|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
October 3, 2011
·
Produce miles
increase disease risk
·
Dole building
new facilities in China
·
Analysis:
What’s next for E-Verify?
·
Broccoli
Brigade heads N. Mexico project
·
Globetrotting
couple ‘good bug’ hunting
Produce miles increase disease risk
WASHINGTON (AP)
— The recent listeria outbreak from cantaloupe shows that large-scale
occurrences of serious illnesses linked to tainted food have grown more common
over the years, partly because much of what we eat takes a long and winding
road from farm to fork.
A cantaloupe grown on a Colorado field may make four or five stops
before it reaches the dinner table. There's the packing house where it is cleaned
and packaged, then the distributor who contracts with retailers to sell the
melons in large quantities. A processor may cut or bag the fruit. The retail
distribution center is where the melons are sent out to various stores. Finally
it's stacked on display at the grocery store.
Imported fruits and vegetables, which make up almost
two-thirds of the produce consumed in the United States, have an even longer
journey.
"Increasingly with agribusiness you have limited
producers of any given food, so a breakdown in a facility or plant or in a
large field crop operation exposes thousands because of the way the food is
distributed," says Dr. Brian Currie, an infectious disease specialist at Montefiore Medical
Center in New York.
The Colorado
cantaloupe crop that's linked to 84 illnesses and as many as 17 deaths in 19
states has traveled so far and wide that producer Jensen Farms doesn't even
know exactly where their fruit ended up.
The company said last week that it can't provide a list of
retailers that sold the tainted fruit because the melons were sold and resold.
It named the 28 states where the fruit was shipped, but people in other states
have reported getting sick.
A Kansas-based processor that purchased cantaloupes from
Jensen, Carol's Cuts, didn't provide a notice to its customers that it had sold
the farm's cantaloupes until nine days after the original recall.
"The food chain is very complex," says Sherri
McGarry, a senior adviser in the Food and Drug Administration's Office of
Foods. "There are many steps, and the more steps there are the harder it
can be to link up each step to identify what the common source" of an
outbreak is.
Fewer and larger farms and companies dominate food
production in the country. That has driven some consumers to seek out farmers
markets and locally grown produce. Supermarkets now highlight food grown
nearby, while farmers markets have soared in popularity.
But many in the produce industry have come together to try
and improve the ability to quickly trace food from field to plate.
This is good business. Large recalls, such as spinach in
2006, peanuts in 2009 and eggs in 2010, tend to depress sales for an entire
product industry, even if only one company or grower was responsible for the
outbreak.
Recent outbreaks of salmonella in peanuts and eggs, which
are ingredients in thousands of foods, have been more widespread and sickened
more people than have the tainted cantaloupe.
"There has been a laser focus on improving traceability
so any recall can identify the affected product immediately and not have an
effect on the rest of the entire category," says Ray Gilmer of United
Fresh Produce Association, which represents the country's largest growers.
Gilmer says that larger food companies have no choice but to
take food safety very seriously.
"The stakes for a large company to have a food safety
incident are huge," he said. "It could destroy their company."
Listeria, a bacteria found in soil and water, often turns up
in processed meats because it can contaminate a processing facility and stay
there for a long period of time. It's also common in unpasteurized cheeses and
unpasteurized milk, though less so produce such as cantaloupe.
The disease can cause fever, muscle aches, gastrointestinal
symptoms and even death. One in five people who have listeria can die.
A food safety law passed by Congress last year gives the FDA
new power to improve tracing food through the system. Food safety advocates say
the law will help make the food network safer by focusing on making every step
in the chain safer and making it easier to find the source of outbreaks.
For the first time, larger farms are required to submit
plans detailing how they are keeping their produce safe.
Erik Olson, director of food and consumer safety programs
for the Pew Health Group, says it is critical that those improvements are made
to prevent more, larger outbreaks as the system grows more complex.
"Clearly the food industry has just changed enormously
in the last several decades," Olson said. "It would be virtually
impossible to sit down and eat a meal and eat food that hasn't come from all
over the world."
Return to Top
Dole building new facilities in China
(fruitnet.com)
– Dole Food Company, the world's largest fresh produce company, is working with
government officials in China to develop new production and processing
facilities in the country, the company's chairman David Murdock has revealed.
Speaking at a special event in Oslo
to mark the 125th anniversary of Norwegian fresh produce importer-distributor
Bama-Gruppen, Murdock said he had spent three weeks in China in late August and the first
half of September, visiting a number of different locations.
"Eight or nine days ago I was all over China,"
he explained. "We are doing a very large amount of new facilities with the
Chinese government."
Dole currently owns processing and distribution centres in
the Chinese cities of Shanghai and Qingdao.
The group's Worldwide Packaged Food Division operates three
processing centres for tinned products in Asia – two in Thailand and one in the Philippines.
In terms of its overall Asian operations, Dole sources
bananas, pineapples, asparagus, mangoes, papaya and other fruits and vegetables
from the Philippines and Thailand, transporting them to markets
principally in Asia, New Zealand
and the Middle East.
The company also sources citrus, deciduous fruit and
vegetables, including asparagus, broccoli, tomatoes, cabbage and lettuce from
North America, Australia, New Zealand, China,
Korea, South Africa, Chile
and other parts of the world for distribution in Asian markets, primarily Japan.
In Japan,
Dole also distributes domestically sourced fruits, vegetables and value-added
products such as fresh-cut fruit, vegetables and salads.
Return to Top
Analysis: What’s next for E-Verify?
(Forbes)
– On September 21, 2011, H.R. 2885, legislation to make E-Verify mandatory
across the nation, passed the House Judiciary Committee by a party line vote of
22-13. Does that mean the bill is on a smooth path to become law?
The major hurdle to be cleared for any House legislation is
to receive time for debate on the floor of the House of Representatives. It is
up to the House leadership to decide whether a bill gets that far. Unlike
spending bills, which are considered “must-pass” pieces of legislation, bills
on other topics are not guaranteed floor time.
If E-Verify legislation passes the House, it faces an
uncertain future in the U.S. Senate. No Democrats voted for the bill in the
House Judiciary Committee. While that does not mean the same will happen in the
Senate, it’s reasonable to assume the bill would get limited Democratic
support.
What does E-Verify legislation have going in its favor? In
its favor, the legislation sports a surface appeal as a way to prevent the
hiring of illegal immigrants and has the support of anti-immigration groups.
H.R. 2885 would make mandatory for all employers an electronic employment
verification system to check (primarily) whether new hires are eligible to work
in the United States.
Also, in its favor, the legislation has the support of business organizations
that include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, since it would establish a single
national standard for E-Verify, rather than a patchwork of state requirements.
Finally, the bill has gained support among Republicans, in part because it is
seen as a technological fix to a difficult to solve problem.
What is working against mandatory E-Verify legislation? The
biggest obstacle a mandatory E-Verify bill faces is it lacks support among
Democrats, which is a particular problem in the Senate. Many Democrats see H.R.
2885 as legislation that will make life more difficult for legal workers, due
to the potential for false “positives” when using the system. They also believe
to the extent E-Verify affects illegal immigrants it will push them further
into black market employment. Democrats would likely support mandatory E-Verify
if coupled with ways to make it easier to work legally in the United States and to legalize many
of the those now working in the country without legal status.
Another factor working against mandatory E-Verify legislation
is vocal opposition to the bill from the agriculture industry. The primary
large agriculture organizations, including the Agriculture Coalition for
Immigration Reform (ACIR), oppose the bill. Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA) said in the
Judiciary Committee that making E-Verify mandatory would “devastate” California’s agriculture
industry unless a workable agricultural temporary visa system was instituted at
the same time. Since the agriculture industry has been an important Republican
supporter it remains to be seen whether Republicans in the House or Senate want
to fight for legislation opposed by growers.
The bill has also engendered opposition from libertarian and
conservatives concerned that mandatory E-Verify would represent a significant
expansion of federal authority. (See letter here.) A Wall Street Journal editorial (September
13, 2011, registration required) on E-Verify legislation was titled “Republican
Overregulation.”
There has been no action on the bill in the past week, since
the House of Representatives has not been in session. Judge Gideon Tucker (and
later Mark Twain) once said, “No Man’s life, liberty or property is safe while
the legislature is in session.” The House is back in session this week.
Return to Top
Broccoli Brigade heads N. Mexico project
(Las
Cruces Sun-News) LAS CRUCES – A new
collaboration between local growers and the New Mexico State University College
of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences could result in more
broccoli on local dinner tables and more money in the pockets of Las Cruces area small
farmers.
Broccoli seedlings in this NMSU pilot project, planted from
seed in early July, are being transplanted from flats into fields this month,
even as some other local vegetable crops are being harvested. Like other
members of the mustard family, broccoli does best during the cooler spring and
fall seasons in this climate zone.
Broccoli is not a crop that is commonly grown in the Mesilla Valley, which is one reason it was
chosen for this demonstration project. The broccoli project is an example of
NMSU outreach aimed at helping small producers diversify their operations by
identifying, producing and marketing new crops. Broccoli is a popular and
highly nutritious vegetable that has been shown through previous NMSU research
to do well in southern New Mexico.
The project involves approximately 20,000 plants that are
being transplanted into one NMSU field and at five other area locations. The
harvest from these plants is likely to begin in late October or early November
and may extend into December.
The project is being implemented by a team dubbed the
"Broccoli Brigade" by Connie Falk, professor in the Department of
Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business. In addition to Falk, the NMSU
team includes AEAB colleagues Eduardo Medina, small farm and ranch outreach
coordinator, and Paul Gutierrez, Extension specialist; assistant professors
Mark Uchanski and Kulbhushan Grover and master's student Alex Benitez, in the
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences; and John Idowu, Extension
agronomist in the Department of Extension Plant Sciences. Community partners
are Shahid Mustafa, manager of the Mountain View Market Co-op in Las Cruces, and Patricia
Salas of the Colonias Development Council.
The Broccoli Brigade came into existence in early 2011.
"We were all getting together to talk about how to move
the agenda of local agriculture forward," Falk said. "Shahid Mustafa,
the G.M. of Mountain View Co-op, said he could sell all the broccoli we could
produce and it was a pity we couldn't grow broccoli in Las Cruces, and I replied, 'Of course we can;
we did for five years at OASIS.' And then we just started planning a broccoli
project from there."
According to Falk, OASIS, or Organization of Aggie Students
Inspiring Sustainability, is a student club at NMSU that began as an organic
production class, which was also named OASIS (Organic Aggie Students Inspiring Sustainability).
"In that class, students learned the Community
Supported Agriculture model of agriculture, and in five years grew more than
550 cultivars of organic vegetables, flowers and herbs," Falk said.
"Broccoli was a successful crop at OASIS, which was taught during spring
and fall seasons 2002-2006."
Uchanski and Falk also investigated season extension
technologies in broccoli production for two years.
By mid-summer 2011, the Broccoli Brigade project, with a
fall harvest in mind, had been fleshed out. Medina and Salas identified four community
gardens and one private producer to participate as growers. Two of the
community gardens, in Anthony and Chaparral, are affiliated with the CDC. Also
participating are the Soil and Water District Youth Farm in Anthony and the
SOLAR Garden in Chaparral. The private producer is Jesse Bustamante of Mesilla.
The main summer activity, July 7-8, was to start 22,000
broccoli plants from seed in plastic flats with the help of some of the local
producers. The brigade chose Arcadia,
one of the broccoli varieties OASIS had successfully grown, for the project.
The seedlings were sheltered from the extreme heat and rain in the Fabian
Garcia lath house for the September transplanting. An additional 4,000
seedlings were started in late August to help replace casualties lost to insect
damage.
Information about this project, and about growing broccoli
more broadly, has been incorporated into NMSU classes taught by some of the
Broccoli Brigade members, and some of the students are involved in the project
as volunteers. Some in Uchanski's vegetable crop management class and Grover's
principles of crop production class have been among the individuals
transplanting 13,000-14,000 broccoli seedlings in an organic research plot at
NMSU's Fabian Garcia
Science Center
in Las Cruces.
Uchanski oversees the plot, which he says was certified as organic in 2004 and
has been maintained using organic principles since then.
The broccoli in this plot is involved in a replicated field
experiment on broccoli fertility as part of Benitez's thesis project. All of it
will be grown organically, with four fertilization treatments: fish emulsion
injected through the drip irrigation system; locally available vermicompost
applied as a side dress; a compost tea, made from the same compost material,
applied through the drip system; and the control group with no fertilization.
While Benitez doesn't expect the unfertilized plants to have a high yield, he
thinks it is reasonable to expect some of the experimental rows to produce a
pound of broccoli per plant.
The cooperating growers are not involved in replicated field
trials, but will be using growing techniques appropriate to their operations.
The local collaborators are supplying growing space and will share in the
profits of a successfully grown crop. If all of the plots achieve optimal
production, the team estimates the result will be between 12,000 and 14,000
pounds of broccoli harvested over several weeks' time.
Patricia Salas is a project coordinator for the Colonias
Development Council and works with a "promotora" at each of the
participating CDC community gardens.
"We got involved in the project after Eduardo Medina
brought the opportunity to our attention," she said recently at the
group's Las Cruces
office. "We have participating families in both Anthony and Chaparral who
are planting broccoli in their community garden plots, and the other families
want to see how it turns out. We think it might be a good crop for backyard
gardening, both as a healthy food for the families to consume and for them to
sell at farmers' markets to increase their incomes."
Broccoli Brigade members assume that Mountain View Market
will receive the bulk of the harvest. If the production is very robust, some of
it may be passed on, through Mountain View's
network, to La Montanita in Albuquerque
for statewide distribution. According to Falk, some of the participating
growers may arrange to market their harvest through other outlets.
"We've also been contacted by NMSU's food
service," Falk said. "The new food service provider, Sodexo, is very
interested in serving local food as much as possible, and so they are very
interested in also purchasing some of the broccoli. We'd love to see some of it
served on campus."
Economic analysis will be an important aspect of this
project. If local producers are to be convinced that raising broccoli can be
profitable in the Mesilla
Valley, they will need to
see the numbers. To this end, Falk and Gutierrez have been developing a cost-and-returns
template.
The Broccoli Brigade does not expect growers to flock to
broccoli immediately. They plan to repeat the project in the fall of 2012,
involving what they hope will be a larger set of community collaborators. In
addition, for broccoli to be grown on more than just a few acres, post-harvest
handling infrastructure will need to be developed, because broccoli is usually
iced soon after harvest to remove field heat and extend shelf life. Working out
the logistical aspects of the enterprise, including storage, transport and
broader marketing, will happen over the next couple of years.
"If we do well with the broccoli project, then we'll
probably consider what the next crop is, in consultation with farmers and
looking at what might sell well in the market. So it's a long-term kind of
effort," Falk said.
Return to Top
Globetrotting couple ‘good bug’
hunting
An entomologist couple
at UC Riverside travel the world searching for parasites to counter imported
pests. Their lab is a high-security warren of trick doors and rooms within
rooms.
By Amina Khan, Los
Angeles Times
Mark Hoddle waits for the door to click into place. A
magnetic sensor won't let him open the next door, just an arm's length away,
until the first has been sealed shut.
Then he's walking
through a maze of darkened corridors. Black lights — positioned to lure and
then zap any fugitive bugs — cast a dim lavender glow that suggests rather than
reveals the way forward.
Finally, Hoddle reaches a high-security laboratory. Inside,
behind a wall of glass, his wife and fellow entomologist, Christina, hunches
over a microscope. Ornate green earrings from Pakistan, picked up on a recent
parasite-hunting expedition, dangle above the lapels of her lab coat.
When Hoddle raps on
the glass, quarantine officer Imad Bayoun stops him: The alarms could go off.
Christina, looking
up, brandishes a vial the width of a pinkie.
"See that little
black speck?" Hoddle says. Trapped inside are tiny parasitic insects that
the couple traveled halfway around the globe to find.
California, like many other states, is under
attack by insects from foreign lands that destroy crops, prey on native plants
and compete with indigenous creatures for food and shelter. They cost the U.S.
about $20 billion annually in agricultural losses, environmental damage and
pest control.
"Each year, California acquires at
least six new exotic species. At least six," said Hoddle, 44, director of
UC Riverside's Center for Invasive Species Research.
They arrive on ships,
in produce, on unsuspecting humans and animals. Many are harmless, but some
wreak havoc, often because they're no longer held in check by parasites that
afflicted them in their native habitats.
That's where
entomologists like the Hoddles come in. They believe the solution is to make
life miserable for invasive critters by importing their natural enemies. It's
an approach called "biological control," and it has taken the couple
around the world in search of exotic parasites, which they bring home in
Rubbermaid containers. They've grown accustomed to grillings by airport
security officers.
Much about their life
mirrors their professional obsession. They were married six years ago at the
Mission Inn in Riverside, where California entomologist
Harry Scott Smith coined the term "biological control" in 1919.
Paintings of insects adorn the walls of their home. They keep a mealworm colony
in their kitchen to feed orioles and lizards in the backyard. Christina, 36,
drives a bright yellow VW Beetle, though the couple bikes to the university's
quarantine facility each day.
The complex, with
gleaming greenhouses on each level, looks distinctly modern from the outside.
Inside, it's a warren of trick doors and rooms within rooms designed to
securely hold insects until they've been thoroughly studied.
"Anything that
goes into that building can't escape," Hoddle said.
At least not until
the Hoddles have the all-clear to unleash a pest against its enemies.
Insects are among the
most troublesome of invasive species. They multiply quickly, can travel far and
are hard to detect. Controlling them with pesticides is costly because the
chemicals have to be sprayed on crops every season. Pesticides can't be used in
uncultivated areas because they would kill all bugs, good and bad.
California,
Hawaii and Florida are especially prone to insect
invasions because their long coastlines and mild weather attract trade and
tourism.
"They do well
for the same reasons we like living here," Hoddle said of the interlopers.
"Great climate, pretty much all year-round; lots of food. And, most
importantly, they've escaped their natural enemies."
Finding those enemies
isn't easy. First, the Hoddles have to figure out where a pest came from. Then
they have to go there and find it. The final step is to identify parasites that
prey on the offending bug and bring them back to UC Riverside for study.
With funding from the
state and federal agriculture departments and the citrus industry, the Hoddles
have traveled to Pakistan's Punjab province several times, most recently this year,
looking for natural enemies of the Asian citrus psyllid. The bug has been
sucking the fluids out of citrus trees in California
since 2008 — and spreading a bacterial disease known as huanglongbing (Chinese
for "yellow dragon disease") through Florida.
In studying the
problem, Mark Hoddle came across an obscure 1927 paper in which researchers reported
finding parasitic wasps that fed on the citrus psyllid in Punjab, which has a
climate similar to that of California's
citrus-growing regions.
In Pakistan, the couple spent hours
tramping through citrus groves in triple-degree temperatures, armed with
pruners, scissors and soda-bottle crates in which they placed vials stuffed
with snipped branches. At night, they brought promising insects back to a local
lab. Frequent power outages cut off the lights and ventilation. The Hoddles
would pull out headlamps and continue peering into microscopes as sweat rolled
off them in the dark.
They flew home with a
Rubbermaid box full of specimens of two kinds of stingless wasps that prey on
the psyllid.
Alarms buzzed when
Mark's passport went under the scanner at London's
Heathrow Airport
on the way back to Los Angeles.
This wasn't unexpected: The couple had told security officials about their
cargo ahead of time. After probing questions, they were allowed to board the
plane. Their sealed container, full of hundreds of insects, sat above them in
the overhead bin.
After further
questioning at LAX, the pair rushed to the UC Riverside quarantine facility,
where they deposited the insects on laboratory plants to get them breeding.
They hope the newly
discovered parasitoids (the technical term for parasitic creatures that
ultimately kill or sterilize their hosts) will help eradicate the citrus
psyllid as successfully as another critter wiped out the glassy-winged
sharpshooter in French Polynesia six years
ago.
The sharpshooter,
native to Mexico and the Southeastern United States, exploded in numbers after
arriving in California in the 1980s, infecting crops with a bacterial blight
called Pierce's disease.
In 1999, shipments of
ornamental plants, probably from Southern California, accidentally took the
sharpshooter to French Polynesia. The insects
— which can suck 100 times their volume in fluids in a single day — soon
blanketed plants all over Tahiti. Their waste
fell from trees like rain, baffling passersby. In some parts of the island, 300
of the insects could be picked off a single hibiscus plant in a minute.
Hoddle and his
colleagues released a parasitic wasp from their collection into the wild there.
The wasp preys on the sharpshooters by laying eggs inside sharpshooter eggs;
these then hatch and eat the sharpshooter eggs from the inside out.
Within seven months,
the sharpshooters had practically vanished from French
Polynesia. "We were like rock stars in the newspapers,"
Hoddle said.
"Bye-bye, peeing
fly," a newspaper headline crowed in French.
As the sharpshooter
populations plummeted, so did the newly introduced parasitoids. Now, Hoddle
said, "they just play hide-and-seek around the island." That's the
beauty of biological control, he said — the two populations keep each other in
balance.
Despite such
successes, some scientists express concern about opening the Pandora's box of
pest-on-pest combat. Peter Stiling, an ecologist at the University of South Florida,
cites the case of the weevil Larinus planus, which was released in Western and
Midwestern states in the 1990s to control the invasive Canada thistle. It ended
up feeding on a rare thistle native to Colorado
and Utah as
well.
And then there is the
case of the cactus moth, whose larvae eat the prickly pear, a cactus from the Americas
that has invaded other parts of the world. After the moth was released in the
Caribbean in the 1960s to control the prickly pear, it spread to the Florida Keys and fed indiscriminately on native cactuses,
reducing one to near-extinction, Stiling said.
"It's like
releasing the genie out of the bottle," he said. "You can never get
it back in."
Hoddle is aware of
such "friendly fire" risks. "We don't want our good guy to wipe
out another good guy," he said.
That's why all waste
products in the UC Riverside testing facility are cooked for days, why whole
floors between each level are dedicated to plumbing and electricity so that
maintenance workers never enter testing floors, and why every inner room has
slightly less air pressure than adjacent rooms, so that any AWOL bug will get
sucked back in, Hoddle said.
Fellow UC Riverside
entomologist Raju Pandey wears a bodysuit and hood when working in the
facility's highest-security levels — and then takes further precautions. He
fashions discount ladies' nylons into wrist guards to keep insects from
hitchhiking out of the building under his sleeves. He uses only white or brown
nylons, so that stray bugs will be visible.
The Hoddles and
coworkers are now testing their Punjabi wasps on the citrus psyllid during long
hours in the high-security quarantine. It is a grueling process. They grow
trees, in pots, on which the insects are bred. Then they sic the parasitoids on
them.
They grow more trees,
breed more insects and test them again, and again.
"Bugs don't take
weekends," Christina Hoddle said, "so neither do we."
If the tests pass
muster with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the North American Plant
Protection Organization, which sets standards for the U.S., Canada
and Mexico, the tiny wasps
should be ready for release at sites in Los Angeles County
early this winter.
But until the
parasitoids prove their worth, the scientists are stuck with their captives in
rooms within rooms, behind walls of glass and metal.
Return to Top
End Transmission