http://www.aglinenews.com

" I heard it
through the
AgLine"

 

September 12, 2008

 

 

 

·        Taiwan center exports vegetable technology

·        Monsanto produces blueprint for female corn

·        Bayer CropScience plans big India push

·        Creating markets for environmental stewardship 

·        Fed up with thieves, angry growers form veg-ilantes

 

 

 

Taiwan center exports vegetable technology

 

(ChinaPost.com.tw) SHANHUA, Taiwan -- While the world is tackling food shortages, a Taiwan-based international research institute is seeking to alleviate malnutrition and poverty in developing counties by improving production and consumption of vegetables.

Since its founding in 1971 in Shanhua, south Taiwan, the Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC) -- the World Vegetable Center -- has changed the lives of millions of farmers in Asia and Africa by teaching them how to grow vegetables, store and transport them as well as how to cook the produce.

Over the past 37 years, AVRDC has seen its size and role expand rapidly as improved vegetable production can help reduce malnutrition and poverty.

"We are not trying to use vegetables as a substitute for food, but rather as an addition to the food basket, to help farmers become better nourished and grow out of poverty," the center's director, Dr. Dyno Keatinge, told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa.

Malnutrition represents a serious global problem. According to figures released by the World Health Organization, 2 to 3.5 billion people suffer from malnutrition and 1.1 billion people are underweight.

By improving vegetable production and raising yields, people's nutrition levels can be improved, at the same time allowing farmers to make more money by growing and selling better vegetables, Keatinge said.

As a non-profit organization, it gets funding from dozens of governments and foundations which for 2008 totaled US$18 million, operating regional centers in Thailand, Tanzania and India. AVRDC also plans to open a regional center in Central America.

One main task for the center is to gather germplasms - seeds or plant culture - of indigenous vegetables from around the world and store them so they won't become extinct. So far, AVRDC has stored 56,136 germplasms from 150 countries.

At the center germplasms are planted to record their growth and characteristics for long-term storage - up to 100 years. Thousands of species of indigenous vegetables existed in the world, providing important nutrition to people in developing countries Lin Li-ju of AVRDC's international cooperation unit said, pointing to the plots of land and greenhouses where the plants were grown.

"Take sweet potato shoots and leaves for example, they were poor men's diet or pigs' feed in Taiwan in the past. But in recent years they have become a popular dish in households and even at banquets because they are high in vitamin A, E and iron," she said.

AVRDC researchers are also experimenting with natural crossing to improve the quality of vegetables and to make them pest- and heat-resistant. Genetic engineering was monitored at the center, but not actively pursued, officials said.

Peter Hanson, a plant breeder, held up a plate of egg-sized yellow tomatoes, the result of several years' of research.

"This Golden Tomato contains three to six times more beta carotene which is the precursor to vitamin A. A single improved tomato like this can provide all your daily vitamin A needs," he said, popping a Golden Tomato into his mouth.

AVRDC also teaches farmers in Asia and Africa how to irrigate vegetable plots, pack and transport vegetables or preserve them.

Research shows that post-harvest loss can be up to 50 percent if the product is not transported properly, resulting in a waste of the produce and a loss of income for farmers.

Often very simple actions can have great effects.

Return to Top

 

 

Monsanto produces blueprint for female corn

 

(Wire Services) ST. LOUIS -- Scientists at Monsanto say they are a step closer to further unlocking the yield potential of corn to help enable each seed to increase its ability meet the world's growing demand for food, feed and fuel.

The company announced today it has produced a genetic blueprint of one of its top-performing elite female corn lines. The scientific achievement, important for developing better-performing corn seeds for farmers, was made through the use of high throughput DNA sequencing methods, as well as data generated by the recently completed maize genome project.

"These sequencing efforts will not only identify preferred genes for our research and development pipelines, but move us into a high-definition molecular breeding era that uses a combination of sequence and markers to derive future higher-yielding hybrids globally," said Monsanto Chief Technology Officer Robert Fraley.

High throughput sequencing methods enable scientists to rapidly identify variations in the genomes of complex organisms. In health care, for example, high throughput sequencing aids in the discovery of gene variants that can lead to development of new medicines.

"In agriculture, high throughput sequencing has the potential to provide an unprecedented level of detail about our current market-leading hybrids and to point us in the direction of meeting Monsanto's commitment to double yields in our core crops by 2030," said Fraley.

In February, scientists led by a team of researchers at Washington University completed a draft sequence of the corn genome. Monsanto contributed valuable data that led to completion of the draft sequence. Fraley said the company is analyzing the blueprint of its own elite line in comparison to the public maize genome sequence to identify genes Monsanto will use in its breeding and biotechnology pipelines to develop future hybrids.

Hybrid corn seed is planted by farmers each spring and is developed by crossing two corn inbred parents, male and female. Monsanto's elite parents represent the culmination of more than a decade of intensive breeding effort, Fraley said.

In June the company announced a three-point commitment to agriculture sustainability, which includes the goal of developing better seeds to enable farmers to double yields in corn, cotton and soybeans by the year 2030, compared to a base year of 2000; helping farmers reduce by one-third the amount of key resources required to grow crops by the year 2030; and helping to improve farmers' lives globally.

Monsanto Company is a leading global provider of technology-based solutions and agricultural products that improve farm productivity and food quality. Monsanto remains focused on enabling both small-holder and large-scale farmers to produce more from their land while conserving more of our world's natural resources such as water and energy.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Bayer CropScience plans big India push

 

(livemint.com) Monheim, Germany: India will receive a substantial portion of the €3.4 billion (about Rs21,522 crore) that Bayer CropScience AG proposes to spend on research and development globally over the next four years, underlining the country’s growing stature as a market for advanced farm products as well as a research hub.

 

The agro-chemicals and plant biotechnology unit of German health care company Bayer AG has also applied to register in India most of the 10 crop protection compounds that it expects to launch worldwide by 2012.

 

India is important for us as a market as well as a strategic location for research and development and manufacturing,” said chairman Friedrich Berschauer on the sidelines of the company’s annual press conference at its global headquarters in Monheim, Germany.

 

“The company is all set to grab the opportunities in the country’s growing agriculture market, as well as the local skill for product development and manufacturing for the company’s global requirement,” he said.

Berschauer did not specify exactly how much Bayer CropScience has budgeted to spend in India or how many of its 10 compounds it will launch in the country.

 

Bayer’s biosciences and plant biotechnology research facility in Hyderabad is one of its largest globally, and is soon to be expanded. Berschauer added that the company will set up another seed and plant biotechnology development centre in Hyderabad, and modernize its manufacturing unit in Vapi and Ankaleshwar in Gujarat.

 

Bayer CropScience last week disclosed its global research investment plans as it looks at “long-term opportunities for growth on the agricultural markets”.

 

“Out of the total new global R&D investment proposed, the company will be spending almost €2.7 billion to develop innovative crop protection active ingredients, and €750 million for developing plant biotechnology products,” Berschauer said.

 

The company expects to achieve its global sales target of €2 billion by the end of 2009, two years earlier than originally planned. In bioscience, which is mainly focused in the Hyderabad research unit, Bayer expects global sales of about €1 million by 2015.

 

The expansion of the Hyderabad facility is in line with the company’s strategy to develop new crop protection molecules, which drive the company’s sales and earnings.

 

Though it expects to generate most of its sales growth on its own, the company will also tap opportunities for alliances and acquisitions in the seed and biotechnology business. Bayer CropScience’s bioscience business rose 15% to €304 million globally in the first half of 2008.

 

Much of this expansion, which is higher than the company’s annual growth in health care and agrochemicals, came from growing cotton seeds, or Bt cotton, in North America, Mexico and India, and from demand for hybrid rice varieties in Asia.

 

India’s agriculture sector “offers attractive opportunities for agrochemicals and biotechnologies companies on the back of rising income levels and consumption levels, resulting in rising food prices,” said Rajen Shah, chief investment officer at Mumbai-based Angel Broking Ltd.

Angel Broking views agriculture, valued at around Rs9 trillion, as the “next big investment opportunity” in India, Shah said.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Creating markets for environmental stewardship 

 

(Amber Waves) – What does a farm produce? Food and fiber is the obvious answer, but most farms have only a portion of their land in crop production. Farms also contain significant amounts of pasture, forest, ponds, meadows, grasslands, and wetlands. In 2002, farms accounted for 41 percent of all U.S. land, including 395 million acres of pasture and range, 76 million acres of forest and woodland, and 16 million acres of wetlands. This natural capital can provide a host of environmental services, including cleaner air and water, flood control, improved wildlife habitat, and carbon sequestration.

 

When farmers decide how to use their land, they generally consider only uses that produce goods and services that can be sold. Products expected to generate the greatest net returns are the ones generally selected for production. As a result, when farmers make their production choices, market commodities win out. Since environmental services generally do not have markets, they have little or no value when the farmer makes land-use or production decisions. As a result, environmental services are under-provided by farmers. This is one reason why billions of dollars are spent each year by government and nongovernment organizations to pay farmers to maintain natural areas and improve the environmental performance of their farms.

 

If environmental services could be sold like other commodities, at prices that reflected their true value to society, farmers would likely invest more to maintain wildlife habitat, woodlots, and wetlands. And, those who benefit the most from environmental services would pay for them. This could mean a reduced need for taxpayer-funded investments in environmental services, increased private investments that are more responsive to changing economic and environmental conditions, and, perhaps, less costly service provision. The question remains: If these services are valued by society, why are there no markets for environmental services?

 

Environmental Services Defy Ownership

 

The biggest reason that markets for environmental services do not develop naturally is that the services themselves have characteristics that defy ownership. With private goods, such as traditional agricultural commodities, a farmer transfers ownership only when a buyer pays the desired price. Environmental services do not have this characteristic. Once they are produced, people can “consume” them without paying a price. Improved water quality, for example, benefits everyone downstream, whether or not they pay for it. Most consumers are unwilling to pay for a good that they can obtain for free, so markets cannot develop. Without a market, there are no price signals encouraging farmers to produce environmental services as part of the farms’ output.

 

Can anything be done other than relying on government programs to provide publicly funded investments in environmental stewardship? While government programs provide incentives to farmers to provide environmental stewardship, they lack many of the desirable characteristics of fully functioning markets. Markets allocate resources efficiently (at least in theory), those who benefit pay, and markets are flexible in the face of changing conditions. Farmers could also benefit from the additional stream of income earned from their land.

 

Experiences With Creating Markets for Environmental Services

 

Creating markets for environmental services is not an entirely novel idea. Several markets (water quality trading, carbon trading, and wetland mitigation) have been created to reduce compliance costs associated with environmental regulations. Two other markets (eco-labeling and fee hunting) have developed on their own. Experiences with these markets highlight their promise and pitfalls.

 

One important characteristic of most markets for environmental services is that government or some other authority plays a central role in setting them up—they do not spontaneously develop from the interaction of buyers and sellers, as most markets do. The reason, as noted, is that environmental services, to varying degrees, defy ownership—they are public goods. One way to get around this is to create a good related to the environmental service that has private-good characteristics, as has been done for markets in water quality trading, carbon trading, and wetland mitigation. These markets would not exist without government programs that require regulated business firms (such as industrial plants and land developers) to meet strict environmental standards. In essence, legally binding caps on emissions (water and carbon) or mandatory replacement of lost habitat (wetland mitigation) create the demand needed to support a market for environmental services.

 

Continue Reading

 

Return to Top

 

 

Fed up with thieves, angry growers form veg-ilantes

 

(mirror.co.uk) – Fruit and vegetable growers already under constant attack from hungry wildlife are now facing a cunning new menace...

 

Sometimes hunting alone, often thieving in packs, these sticky-fingered predators are invading allotments all over the country.

 

In an unlikely consequence of the credit crunch, there is a huge surge in reported thefts of prized fruit and vegetables as families try to cope with soaring food bills.

 

Now some angry growers have reached boiling point, forming teams of night-time "veg-ilantes" to patrol their stricken plots.

 

In picturesque Ottery St Mary, Devon, Adrian Forster says: "You wouldn't believe what we have to put up with. The rabbits come in and chew the lettuce. Birds attack us and badgers creep through the hedge to eat what they want.

 

"The worst offenders, though, are what we call the two-legged foxes - human thieves. Badgers can't untie three knots on a fruit net, can they?"

 

Adrian adds: "We've always had a bit of pilfering but these days they'll nick anything.

 

"My raspberries have been decimated. I caught a whole family picking them from my plants and when I challenged them the dad had the cheek to say, 'There's an abundance here. You'll never eat them all.'"

 

With a quarter of a million allotments in the UK, it's not difficult to see why they are becoming a target for thieves everywhere.

 

All around us is an amazing array of produce - and not just your potatoes, onions and cucumbers. There's Swiss and ruby chard, red sprouting broccoli, sweet potatoes, squashes and giant rhubarb plants - and some prize dahlias for colour.

 

Pat Leisk, 74, says: "This stuff is equal in standard to the very best organic stuff in the best grocers' shops. And thousands of hours of very hard work go into growing it."

 

Pat and Adrian, 52, and fellow allotment holders have now banded together to form evening patrols to stop the thieves.

 

A teenager on a bike scoots by with a heaving bag swinging from the handlebars.

 

Was he doing a runner with the beans?He's challenged at the gate - but turns out to be the son of an allotment holder. "You can't be too careful," says Adrian, looking over his shoulder.

 

"It's the worst I've known it in 22 years. With the credit crunch, people think they can save money on their food bills. They're running off with our beans, peas and gooseberries. I'm miffed about my goosegogs. They were giant - would've made lovely pies - and they've stripped the bushes bare."

 

Jackie Roche, 52, shows me where two rows of plump lettuce disappeared overnight. "And look at this," she says, patting a fat, yellow pumpkin.

 

"There was an even bigger one, but someone nicked it." Jackie, a biomedical scientist at an Exeter hospital, goes on: "I asked my employers to put me on a fourday week last year as I wanted to spend more time here. I am a vegetarian and totally self-sufficient, so when people pinch the stuff I grow they are literally taking the food out of my mouth.

 

"I'm also frightened - I am a woman alone and I wondered if this was a lone thief or people in gangs."

 

Adrian adds: "These thieves haven't experienced the sweaty effort of wheeling barrows of dung up here, digging it in and tending it all summer. I produce a lot, but I share it with family and friends and swap it for different produce with other growers."

 

Clive Essame, 48, chips in: "I've just found out thieves have cleaned out my best courgette plants." Steve Hamilton, 61, who has tended his plot for 30 years, lives in a bungalow nearby and keeps an eye on who comes and goes. He's also done his bit to scupper the thieves - he's shoved 25lb of raspberries in his freezer.

 

"I would rather give them away than have people nick 'em," he growls.

 

Seventy miles to the west, in Torpoint, Cornwall, allotment owners are also organising night-time patrols after thefts and vandalism at their plots.

 

But with 250,000 allotments nationwide, this problem isn't confined to the south-west. In East Shields, South Tyneside, the crimewave is forcing an allotment watch scheme to be considered.

 

Funding is in the pipeline for a security fence for the Stranton allotments in Hartlepool after 500 onions were stolen - enough to make anyone weep.

 

Entire crops of strawberries and broccoli, along with onions, cabbages, tubs of flowers and sacks of manure, have been stolen from plots in Abbotts Barton, Winchester, in recent weeks.

 

In Burnley, Lancs, councillor Tony Martin called for CCTV to be installed after beetroots, fennel, onions and rhubarb was ripped from his plot.

 

Allotments are big business. Alan Cavill, of the National Society of Allotments and Leisure Gardeners, says: "There's been an explosion of interest in the past few years. Every one has a waiting list. It's a result of TV cooking and gardening shows and doctors telling us we need five portions of fresh fruit and veg a day."

 

Back at Ottery St Mary, the town's deputy mayor, Ian Holmes, 64, points to the heavy-duty padlock about to be fitted to the freshly painted gate.

 

"It was fitting that the work was done using young offenders," he says.

 

Let's hope it gives those two-legged foxes plenty of food for thought.

 

 

Return to Top

 

 

End Transmission