http://www.aglinenews.com

" I heard it
through the
AgLine"

 

September 21, 2009

 

 

·        Monsanto steering clear of GM veggies

·        Bayer goal to triple biotech and seed sales

·        DuPont to hike seed prices less in 2010

·        Water restrictions cost 2000 jobs in Calif.

·        Lime cost effective in fixing acidic soil

 

 

Monsanto steering clear of GM veggies

 

(STLtoday.com) – WOODLAND, CALIF. — The future of supermarket produce is spread across 144 acres of flat, arid farmland in California's Central Valley.

 

The region is known for its processing tomatoes used in ketchup, soups and

salsa. In mid-August, trucks zip up and down the highways overflowing with red balls destined to be chopped, canned and shipped.

 

But what's grown here is exponentially more diverse. There are dozens of

varieties of tomatoes, melons, hot peppers, onions and squash. And they're not so much for eating, but specimens for probing, prodding and extracting DNA.

 

This small farm, about a half-hour west of Sacramento, belongs to Monsanto Co., the biotech giant known as the king of genetically modified, or GM, crops and maker of Roundup weed killer. Less recognized is Monsanto's leading position in the $3 billion global vegetable seed industry.

 

Monsanto, based in Creve Coeur, got to be No. 1 in vegetable seed through a

pair of acquisitions. Now, CEO Hugh Grant aims to boost profitability and

market share further by using much the same playbook that made the company dominant in corn and soybeans — by building seeds that produce healthier, better tasting fruit and vegetables.

 

Monsanto is spending about $75 million developing new vegetable seeds. Much of its budget still goes to traditional and advanced breeding. With few

exceptions, it's not investing in genetically modified varieties, which involve

introducing new genes to make plants resistant to pests or herbicide.

 

Woodland is the largest of 60 vegetable breeding stations around the globe.

It's home to about 180 breeders, pathologists and other scientists. Offices,

labs and 290,000 square feet of greenhouses are surrounded by fields brimming with new and novel varieties of tomatoes, peppers, onions, squash and melons.

 

Take the small, bright orange grape tomato known simply as No. 3756.

 

To most people, it doesn't look different from what you might find today at the grocery store. Its creator, tomato breeder Doug Heath, believes it's destined to become a hit with consumers, retailers and growers — all of which will mean an opportunity to justify higher seed prices.

 

On a tour of the tomato plot on a sunny mid-August morning, Heath walks down a 100-foot-long row of plants full of bright orange tomatoes that stand out like lights on a Christmas tree.

 

The tomato is characterized by several key traits. It contains a specific "long

shelf life" gene that helps it stay fresh as it travels thousands of miles to

stores. It's resistant to Tomato Mosaic Virus, a scourge for greenhouse

growers. But mostly, it's higher in Brix, or sweetness. A slicing tomato

measures about 5 degrees Brix; a typical cherry or grape tomato is 8. This one registers near 12.

 

"This is a favorite of my kids," Heath says, plucking one of the bulbs and

popping it in his mouth. "Absolutely kid-proven. If I bring these home, they

eat them like Skittles."

 

Heath and many of the other scientists at Woodland are holdovers from Seminis Inc., which was already the world's largest vegetable seed company when Monsanto bought it for $1.5 billion in 2005.

 

The company added to its seed empire last year with the $800 million purchase of Netherlands-based De Ruiter Seeds Group BV, which specializes in seeds for greenhouse vegetables, a fast-growing and more profitable segment of the business.

 

HEALTHIER TOMATOES

 

Monsanto was developing potatoes, tomatoes and berries, including genetically modified varieties, in the late 1990s. The company left that business a few years later.

 

Executives never lost interest, though. A few years later they saw an

opportunity to leverage the company's expertise in plant genetics and

biotechnology to take advantage of increasing global vegetable consumption.

 

Vegetables are still a tiny piece of Monsanto's business. Sales totaled $744

million in fiscal 2008, just 7 percent of total revenue. Overall, it sells more

than 3,000 products in 156 countries, mostly to seed dealers and distributors.

 

Monsanto aims to boost vegetable seed sales to $1 billion by 2012 by focusing on consumer traits such as flavor and nutrition. That's a new tack for seed companies, which historically poured their energy into boosting yields and creating produce that resisted disease. Sometimes, those grower traits came at the expense of flavor.

 

New products include Dolce Verde, a lettuce that combines the sweetness and crunch of iceberg and the dark color and nutritional qualities of romaine. It's being sold at 800 Tesco supermarkets in the United Kingdom, and the company hopes to bring it to the United States.

 

A new sweet onion will be test-marketed in St. Louis around Thanksgiving. It's meant to fill the seasonal gap that exists when Vidalia onions aren't available.

 

Other new products are aimed squarely at nutrition, such as high-lycopene

tomatoes and broccoli that the company claims contains more cancer-fighting compounds than varieties available today.

 

"When I talk to people who are leading nutritionists and ask them what we

should do to make fruits and vegetables healthier, the real consensus I get is

to make them taste better so that people will eat more," said David M. Stark,

Monsanto's vice president of consumer traits.

 

Booming demand for antioxidant-rich "superfoods" such as blueberries and

pomegranates are examples of consumer interest in healthy foods, said Michael  O'Brien, vice president of produce and floral for St. Louis-based Schnuck Markets Inc.

 

"Those two items resonated with people," said O'Brien, who is part of a group advising Monsanto through his position as secretary-treasurer of the Produce Marketing Association.

 

Monsanto is also forging relationships with companies such as produce giant

Dole Food Co. The companies announced a five-year agreement this year to

develop healthier, better-tasting broccoli, cauliflower, lettuce and spinach.

 

Sano Shimoda, president and founder of Bioscience Securities Inc., an advisory and investment banking firm in Venice, Calif., believes the goal of such alliances is to create brands that will fetch a premium from consumers.

 

"If you can create differentiated products coming off the farm, then there's

the opportunity to create brand identification that is tied to traits," he

said. "The whole point is: How can they

 

create product identification that the consumer will pay for, that will create

brand identity and that they can charge more for?"

 

But knowing what consumers want today is only part of the challenge. It can

take years to develop a new tomato, melon or pepper. And tastes vary widely by geography. Consider tomatoes: Italians want an acidic tomato. Japanese want a pinkish, sweet fruit without a hint of acid. Americans generally prefer

something in between.

 

Processed food companies and fast-food restaurants also have different demands.

 

"McDonald's doesn't want a perfectly round tomato. They want a uniform red tomato like a sausage, so that every slice is almost the same," said John

Uhlig, who runs Monsanto's food quality lab at Woodland. "And when they make ketchup, they want a different tomato. You've almost got a moving target."

 

ACCELERATING NATURE

 

Uhlig's lab resembles a science classroom. Stacks of brown plastic bins holding basketball-size watermelons sit on the floor, waiting to be tested to see how they withstand the cold (typically, they don't).

 

On a table around the corner, clear plastic containers of slicing tomatoes are

arranged on cafeteria trays. Each box holds three or four pre-sliced tomatoes

picked days earlier. The goal: to mimic how they'll hold up when they arrive at a deli or a fast-food restaurant.

 

Over the course of a year, the lab will handle 58,000 pounds of produce,

running tests on sugars, acidity and pungency. In all, more than 330,000

individual items will be bar-coded and tested for various physical and chemical properties.

 

Much of the work is still done by hand, as are other time-consuming chores at Woodland, such as pollinating tiny greenhouse plants.

 

Meanwhile, much of the head-spinning genetic analysis that's become an integral part of the company's plant-breeding program has been revolutionized by proprietary automated systems.

 

The speed and efficiency is a key to Monsanto's increased use of a powerful

biotech tool — the use of molecular markers, DNA fragments used to identify genetic features of plants.

 

So far, Monsanto researchers have identified more than 15,000 such markers

across a dozen key crops, such as tomatoes, peppers and melons, that can

significantly accelerate the breeding process.

 

Take a cherry tomato developed by Heath. It was bred with a wild species

indigenous to Peru to make it resistant to late blight disease, a fungal

disease that has wreaked havoc on some tomato crops this year.

 

In the past, crossing a domesticated tomato with a wild species would have

taken a decade. With markers, the time can be cut to as little as two to three

years, Heath said.

 

"It's almost like having X-ray glasses," he said. "My assistant takes a

millimeter sliver of leaf, extracts the DNA, and we have many markers we can look at."

 

Monsanto has earned billions of dollars selling genetically engineered corn and soybean, and it even markets transgenic squash developed by Seminis in 1995 that's resistant to certain plant viruses. Yet, the company doesn't have

aggressive plans to launch new GM fruit or vegetables in the near future.

 

The company's first foray into biotech vegetables was the NewLeaf potato, which contained a gene from a microorganism that produced a toxin to repel the Colorado potato beetle — a damaging pest for growers. At its peak, the potato was planted on 55,000 acres. But fast-food giant McDonald's instructed French fry suppliers to stop using the potato. Many farmers followed suit, and Monsanto shelved it in 2001.

 

Today, Monsanto said it was investing in only a handful of biotech products.

One is an insect-protected and herbicide-tolerant sweet corn that it hopes to

introduce in the United States within the next decade to compete against a

product offered by rival Syngenta.

 

A partner in India, Mahyco, has commercialized insect-protected brinjal, or

eggplant, for that country. Now Monsanto is considering launching the trait in its own line of GM brinjal seeds.

 

The projects are evidence that Monsanto continues to believe biotech traits

hold promise for consumers and growers.

 

But the scientific and business obstacles for successfully commercializing a

genetically modified vegetable is steep, said Doug Gurian-Sherman, a senior

scientist in the Food and Environment Program at the Union of Concerned

Scientists in Washington.

 

Perhaps the steepest hurdle is getting consumers to accept it. "The concept

still is somewhat troubling to people," he said.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Bayer goal to triple biotech and seed sales

 

(Wire Services) – MONHEIM, German -- Bayer CropScience is accelerating the extension of its biotech and seed business. Following a record year in 2008, the company is continuing its strategy of expansion, aiming systematically to expand its fast-growing business in seed and plant traits in the coming years.

The intention is to more than triple sales in the BioScience segment to around EUR 1.4 billion by 2018.

"In this context, the company is planning to invest some EUR 3.5 billion in research and infrastructure for its biotech and seed business between now and 2018. This figure does not include possible acquisitions," said Professor Dr. Dr. h.c. Friedrich Berschauer, Chairman of Bayer CropScience AG's Board of Management, at the company's annual press conference.

According to Berschauer, the company's objective is to become the farmers' first choice as a partner worldwide and to offer "innovative and sustainable solutions all the way from sowing to harvesting." With this in mind, Bayer CropScience is seeking to further strengthen its role as a leading supplier of innovative technologies in all business segments, to grow its portfolio strategically, and to expand its business sustainably in rapidly growing emerging markets. The growth strategy revolves around three elements: chemical crop protection, plant traits, and high-quality seed. "We are developing from a classical supplier of crop protection products into a supplier of integrated solutions for farmers which comprise not only products but technologies and services as well," Berschauer explained.

Well-filled agrochemical research pipeline

Bayer CropScience believes that it is extremely well-positioned as a global innovation leader in the classical crop protection business. In this segment the company has set itself the goal of bringing to market between 2008 and 2012 ten new crop protection active substances with a combined peak sales potential in excess of EUR 1.25 billion - previously the target sales figure was above EUR 1 billion. Following the successful launch of the insecticide spirotetramat and the herbicide pyrasulfotole in 2008, the company has achieved a further milestone this year with the grant of regulatory approval for the new herbicide thiencarbazone-methyl in combination with the safener cyprosulfamide in first countries. Three fungicides -- fluopyram, bixafen and isotianil -- are scheduled for launch in 2010 and 2011. In addition, three further candidates, among them a biological pest-control product, are at an advanced stage of development.

Plant biotechnology helps to boost productivity

Bayer CropScience has gained a strong position worldwide in the BioScience segment with its four core crops canola, rice, cotton and vegetables. The intention is to expand the portfolio on a regional basis in the coming years and to include further crops. The company has begun research into improved cereal varieties. The objective here, as with other crops, is to increase yields and to make plants more resistant to adverse weather conditions. The company's research activities are also focusing increasingly on soybeans.

Bayer CropScience is currently investing the equivalent of roughly 27 percent of sales in the development of new BioScience products - a figure that puts it among the leaders in the industry in terms of research intensity. Almost 1,000 BioScience researchers and breeders are working on over 50 projects.

The company's own research is being rounded out by a number of cooperation agreements. This year, more than ten alliances with public and private-sector research bodies have been agreed so far. For example, Bayer CropScience has been working with one of the world's leading agricultural research institutes since July to develop new varieties of wheat. The company is also expanding successively its global network of research locations.

"We are currently active in about one quarter of the seed and plant trait market," said Dr. Joachim Schneider, Head of the Business Operations Unit BioScience. "In the future we want to offer an expanded portfolio of products that will serve around one half of the total market. Our goal is for the BioScience business unit to grow roughly twice as fast as the market in the next few years." Sales are planned to increase from EUR 452 million (2008) to around EUR 1.4 billion by 2018. Bayer CropScience is seeking to offer its solutions to as many farmers as possible worldwide by out-licensing its technologies to other companies. The four agreements that have been concluded to date represent a cumulative potential for license fees in excess of EUR 500 million.

Good half-year - cautious start in third quarter

Currency-adjusted sales of the Bayer subgroup grew 4.8 percent to EUR 3,972 million (previous year: EUR 3,782 million) in the first six months of 2009 despite unfavorable weather conditions in some of the major growing regions. Sales in the Crop Protection segment increased 4 percent to EUR 3,274 million in the first six months in response to greater demand for seed dressings, herbicides and insecticides. Growth in North America, Europe and Asia was driven by products based on new active ingredients. Sales of fungicides declined in practically all regions owing to a lower burden of disease.

The Environmental Science segment posted stable development with sales of EUR 336 million. In the BioScience business unit, Bayer CropScience increased sales to EUR 362 million -- currency-adjusted 18.8 percent ahead of the previous year. This growth was due mainly to sales gains in canola seeds in North America.

Good development in the first six months of 2009 was followed by a more modest start to the third quarter. Lower selling prices for wheat and corn, unfavorable weather conditions in Europe and the subcontinent India in particular, and the relatively late start of the season in Argentina as well as a decreasing demand in the United States all impacted on the company's business. "Against this background, we have to consider our target of retaining a margin forecast of a clean EBITDA margin of 25 percent for the full year as ambitious", explained Berschauer.

Bayer is a global enterprise with core competencies in the fields of health care, nutrition and high-tech materials. Bayer CropScience AG, a subsidiary of Bayer AG with annual sales of about EUR 6.4 billion (2008), is one of the world's leading innovative crop science companies in the areas of crop protection, non-agricultural pest control, seeds and plant biotechnology. The company offers an outstanding range of products and extensive service backup for modern, sustainable agriculture and for non-agricultural applications. Bayer CropScience has a global workforce of more than 18,000 and is represented in more than 120 countries.

 

Return to Top

 

 

DuPont to hike seed less prices in 2010

 

(Bloomberg) -- DuPont Co., the world’s second biggest seed producer, said it won’t raise prices for crop seeds as much as last year because farmers are grappling with a more difficult economy.

 

DuPont raised average prices for soybean seeds in 2009 by 35 percent and corn seeds by more than 20 percent, Paul Schickler, president of the Pioneer unit, said at the JPMorgan Chase & Co. 4th Annual Diversified Industries Conference in New York. Increases determined this month won’t be as aggressive, he said.

 

“The economic environment and situation farmers face today is different compared to one year ago,” Schickler said. “We are going to deliver solid price increases that will be consistent with historical increases while maybe not at the level of 2009.”

 

Profits for U.S. farmers will plunge 38 percent from 2008 as the recession erodes demand for crops, livestock and dairy products, the government said Aug. 27.

 

DuPont expects to boost seed sales and profit by more than 15 percent this year. The Pioneer unit gained 2 percentage points market share in North American corn, the most profitable seed market, reversing years of losses to Monsanto Co., the biggest seed producer. DuPont grabbed three more percentage points of soybean seed sales in North American, and it also gained in crops outside the U.S., Schickler said.

 

DuPont climbed 75 cents, or 2.3 percent, to $33.90 at 4:03 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have gained 34 percent this year.

 

DuPont won’t detail increases for 2010 seed prices until discussions with customers conclude in January, said Doyle Karr, a spokesman.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Water restrictions cost 2000 jobs in Calif.

 

(HanfordSentinel.com) – Officials at the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority issued a statement Friday claiming100,000 acres went unplanted and 2,000 jobs have been lost on the Westside because of federal pumping cutbacks to protect the endangered Delta smelt fish.

 

The statement refutes a document released Thursday by the U.S. Department of the Interior that claims it’s “not true” that “water shortages and high unemployment rates in California’s Central Valley are the result of a man-made, ‘regulatory’ drought, as opposed to natural conditions.”

 

“Interior is lacking candor in explaining and accepting the human impacts of the Endangered Species Act restrictions,” said Jason Peltier, deputy general manager of Westlands Water District.

 

Westlands, a member of the authority, has about 80,000 acres in Kings County that rely on federal Central Valley Project water from the delta.

 

“I would just say in general we look forward to ... working with the local and state government, as well as the water authorities and our other partners, to solve this problem,” said Interior spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff.

 

Barkoff declined to get into specifics about how much of a role environmental regulations play in the current situation.

 

Current laws call for a certain percentage of the Central Valley Project water to go to environmental protection and ecosystem preservation in the delta and other areas. These rules are not suspended in drought situations like the current one — California is in its third consecutive dry year.

 

Many of the regulations were included in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, passed in 1992, which reserves some water for fish and wildlife protection and ecosystem preservation.

 

But this year Westside farmers are facing additional regulations stemming from a 2007 federal court order to protect the delta smelt fish and a 2009 federal biological opinion mandating additional cutbacks to protect other fish species including salmon and steelhead.

 

The cumulative impacts have left giant bare patches of earth on the Westside and created high farmworker unemployment in small towns like Avenal, Huron and Mendota.

 

Westlands officials predict district farmers will lose 1 million acre-feet of water as a result of both the court order and the biological opinion.

 

The Interior Department is right about the fact that there is a natural drought, but has tried to “minimize the role that regulatory decisions play,” said Dan Nelson, executive director of the authority.

 

Return to Top

 

 

Lime cost effective in fixing acidic soil

 

(University of Missouri) – Liming is an inexpensive way to boost crop yields in fields with overly acidic soils, said a University of Missouri Extension agronomy specialist.

 

A soil pH of 6.0 to 6.5 is optimum for most crops in Missouri, said Travis Harper, a University of Missouri Extension agronomy specialist.

 

Soil pH affects the availability of soil nutrients to plants. An increase in soil acidity (lower pH) reduces the amount of available phosphorous in the soil while increasing the amount of available aluminum and hydrogen. At a pH of 4.5, available aluminum and hydrogen are at toxic levels, he said.

 

To counter these effects, an application of lime can reduce soil acidity. Liming increases the activity of organisms responsible for nitrification and nitrogen fixation and improves the overall condition of the soil.

 

"MU research indicates that increasing the pH of a soil from 4.5 to 6.0 through liming can increase soybean yield by as much as 15 percent," Harper said. "Given the benefits of liming, and the fact it is one of the cheapest products farmers add to the soil, there should be no reason the pH levels of Missouri agricultural soils don't fall within the ideal range."

 

A soil test, available through local MU Extension centers, can measure soil pH and indicate the amount of lime necessary to neutralize soil acidity.

 

The amount of lime to apply is expressed in terms of "effective neutralizing material" (ENM). All lime sold in Missouri is tested for purity and fineness, the two factors that determine the ENM of a lime product.

 

"For example, a soil test may indicate that a soil is acidic and needs 1,200 ENM to increase the pH," Harper said. "If lime from a dealer is 400 ENM per ton, the farmer would need to apply three tons to correct the soil pH."

 

The main disadvantage with lime is that it can take a long time to correct soil acidity, especially if it's not properly incorporated. MU research indicated it would take 10 to 14 years for surface-applied lime without incorporation to raise the soil pH to a depth of 6 inches. All applied lime should be incorporated for maximum effectiveness.

 

Even with incorporation, it may take several months for lime to correct soil pH. For this reason, don't apply lime in March in an attempt to correct the soil pH for a crop you are going to plant in April.

 

"An ideal situation would be to take a soil sample right after harvest, then apply and incorporate the recommended amount of lime that fall," Harper said. "There should be sufficient correction in soil pH by the following spring to have a positive impact on crop growth."

 

Return to Top

 

 

End Transmission