yellow watermelons, at best, it's 2 percent of the market. And I think it's a crying shame," Lowe said. "We're no farther ahead now with yellows and oranges than we were 20 years ago."

Farmers such as Parry Klassen may solve this problem. This year, Klassen sold a test crop of a yellow-orange mini from his stand in Selma. "They loved them," Klassen said of his customers. "Their little 2-year-olds and 3-year-olds could pick them up."

With the harvest season over, Klassen's making plans for double or triple plantings of these minis, making them 5 percent of his crop. He's not sure if he'll grow much more than this, though. He has a problem that affects the general mini market: The little ones cost as much to produce as the big ones.

"Labor (for a mini) is just as difficult as with a regular watermelon," Klassen said. "Growing, the picking cost, everything is the same." This year, he sold the minis for $4 apiece, the same price as some of his larger watermelons. Predictably, some customers balked.

It's these costs — along with development of new varieties, marketing and consumer demand — that influence the market share of minis. Farmers simply can't drop prices too low as supply increases. "There's going to be price resistance," Klassen said. "I don't know if we can make a profit selling them for $2-$3 each."

 

Source Link

 

Return to Top

 

 

Precision ag benefits seen in corn production

 

(Science Daily) – As of late, many uncertainties have been sprouting up in corn production. Researchers and producers have been wondering if precision agricultural technologies can improve crop yield and quality or reduce their variability. Farmers have been asking a number of questions from, which hybrid should I plant for best yield and quality, to does applying nitrogen fertilizer at a uniform rate produce a better crop outcome, and if not, what nitrogen fertilization strategy does produce a better crop in yield and quality?

Scientists at China Agricultural University, the Precision Agriculture Center of University of Minnesota and Mosaic Crop Nutrition have been attempting to answer those questions by investigating the potential impact of precision nitrogen management on corn yield, protein content and test weight in a new study. 

Precision agriculture is defined as the usage of available technology to develop custom management of soil and crops to fit specific conditions of a small area that is within a larger unit, such as a field. This practice has revolutionized modern farming by allowing farmers to choose the best management strategy at a specific time and place in their fields.

It has the potential to increase agricultural resource use efficiency, reduce environmental contamination, and maintain or increase crop yield. Corn farmers use this application by varying the rate of fertilizer depending on differences in potential crop yield, soil type and landscape features across the field. As grain markets shift to a greater emphasis on ethanol, more attention is being directed to optimizing grain quality, where traditionally the emphasis was on quantity.

The significant variability of abundance in a given area and abundance over a period of time in crop yield and grain quality has not influenced use efficiency or profit of products made from the crops, but made it difficult for farmers to get premium prices for their products.

The study was conducted on two commercial corn fields in eastern Illinois in 2001 and 2003 involving two corn hybrids and five different N fertilizer application rates across the landscape. Nitrogen response of corn yield and quality were fitted at different within-field locations, and the potential impacts of different N management strategies were evaluated against a uniform rate of N application that is a common farmer's practice in the region.

The results indicated that one hybrid was found to have higher yield, quality and distribution to suppliers than the other hybrid under either a uniform or varied nitrogen application. Results also showed that varying nitrogen applied to localized within-field conditions and hybrid differences could either increase corn yield with similar or higher nitrogen rates or maintain yield with less nitrogen application, without any significant improvement of grain quality.

The results from this study are published in the September-October 2007 issue of the Soil Science Society of America Journal. The study was funded by Cargill Crop Nutrition (now Mosaic Company), Cargill Dry Corn Ingredients and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.

Return to Top

 

 

Commentary: Olympic veggies and Olympic pigs

 

(UPI Asia) – As time ticks away in Beijing's one-year countdown to the 2008 Olympic Games, toxic food scandals keep popping up to embarrass China. Yet there are two bits of positive news for those heading to Beijing for the Olympics.

    The first is that during the Games Beijing will supply vegetables from a special Olympic Games Vegetable Base. Vegetables grown in these plots will be fertilized with yellow beans and sprayed with a liquid fertilizer made of milk powder, sugar and vinegar. Apart from that, each vegetable will have an identity certificate.

    The second is that pigs to be served at the Games will be raised in a special, secret, fully-enclosed shelter. The food for those lucky pigs will be certified organic by the European Union and contain no preservatives. The pigs will be immunized with natural Chinese herbs. Moreover, in order to keep them healthy, the pigs will be taken outdoors for two hours of exercise each day.

    These two reports are not imaginary. From this we can see that the Chinese Communist Party is taking the Olympic Games seriously and is ready to go to any lengths to make them a success.

    Considering its seriously polluted air and contaminated food, China does not actually meet the basic conditions for holding the Olympic Games. Considering its standards of education and medical care and the living standards of the majority of its people, China does not meet the economic conditions for hosting the Olympics.

    After all, improving the people's education, medical care and living standards are more important than holding athletic events. But in order to polish up China's image, the Chinese Communist Party is willing to use all its people's resources to host the luxurious Olympic Games. This does not deserve praise.

    To hold the Olympic Games, the CCP must reach the standards requested by the Olympic Committee. Take food for example. Food is as important as air for human life, but in today's China you can hardly find any food that is not contaminated. The majority of the food supply is unacceptable to anyone outside China.

    The international athletes and staff coming to Beijing for the Olympic Games are all ordinary people in their own countries, and they eat exactly the same as others. The food they eat is bought at regular supermarkets. Why should they be treated differently in China, with special food prepared for them?

    The first reason is that China's food standards are far behind those of other countries. The second reason is the CCP's habit of flattering foreigners. To guarantee food safety for the Olympic personnel, growing vegetables in clean soil and water should be enough. Why use milk powder and sugar? Pigs need only uncontaminated food and immunizations. Why do they need two hours of exercise each day? Whoever proposed this idea must be either an idiot or a genius, or most probably an expert at flattery.

    Chinese media recently reported that Jacques Rogge, president of the International Olympic Committee, said during an inspection tour in Beijing that the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games would leave an "important heritage to be managed and maintained by China." It is unclear if Rogge was taking into account the special way of growing vegetables and feeding pigs as an important heritage to be managed and maintained by China.

    If these two practices could be maintained it would be a real blessing for the Chinese people. But how could the average Chinese, who cannot even afford milk and sugar, afford vegetables grown in that luxurious way? How could ordinary Chinese, who cannot even afford toxic pork, enjoy the meat of healthy pigs that exercise every day? Olympic vegetables and Olympic pigs are part of the Beijing Olympic Games, so they are certainly part of the "heritage" too.

    Rogge is a citizen living in Europe where the wealth is more evenly distributed; he does not know what is happening in China. Therefore it is understandable that he thinks the Olympic Games, purchased with all the Chinese people's money, may have something to offer them in return. But for the CCP officials who know China's current reality very well, they are indeed cheating the Chinese people and insulting their intelligence by saying the Games will leave them a valuable "heritage."

    (Chen Weijian is chief editor of the Chinese newspaper "Xin Bao" in New Zealand, and a well-known critic of current affairs. He immigrated to New Zealand from China in 1991. This article is edited and translated from the Chinese by UPI Asia Online; the original can be found at http://news.boxun.com/news/gb/pubvp/2007/08/200708300757.shtml.©Copyright Chen Weijian.)

 

Return to Top

 

End Transmission