|
|
 |
" I heard it
through the
AgLine"
|
|
December 8, 2009
·
Meat-eating
plants more common than you think
·
Monsanto CEO
takes a pay cut to $12.7 million
·
Greenies
attack California ag water contracts
·
Peanut
shells, corn stalks: China’s coal alternative
·
Top US
negotiator slams ‘climategate’ scandal
Meat-eating plants more common than
you think
(Wire Services) – Scientists from the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew and the Natural History Museum
believe that carnivorous behaviour in plants is far
more widespread than previously thought, with many commonly grown plants - such
as petunias and tomatoes - at least part way to being "meat eaters".
A review paper, Murderous plants: Victorian Gothic, Darwin
and modern insights into vegetable carnivory, is
published in the Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society.
Carnivorous plants have caught the imagination of humans
since ancient times, and they fitted well into the Victorian interest in Gothic
horrors. Accounts of man-eating plants published in 19th century works have
long since been discredited, but they continue to appear in different media
including films (Audrey II in Little Shop of Horrors) and books (Tentacula in the Harry Potter series). Even popular
Japanese cartoon Pokémon includes some characters based on carnivorous plants (Bellsprout, Weepinbell and Victreebell).
Carnivorous plants fascinated Charles Darwin, and he and his
friend Sir Joseph Hooker (Director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew at that time) had an extensive correspondence
concerning them. Darwin's
book Insectivorous Plants played a critical role in the idea that plants could
eat animals being generally accepted. Before this, many botanists (including
Linnaeus) had refused to accept that this could be the case.
Since Darwin's
time, several groups have been generally recognised
as carnivorous plants (including sundews, Venus flytraps and pitcher plants).
Various other plants have been suggested as possible carnivores by some
authors, but wide acceptance of these has failed to materialise.
Defining what constitutes carnivory in plants is a
challenge, and authors include or exclude groups of plants on the basis of
different sets of criteria. Professor Mark Chase and co-authors from the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew and the Natural History Museum contend that carnivory and non-carnivory
should not be treated as a black and white situation, and they view plants as
being on a sliding scale between those that show no carnivorous characteristics
and those that are real "meat eaters" such as the Venus flytrap.
Plants like petunias and potatoes have sticky hairs that
trap insects, and some species of campion have the
common name catchfly for the same reason. However, some of the commonly
accepted carnivores have not been demonstrated to have the ability to digest
the insects they trap or to absorb the breakdown products. In their paper,
Chase et al. review each of the groups of potential carnivores.
Professor Mark Chase, Keeper of the Jodrell
Laboratory at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew says, "Although a man-eating
tree is fictional, many commonly grown plants may turn out to be cryptic
carnivores, at least by absorbing through their roots the breakdown products of
the animals that they ensnare. We may be surrounded by many more murderous
plants than we think."
Vaughan Southgate, President of the Linnean
Society of London says, "This scholarly, beautifully illustrated, review
of carnivorous plants and the different levels of carnivory
that exist in the plant world by botanists at the Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew and the Natural History Museum
makes for fascinating reading."
Source: Wiley-Blackwell
Return to Top
Monsanto CEO takes a pay cut to $12.7
million
ST. LOUIS
(AP) - Monsanto Co. Chairman and Chief Executive Hugh Grant's compensation
package slid about 3.5 percent to $12.7 million in 2009, from $13.1 million the
previous year, according to a regulatory filing Monday.
Grant's pay cut came in a year when the world's biggest seed
maker saw its stock price tumble more than 23 percent amid the global recession
and lower profit.
According to a proxy statement the company filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Grant received a base salary of $1.4
million, stock options worth $9.7 million and a performance-related cash bonus
of about $1.1 million. All other perks, including use of the company aircraft,
deferred compensation, home security costs and club dues, amounted to $564,214.
The Associated Press executive compensation formula is
designed to isolate the value the company's board placed on the executive's
total pay package during the fiscal year. It includes salary, bonus,
performance-related bonuses, perks, above-market returns on deferred
compensation and the estimated value of stock options and awards granted during
the year on the date they were granted.
The calculations don't include changes in the present value
of pension benefits, and they sometimes differ from the totals companies list
in the summary compensation table of proxy statements, which reflect the size
of the accounting charge taken for the executive's compensation in the previous
fiscal year.
Monsanto's profit rose 4.2 percent to $2.1 billion, or $3.80
per share, during the fiscal year that ended Aug. 31, on sales of $11.7
billion. In 2008, the company's profit had doubled from to $2 billion, or $3.62
per share.
Return to Top
Greenies attack California ag water contracts
(Daily Democrat) SAN FRANCISCO -- Environmental groups filed a legal
challenge to water rights of some of Northern California's oldest agricultural
water users, stating that contracts for use of Sacramento
River water for the next 40 years violate the Endangered Species
Act.
The suit goes to the federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals,
and seeks to revisit 40-year water contracts approved in 2005 between the
federal Bureau of Reclamation and water districts including Glenn-Colusa
Irrigation District in Willows, Princeton-Codora-Glenn
Irrigation District, Provident Irrigation District, Anderson-Cottonwood
Irrigation District, city of Redding, M&T Chico Ranch, and others.
Also named in the suit are 25-year contracts with water
districts in the San Joaquin
Valley, which get water
from the delta.
The water agencies are known as "settlement
contractors," who had water rights before the Central Valley Project was
completed, with some water rights dating back to the 1880s.
In the early 1960s, these water contractors entered into
40-year water rights settlement contracts with the Bureau of Reclamation. These
contracts recognized the water users' pre-existing water rights, according to a
document provided by water attorney Andy Hitchings, of the firm Somach Simmons & Dunn, which represents several water
districts in the suit.
Last week, environmental groups including the Natural
Resources Defense Council, San Francisco Baykeeper
and Earthjustice, filed an appeal stating that the
contracts renewed in 2005 relied on a flawed biological opinion on the Delta
smelt. Through court proceedings, that biological opinion from 2005 has now
been thrown out by a federal court.
The suit states that the water contracts need to be
re-evaluated with the most recent science.
"These water contracts must be revised to reflect a
reasonable level of water diversions, require sensible conservation measures,
and protect the collapsing delta if we are going to fix California's broken water system and restore
healthy fish populations," said Kate Poole, lead attorney at the Natural
Resources Defense Council in a press release.
The groups state that growers, mostly rice farmers, have
received 100 percent of their water supplies for the past three years, while
fish populations and wildlife in the state are in dire straits.
In April of this year, Judge Oliver Wanger
reaffirmed the water districts' claim to the water, stating that those deals
were worked out 45 years ago and included contract compromises that allowed the
Central Valley Project to proceed and avoided prolonged legal battles.
Trent Orr, an attorney with Earthjustice
in the Bay Area, said the appeal has to do with "water in the Sacramento Valley, and probably anywhere. There's
not enough of it to go around."
"Their theory is that they are absolutely owed every
drop of water" in the contracts, Orr said.
But from "the environmental and fisheries side, there
are other uses for the water," Orr said.
"What this case is about is we maintain that before the
Bureau of Reclamation renews contracts for another 40 years on exactly the same
terms, they need to look at the effects on various listed species," he
said.
The water districts in the suit have access to more than 2
million acre-feet of water, Orr said.
The Central Valley Project is California's largest water supplier,
delivering more than 7 million acre-feet of water a year, primarily for
agriculture. It includes 20 dams, including Shasta Dam.
Attorneys for the water districts and the California Rice
Commission make the point that water used in Northern
California for rice provides habitat for 5-7 million migratory
waterfowl and that 40 percent of the water used to grow rice is returned to
waterways.
Hitchings said the case will likely take until the middle of
2010 or the end of next year to resolve.
Return to Top
Peanut shells, corn stalks: China’s
coal alternative
Beijing, China (CNN)
-- Mountains of peanut shells are spread out across Shengchang Bioenergy's property
on the outskirts of Beijing.
Local farmers drive in and out, unloading dried corn stalks in exchange for a
small fee.
The peanut shells, corn stalks and even tree bark are dried,
ground and re-purposed. The end result: Biomass pellets that can be used as a
replacement for coal.
Shengchang Bioenergy
also makes a line of stoves and boilers in which the pellets can be burned. The
company says the stoves are up to five times more energy efficient than
traditional coal boilers and are slightly cheaper to operate.
"Our stoves mean a lot to rural villagers because they
heat more effectively," said the company's general manager, Fu Youhong. "They're very accessible and we're planning
to expand with the government."
Just down the street from the factory, Bi Hongjun, a bus driver for the city of Beijing, has received a new stove as part of
a test project with Shengchang Bioenergy
and the Ministry of Agriculture.
"It's very easy to use," Bi said as he
demonstrated how to load the energy-saving stove with the pellets. "It's
not like the old-style cumbersome boiler which is difficult to light."
The Shengchang boilers are one
small-scale example of how China
can make a large-scale transition to becoming a low-carbon economy.
China,
the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, relies on dirty coal for 70
percent of its energy.
But the Chinese government has recently made some
commitments to change that. The National Development and Reform Commission
(NDRC) -- China's
top economic planner -- has pledged to cut carbon intensity 40 to 45 percent
below 2005 levels by 2020. Carbon intensity is the amount of carbon released
per unit of gross domestic product.
Last week Xie Zhenhua,
vice minister of the NDRC, vowed that China would meet these goals.
"China
will not repeat traditional path of growth of developed nations of high
emissions, high energy consumption and high pollution," Xie said.
Analysts say this means China's emissions will still
continue to rise significantly -- though at a slower pace. While China
is not capping emissions absolutely, most argue it is a significant step in the
right direction.
"China
will not repeat traditional path of growth of developed nations of high
emissions, high energy consumption and high pollution."
--Xie Zhenhua,
vice minister of the National Development and Reform Commission
"Chinese leadership is very clear that China
has to improve its environmental performance," said Bjorn Stigson, president of the World Business Council for
Sustainable Development. "It's really driven from a strong feeling that
China needs to reduce its energy, reduce its pollution, to be able to provide a
good future and quality of life."
Stigson was among a team of
experts recently invited by the Chinese government to develop a plan to help
transform China's
energy-intensive economy. He personally met with Premier Wen
Jiabao, who will represent China
at Copenhagen.
In a November 2009 report entitled "China's Pathway Towards
a Low Carbon Economy," Stigson outlined various
steps China
could take to "go green," including low-carbon industrialization,
developing renewable energies and educating residents about how to live
sustainably.
Stigson also indicated that China's
rapid development gave the Asian giant the potential to implement green
technology more quickly, perhaps bypassing the high polluting growth model of
Western countries.
"Because China
is building so much new capacity, China can leapfrog with
solutions," Stigson said. "That will be the
platform for the next phase of economic growth, which will probably, hopefully,
clean up their resources and make them more efficient."
According to state-run news agency Xinhua, 80,000 households
in downtown Beijing
have done away with coal heating this winter, the Beijing Electric Power
Company said.
The courtyards homes located in a historic section of Beijing have replaced the polluting coal stoves with
electric heaters, a culmination of a seven-year program to eliminate coal
heating in 160,000 homes in downtown Beijing,
Xinhua reported.
But projects on the local level will not be enough to
address the steep challenge in the country of 1.3 billion.
Hundreds of millions of rural Chinese citizens will still
rely solely on coal to keep their families warm through the heating season that
ends on March 15 of next year.
Shengchang Bioenergy
has manufactured 12,000 stoves since opening in 2006. Many of them now belong
to low-income families in the neighborhood around the plant outside Beijing, but many more are needed throughout China.
"It is understandable ... that China has gone through this focus
on economic growth," Stigson said. "But
now, you can, as a country, take this more holistic approach. You have to do
it, because the consequences are beginning to be seen, in the form of local
pollution, in the form of impacts on water, in the form of impacts on rural
areas."
Return to Top
Top US negotiator slams ‘climategate’ scandal
(AFP
via New Straits Times) – COPENHAGEN: A top US negotiator at the Copenhagen climate conference on Monday
slammed the controversy over emails stolen from prominent climate scientists,
dubbed Climategate, as “opportunistic”.
“It just happens to be the topic of the moment,” said
Jonathan Pershing, the deputy head of the US delegation at the December 7-18
UN talks. “It is a misrepresentation of the robustness of science. What we end
with is that our understanding of the issues is not different... I look at this
and I think to myself, it’s opportunistic.”
The emails, seized on by climate skeptics as evidence that
scientists have distorted data to dramatise the
threat of global warming, have provoked a firestorm of controversy, especially
in the United States.
“It has sucked up all the oxygen,” said James Overland, an
Arctic specialist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), in Copenhagen
Monday to open a US-sponsored science centre.
Some of the thousands of emails purloined from scientists at
Britain’s East Anglia, a top centre for
climate research, expressed frustration at the scientists’ inability to explain
what they described as a temporary slowdown in warming.
They also discussed ways to counter the campaigns of climate
naysayers. The controversy has fueled debate in blogs, chatrooms
and now the mainstream media.
“The IPCC has released some new information talking about
their process...
making very clear that there is no
change in our understanding,” Pershing said, referring to the Nobel-winning UN
Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC).
“There are many data sets and they all show the same true
type of change, significant damages,” he said. The Copenhagen meeting,
which will end with a December 17 summit of more than 100 heads of state,
including US President Barack Obama, is tasked with forging a deal to tame
global warming and help poor countries cope with its consequences.
Return to Top
End Transmission