|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
November 5, 2010
·
Seed bombs
away for guerrilla gardeners
·
Russia muscling
in on Potash takeover
·
Delay veggie
harvest to prevent E. coli
·
Organic
produce not always healthier
·
‘Evergreen
agriculture’ boosts crop yields
Seed bombs away for guerrilla gardeners
(TwinCities.com)
– Tully Hall doesn't look like a criminal.
She pays her taxes, loves her family and obeys the law —
with one glaring exception.
Hall is a guerrilla gardener. She plants flowers and vegetables
on land she doesn't own — like a growing number of undercover green thumbs
emerging from the shadows.
To Hall and her furtive cohorts, beautifying ugly land can't
be a bad thing. "All it means is that a little bit of ground is being
improved," said Hall, gazing at her 8-by-12-foot garden on city property
behind her town home.
Many people have seen the work of guerrilla gardeners but
don't know it. The eco-outlaws sneak flowers into land by freeway exits,
abandoned city gardens or vacant lots.
Some make their own "seed bombs" — green grenades
made of compressed compost, fertilizer and seeds, designed to be thrown onto
soil.
"When I am riding my bike, I look for vacant lots and
just throw in a couple of my seed bombs," said Bridget McDonald of Minneapolis, who started
guerrilla gardening last year.
"A month later — flowers!"
Some guerrilla gardeners remain hidden. But any decent
detective would notice greenery seems to follow in the footsteps of Bonnie
Lawrence of St. Paul.
For 19 years, she has planted near schools, sidewalks and
workplaces.
She planted flowers, shrubs and crabapple trees along Fairview Avenue
under the Interstate 94 bridge. She has beautified
freeway interchanges.
"I encourage people to do it," Lawrence said. "It puts people on the
street, instead of just working in their back yard. You get to know your
neighbors."
In some cases, gardeners do their dirty work with officials'
knowledge and backing. Take Jeanne Weigum of St. Paul, for example.
Near Snelling and Concordia avenues, the city of St. Paul installed a
special water tap on a fire hydrant for Weigum so
that she can hook up her watering hose to tend to a garden she planted on city
land.
But often, her gardening is less governed and more
guerrilla.
She confesses to planting unauthorized gardens on city
property at Lexington Parkway
and Summit Avenue
and other locations. She's especially proud of the garden at Summit and Mississippi River Boulevard, by a
monument.
McDonald, the Minneapolis
seed-bomber, compared her hobby with graffiti.
"Graffiti is destructive," she said. But with
seed-bombing, she can leave her mark on the community in a constructive way.
"It's my little way of giving nature a way to fight
back," she said.
She is thinking of branching out into vegetables. But that
would require more commitment, including constant maintenance. "I am
trying to identify an area where I can sneak in and tend to it," McDonald
said.
PRETTY TO SOME, PAIN TO OTHERS
The thrill of illegal planting is lost on city officials.
They know the gardening is well-intentioned, but it's an
annoyance. They say no one has a right to plant anything on city land any more
than they could plant a garden in a neighbor's yard.
Woodbury's chief building official, Ron Glubka,
said the gardens are often neglected when the gardener moves or loses interest.
Even gardener Lawrence admitted it was tough to maintain the
impromptu gardens. "Everyone likes the fun part — planting — but no one
wants to pull the weeds," she said.
Allowing a garden such as Hall's, Glubka
said, would set a precedent. And private use of city land isn't allowed in
Woodbury.
The City Council recently passed a rule forbidding
"encroachment," the use of city property by an individual. It was
passed in response to homeowners who trim trees on park land to improve their
views, mow wild areas or build fences that block maintenance vehicles.
Lawrence
has encountered another official objection — the notion that she is endangering
union jobs. But she said tending green areas is a low priority, especially in a
climate of cost-cutting.
"When will a custodian have time to do this?" she
said.
Hall lives in a town house near the CityWalk
complex in Woodbury. With almost no garden space of her own, she took over a
future construction site behind her home.
"It was mowed once a year. It was used for nothing and
got 10 full hours of sun a day," she said. "I couldn't stand
it."
In 2009, she asked for permission to plant a garden, and the
city turned her down. This spring, she did it anyway.
The lush garden sits in the vacant lot like an oasis in a
desert. It's surrounded by a four-foot black fence and ringed with a flowerbed.
Inside is a virtual produce aisle: broccoli, tomatoes, beans, fennel, lettuce
and squash.
She was given a June 7 deadline to tear out the garden but
has asked for an extension. She will get a chance to appeal the decision
sometime this summer.
If she is shut out, will she quit or just shove her illegal
activities more deeply underground?
"I think I would try to find something else," she
said, "through other channels."
HOW TO BUILD A SEED BOMB
A seed bomb, aka a seed ball, is a self-contained weapon
used by guerrilla gardeners.
The golf-ball-sized bombs can be purchased commercially or
made at home. Each contains seeds and compost, and some include fertilizer.
Clandestine gardeners toss them into any area they think
needs beautification, including vacant lots, abandoned gardens and roadway
easements.
In Los Angeles,
Greenaid vending machines have sprung up to sell
them. Manufacturers say the bombs are tailored for local growing conditions.
Bridget McDonald of Minneapolis
makes her own, using this recipe:
# Start with three parts dried compost, one part seeds, five
parts soil and one or two parts water. Sift the dry ingredients together, add
the water and roll the mixture into balls. Let them dry for one or two days.
# The preferred seeds are native to
Minnesota,
including sunflowers, black-eyed Susans, coneflowers
and clover.
For more information about guerrilla gardening or seed
bombs, visit guerrillagardening.org.
Return to Top
Russia muscling in on Potash
takeover
(AFP
via Yahoo! News) – Russian agriculture firm Phosagro
wants to make a rival bid for the world's biggest fertilizer maker Potash Corp
to counter a hostile offer by mining giant BHP Billiton, a report said this
week.
The Vedomosti business daily said
that the head of Phosagro had written to Prime
Minister Vladimir Putin saying that the acquisition of Potash Corp would be a
"significant geo-political instrument for the country's leadership."
Phosagro's chief Vladimir Litvinenko is a close ally of Putin from his home city of Saint Petersburg and
played a major role in his 2004 presidential campaign, Vedomosti
said.
The report said that Putin had handed the dossier to his
powerful deputy prime minister Igor Sechin who had
now charged state institutions with preparing proposals for the purchase of
Potash Corp.
The importance of potash fertilizer has grown over the last
years owing to mounting demand for food in the world and rapidly-expanding China
is a major importer of the product.
Russia
is already a major potash fertilizer producer and Litvinenko
told Putin that the country would control 70 percent of the world potash
fertilizer market if Phosagro launched a successful
bid.
Russia's
two leading potash producers, Silvinit and Uralkali, would not be appropriate bidders due to
anti-monopoly concerns, Litvinenko said.
"Control over this resource can be seen as one of the
necessary elements of state food security," he added.
Phosagro had a
a turnover in 2009 of 56.9 billion rubles (1.8
billion dollars) and with political backing it would not fear bidding for the
larger Potash Corp, Vedomosti said.
Litvinenko said that financing for
half the purchase had already been agreed with Canadian banks while the other
half would need to come from Russian financial institutions like the main state
lender Sberbank.
Potash Corp is currently valued at 43 billion dollars, Vedomosti said.
Anglo-Australian miner BHP Billiton in August launched a
hostile all-cash takeover bid for Potash Corp valuing it at 40 billion US
dollars but this was immediately rejected by the Canadian firm.
According to media reports, the Canadian government has
until late Wednesday to give its decision on the BHP Billiton bid.
The company's home region of Saskatchewan has said it opposes the bid and
although it cannot stop the takeover of Potash Corp it can influence a federal
decision.
A Phosagro spokesman said in a
statement to AFP that it would not comment on the report until the Canadian
government gives its decision later Wednesday on whether to approve the BHP
Billiton bid.
Return to Top
Delay veggie harvest to prevent E. coli
(Purdue
University via PHYSORG.com) – E. coli can live for weeks around the roots
of produce plants and transfer to the edible portions, but the threat can be
minimized if growers don't harvest too soon, a Purdue University
study shows.
Purdue scientists added E. coli to soil through manure
application and water treated with manure and showed that the bacteria can
survive and are active in the rhizosphere, or the
area around the plant roots, of lettuce and radishes. E. coli eventually gets
onto the aboveground surfaces of the plants, where it can live for several
weeks. Activity in the rhizosphere was observed using
a bioluminescent E. coli created by Bruce Applegate that glows when active.
Applegate, a co-author on the project, is an associate professor in the food
science and biological sciences departments at Purdue.
"E. coli is actually quite active in the rhizosphere. They're eating something there - probably
plant exudates," said Ron Turco, a professor of
agronomy and co-author of the study published in the November issue of the
Journal of Food Protection.
Turco said the E. coli didn't
survive on the plants' surfaces more than 40 days after seeds were planted.
Harvesting produce at least 40 days after planting should reduce the
possibility of contamination, but he warned that E. coli could still come from
other sources.
"In actual field application, you pick up other things
that are all around," Turco said. "You
don't just get the plants that are 40 days old. An animal getting loose in a
field could also contaminate plants."
Mussie Habteselassie,
Turco's former postdoctoral researcher and now an
assistant professor of soil microbiology at the University
of Georgia's Griffin campus, said harvesting practices in
manure-treated fields can be critical for produce crops.
"If you harvest young and old plants together or mix
them after harvesting, there is risk of contamination of the older
plants," Habteselassie said. "If plants are
uprooted during harvest, there is also a possibility of contamination from E.
coli living in the rhizosphere."
Producers should apply manure to fields well in advance of
planting and harvesting. Turco said a wait of 90-120
days between manure application and harvesting, with a minimum of 40 days
between planting and harvesting, should minimize the chance of E. coli
contamination.
Turco said he would continue
studying E. coli's ability to survive in different
situations, including in water and processed produce. The U.S. Department of
Agriculture funded the research.
Provided by Purdue
University
Return to Top
Organic produce not always healthier
(American
Chemical Society via Eureka Alert) – With the demand for organically
produced food increasing, scientists are reporting new evidence that
organically grown onions, carrots, and potatoes generally do not have higher
levels of healthful antioxidants and related substances than vegetables grown
with traditional fertilizers and pesticides.
Their study appears in ACS' bi-weekly Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
In the study, Pia Knuthsen and colleagues point out that there are many
reasons to pay a premium for organic food products. The most important reasons
for the popularity of organic food products include improved animal welfare,
environmental protection, better taste, and possible health benefits.
However, the health benefits of organic food consumption are
still controversial and not considered scientifically well documented.
The scientists describe experiments in which they analyzed
antioxidants termed "polyphenols" from
onions, carrots and potatoes grown using conventional and organic methods. They
found no differences in polyphenol content for
organic vs. traditional methods of growth. "On the basis of the present
study carried out under well controlled conditions, it cannot be concluded that
organically grown onions, carrots, and potatoes generally have higher contents
of health-promoting secondary metabolites in comparison with the conventionally
cultivated ones," the report states.
Return to Top
‘Evergreen agriculture’
boosts crop yields
(ScienceDaily.com)
– A unique acacia known as a "fertilizer tree" has typically led to a
doubling or tripling of maize yields in smallholder agriculture in Zambia and Malawi,
according to evidence presented at a conference in the Hague.
The findings were central to the arguments of agroforestry experts at the conference, who urged decision
makers to spread this technology more widely throughout the African nations
most vulnerable to climate change and food shortages, and to think differently
about more practical ways to solve the problems that are most pressing to
smallholder farmers.
Speaking at The Hague Conference on Agriculture, Food
Security and Climate Change, Dr. Dennis Garrity,
Director General of the World Agroforestry Centre,
said that evergreen agriculture -- or the integration of fertilizer trees into
crop and livestock-holding farms -- is rapidly emerging as an affordable and
accessible solution to improving production on Africa's
farms.
"Doubling food production by mid-century, particularly
in Africa, will require nonconventional
approaches, particularly since so many of the continent's soils are depleted,
and farmers are faced with a changing climate," Garrity
said. "We need to reinvent agriculture in a sustainable and affordable
way, so that it can reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases and be adapted to
climate change."
Garrity spoke to leading
agriculture and climate scientists, policymakers, development experts, and
private sector representatives from around the world gathered at The Hague to
develop a concrete action plan for linking agriculture-related investments,
policies, and measures to transition agriculture to lower carbon-emitting,
climate-resilient growth.
In a recent article in Food Security, Garrity
and co-authors highlighted how evergreen agriculture has already provided
benefits to several million farmers in Zambia,
Malawi, Niger and Burkina Faso. Fertilizer trees draw
nitrogen from the air and transfer it to the soil through their roots and leaf
litter, replenishing exhausted soils with rich sources of organic nutrients.
The trees bolster nutrient supply, increase food crop yields, and enhance the
production of fodder, fuel and timber. These systems also provide additional
income to farmers from tree products, while at the same time storing much
greater amounts of carbon than other agricultural systems.
For example, farmers in Malawi have increased their maize
yields by up to 280 percent when the crop is grown under a canopy of one
particular fertilizing tree, Faidherbia albida. Unlike most other trees, Faidherbia
sheds its leaves during the early rainy season and remains dormant during the
crop-growing period. This makes it highly compatible with food crops because it
does not compete with them for water, nutrients, or light -- only the bare branches
of the tree's canopy spread overhead while crops of maize, sorghum, or millets
grow to maturity below. The leaves and pods also provide a crucial source of
fodder in the dry season for livestock when nearly all other plants have dried
up. The trees may continue to provide these cost-free benefits for up to 70 to
100 years.
In Niger,
there are now more than 4.8 million hectares of millet and sorghum being grown
in agroforests that have up to 160 Faidherbia trees on each hectare.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has
already noted that transforming degraded agricultural lands into agroforestry has far greater potential to store carbon than
any other managed land use change.
Researchers suggest that integrating agroforestry
into farming systems on a massive scale would create a vital carbon bank. The
IPCC estimates that a billion hectares of developing country farmland is
suitable for conversion to carbon agroforestry
projects.
A broad alliance is now emerging of governments, research
institutions, and international and local development partners committed to
expanding evergreen agriculture and agroforestry. The
International Fund for Agricultural Development, the Alliance
for a Green Revolution in Africa, the European
Union, the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, and the
UN Environment Programme are among those interested
in developing partnerships to move the evergreen agriculture agenda forward.
"We are already working with 18 countries across the
African continent to develop national plans for the accelerated implementation
of evergreen agriculture," Garrity explained.
The next step is to further refine and adapt the
technologies to a wider range of smallholder farming systems in diverse
agricultural environments, so that millions more farmers can benefit now and
for generations to come from such sustainable solutions to their food
production challenges.
"Evergreen agriculture allows us to glimpse a future of
more environmentally-sound farming where much of our annual food crop
production occurs under a full canopy of trees," said Garrity.
For more information on evergreen agriculture, visit: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/evergreen_agriculture
Return to Top
End Transmission