|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
October 20, 2009
·
Consumer
trust is key issue for US farmers
·
Researchers
put Florida in the pumpkin patch
·
Climate bill
unfriendly to agriculture – AFBF
·
Solar-heated
water warms Oregon nursery
·
Canadian
growers deliver a blunt message
Consumer trust is key issue for US farmers
(Wire Services) – Consumers still trust farmers -- they just
need their confidence restored in some aspects of the food system.
Those were some of the conclusions from a "consumer
trust" survey commissioned by the Center for Food Integrity. Highlights
from the survey were presented last week at the 4th Annual 2009 Food System
Summit in Kansas City.
Consumers still trust farmers, but aren't sure what we are
doing is still farming.
"That is a challenge in building consumer trust,"
said Center for Food Intregity CEO Charlie Arnot. "As an industry, we've tended to rely on
science and attacking our attackers," said Arnot.
"That's not working. We need to build consumer trust and confidence in the
food system."
The research indicated that the contemporary food system is
not perceived as being consistent with the understanding or values of consumers
or with the positive attributes historically assigned to farmers. Voices
questioning current food systems practices are increasing in number and volume.
Arnot says research revealed that
the target the food system industry should focus on are
the early-adopters who are the agents of change and will drive social change.
"They are the opinion leaders and gatekeepers of their social groups, and
information seekers," he said. "They are more likely to believe and
be impacted by education as long as it is not perceived as self-interest; it
must be objective and balanced."
As a group, early-adopters are more educated, have a higher
social status, are information seekers, have a favorable attitude toward
science and are favorable toward change. Early-adopters also prefer to get
their information on the food system from online sources, followed by cable TV.
"This all works to our advantage," Arnot
said.
Key findings of the survey included:
# Consumers hold farmers/producers, themselves and food
companies/processors primarily responsible for food safety.
# Consumers continue to trust themselves and those who
prepare food in their homes more than any others.
# Consumers place a high amount of trust in farmers and food
companies for food safety.
# Consumers hold farmers primarily responsible for humane
treatment of farm animals.
# Consumers lack confidence and trust in any food system
segment for ensuring the humane treatment of farm animals.
# Consumers hold farmers primarily responsible for
sustainability.
# Consumers lack confidence and trust in any food system
segment for ensuring sustainability.
# Consumers hold themselves, farmers and food companies
primarily responsible for nutrition.
# Consumers lack confidence and trust in any food system
segment for ensuring nutrition.
Return to Top
Researchers put Florida in the pumpkin patch
(Gainesville.com)
– Every October, Americans embark on a quest that is part of a longstanding
fall tradition: The search for the perfect pumpkin.
The national demand for these festive, orange fruits
provides an economic boost every fall for the agricultural sectors of many
states, but Florida
has always been left out of this opportunity because of inhospitable growing
conditions.
However, researchers from the University
of Florida now believe that they may
have developed the proper strategies and marketing schemes to overcome the
obstacles and make pumpkin farming a profitable option for Florida's farmers.
In the past, pumpkins have almost never been grown
successfully in Florida.
In fact, as few as one in five of Florida's growing seasons
have a chance at success, said Bob Hochmuth, an
extension agent at UF's North Florida Research and
Education Center in the Suwannee Valley.
Researchers believe that these dismal odds stem from the
fact that pumpkins must be grown during the summer in order to be ready for
consumption in fall. This means that they are subjected to Florida's most extreme weather conditions.
Hurricanes put farmers at risk of crop losses, while summer
heat decreases the vitality of plants, and humidity and heavy rainfall set the
perfect conditions for crops to be ravaged by pests and disease.
Pumpkins are very vulnerable to a wide range of voracious
pests, such as worms and whiteflies, as well as diseases, such as fungal
infection, downy mildew, bacterial leaf spot, anthracnose and gummy stem
blight.
Although these challenges might seem daunting, UF researcher
Doug Gergela, who works at the Florida Partnership
for Water, Agriculture and Community Sustainability in Hastings,
located between Palatka and Crescent
Beach, has been growing
pumpkins with great success for the past nine years.
Gergela and his assistants
experimented with different plant varieties and various horticultural
techniques, and they were able to overcome many of the problems that have
always plagued pumpkins in Florida.
Gergela identified at least seven
varieties of pumpkin that seem to be hardy enough to grow in Florida. He also developed cultivation
techniques that keep these plants healthy and keep production costs at less
than $3,000 per acre, which is comparable with other popular crops.
He uses a special irrigation system to water the plants from
underneath the soil and avoid the mildews that occur when standing water
accumulates on humid days.
Gergela also protects the plants
from whiteflies by using silver reflective mulch that acts as a deterrent.
To control for the majority of other diseases and pests, he
and his team developed a routine of spraying the plants with special pesticides
and fungicides.
These methods have led to some rather bountiful harvests.
Gergela has just begun harvesting
his pumpkin crop for this year, and he expects a yield of almost 15 tons from
his 1 1/2-acre plot.
Although these results seem to prove that there is potential
for growing pumpkins in Florida, Gergela also
acknowledged that, in order to succeed, farmers need to be willing to put in a
bit more time and effort than they do with some other crops.
"It takes some tender loving care," he said.
"You have to baby this crop."
For those farmers who are willing to do the work, Gergela said he would be able to confidently recommend
growing strategies, but the next big question he seeks to answer is whether
growers will be able to make enough money to support their enterprises.
"Is it economical to grow? That is the question that
every farmer wants to know," Gergela said.
"And the answer is maybe."
Competition from northern farmers will probably prevent Florida farmers from
selling to wholesale markets, but Gergela thinks that
they could make a fair bit of money by participating in the agritourism
industry.
Alan Hodges, an extension scientist in the UF Food and
Resource Economics Department, explained that "pick-your-own" pumpkin
patches are a popular form of agritourism in some
states.
Pick-your-own pumpkin patches allow families to visit a farm
and select a pumpkin directly from the fields for a price. This price is often
greater than the wholesale value of a pumpkin, but patrons give up the few
extra dollars willingly for the opportunity to spend some time in the
countryside and see the inner workings of an active farm.
Return to Top
Climate bill unfriendly to
agriculture – AFBF
(AFBF) WASHINGTON,
D.C. — The Boxer-Kerry climate
change bill introduced in the Senate Sept. 30 includes few provisions that are
friendly to agriculture and will be strongly opposed by the American Farm
Bureau Federation.
“America’s
farmers and ranchers did not fare that well in the House-passed climate change bil, and they fare even worse in the Senate bill,” said
American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman. “There are few benefits
and even greater costs to agriculture and the American public.”
The bill, authored by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and John Kerry (D-Mass), seeks to reduce U.S.
greenhouse gas emissions through a cap-and-trade program. The legislation would
require greenhouse gas emissions to be cut 20 percent by 2020 from 2005 levels
— greater than the House bill’s target of 17 percent. Stallman said the 20
percent target is unrealistic and will lead to higher energy bills for all
consumers.
“The Waxman-Markey bill, passed narrowly by the House this
summer, did at least include credits to farmers for carbon-storing or carbon
management practices. The Senate bill does not guarantee any benefits to
agriculture for carbon sequestration,” Stallman said.
Another major concern for Farm Bureau is that the
Boxer-Kerry bill would not prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from continuing
to move forward to fully regulate all greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
The bill also does nothing to provide alternative sources of energy to fill the
energy deficit left by the reduction in fossil fuels, nor does it prevent the
EPA from using controversial indirect land use principles that penalize
ethanol, according to Stallman.
“This bill does not realistically address America’s energy needs,” said
Stallman.
“Both the Senate and House bills would bring higher fuel and
fertilizer costs to American farmers and ranchers, which puts us at a
competitive disadvantage in international markets with other countries that do
not have similar carbon emission restrictions,” Stallman said. “For the future
prosperity of the U.S.
economy and American agriculture, climate change legislation must be defeated
by Congress.”
Return to Top
Solar-heated water warms Oregon nursery
(KOMONews.com
via The Oregonian) – CORNELIUS, Ore. It was a combination of things that
drew Grace Dinsdale back to the family farm 28 years
ago, where she transformed a struggling dairy into a profitable plant nursery.
One was the simple joy of growing things. Another was a complex sense of
stewardship.
Both are at play in the project rising from the ground at
her 130-acre Blooming Nursery. There, workers are installing an array of
towering solar panels that will stretch nearly the length of the nursery's
700-foot driveway. Nearby, a crew is applying insulating foam to a covered
concrete tank that will hold 300,000 gallons of water.
When finished, it will be Oregon's largest application of solar
thermal energy. Instead of producing electricity, the solar panels will heat
the tank water, which will circulate underground and warm the plants growing in
a 54,000-square-foot greenhouse.
The system is so immense and the tank so well insulated that
it will retain heat for months. Dinsdale expects to
use her existing natural gas heating system only as a backup. She'll continue
to use natural gas in two other large greenhouses.
It's a project of great interest to the state's 2,130
nurseries, which produce potted houseplants, vegetable starts, and trees,
flowers and bushes for outdoor landscaping. Nurseries are the leading sector of
Oregon
agriculture, with sales last year of $820 million, but are particularly
susceptible to energy cost increases because much of their produce is grown in
heated greenhouses.
"The long-term trend is established - energy is going
to become more expensive," said John Aguirre, director of the Oregon
Association of Nurseries. "You overlay that with general concern about
issues like climate change, and there is strong motivation to become more
efficient users of energy."
Dinsdale declined to disclose the
project's cost - "You don't want to know; I don't want to know," she
said - but said her heating bill is $150,000 a year.
A 50 percent tax write-off - available under Oregon's Business Energy
Tax Credit program - and anticipated energy cost savings make the project
feasible, Dinsdale said. She expects the project to
pay for itself in five to eight years.
"If the tax incentives weren't there, we wouldn't do a
solar system," she said. "It was what we wanted to do, and thankfully
we were able to because of the incentives in place."
The system was designed by Ra Energy, a Portland
company that installed a similar but much smaller project for Lucky Labrador
Brewing Co. on Southeast Hawthorne
Street in Portland.
The brewpub uses solar thermal to heat water used to make beer.
Tim Ruch, a Ra Energy partner,
said Dinsdale and her general manager approached him
at a trade show and asked if it was possible to design a system for the
nursery. The engineering and financing took nearly two years, and construction
began late this summer.
A thermal flywheel will store heat in the heavily insulated
concrete vault for months, with water at the back of the vault approaching 200
degrees, Ruch said. It cools over time, circulating
in the greenhouse floor at about 80 degrees. Ruch
said the system will save enough in natural gas consumption to heat 200 homes.
"This is a success story. This puts money back in your
pockets," he said.
Nursery owners have reduced natural gas, fuel, water and
fertilizer usage, but the solar thermal project at Blooming Nursery marks the
next level of sustainability, said Stephanie Page, renewable energy specialist
with the Oregon Department of Agriculture.
"It's a great model for others to look at, and
definitely something we support," Page said.
Dinsdale said the heating system
will allow her to diversify the type of plants she grows in the greenhouse,
adding a degree of flexibility in a business where markets and trends change.
"We could do tropicals," she said. "There's
a good market for bold foliage."
But she said the solar thermal system is "not just an
economic project."
Dinsdale grew up on the farm,
raking stalls and feeding calves when it was a dairy. She's the second-youngest
of 11 children, and the only one to step forward when her mother announced she
intended to sell it. The property had been her childhood wonderland, and she
couldn't stand the thought of it passing out of the family. She returned home,
turned it into a nursery, bought out her siblings and has been at Blooming
Nursery ever since.
If she has anything to say about it, the land will always be
a farm. The solar thermal system, which could last 30 to 50 years, will help
the farm survive in what Dinsdale believes will be a
changing economy.
"I see everything shifting during this period,"
she said. "We can see trends. It's quite clear we need to develop
versatility, grow diverse crops and control and even reduce our costs."
A renewable energy system is key to the farm thriving even
after she's gone.
"The way I see it is, it's really about the
nursery," she said. "Being a steward of the
nursery."
Return to Top
Canadian growers deliver a blunt
message
(The
Standard) – Ontario's
fruit and vegetable sector is in peril, and we could soon see it wither away.
That was the blunt message delivered last week by two
leaders of Ontario's
fruit and vegetable associations to provincial Progressive Conservative Leader
Tim Hudak.
Brenda Lammens, chair of the
Ontario Fruit and Vegetable Growers' Association and Len Troup, chair of the
Ontario Tender Fruit Producers' Marketing Board, met with Hudak
at Troup's farm in Jordan Station.
They discussed chronic problems facing provincial tender
fruit and vegetable growers.
They told Hudak fierce
competition, skyrocketing costs and excessive regulation is battering the
industry.
Without support, including a risk-management program,
"you may not have a horticulture industry around here within the next five
years in Ontario,"
said Lammens. "It's that serious."
Troup added the problem is heightened by
"ever-increasing costs, many of them driven by regulation and legislation
and (they're) big increases.
"When we go to the marketplace to try and pass (the
costs) through, we simply cannot do it, because of the competition factor.
"This has been building and the banks have been patient
... we must show a profit."
Hudak, the MPP for Niagara West- Glanbrook, said the meeting reinforced the dire state of
the provincial fruit and vegetable sector.
"Sadly, that means that many farms here in west Niagara
and other parts of southern Ontario in the horticulture sector are at risk ...
are on the brink," he said.
At the meeting, Lammens presented
a proposal for a new risk-management program for Ontario's fruit and vegetable farmers.
The premium-based provincial government initiative would
provide production insurance to growers, to protect them from rising costs and
falling returns.
Payments would happen when market prices fall below a
predetermined industry price for a commodity.
In response, Hudak said he and
Conservative agriculture critic Ernie Hardeman "would continue to call
attention to the crisis (faced) by fruit and vegetable growers in our
province."
"I have always supported improved risk-management
programs to help our farmers though tough times."
Hudak also responded to new
provincial wine rules announced this week that seek to help grape growers and
wineries.
It provides a focus and financial support for wines made
with all-domestic (Vintners Quality Alliance) grapes.
It will require a short-term increase in wineries' overall
Cellared in Canada content
to 40 per cent of Ontario
grapes, with a 25 per cent per bottle minimum.
Among the measures, legislation would be introduced to
eliminate the domestic content requirement for blended wines by 2014.
"I think the Cellared in Canada label is fundamentally
dishonest," Hudak said. "I've been saying
that for some time, because it plays on the confusion of consumers as to what's
an Ontario
product and what isn't.
Return to Top
End Transmission